No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Notes from the Editors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 August 2011
Extract
As we proceed through our final year of editing the Review (something we approach with mixed feelings of relief and satisfaction), we will reflect from time to time on lessons learned, changes achieved (or perhaps only observed), and trends still underway.
- Type
- From the Editor: In This Issue
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011
References
1 Readers may recall the effort in the 2000 Presidential election, only half in jest, to get Democrats from “safe” states (e.g., California) to become temporary residents of important “swing” states (e.g., Florida). That presumed, of course, that having arrived there they would have had the slightest chance of understanding the Florida ballots.
2 A standard test might be this: Were newly elected Republican representatives more or less likely to have been intransigent (e.g., to have opposed the first Boehner Plan) the more securely they were able to return to their prior profession with little economic loss (and hence objectively could be more immune to sanctions)?
4 One widely accepted guide to such norms is given by the American Anthropological Association's Code of Ethics, particularly Section III. http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/AAA-Ethics-Code-2009.pdf