Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T00:10:12.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metaphor and Political Knowledge*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Eugene F. Miller
Eugene F. Miller*
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the language of political inquiry seems to be inescapably metaphorical, the question necessarily arises as to how metaphors of various types, including models, enter into the composition and expression of political knowledge. The solutions that have been most influential in contemporary political science can be called the verificationist and constitutivist views of political metaphor. While both views contain important elements of truth, there are fundamental difficulties in each that require the search for a more satisfactory view. An alternative view of metaphor and political knowledge is developed by reference to four main problems: Why is political speech metaphorical? How do metaphors make political things manifest? How are political metaphors tested? and Are metaphors indispensable to political expression and political knowledge?

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 155 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These reflections on metaphor grow out of lectures delivered in 1974 at Loyola University of Chicago on “The Problem of Political Knowledge.” I am grateful to Professor Richard S. Hartigan, Director of the Loyola Lectures in Political Analysis, for his help and encouragement. My continuing investigation of the problem of political knowledge has been supported at various stages by the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Earhart Foundation as well as by my own department. It has received encouragement also from many colleagues and friends, and I wish to dedicate this essay to the memory of two of them–Martin Diamond and Herbert Storing.

References

Asch, Solomon E. (1955). “On the Use of Metaphor in the Description of Persons.” In Werner, Heinz (ed.), On Expressive Language. Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1961). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bambrough, Renford (1967). “Plato's Political Analogies.” In Laslett, Peter (ed.), Philosophy, Politics and Society: First Series. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berggren, Douglas (1962, 1963). “The Use and Abuse of Metaphor.” Review of Metaphysics 16:237–58, 450–72.Google Scholar
Black, Max (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brodbeck, May (1959). “Models, Meaning, and Theories.” In Gross, Llewellyn (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theory. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Burrell, David (1973). Analogy and Philosophical Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin (1971). “Current Models of the Political System.” Comparative Political Studies 4:21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Norman (1953). “The Structure of Theories.” In Feigl, Herbert and Brodbeck, May (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1963). “Intellectual Autobiography.” In Schilpp, Paul A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1966). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl (1963). The Nerves of Government. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, H. M. (1970). “Just Analogies?: The Place of Analogies in Political Thinking.” Political Studies 18:448–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Translated by Wiener, Philip P.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Edie, James M. (1976). Speaking and Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Henle, Paul (1965). “Metaphor.” In Henle, Paul (ed.), Language, Thought and Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1955). Leviathan. Edited by Oakeshott, Michael. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Howe, James (1977). “Carrying the Village: Cuna Political Metaphors.” In Sapir, J. David and Crocker, J. Christopher (eds.), The Social Use of Metaphor. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1955). A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Paul F. (1969). “The Web and the Tree: Metaphors of Reason and Value.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 13:395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Martin (1972). Political Theory and Political Science. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lasky, Melvin J. (1970). “The Birth of a Metaphor.” Encounter 34, February:35–45; March:30–42.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1969). Selected Literary Essays. Edited by Hooper, Walter. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Richard (1976). “Political Discourse and Sports Symbolism.” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1959). Ah Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Fraser, Alexander Campbell. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Margaret (1965a). “The Philosopher's Use of Analogy.” In Flew, Anthony (ed.), Logic and Language: First and Second Series. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Margaret (1965b). “The Language of Political Theory.” In Flew, Anthony (ed.), Logic and Language: First and Second Series. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph (1961). The Logic of Analogy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph (1968). Studies in Analogy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest (1961). The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Nash, Leonard K. (1963). The Nature of the Natural Sciences. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol (1959). “The Uses and Limitations of Mathematical Models in Social Science.” In Gross, Llewellyn (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theory. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. (1963). “Various Meanings of ‘Theory.’” In Polsby, Nelson W., Dentler, Robert A., and Smith, Paul A. (eds.), Politics and Social Life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1965). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1977). The Rule of Metaphor. Translated by Czerny, Robert. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stanley (1961). “Thought and Touch.” Phronesis 6:127–37.Google Scholar
Rossum, Ralph (1976). “James Wilson and the ‘Pyramid of Government’: The Federal Republic.” The Political Science Reviewer 6:113–42.Google Scholar
Sapir, J. David (1977). “The Anatomy of Metaphor.” In Sapir, J. David and Crocker, J. Christopher (eds.), The Social Use of Metaphor. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Jerome P. (1969). I. A. Richards' Theory of Literature. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred (1973). “Symbol, Reality and Society.” In Natanson, Maurice (ed.), Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers, Vol. I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E. (1965). The Philosophy of Science. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Turbayne, Colin M. (1962). The Myth of Metaphor. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista (1948). The New Science. Edited by Bergin, Thomas G. and Fisch, Max H.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wheelwright, Philip (1962). Metaphor and Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Zashin, Elliot and Chapman, Phillip C. (1974). “The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy. Toward a Renewal of Political Language.” Journal of Politics 36:290–326.Google Scholar