Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:37:21.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructing the ‘automatic’ Greenwich time system: George Biddell Airy and the telegraphic distribution of time, c.1852–1880

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

YUTO ISHIBASHI*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Letters, Chuo University, Japan. Email: ishibashi@tamacc.chuo-u.ac.jp.

Abstract

In the context of the telegraphic distribution of Greenwich time, while the early experiments, the roles of successive Astronomers Royal in its expansion, and its impacts on the standardization of time in Victorian Britain have all been evaluated, the attempts of George Biddell Airy and his collaborators in constructing the Royal Observatory's time signals as the authoritative source of standard time have been underexplored within the existing historical literature. This paper focuses on the wide-ranging activities of Airy, his assistant astronomers, telegraph engineers, clockmakers and others, which served to increase the reliability of the Royal Observatory's time service between the 1850s and 1870s. Airy and his collaborators aimed to mechanize and automate their telegraphic time distribution system in order to improve its accuracy and reliability. The accomplishment of such technological innovations was disseminated via public lectures, journal articles and correspondence with experts, secondary distributors of standard time and the general public. These communications were used to build public trust in the Greenwich time service. However, the unexplored archival material used in the present paper provides fresh insight into the unstable nature of the Greenwich time system, including its clear limits in terms of its scale of automation and degree of accuracy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Charlotte Sleigh, Amanda Rees and the two anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and assistance in improving this paper. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the British Society for the History of Science annual conference at the University of St Andrews. The author is grateful to the members of the audience for their constructive comments. This work is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research).

References

1 Ellis, William, ‘Lecture on the Greenwich system of time signals’, Horological Journal (1865) 7, pp. 122123Google Scholar.

2 Bennett, Jim, ‘George Biddell Airy and horology’, Annals of Science (1980) 37, pp. 269285Google Scholar; Howse, Derek, Greenwich Time and the Longitude, London: Philip Wilson and National Maritime Museum, 1997, pp. 8285, 95–105Google Scholar; Meadows, Arthur J., Greenwich Observatory, vol. 2: Recent History (1836–1975), London: Taylor and Francis, 1975, pp. 3738, 69–70Google Scholar; Allan Chapman, ‘Standard time for all: the electric telegraph, Airy, and the Greenwich time service’, in Frank A.J.L. James (ed.), Semaphores to Short Waves, London: Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, 1998, pp. 40–59. For the installation of time balls at naval docks see Homes, Caitlin, ‘The Astronomer Royal, the Hydrographer and the time ball: collaborations in time signalling 1850–1910’, BJHS (2009) 42, pp. 381406Google Scholar.

3 Chapman, Allan, ‘Sir George Airy and the concept of international standards in science, timekeeping and navigation’, Vistas in Astronomy (1985) 28, pp. 321328Google Scholar; Schaffer, Simon, ‘Astronomers mark time: discipline and the personal equation’, Science in Context (1988) 2, pp. 115145Google Scholar; Morus, Iwan Rhys, When Physics Became King, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005, Chapter 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Gay, Hannah, ‘Clock synchrony, time distribution and electrical timekeeping in Britain, 1880–1925’, Past and Present (2003) 181, pp. 107140Google Scholar; Rooney, David and Nye, James, ‘“Greenwich Observatory time for the public benefit”: standard time and Victorian networks of regulation’, BJHS (2008) 42, pp. 530Google Scholar. See also Ogle, Vanessa, The Global Transformation of Time 1870–1950, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015, Chapter 2Google Scholar.

5 Gillin, Edward, The Victorian Palace of Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Building of the Houses of Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, Chapter 6Google Scholar.

6 Howse, op. cit. (2), Chapter 4.

7 Thompson, E.P., ‘Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism’, Past and Present (1967) 38, pp. 5697Google Scholar.

8 For the standardization of time in nineteenth-century Britain see Howse, op. cit. (2), Chapter 4; Gay, op. cit. (4).

9 Howse, op. cit. (2), p. 105.

10 Howse, op. cit. (2), p. 104.

11 Some of the railway companies in Scotland depended on standard time provided by the Edinburgh Observatory. Papers of George Biddell Airy, Royal Greenwich Observatory Archives, Cambridge University Library (subsequently RGO), ‘Copies of letters from superintendents of railways to Mr. Culley about the use of the Greenwich time signal’, 6/631/497–506.

12 For recent analyses on navigation and timekeeping generally see Dunn, Richard and Higgitt, Rebekah, Finding Longitude, Glasgow: Collins and Royal Museums Greenwich, 2014Google Scholar; Dunn, and Higgitt, (eds.), Navigational Enterprises in Europe and Its Empires, 1730–1850, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015Google Scholar.

13 Memorandum, ‘List of time balls in actual operation in 1861 May’, created by George Airy, RGO 6/615/2–3. The latter two time balls served more for urban dwellers setting their watches and knowing the time.

14 Admiralty, List of Time Signals, Established in Various Parts of the World, London, 1898.

15 Gay, op. cit. (4). Cf. Robert Miles, Synchronome: Masters of Electrical Timekeeping, Ticehurst: Antiquarian Horological Society, 2011

16 Rooney, David, Ruth Belville: The Greenwich Time Lady, London: National Maritime Museum, 2008Google Scholar.

17 For instance, among the STC's plan, the least expensive one charged an annual five pounds and five shillings for one clock, a cost that was one-third of the RO–GPO's service. Nye, James and Rooney, David, ‘“Such great inventors as the late Mr Lund”: an introduction to the Standard Time Company, 1870–1970’, Antiquarian Horology (2007) 30, pp. 501523Google Scholar.

18 Rooney and Nye, op. cit. (4), p. 7.

19 Kinns, Roger, ‘Time balls, time guns and Glasgow's quest for a reliable local time service’, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (2010) 13, pp. 194206Google Scholar; Kinns, , ‘The early history of the Edinburgh time ball and time gun’, International Journal for the History of Engineering and Technology (2011) 81, pp. 264290Google Scholar.

20 Smith, Robert, ‘A national observatory transformed: Greenwich in the nineteenth century’, Journal for the History of Astronomy (1991) 22, pp. 520CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Airy, George, ‘Science and the government’, Athenaeum (1856) 1505, pp. 10861087Google Scholar; Howse, Derek, Greenwich Observatory, vol. 3: The Buildings and Instruments, London: Taylor and Francis, 1975Google Scholar.

22 For the notable changes of astronomical time determination and their influence on the telegraphic determination of longitude at the RO see Kershaw, Michael, ‘“A thorn in the side of European geodesy”: measuring Paris–Greenwich longitude by electric telegraph’, BJHS (2014) 47, pp. 637660Google ScholarPubMed.

23 Satterthwaite, Gilbert E., ‘Airy's transit circle’, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (2001) 4, pp. 115141Google Scholar.

24 Maunder, E. Walter, The Royal Observatory Greenwich: A Glance at Its History and Work, London: Religious Tract Society, 1900, pp. 157159Google Scholar.

25 Dunkin, Edwin, ‘Comparison of the probable error of a transit of a star observed with the transit-circle by the “eye and ear” and chronographic methods’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1860) 20, pp. 8688CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 For the technical features of this invention see George Airy's memorandum, ‘Remarks on the methods which may be used for producing sympathy in the movements of distant clocks as depending upon one central clock’, RGO 6/630/574–577; R.L. Jones, ‘On electric clocks, being a portion of a paper read before the Literary and Philosophical Society of Chester’, RGO 6/627/299–300.

27 Ellis, op. cit. (1), pp. 90–91.

28 ‘Correspondence with W. De La Rue about regulation of his factory clocks’, RGO 6/615.

29 Cromwell Varley, Description of the Chronopher, or Apparatus Employed at the Central Station of the Electric and International Telegraph Company, in London, London, 1864.

30 Ellis, William, ‘The Greenwich time signal system’, Nature (1876) 12, pp. 5052, 110–113, 110Google Scholar.

31 Letter, George Airy to R.S. Culley, 6 September 1873, RGO 6/617/165.

32 Ellis, op. cit. (30), p. 111.

33 Inscribed with the name ‘E.T.C.’, the time ball was raised more than a hundred feet above the level of the Thames. ‘Regulation of time by electric telegraph’, The Times, 19 June 1852.

34 Letter, George Airy to the Secretary of the Admiralty, 1 March 1855, RGO 6/619/31–34.

35 See Cromwell Varley, ‘Description of the apparatus fixed in Newcastle’, attached to Varley, op. cit. (29).

36 John Hartnup, ‘The time-ball in Castle Street’, Liverpool Mercury, 23 Dec 1853. See also Ishibashi, Yuto, ‘In pursuit of accurate timekeeping: Liverpool and Victorian electrical horology’, Annals of Science (2014) 71, pp. 474496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

37 Letter, George Airy to Latimer Clark, 29 May 1854, Clark to Airy, 30 May 1854, RGO 6/612/70–71.

38 Letter, George Airy to Charles Cunning (first commissioner of woods and forests), 22 June 1846, Parliamentary Papers 1852 (500-I), p. 10.

39 George Airy, ‘Memorandum of the arrangement which will probably be found expedient for the regulation of the clocks at the General Post Office’, 22 March 1855, RGO 6/612/168–173.

40 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1858, p. 16.

41 Ellis, op. cit. (30), p. 51.

42 See Aubin, David, ‘Observatory mathematics in the nineteenth century’, in Robson, Eleanor and Stedall, Jacquelin (eds.), Oxford Handbook for the History of Mathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 273298Google Scholar.

43 Chapman, op. cit. (3); Schaffer, op. cit. (3); Schaffer, Simon, ‘Babbage's intelligence: calculating engines and the factory system’, Critical Inquiry (1994) 21, pp. 203227CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Morus, Iwan Rhys, ‘“The nervous system of Britain”: space, time and the electric telegraph in the Victorian age’, BJHS (2000) 30, pp. 464470Google Scholar.

45 Letter, George Airy to the Secretary of the Admiralty, 12 February 1878, RGO 6/618/82–83, underlining original.

46 Airy's autobiography suggests that he generally selected the most suitable channels for publication. It also states, ‘he regarded it as a duty to popularize as much as possible the work done at the observatory, and to take the public into his confidence’. Airy, George, Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy (ed. Airy, W.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1892, p. 12Google Scholar.

47 See, for example, George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1842, p. 12; George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1847, p. 10. For the utilitarian aspects of the RO under Airy's tenue of office see Chapman, Alan, ‘Private research and public duty: George Biddell Airy and the search for Neptune’, Journal for the History of Astronomy (1988) 19, pp. 121139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 See, for example, Literary Gazette (August 1853) 1908, p. 795; Athenaeum (June 1854) 1389, p. 719; Monthly Notice of the Royal Astronomical Society (May 1854) 14, pp. 202–211. Once a procedure within the time system became mechanized, Airy communicated knowledge about its technical changes in the reports.

49 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1853, p. 8.

50 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1865, p. 24.

51 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1868, p. 22.

52 Alberti, Samuel, ‘The status of museums: authority, identity, and material culture’, in Livingstone, David and Withers, Charles (eds.), Geographies of Nineteenth-Century Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011, Chapter 3Google Scholar; Robert Millward, ‘The political economy of urban utilities’, in Martin Daunton (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, vol. 3: 1840–1950, pp. 315–350; R.J. Morris, ‘Structure, culture and society in British towns’, in Daunton, op. cit., pp. 395–426.

53 Ellis, op. cit. (1), p. 85.

54 Ellis, op. cit. (30), p. 111.

55 Ellis, op. cit. (1), p. 122.

56 Ellis, op. cit. (1), p. 123.

57 For Airy's role as the government astronomer see Chapman, Allan, ‘Science and the public good: George Biddell Airy (1801–92) and the concept of a scientific civil servant’, in Rupke, Nicolaas A. (ed.), Science, Politics and the Public Good, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1988, pp. 3662CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Perkins, Adam, ‘“Extraneous government business”: the Astronomer Royal as government scientist’, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (2001) 4, pp. 143154Google Scholar.

58 Letter, George Airy to Hugh Childers, 13 March 1866, RGO 6/616/17–19.

59 Letter, George Airy to B.B. Stoney, 1 November 1866, RGO 6/616/29.

60 Edwin Clark, ‘The Electric Telegraph Company’, The Times, 8 September 1852.

61 Letter, George Airy to Edwin Clark, 17 June 1853, RGO 6/611/219–220. For the measurement of time the maker might bring a chronometer to the Strand.

62 Letter, Latimer Clark to Robert Main, 26 July 1853, RGO 6/611/249.

63 George Airy, ‘Notice to chronometer maker and to the public’, 20 August 1853, RGO 6/611/263.

64 Letter, French to George Airy, 30 September 1856, RGO 6/613/184.

65 Letter, George Airy to French, 1 October 1856, RGO 6/613/186.

66 Letter, French to George Airy, 7 October 1856, RGO 6/613/188.

67 Letter, George Airy to French, 16 February 1857, RGO 6/613/190.

68 ‘Professor Airy and the time guns of the Tyne’, Northern Daily Express, 26 January 1864.

69 Letter, James Mather to Cromwell Varley, 6 June 1864, RGO 6/615/136.

70 Letter, Cromwell Varley to George Airy, 10 June 1864, RGO 6/615/137–138.

71 Letter, Edward Stone to Cromwell Varley, 11 June 1864, RGO 6/615/139.

72 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1864, p. 21.

73 ‘The Astronomer Royal's report and the time guns of the Tyne’, Newcastle Daily Journal, 16 June 1864.

74 See Marsden, Ben and Smith, Crosbie, Engineering Empires: A Cultural History of Technology in Nineteenth-Century Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005Google Scholar.

75 See, for instance, RGO 6/611/291, 310, 333, 636.

76 Ellis, op. cit. (30), p. 111.

77 Letter, Telegraph Department of Great Western Railway to R.S. Culley, 2 June 1869, RGO 6/631/501.

78 Ellis, op. cit. (1), p. 109.

79 See, for example, the files preserved under the names of ‘Post Office’, RGO 6/614; ‘General Post Office’ and ‘Westminster Great Clock’, RGO 6/615; ‘Post Office Clocks’ and ‘Westminster Clock’, RGO 6/616; ‘Failures of Greenwich Signals’ and ‘Post Office Clocks’, RGO 6/617.

80 David Landes pointed out the importance of maintenance and repair in clockmaking in general. This claim can be extended to time-signalling works in the nineteenth century. Landes, David, Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983, p. 197Google Scholar.

81 For the importance of maintenance in the history of science and technology generally see Edgerton, David, Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900, London: Profile, 2006Google Scholar.

82 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1855, p. 10.

83 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1858, p. 7.

84 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1860, p. 7.

85 George Airy, Report of the Astronomer Royal to the Board of Visitors, London, 1864, p. 7.

86 Letter, Cromwell Varley to William Ellis, 25 January 1861. Ellis to Varley, 26 January 1861, RGO 6/630/3–5.

87 ‘The ball at Charing-Cross again’, The Atlas, 12 December 1855, RGO 6/628/77.

88 Letter, Reid & Son to Cromwell Varley, 25 November 1865, RGO 6/615/218.

89 Letter, George Airy to Cromwell Varley, 25 November 1865, RGO 6/615/219–221.

90 Letter, William Ellis to W.N. Winter, 16 December 1865, RGO 6/615/224.

91 Letter, Reid & Son to Mosley (the Electric Telegraph Company's branch in Newcastle), 2 December 1868, RGO 6/616/128.

92 Letter, George Airy to R.S. Culley, 4 December 1868, RGO 6/616/131.

93 Letter, Edwin Langford to George Airy, 3 October 1874, RGO 6/617/216–217.

94 Letter, George Airy to Edwin Langford, 5 October 1874, RGO 6/617/218.

95 Letter, Edwin Langford to George Airy, 14 September 1875, RGO 6/618/3.

96 Letter, George Criswick to Edwin Langford, 16 September 1875, RGO 6/618/4.

97 Letter, Commander Swainson to Frederick Evans, 10 September 1877, Hydrographer's Minutes Book, United Kingdom Hydrographic Office (subsequently MB), 21/268.

98 Letter, George Airy to Frederick Evans, 26 September 1877, RGO 6/618/72, MB 21/276–277.

99 Letter, Secretary of the Admiralty to George Airy, 21 January 1878, RGO 6/618/74–75, George Airy to H. Eaton, 24 January 1878, RGO 6/618/76.

100 George Criswick, ‘Report of visit to Portsmouth to examine the apparatus connected with the transmission of the 10 o'clock time signal to the college observatory in the Portsmouth dockyard’, 9 February 1878, RGO 6/618/78.