Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T13:36:13.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dairy cows’ reproductive response to feeding level differs according to the reproductive stage and the breed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2010

E. Cutullic ,
L. Delaby ,
Y. Gallard  and
C. Disenhaus
E. Cutullic
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1080 Dairy production, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus-Ouest, UMR1080 Dairy production, 35000 Rennes, France
L. Delaby
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1080 Dairy production, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus-Ouest, UMR1080 Dairy production, 35000 Rennes, France
Y. Gallard
Affiliation:
INRA, UE326 Domaine Expérimental du Pin-au-Haras, 61310 Exmes, France
C. Disenhaus*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1080 Dairy production, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus-Ouest, UMR1080 Dairy production, 35000 Rennes, France
*
† E-mail: catherine.disenhaus@agrocampus-ouest.fr
Get access

Abstract

Reproductive performance has decreased over the last decades in many dairy systems. This study aimed at comparing the effects of a high- and a low-feeding level on reproductive stages (cyclicity, oestrus and fertility) of Holstein and Normande cows in a grass-based winter compact calving system. High-fed cows received a total mixed ration composed of 55% maize silage, 15% dehydrated alfalfa pellets and 30% concentrate in winter and 4 kg/day concentrate supply at grazing. Low-fed cows only received 50% grass silage and 50% haylage in winter and no concentrate at grazing. Low-fed cows produced less milk over 44 weeks, but lost more body condition (BC) than high-fed ones (5207 v. 7457 kg, −1.28 v. −0.96 unit, P < 0.001). Normande cows produced less milk and lost less BC than Holstein ones (5596 v. 7068 kg, −0.89 v. −1.36 unit, P < 0.001). Post-partum ovarian activity was little affected by the feeding level. In both breeds, ovulation detection rate was higher in low-fed cows (74% v. 59%, P < 0.001) and detection relied more frequently on standing behaviour (67% v. 55%, P = 0.022). In both breeds, the recalving rate following the first and second inseminations was not significantly affected by the feeding level, although more non-fertilisations or early embryo mortalities occurred in low-fed cows (43% v. 26%, P = 0.004). For the Holstein breed, this was clearly explained by more late embryo mortalities in high-fed cows (30% v. 9%, P = 0.004). Finally, pregnancy rate by the end of the 13-week breeding period was similar between feeding groups. Conversely, the Normande dual-purpose cows had a higher pregnancy rate by the end of the breeding period than the Holstein dairy cows (72% v. 54%, P = 0.007), owing to a better ovarian activity (79% v. 54% normal, P < 0.001) and a higher recalving rate following insemination (53% v. 37%, P = 0.007). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that feeding levels with converse effects on milk yield and BC score also have converse effects on reproductive stages and lead to quite similar final reproductive performance in compact calving systems. Normande cows benefit from an overall better reproductive performance, but do not suit high feeding levels for very compact calving systems owing to depressed oestrous behaviour.

Keywords

dairy cowsfeeding strategycyclicityoestrusfertility
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 5 , 04 April 2011 , pp. 731 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamiak, SJ, Mackie, K, Watt, RG, Webb, R, Sinclair, KD 2005. Impact of nutrition on oocyte quality: cumulative effects of body composition and diet leading to hyperinsulinemia in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 73, 918–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbat, A, Druet, T, Bonaiti, B, Guillaume, F, Colleau, JJ, Boichard, D 2005. Bilan phénotypique de la fertilité à l’insémination artificielle dans les trois principales races laitières françaises. Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants 12, 137–140.Google Scholar
Bazin, S, Augeard, P, Carteau, M, Champion, H, Chilliard, Y, Cuylle, G, Disenhaus, C, Durand, G, Espinasse, R, Gascoin, A, Godineau, M, Jouanne, D, Ollivier, O, Remond, B 1984. Grille de notation de l’état d’engraissement des vaches pie-noires. RNED bovin, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Burke, CR, Roche, JR 2007. Effects of pasture feeding during the periparturient period on postpartum anovulation in grazed dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4304–4312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, WR, Everett, RW, Coppock, CE 1981. The relationships between energy balance, milk production and ovulation in postpartum Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 53, 742–748.Google Scholar
Coleman, J, Pierce, KM, Berry, DP, Brennan, A, Horan, B 2009. The influence of genetic selection and feed system on the reproductive performance of spring-calving dairy cows within future pasture-based production systems. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5258–5269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutullic, E, Benhaim, A, Barbey, S, Mitre, H, Carreau, S, Disenhaus, C 2009a. Does a low feeding level enhance estradiol synthesis in preovulatory follicles of Holstein × Normande dairy cows? Journal of Dairy Science 92 (E-suppl. 1), 73.Google Scholar
Cutullic, E, Delaby, L, Causeur, D, Michel, G, Disenhaus, C 2009b. Hierarchy of factors affecting behavioural signs used for oestrus detection of Holstein and Normande dairy cows in a seasonal calving system. Animal Reproduction Science 113, 22–37.Google Scholar
Delaby, L, Faverdin, P, Michel, G, Disenhaus, C, Peyraud, JL 2009. Effect of different feeding strategies on lactation performance of Holstein and Normande dairy cows. Animal 3, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillon, P, Buckley, F, O’Connor, P, Hegarty, D, Rath, M 2003. A comparison of different dairy cow breeds on a seasonal grass-based system of milk production: 1. Milk production, live weight, body condition score and DM intake. Livestock Production Science 83, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faverdin, P, Delaby, L, Delagarde, R 2007. L’ingestion d’aliments par les vaches laitières et sa prévision au cours de la lactation. INRA Productions Animales 20, 151–162.Google Scholar
Ferris, C, Gordon, FJ, Patterson, DC, Murphy, J 2003. A comparison of four grassland-based systems of milk production for winter calving high genetic merit dairy cows. Agrisearch, Dungannon, Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Disenhaus, C, Petit, C 2010. Nutritional sub-fertility in the dairy cow: towards improved reproductive management through a better biological understanding. Animal 4, 1197–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friggens, NC, Emmans, GC, Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD, Lewis, M 1998. Feed intake relative to stage of lactation for dairy cows consuming total mixed diets with a high or low ratio of concentrate to forage. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2228–2239.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, WJ, Wilkins, J, Dobos, RC, Hough, GM, Goddard, ME, Davison, T 2001. Reproductive performance in Holstein-Friesian cows in relation to genetic merit and level of feeding when grazing pasture. Animal Science 73, 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garmo, RT, Martin, AD, Thuen, E, Havrevoll, O, Steinshamn, H, Prestlokken, E, Randby, A, Eknaes, M, Waldmann, A, Reksen, O 2009. Characterization of progesterone profiles in fall-calving Norwegian Red cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4919–4928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimard, B, Fréret, S, Chevallier, A, Pinto, A, Ponsart, C, Humblot, P 2006. Genetic and environmental factors influencing first service conception rate and late embryonic/foetal mortality in low fertility dairy herds. Animal Reproduction Science 91, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horan, B, Mee, JF, Rath, M, O’Connor, P, Dillon, P 2004. The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on reproductive performance in seasonal-calving milk production systems. Animal Science 79, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, B, Mee, JF, O’Connor, P, Rath, M, Dillon, P 2005. The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on postpartum ovarian function and conception rate to first service. Theriogenology 63, 950–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humblot, P 2001. Use of pregnancy specific proteins and progesterone assays to monitor pregnancy and determine the timing, frequencies and sources of embryonic mortality in ruminants. Theriogenology 56, 1417–1433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humblot, P, Fréret, S, Ponsart, C 2009. Epidemiology of embryonic mortality in cattle; practical implications for AI and embryo production. In Proceedings of Canadian Embryo Transfer Association and American Embryo Transfer Association Joint Convention, Montréal, Canada, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J, Dillon, P, O’Sullivan, K, Buckley, F, Rath, M 2003. The effect of genetic merit for milk production and concentrate feeding level on the reproductive performance of Holstein-Friesian cows in a grass-based system. Animal Science 76, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat, S, Disenhaus, C 2004. A proposition for an updated behavioural characterisation of the oestrus period in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87, 223–238.Google Scholar
Lemley, CO, Vonnahme, KA, Krause, KM, Wilson, ME 2009. Cytochrome P450 activity, liver blood flow and progesterone clearance in dairy cows fed a high starch versus a high fiber diet. Journal of Dairy Science 87 (E-suppl. 1), 552.Google Scholar
Lopez, H, Satter, LD, Wiltbank, MC 2004. Relationship between level of milk production and estrous behavior of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 81, 209–223.Google Scholar
López-Gatius, F, Santolaria, P, Mundet, I, Yániz, JL 2005. Walking activity at estrus and subsequent fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology 63, 1419–1429.Google Scholar
Macdonald, KA, Penno, JW, Lancaster, JAS, Roche, JR 2008. Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2151–2163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCoy, MA, Lennox, SD, Mayne, CS, McCaughey, WJ, Edgar, HWJ, Catney, DC, Verner, M, Mackey, DR, Gordon, AW 2006. Milk progesterone profiles and their relationship with fertility, production and disease in dairy cows in Northern Ireland. Animal Science 82, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, A, Ponsart, C, Fréret, S, Humblot, P 2003. Influence de la conduite de la reproduction sur les résultats à l’insémination en période de pâturage. Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants 10, 131–134.Google Scholar
Morris, D, Diskin, M 2008. Effect of progesterone on embryo survival. Animal 2, 1112–1119.Google Scholar
Pedernera, M, Garcia, SC, Horagadoga, A, Barchia, I, Fulkerson, WJ 2008. Energy balance and reproduction on dairy cows fed to achieve low or high milk production on a pasture-based system. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3896–3907.Google Scholar
Petersson, KJ, Gustafsson, H, Strandberg, E, Berglund, B 2006. Atypical progesterone profiles and fertility in Swedish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2529–2538.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Roche, JR, Macdonald, KA, Burke, CR, Lee, JM, Berry, DP 2007. Associations among body condition score, body weight, and reproductive performance in seasonal-calving dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 376–391.Google Scholar
Royal, MD, Darwash, AO, Flint, APF, Webb, R, Woolliams, JA, Lamming, GE 2000. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science 70, 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangsritavong, S, Combs, DK, Sartori, R, Armentano, LE, Wiltbank, MC 2002. High feed intake increases liver blood flow and metabolism of progesterone and estradiol-17β in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2831–2842.Google Scholar
Schopper, D, Claus, R 1990. Einfluss einer negativen Energiebilanz auf die peripheren Konzentrationen von Gonadenhormonen und auf die Brunstsymptomatik bei der Milchkuh post partum. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 25, 145–146.Google Scholar
Suriyasathaporn, W, Nielen, M, Dieleman, SJ, Brand, A, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Schukken, YH 1998. A Cox proportional-hazards model with time-dependent covariates to evaluate the relationship between body-condition score and the risks of first insemination and pregnancy in a high-producing dairy herd. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 37, 159–172.Google Scholar
Villa-Godoy, A, Hughes, TL, Emery, RS, Stanisiewski, EP, Fogwell, RL 1990. Influence of energy balance and body condition on estrus and estrous cycles in Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 2759–2765.Google Scholar
Windig, JJ, Beerda, B, Veerkamp, RF 2008. Relationship between milk progesterone profiles and genetic merit for milk production, milking frequency, and feeding regimen in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2874–2884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed