Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:33:46.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: The History of Social Epistemology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Extract

Social epistemology is a burgeoning branch of contemporary epistemology. Since the 1970s, philosophers have taken an ever-increasing interest in such topics as the epistemic value of testimony, the nature and function of expertise, the proper distribution of cognitive labor and resources among individuals in communities, and the status of group reasoning and knowledge. This trend emerged against the resistance of the widely shared view that social considerations are largely irrelevant to epistemological concerns. The trend was stimulated by diverse approaches to the study of knowledge, in such fields as library science, educational theory, the sociology of science, and economics, and within philosophy itself, in the decades preceding the 1980s. To name only a few influences within philosophy, W. V. Quine promoted a naturalistic approach to knowledge, and many who accepted the relevance of nature to epistemology found it sensible to accept the relevance of social factors as well. Thomas S. Kuhn suggested that social factors precipitate revolutionary conceptual and doctrinal changes in the history of science. And feminist epistemologists uncovered the importance of gender differences in knowledge – a species of social factor.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Egan, M. E. and J, Shera. 1952. “Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography.” The Library Quarterly 22: 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R. 2004. A History of Reasonableness: Testimony and Authority in the Art of Thinking. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F. F. (ed.) 1994. Socializing Epistemology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Scholz, O. R. 2004. “Zeuge, Zeugnis I.” In Ritter, J., Gründer, K. & Gabriel, G. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Vol. 12: 1317–24. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Scholz, O. R. 2009a. “Von Rom, den Antipoden und von Wundern – Zur Behandlung des Zeugnisses anderer In Logiken der Frühen Neuzeit.” In Spoerhase, C. et al. (eds.), Unsicheres Wissen. Skeptizismus und Wahrscheinlichkeit 1550–1850, pp. 245–67. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scholz, O. R. 2009b. “Zeugnis.” In Ueding, G. (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 9, Su-Z: 1511–21. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Shera, J. 1970. Sociological Foundations of Librarianship. New York: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article: