Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:40:16.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

War and the Cycle of Relative Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Charles F. Doran  and
Wes Parsons
Charles F. Doran
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Wes Parsons
Affiliation:
Rice University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Relative nation-state capability follows a generalized nonlinear pattern over long periods. Empirical evidence indicates that between 1816–1975 nine major powers have traversed at least a segment of this relative capability cycle of political ascendancy, maturation and decline. Specific changes in a state's relative capability dynamics increase its propensity to initiate extensive war. Whether the extensiveness of a war is defined in terms of duration, intensity or magnitude, major powers are likely to initiate more extensive wars at the critical inflection and turning points on the curve of relative capability where the linear role perceptions held by government and society change pervasively. This analysis involves a new theoretical focus for examining the causes of war, shifting attention from interactions between nations to the consequences of changes in relative power and to the political evolution of the nation-state itself.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 947 - 965
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, Norman (1972). The War Disease. Oakville, Ontario: Canadian Peace Research Institute Press.Google Scholar
Art, Robert J. (1973). The Influence of Foreign Policy on Seapower: New Weapons and Weltpolitik in Wilhelmian Germany. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, p. 22.Google Scholar
Berghan, V. R. (1973). Germany and the Approach of War in 1914. New York: St. Martin's Press, p. 31.Google Scholar
Blainey, Geoffrey (1973). The Causes of War. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Alan (1964). Hitler: A Study in Tyranny. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Choucri, Nazli, and North, Robert C. (1974). Nations in Conflict: Natural Growth and International Violence. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Demon, Frank H., and Phillips, Warren (1968). “Some Patterns in the History of Violence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 12: 182–95.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. W., and Merritt, R. L. (1965). “Effects of Events on National and International Images.” In Kelman, H. C. (ed.), International Behavior: A Social-Psychological Anslysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Doran, Charles F. (1971). The Politics of Assimilation: Hegemony and Its Aftermath. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Doran, Charles F. (1980). “Leading Indicators of the June War.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 2: 23–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Alexander (1977). China's Economic Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, Wayne H. (1973). The Power Capabilities of Nation-States. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fucks, Wilhelm (1965). Formeln Zur Macht. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanfalt.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan (1966). “International Relations and International Conflicts: A Sociological Approach.” Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, pp. 275–83.Google Scholar
Grew, Raymond, ed. (1978). Crises of Political Development in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heiss, Klaus P., Knorr, Klaus and Morgenstein, Oskar (1973). Long Term Projections of Power: Political, Economic and Military Forecasting. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Holsti, K. J. (1970). “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 14: 233–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Job, Brian (1976). “Membership in International Alliances 1815–1965: Exploration Using Mathematical Modelling.” In Zinnes, Dina and Gillespie, John V. (eds.), Mathematical Models in International Relations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kindelberger, Charles P. (1970). Power and Money. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, Klaus (1973). Power and Wealth: The Political Economy of International Power. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Hans (1944). The Idea of Nationalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon (1966). Modern Economic Growth. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur (1978). The Evolution of the International Economic Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Liska, George (1967). Imperial America: The International Politics of Primacy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
McGowan, P. J., and Rood, R. M. (1975). “Alliance Behavior in Balance of Power Systems: Applying a Poisson Model to Nineteenth Century Europe.” American Political Science Review 69: 859–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modelski, George (1978). “The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation State.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 20: 214–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organski, A. F. K., and Kugler, Jacek (1977). “The Costs of Major Wars: The Phoenix Factor.” American Political Science Review 71: 1347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Raymond (1924). Studies in Human Biology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Porter, Bernard (1975). The Lion's Share: A Short History of British Imperialism 1850–1970. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pruitt, Dean G. (1969). “Stability and Sudden Change in Interpersonal and International Affairs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 13: 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard N. (1963). Action and Reaction in World Politics. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M., and Abelson, R. (1960). “An Analysis of Cognitive Balancing” in Rosenberg, M.et al., Attitude Organization and Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. (1978). The World Economy: History and Prospect. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, R. (1971). “A Status-Field Theory of International Relations.” The Dimensionalities of Nations Project, Research Report No. 50, Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. (1968). “Is There a Long-run Trend Toward Concentration in the International System?” Comparative Political Studies 1: 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmore, S. A., and Herman, C. F. (1969). “The Effects of Size, Development and Accountability on Foreign Policy,” Peace Research Society (International) Papers 14: 24–47.Google Scholar
Scott, Andres M. (1965). The Revolution in Statecraft: Informal Penetration. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Silverson, R. M., and Duncan, G. T. (1976). “Stochastic Models of International Alliance Initiation.” In Zinnes, D. A. and Gillespie, J. V. (eds.), Mathematical Models in International Relations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., Bremer, Stuart and Stuckey, John (1972). “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty and Major Power War 1920–1965.” In Russett, Bruce (ed.), Peace, War and Numbers. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., and Small, Melvin (1966). “The Composition and Status Ordering of the International System 1815–1940.” World Politics 18: 236–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. D., and Small, Melvin (1968). “Alliance Aggregation and the Onset of War.” In Singer, J. D.et al. (eds.), Quantitative International Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., and Small, Melvin (1972). The Wages of War 1816–1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Soloman, George F. (1970). “Psychodynamic Aspects of Aggression, Hostility and Violence.” In Daniels, David N., Gilula, Marshall F., and Ochberg, Frank M. (eds.), Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P. (1954). The Struggle for Mastery in Europe 1848–1914. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wainer, Howard (1978). “On the Sensitivity of Regression and Regressors.” Psychological Bulletin 85:267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Michael (1973). War and Rank Among Nations. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Weede, Erich (1973). “Nation-Environment Relations as Determinants of Hostility Among Nations.” Peace Science Society (International) Papers 20:67–89.Google Scholar