Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T03:43:35.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of Radiocarbon Datings for the Origin of the Dorset Culture*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Bernard G. Hoffman
Bernard G. Hoffman*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since its discovery by Jenness in 1925, the Dorset culture has presented students of Eskimo archaeology with a persistent problem. Apparently representing an Arctic land-hunting culture, centering in the eastern Arctic, and containing many cultural items also to be found in more southern Indian cultures, the Dorset culture has presented ample opportunity for conjectural reconstructions of its origins and affinities. Mathiassen, who collected Dorset materials from Bylot and Southampton islands, first considered Dorset merely as a localized and specialized phase of the Thule culture (Mathiassen, 1925, part 1, pp. 206-12, 258-60; part 2, pp. 164-65). Later, however, he came to regard Dorset as non-Eskimo, and as a culture both influenced by, and influencing, Thule (Mathiassen and Holtved, 1936, p. 130). Jenness originally regarded Dorset as a paleo-Eskimo form of the proto-Eskimo culture of the Arctic Interior (Jenness, 1933, p. 365), but later shifted to the viewpoint that Dorset was a genuine Eskimo culture–albeit showing some Indian influences–which was distantly related to the cultures of Western Alaska (Jenness, 1940, p. 9). That this was the case has been repeatedly assumed as proved by de Laguna (1946, p. 106; 1947, pp. 13-14, 284-85).

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , July 1952 , pp. 15 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Since this paper was written, Ritchie's article “Ground Slates: Indian or Eskimo?,” Pennsylvania Archaeologist, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1951 has appeared. Ritchie's conclusions agree with those of this paper, although the problem was approached differently.

References

Antevs, Ernst 1931. Late-Glacial Correlations and Ice Recession in Manitoba. Canadian Department of Mines: Geological Survey, Memoir168. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Bryan, Kirk, AND L. Ray, Louis 1940. Geologic Antiquity of the Lindenmeier Site of Colorado. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 99, No. 2. Washington.Google Scholar
Coleman, A. P. 1921. Northeastern Part of Labrador, and New Quebec. Canadian Department of Mines: Geological Survey, Memoir124. Ottawa.Google Scholar
De Laguna, Frederica 1946. The Importance of the Eskimo in Northeastern Archaeology. In “an in Northeastern North America,” edited by Johnson, F.. Robert S. Peabody Foundation for Archaeology, Vol. 3, Phillips Academy, Andover.Google Scholar
De Laguna, Frederica 1947. The Prehistory of Northern North America as Seen from the Yukon. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 3. Menasha.Google Scholar
Flint, Richard F. 1947. Glacial Geology and the Pleistocene Epoch.New York.Google Scholar
Flint, Richard F. 1951. Discussion of the Geologic Material Dated by Radiocarbon, a Brief. In “Radiocarbon Dating.” Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 8, pp. 54–5. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Flint, Richard F., AND S. Deevey, Edward 1951. Radiocarbon Dating of Late-Pleistocene Events. American Journal of Science, Vol. 249, pp. 257–306. New Haven.Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond 1925. A New Eskimo Culture in Hudson Bay. Geographical Review, Vol. 15, pp. 428–37. New York.Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond 1933. The Problem of the Eskimo. In The American Aborigines: Their Origin and Development, pp. 373–96. Toronto.Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond 1940. Prehistoric Culture Waves from Asia to America. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol. 30, pp. 1–15. Washington.Google Scholar
Johnson, Frederick (editor) 1951. Radiocarbon Dating. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 8. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Mckern, W. C. 1942. First Settlers of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Magazine of History, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 153–69. Menasha.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S., Quimby, George I., and Collier, Donald 1947. Indians Before Columbus.Chicago.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Therkel 1927. Archaeology of the Central Eskimos. Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition 1921-24, Vol. 4. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Therkel, Mathiassen, and Holtved, Erik 1936. The Eskimo Archaeology of Julianhaap District. Meddelelser om Gronland, Vol. 118, No. 1. Kobenhavn.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1944. The Pre-Iroquoian Occupations of New York State. Rochester Museum Memoir, No. 1. Rochester.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1945. An Early Site in Cayuga County, New York. Researches and Transactions of the New York State Archeological Association, Vol. 10, No. 1. Rochester.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1951. Radiocarbon Dates on Samples from New York State. In “Radiocarbon Dating.” Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 8, pp. 31–32. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Rowley, Graham 1940. The Dorset Culture of the Eastern Arctic. American Anthropologist, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 490–9. Menasha.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. 1930. A Stone Culture of Northern Labrador and Its Relation to the Eskimo-like Cultures of the Northeast. American Anthropologist, Vol. 32, pp. 126–44. Menasha.Google Scholar
Thwaites, F. T. 1941. Outline of Glacial Geology. Madison.Google Scholar