No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Miniature Cist from the Roman Villa at Warblington, Hampshire
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 May 2019
Abstract
Excavations by Chichester and District Archaeology Society on the site of a Roman villa at Warblington, near Emsworth, Hampshire, revealed a small stone cist containing two lead packages. While interpretation as a burial is explored, it appears more likely that the cist and its contents represent a ritual deposit within a domestic structure.
- Type
- Shorter Contributions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BBC a History of the World, available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/objects/MYGbAK-nT6aaTNLO8FpWQQ (Accessed 20/07/17)Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K., Brady, J.M., Tomlin, R.S.O., and Thomas, J.D. 2000: A Corpus of Writing-Tablets from Roman Britain, available at www.csad.ox.ac.uk/rib/ribiv/jp4.htm (Accessed 24/09/14)Google Scholar
Carvalho, L.a.M.J. 2015a: Conservation of the Cist; First Preliminary Report, London: Conservation Science Laboratory, Institute of Archaeology, University College LondonGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, L.a.M.J. 2015b: Conservation of the Cist; Second Preliminary Report, London: Conservation Science Laboratory, Institute of Archaeology, University College LondonGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, L.a.M.J. 2016: Conservation of the Cist; Third Final Report, London: Conservation Science Laboratory, Institute of Archaeology, University College LondonGoogle Scholar
Davies, T.R. 2011: Warblington Geophysical Survey (2011), Chichester: Chichester and District Archaeology Society archiveGoogle Scholar
Davies, T.R. 2012: Warblington Geophysical Survey (2012), Chichester: Chichester and District Archaeology Society archiveGoogle Scholar
Davies, T., Dicks, J., Haskins, N., and Joy, S. 2009: A Geophysical Survey of the Warblington Villa, Chichester: Chichester and District Archaeology Society archiveGoogle Scholar
Hampshire County Council 2012: Archaeology and Historic Buildings Record 23474, Winchester: Hampshire County CouncilGoogle Scholar
Millett, M., and Gowland, R. 2015: ‘Infant and child burial rites in Roman Britain: a study from East Yorkshire’, Britannia 46, 171–8910.1017/S0068113X15000100Google Scholar
Natalias, C.S. 2018: ‘The medium matters: materiality and metaphor in some Latin curse tablets’, in Mckie, S. and Parker, A. (ed.), Material Approaches to Roman Magic, Oxford, 9–1610.2307/j.ctvh1dnfj.5Google Scholar
Pearce, J. 2001: ‘Infants, cemeteries and communities in the Roman provinces’, in Davies, G., Gardner, A. and Lockyear, K. (eds), TRAC 2000: Proceedings of the Tenth Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, London, Oxford, 125–4210.16995/TRAC2000_125_142Google Scholar
Scott, E. 1991: ‘Animal and infant burials in Roman-British villas: a revitalization movement’, in Garwood, P., Jennings, D., Skeates, R. and Toms, J. (eds), Sacred and Profane, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 32, Oxford, 115–21Google Scholar
Scott, E. 1999: The Archaeology of Infancy and Infant Death, BAR International Series 819, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.H.S. 1858: ‘An account of certain Roman sepulchral remains lately discovered at Densworth, in the parish of Funtington, Sussex’, Sussex Archaeological Collections 10, 169–80Google Scholar
Taylor, M., and Collingwood, R.G. 1927: ‘Roman Britain in 1927: sites explored’, Journal of Roman Studies 17, 208Google Scholar