Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:09:58.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protecting Holy Heritage in Italy—A Critical Assessment through the Prism of International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2015

Alessandro Chechi
Alessandro Chechi*
Affiliation:
Art-Law Centre, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Ph.D. in International Law, European University Institute, Italy. Email: alessandro.chechi@unige.ch.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In Italy, churches, chapels, and monasteries are often rich in precious artifacts. However, these religious buildings cannot be easily protected from theft because either they have no antitheft measures or they are abandoned. This article examines the problematic state of the holy heritage in the Italian territory from a legal perspective. In particular, it looks at Italian legislation and the international instruments entered into by the Italian State. The article argues that this protective legal regime is affected by various shortcomings and loopholes that mostly relate to the implementation of existing legal standards. Notably, it appears that these problems originate from the fact that most of the holy heritage situated in Italy belongs to the Catholic Church, and at the same time, it constitutes the historical and artistic patrimony of the Italian State. The article calls for a more efficient management of such precious vestiges by the stakeholders involved and for a revision of the domestic legislation with a view of properly incorporating the achievements of international cultural heritage law.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 397 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agreement between the Holy See and the Italian Republic, Modifications to the Lateran Concordat, 18 February 1984, with Supplementary Protocol, ratified by Italy with Law No. 121 of 25 March 1985.Google Scholar
Bart, Jean. “Patrimoine et religion. Les dieux possèdent-ils un patrimoine?” In Le patrimoine culturel religieux. Enjeux juridiques et pratiques cultuelles, edited by Basdevant-Gaudemet, Brigitte, Cornu, Marie, and Fromageau, Jérôme. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2006, 17–34.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Catechism of the Catholic Church. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM (2003).Google Scholar
Code of Canon Law. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM (1983).Google Scholar
Code of Cultural Heritage and Landscape, Legislative Decree No. 42 of 22 January 2004. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 45 (24 February 2004).Google Scholar
Conforti, Benedetto. Diritto internazionale. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2010.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Directive 93/7 on the Return of Cultural Objects Illegally Exported from the Territory of a Member State of 1993, OJ L74/74, 27 March 1993.Google Scholar
Directive 2014/60 on the Return of Cultural Objects Unlawfully Removed from the Territory of a Member State, OJ L 159/1, 15 May 2014.Google Scholar
Doyal, Stephanie. “Implementing the UNIDROIT Convention on Cultural Property into Domestic Law: The Case of Italy.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2000-2001): 657–700.Google Scholar
Emiliani, Andrea. Leggi, bandi e provvedimenti per la tutela dei beni artistici e culturali negli antichi stati italiani 1571–1860. Bologna: Ed. Alfa, 1978.Google Scholar
Farouki, Jumana. “Spirited Away: Art Thieves Target Europe’s Churches.” Time, 10 January 2008.Google Scholar
Feliciani, Giorgio. “Les édifices de culte: une composante du patrimoine historique et artistique de la Nation italienne.” In Le patrimoine culturel religieux. Enjeux juridiques et pratiques cultuelles, edited by Basdevant-Gaudemet, Brigitte, Cornu, Marie, and Fromageau, Jérôme. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2006, 149–58.Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco. “Principi e criteri ispiratori per la protezione internazionale del patrimonio culturale.” In Protezione internazionale del patrimonio culturale: interessi nazionali e difesa del patrimonio comune della cultura, edited by Francesco, Francioni, Vecchio, Angela Del, and Caterini, Paolo De. Milano: Giuffrè, 1999, 11–19.Google Scholar
Jensen, Robin Margaret. Understanding Early Christian Art. Oxon/New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Kowalski, W. Wojciech. Art Treasures and War. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law, 1998.Google Scholar
Lafarge, François. “La circolazione dei beni culturali, dopo le modifiche al Codice.” Aedon—Rivista di arti e diritto 1. www.aedon.mulino.it/archivio/2009/1/lafarge.htm (2009; accessed 31 July 2013).Google Scholar
Lateran Pacts between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See, 11 February 1929, ratified by Italy with Law No. 810 of 1929.Google Scholar
Leanza, Umberto. “General Problems of International Law Concerning Sacred Places.” In Between Cultural Diversity and Common Heritage. Legal and Religious Perspectives on the Sacred Places of the Mediterranean, edited by Ferrari, Silvio and Benzo, Andrea, Burlington: Ashgate, 2014, 37–56.Google Scholar
Martens, Kurt. “Law, Art and the Ecclesiastical Heritage.” In Art & Law, edited by Schrage, Eltjo, Tilleman, Bernard, Verbeke, Alain, and Demarsin, Bert. Brugge: die Keure, 2008, 414–41.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, J. Patrick. “Repatriation of Sacred Objects.” Art Antiquity and Law (2008): 225–41.Google Scholar
Passas, Nikos, and Bowman Proulx, Blythe. “Overview of Crimes and Antiquities.” In Crime in the Art and Antiquities World, edited by Stefano, Manacorda and Chappell, Duncan. New York: Springer, 2011, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavoni, Riccardo. “L’incompiuta ‘codificazione’ italiana delle norme internazionali e comunitarie sulla circolazione dei beni culturali: interazioni fra sistemi e problemi in material di adattamento.” In Il Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio tra teoria e prassi, edited by Valeria, Piergigli and Lisa, Maccari Anna. Milano: Giuffré, 2006, 331–88.Google Scholar
Pontifical Commission for the Conservation of the Artistic and Historical Patrimony of the Church. “Circular Letter Regarding the Cultural and Pastoral Training of Future Priests in Their Upcoming Responsibilities Concerning the Artistic and Historic Heritage of the Church.”www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_commissions/pcchc/documents/rc_com_pcchc_19921015_futuri-presbiteri_en.html (15 October 1992).Google Scholar
Pontifical Commission for the Cultural Heritage of the Church. “The Inventory and Catalogue of the Cultural Heritage of the Church.”www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=2886 (8 December 1999).Google Scholar
Pontifical Commission for the Cultural Heritage of the Church. “Inventory of the Institutes of Consecrated Life and the Societies of Apostolic Life Cultural Patrimony: Some Pratical [sic.] Orientations.” Circular Letter of Mauro Piacenza, then President of the Pontifical Commission for Sacred Archeology, Prot. N. 14/06/4. www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_commissions/pcchc/documents/rc_com_pcchc_20060915_inventariazione_en.html (15 September 2006).Google Scholar
Provisions on Ecclesiastical Institutions and Properties in Italy for the Support of the Catholic Clergy Serving in Dioceses (Disposizioni sugli enti e beni ecclesiastici in Italia e per il sostentamento del clero cattolico in servizio nelle diocesi). Law No. 222 of 20 May 1985. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 129 (3 June 1985).Google Scholar
Regulation 3911/92 on the Export of Cultural Goods of 1992, OJ L 395/1, 31 December 1992.Google Scholar
Regulation 116/2009 on the Export of Cultural Goods of 12 December 2008, OJ L 39, 10 February 2009.Google Scholar
Renold, Marc-André. “Stolen Art: The Ubiquitous Question of Good Faith.” In Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes, edited by the International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004, 251–63.Google Scholar
Roccella, Alberto. “La nuova intesa con la Conferenza episcopale italiana sui beni culturali d’interesse religioso.” Aedon—Rivista di arti e diritto 1. www.aedon.mulino.it/archivio/2006/1/roccella.htm (2006; accessed 31 July 2013).Google Scholar
Understanding between the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference on the Conservation and Consultation of Archives of Historical Interest and Libraries Belonging to Ecclesiastical Bodies and Institutions, 18 April 2000, implemented with the Decree of the President of the Republic No. 189 of 16 May 2000.Google Scholar
Understanding between the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference on the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Religious Interest Belonging to Ecclesiastical Bodies and Institutions, 13 September 1996, implemented with the Decree of the President of the Republic No. 571 of 26 September 1996.Google Scholar
Understanding between the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference on the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Religious Interest Belonging to Ecclesiastical Bodies and Institutions, 26 January 2005, implemented with the Decree of the President of the Republic No. 78 of 4 February 2005.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 14 May 1954, 249 U.N.T.S. 240.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 17 November 1970, 823 U.N.T.S. 231.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. 16 November 1972, 1037 U.N.T.S. 151.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. 17 October 2003, UNESCO Doc. 32C/Resolution 32.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Statutes of the Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation, adopted by 20 C/Resolution 4/7.6/5 of 24 October–28 November 1978.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Paris: UNESCO, 2013.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT. Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported of Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 34 I.L.M. 1322.Google Scholar
Watson, Peter, and Cecilia, Todeschini. The Medici Conspiracy. New York: Public Affairs, 2006.Google Scholar