Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:55:44.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revealing deformation mechanisms in Mg–Y alloy by in situ deformation of nano-pillars with mediated lateral stiffness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2019

Dalong Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-2575, USA
Lin Jiang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-2575, USA
Xin Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-2575, USA
Irene J. Beyerlein
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Materials Department, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
Andrew M. Minor
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California-Berkeley, and National Center for Electron Microscopy, Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Julie M. Schoenung
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-2575, USA
Subhash Mahajan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
Enrique J. Lavernia*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-2575, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: lavernia@uci.edu
Get access

Abstract

In our previous study, we observed a lack of $\left\{ {10\bar{1}2} \right\}$ twinning in a deformed Mg–Y alloy, which contributed to the observed yield “symmetry.” However, the effects of texture and grain size on polycrystalline deformation made it difficult to fully understand why twinning was not active. Therefore, we report herein in-depth study by in situ transmission electron microscopy, i.e., in situ TEM. The in situ deformation of nano-sized Mg–Y pillars revealed that prismatic slip was favored over twinning, namely, the critical stress required to activate prismatic slip was lower than that for twinning. This finding diametrically differs from that reported in other nano/micro-pillar deformation studies, where twinning is always the dominant deformation mechanism. By measuring the critical stresses for basal, prismatic, and pyramidal slip systems, this in situ TEM study also sheds light on the effects of the alloying element Y on reducing the intrinsic plastic anisotropy in the Mg matrix.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

b)

Present address: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

References

El Kadiri, H., Barrett, C.D., Wang, J., and Tomé, C.N.: Why are twins profuse in magnesium? Acta Mater. 85, 354 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, M.H.: Slip, twinning, and fracture in hexagonal close-packed metals. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 12, 409 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayama, T., Aizawa, K., Tadano, Y., and Kuroda, M.: Influence of twinning deformation and lattice rotation on strength differential effect in polycrystalline pure magnesium with rolling texture. Comput. Mater. Sci. 47, 448 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chino, Y., Kado, M., and Mabuchi, M.: Enhancement of tensile ductility and stretch formability of magnesium by addition of 0.2 wt% (0.035 at.%) Ce. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 494, 343 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, J. and Al-Samman, T.: Superior light metals by texture engineering: Optimized aluminum and magnesium alloys for automotive applications. Acta Mater. 61, 818 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M.R., Keshavarz, Z., Beer, A.G., and Atwell, D.: Influence of grain size on the compressive deformation of wrought Mg–3Al–1Zn. Acta Mater. 52, 5093 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaderi, A. and Barnett, M.R.: Sensitivity of deformation twinning to grain size in titanium and magnesium. Acta Mater. 59, 7824 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panigrahi, S.K., Kumar, K., Kumar, N., Yuan, W., Mishra, R.S., DeLorme, R., Davis, B., Howell, R.A., and Cho, K.: Transition of deformation behavior in an ultrafine grained magnesium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: Mater. Sci. Eng., A 549, 123 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W.T., Chou, Y.W., Hsiao, C.I., Chang, C.P., Chang, L., and Kao, P.W.: Compression along the easy-glide orientation of ultrafine and fine-grained Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 41, 3282 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H.J., Kim, Y., Shin, J.H., and Bae, D.H.: Deformation behavior of magnesium in the grain size spectrum from nano- to micrometer. Materials Science and Engineering: Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 1565 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhuddin, U.F.H.R., Mironov, S., Sato, Y.S., Kokawa, H., and Lee, C.W.: Grain structure evolution during friction-stir welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Acta Mater. 57, 5406 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R.S. and Ma, Z.Y.: Friction stir welding and processing. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 50, 1 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandlöbes, S., Zaefferer, S., Schestakow, I., Yi, S., and Gonzalez-Martinez, R.: On the role of non-basal deformation mechanisms for the ductility of Mg and Mg–Y alloys. Acta Mater. 59, 429 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandlöbes, S., Pei, Z., Friák, M., Zhu, L.F., Wang, F., Zaefferer, S., Raabe, D., and Neugebauer, J.: Ductility improvement of Mg alloys by solid solution: Ab initio modeling, synthesis and mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 70, 92 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, N., Marceau, R.K.W., and Barnett, M.R.: The effect of high yttrium solute concentration on the twinning behaviour of magnesium alloys. Acta Mater. 82, 447 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, N., Cottam, R., Davis, B., and Robson, J.: Evaluating the effect of yttrium as a solute strengthener in magnesium using in situ neutron diffraction. Acta Mater. 78, 1 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, L., Liu, W., Ding, Z., Zhang, D., Zhao, Y., Lavernia, E.J., and Zhu, Y.: Alloying Mg with Gd and Y: Increasing both plasticity and strength. Comput. Mater. Sci. 115, 85 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., Jiang, L., Schoenung, J.M., Mahajan, S., and Lavernia, E.J.: TEM study on relationship between stacking faults and non-basal dislocations in Mg. Philos. Mag., 1 (2015).Google Scholar
Yasi, J.A., Hector, L.G. Jr., and Trinkle, D.R.: Prediction of thermal cross-slip stress in magnesium alloys from a geometric interaction model. Acta Mater. 60, 2350 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasi, J.A., Hector, L.G. Jr., and Trinkle, D.R.: First-principles data for solid-solution strengthening of magnesium: From geometry and chemistry to properties. Acta Mater. 58, 5704 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., Wen, H., Kumar, M.A., Chen, F., Zhang, L., Beyerlein, I.J., Schoenung, J.M., Mahajan, S., and Lavernia, E.J.: Yield symmetry and reduced strength differential in Mg–2.5Y alloy. Acta Mater. 120, 75 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q., Legros, M., and Minor, A.M.: In situ TEM nanomechanics. MRS Bull. 40, 62 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legros, M.: In situ mechanical TEM: Seeing and measuring under stress with electrons. C. R. Phys. 15, 224 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, J.R. and De Hosson, J.T.M.: Plasticity in small-sized metallic systems: Intrinsic versus extrinsic size effect. Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 654 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, K.Y., Shrestha, S., Cao, Y., Felfer, P.J., Wang, Y., Liao, X., Cairney, J.M., and Ringer, S.P.: The effect of pre-existing defects on the strength and deformation behavior of α-Fe nanopillars. Acta Mater. 61, 439 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q., Qi, L., Chen, K., Mishra, R.K., Li, J., and Minor, A.M.: The nanostructured origin of deformation twinning. Nano Lett. 12, 887 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, J., Mishra, R.K., Sachdev, A.K., and Minor, A.M.: In situ TEM compression testing of Mg and Mg–0.2 wt% Ce single crystals. Scr. Mater. 64, 292 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B.Y., Wang, J., Li, B., Lu, L., Zhang, X.Y., Shan, Z.W., Li, J., Jia, C.L., Sun, J., and Ma, E.: Twinning-like lattice reorientation without a crystallographic twinning plane. Nat. Commun. 5 (2014).Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, G.S., Yi, S., Huang, Y., and Lilleodden, E.: Twining and slip activity in magnesium $\left\langle {11\bar{2}0} \right\rangle$ single crystal. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 1224 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilleodden, E.: Microcompression study of Mg(0001) single crystal. Scr. Mater. 62, 532 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byer, C.M., Li, B., Cao, B., and Ramesh, K.T.: Microcompression of single-crystal magnesium. Scr. Mater. 62, 536 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, Z.H., Fan, H., El-Awady, J.A., and Greer, J.R.: The effect of size, orientation and alloying on the deformation of AZ31 nanopillars. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 76, 208 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, C., Beyerlein, I.J., and LeSar, R.: Plastic deformation mechanisms of fcc single crystals at small scales. Acta Mater. 59, 7673 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, C., Biner, S.B., and LeSar, R.: Discrete dislocation dynamics simulations of plasticity at small scales. Acta Mater. 58, 1565 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q., Qi, L., Mishra, R.K., Li, J., and Minor, A.M.: Reducing deformation anisotropy to achieve ultrahigh strength and ductility in Mg at the nanoscale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 13289 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J. and Stanford, N.: Investigation of precipitate hardening of slip and twinning in Mg5% Zn by micropillar compression. Acta Mater. 100, 53 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, A.T., Burek, M.J., and Greer, J.R.: Microstructure versus size: Mechanical properties of electroplated single crystalline Cu nanopillars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 135503 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, P.G.: The crystallography and deformation modes of hexagonal close-packed metals. Metall. Rev. 12, 169 (1967).Google Scholar
Koike, J., Kobayashi, T., Mukai, T., Watanabe, H., Suzuki, M., Maruyama, K., and Higashi, K.: The activity of non-basal slip systems and dynamic recovery at room temperature in fine-grained AZ31B magnesium alloys. Acta Mater. 51, 2055 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byer, C.M. and Ramesh, K.T.: Effects of the initial dislocation density on size effects in single-crystal magnesium. Acta Mater. 61, 3808 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, K.Y., Alam, Z., Caffee, A., and Hemker, K.J.: Pyramidal I slip in c-axis compressed Mg single crystals. Scr. Mater. 112, 75 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B-Y., Wan, L., Wang, J., Ma, E., and Shan, Z-W.: Terrace-like morphology of the boundary created through basal-prismatic transformation in magnesium. Scr. Mater. 100, 86 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyerlein, I.J., McCabe, R.J., and Tomé, C.N.: Effect of microstructure on the nucleation of deformation twins in polycrystalline high-purity magnesium: A multi-scale modeling study. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 59, 988 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niezgoda, S.R., Kanjarla, A.K., Beyerlein, I.J., and Tomé, C.N.: Stochastic modeling of twin nucleation in polycrystals: An application in hexagonal close-packed metals. Int. J. Plast. 56, 119 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., Zheng, B., Zhou, Y., Mahajan, S., and Lavernia, E.J.: Prism stacking faults observed contiguous to a $\left\{ {10\bar{1}2} \right\}$ twin in a Mg–Y alloy. Scr. Mater. 76, 61 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, J., Alfreider, M., Konetschnik, R., Kiener, D., and Oh, S.H.: In situ TEM observation of $\left\{ {10\bar{1}2} \right\}$ twin-dominated deformation of Mg pillars: Twinning mechanism, size effects and rate dependency. Acta Mater. 158, 407 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K-H., Jeon, J.B., Kim, N.J., and Lee, B-J.: Role of yttrium in activation of 〈c + a〉 slip in magnesium: An atomistic approach. Scr. Mater. 108, 104 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, Z., Zhu, L.F., Friak, M., Sandlobes, S., von Pezold, J., Sheng, H.W., Race, C.P., Zaefferer, S., Svendsen, B., Raabe, D., and Neugebauer, J.: Ab initio and atomistic study of generalized stacking fault energies in Mg and Mg–Y alloys. New J. Phys. 15, 043020 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Awady, J.A.: Unravelling the physics of size-dependent dislocation-mediated plasticity. Nat. Commun. 6 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parthasarathy, T.A., Rao, S.I., Dimiduk, D.M., Uchic, M.D., and Trinkle, D.R.: Contribution to size effect of yield strength from the stochastics of dislocation source lengths in finite samples. Scr. Mater. 56, 313 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girault, B., Schneider, A.S., Frick, C.P., and Arzt, E.: Strength effects in micropillars of a dispersion strengthened superalloy. Adv. Eng. Mater. 12, 385 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, J.F., Wilson, N.C., Zhu, Y.M., and Xu, Z.: Solute clusters and GP zones in binary Mg–RE alloys. Acta Mater. 106, 260 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, Z.W., Mishra, R.K., Syed Asif, S.A., Warren, O.L., and Minor, A.M.: Mechanical annealing and source-limited deformation in submicrometre-diameter Ni crystals. Nat. Mater. 7, 115 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, Q., Shan, Z.W., Li, J., Huang, X.X., Xiao, L., Sun, J., and Ma, E.: Strong crystal size effect on deformation twinning. Nature 463, 335 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, Q., Sun, J., Morris, J.W. Jr., and Minor, A.M.: Source mechanism of non-basal 〈c + a〉 slip in Ti alloy. Scr. Mater. 69, 57 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, J., Mishra, R.K., and Minor, A.M.: Relating nanoscale plasticity to bulk ductility in aluminum alloys. Scr. Mater. 59, 951 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, J., Mishra, R.K., Pelton, A.R., and Minor, A.M.: Direct observation of the NiTi martensitic phase transformation in nanoscale volumes. Acta Mater. 58, 490 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husser, E., Lilleodden, E., and Bargmann, S.: Computational modeling of intrinsically induced strain gradients during compression of c-axis-oriented magnesium single crystal. Acta Mater. 71, 206 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, M.: Higher-order gradient effects in micropillar compression. Acta Mater. 61, 2283 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daum, B., Dehm, G., Clemens, H., Rester, M., Fischer, F.D., and Rammerstorfer, F.G.: Elastoplastic buckling as source of misinterpretation of micropillar tests. Acta Mater. 61, 4996 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchlechner, C., Keckes, J., Motz, C., Grosinger, W., Kapp, M.W., Micha, J.S., Ulrich, O., and Dehm, G.: Impact of instrumental constraints and imperfections on the dislocation structure in micron-sized Cu compression pillars. Acta Mater. 59, 5618 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchic, M.D., Shade, P.A., and Dimiduk, D.M.: Plasticity of micrometer-scale single crystals in compression. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 39, 361 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shade, P.A., Wheeler, R., Choi, Y.S., Uchic, M.D., Dimiduk, D.M., and Fraser, H.L.: A combined experimental and simulation study to examine lateral constraint effects on microcompression of single-slip oriented single crystals. Acta Mater. 57, 4580 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiener, D., Motz, C., and Dehm, G.: Micro-compression testing: A critical discussion of experimental constraints. Materials Science and Engineering: Mater. Sci. Eng., A 505, 79 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material 1

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 2.5 MB

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material 2

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 6.3 MB

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material 3

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 4.7 MB