Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T09:14:25.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conditions for the Diffusion of Agricultural Technology: An Asian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Yujiro Hayami
Yujiro Hayami
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A unique aspect of agricultural production as a biological process is that it is basically conditioned by natural environments. Agricultural technology is so developed as to be efficient in the given environmental conditions in addition to being consistent with relative factor and product prices. In consequence, there is a tendency for agricultural technology to become location-specific, and its direct transfer is limited within a small area of similar environmental conditions.

Type
Papers Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 131 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The study on which this paper is based was, in part, supported by a grant of the Rockefeller Foundation to the University of Minnesota Economic Development Center.

1 Chambers, J. C. and Mingay, G. E., The Agricultural Revolution, 1750–1880 (London: Batsford, 1966), pp. 174–76.Google Scholar

2 Ernle, Lord, English Farming, Past and Present (6th ed; London: Heinemann, 1961).Google Scholar

3 Samuelson, P. A., “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVI (November 1954), 387–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditures,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVII (November 1955), 350–56Google Scholar; and “Aspects of Public Expenditure Theories,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XL (November 1958), 332–38.Google ScholarMusgrave, R. A., The Theory of Public Finance (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959).Google Scholar

4 For a review of diffusion studies by rural sociologists see Beal, G. M. and Bohlen, J. M., The Diffusion Process (Ames: Iowa State Agricultural Experiment Station, Special Report No. 18, March 1957)Google Scholar; and Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations (New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1962).Google Scholar

5 The theory behind this approach may be called the “diffusion model” of agricultural development. See Hayami, Yujiro and Ruttan, V. W., Agricultural Development: An International Perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971), pp. 36–39.Google Scholar

6 Moseman, A. H., Building Agricultural Research Systems in the Developing Nations (New York: Agricultural Development Council, 1970), pp. 70–72.Google Scholar

7 Schultz, T. W., Transforming Traditional Agriculture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

8 For a typical example see Griliches, Zvi, “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica, XXV (October 1957), 501–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Hayami and Ruttan, Agricultural Development, pp. 174–82.

10 For a popular introduction to the green revolution see Brown, L. R., Seeds of Change (New York: Praeger, 1970).Google Scholar

11 See Hayami and Ruttan, Agricultural Development, pp. 182–90.

12 For the process of factor substitution involving technical change in response to changes in relative factor prices see Hayami and Ruttan, Agricultural Development, pp. 111–35.

13 See Vol. 1 to Vol. 3 of Chosakai, Nogyo Hattatsushi, Nihon Nogyo Hattatsu Shi (History of Agricultural Development in Japan) (Tokyo: Chuokoronsha, 1953–1958).Google Scholar

14 ibid.

15 Vol. 3 of Nihon Nogyo, pp. 219–388.

16 Hayami, Yujiro and Yamada, Saburo, “Technological Progress in Agriculture,” in Klein, Lawrence and Ohkawa, Kazushi, (eds.), Economic Growth: The Japanese Experience since the Meiji Period (Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1968), pp. 135–61.Google Scholar

17 See ibid, for the quantitative analysis of the diffusion process that resulted in the regional patterns of rice yield increases as shown in Figure 2.

18 For the early experience with technology importation and the subsequent policy reorientation, see Hayami and Ruttan, Agricultural Development, pp. 153–64, and Ogura, Takekazu (ed.), Agricultural Development in Modern Japan (Tokyo: Fuji Publishing Co., 1963).Google Scholar

19 Vol. 4 of Nihon Nogyo, pp. 213–32.

20 Hayami and Ruttan, Agricultural Development, pp. 160–62.

21 For the motivation process of transferring the Japanese rice technology to Taiwan and Korea, see ibid., pp. 198–212.

22 Tobata, Seiichi and Ohkawa, Kazushi, Chosen Beikoku Keizairon (A Treatise on Rice Economy in Korea), (Tokyo: Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkokai, 1935), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

23 Kobayakawa, Kuro, ed., Chosen Nogyo Hattatsushi: Seisakuhen (History of Korean Agricultural Development), (Tokyo: Yukokyokai, 1959), pp, 27–28.Google Scholar

24 Crisostomo, Cristina and Barker, Randolph, Growth Rates of Philippine Agriculture, 1948–1969, a paper prepared for the Conference on Agricultural Growth in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines, at the East-West Food Center, February 6–9, 1973 (mimeographed).Google Scholar

25 Crisostomo, Cristina, Meyers, W. H., Paris, T. B., Duff, Bart, and Barker, Randolph, “The New Rice Technology and Labor Absorption in Philippine Agriculture,” Malayan Economic Review, XVI (October 1971), 117–58.Google Scholar