Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:36:28.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical study of the effects of the breaking intensity on wave breaking flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

A. IAFRATI
A. IAFRATI*
Affiliation:
INSEAN – Italian Ship Model Basin, Rome 00128, Italy
*
†Email address for correspondence: a.iafrati@insean.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flow generated by the breaking of free-surface waves of different initial steepnesses is simulated numerically. The aim is to investigate the role played by the breaking intensity on the resulting flow. The study, which assumes a two-dimensional flow, makes use of a two-fluids Navier–Stokes solver combined with a Level-Set technique for the interface capturing. The evolution of periodic wavetrains is considered. Depending on the initial steepness ϵ, the wavetrain remains regular or develops a breaking, which can be either of spilling or plunging type. From the analysis of the local strain fields it is shown that, in the most energetic phase of plunging breaking, dissipation is mainly localized about the small air bubbles generated by the fragmentation of the air cavity entrapped by the plunging of the jet. The downward transfer of the horizontal momentum is evaluated by integrating the flux of momentum through horizontal planes lying at different depths beneath the still water level. From weak to moderate breaking, increase in the breaking intensity results in growing transfer of horizontal momentum, as well as thickening of the surface layer. Beyond a certain breaking intensity, the larger amount of air entrapped causes a reduction in the momentum transferred and the shrinkage of the layer. Quantitative estimates of the amount of air entrapped by the breaking and of the degassing process are provided. A scaling dependence of the amount of air entrapped by the first plunging event on the initial steepness is found. A careful analysis of the circulation induced in water by the breaking process is carried out. It is seen that in the plunging regime the primary circulation induced by the breaking process scales with the velocity jump between the crest and the trough of the wave.

The limits of the main assumptions of the numerical calculations are analysed. It is shown that up to half-wave period after the breaking onset, the Reynolds number of the simulation does not significantly affect the solution. In order to further support the findings, an estimate of the uncertainty of the numerical results is derived through several repetitions of the numerical simulation with small perturbations of the initial conditions.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 622 , 10 March 2009 , pp. 371 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banner, M. L. & Phillips, O. M. 1974 On the incipient breaking of small scale waves. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blenkinsopp, C. E. & Chaplin, J. R. 2007 Void fraction measurements in breaking waves. Proc. R. Soc. A 463, 3151–3170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonmarin, P. 1989 Geometric propertiesd of deep-water breaking waves. J. Fluid Mech. 209, 405–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackbill, J. U., Kothe, D. B. & Zemach, C. 1992 A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J. Comput. Phys. 100, 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocchini, M. & Peregrine, D. H. 2001 The dynamics of strong turbulence at free surfaces. Part 1. Description. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, K.-A. & Liu, P. L.-F. 1999 Experimental investigation of turbulence generated by breaking waves in water of intermediate depth. Phys. Fluids 11, 3390–3401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Kharif, C., Zaleski, S. & Li, J. 1999 Two-dimensional Navier–Stokes simulation of breaking waves. Phys. Fluids 11, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorin, A. J. 1967 A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2, 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, D. & Gharib, M. 1997 Experimental investigation of the vorticity generation within a spilling water wave. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, G. B. & Stokes, M. D. 2002 Scale dependence of bubble creation mechanisms in breaking waves. Nature 418, 839–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diorio, J., Liu, X. & Duncan, J. H. 2008 On the self-similarity of short-wavelength incipient spilling breakers. In Proceedings of the XXII ICTAM Conference, University Adelaide.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 1981 An experimental investigation of breaking waves produced by a towed hydrofoil. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 377, 331–348.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 1983 The breaking and nonbreaking wave resistance of a two-dimensional hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, J. H., Qiao, H., Philomin, V. & Wenz, A. 1999 Gentle spilling breakers: crest profile evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 379, 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, U. 1995 Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grue, J., Clamond, D., Huseby, M. & Jensen, A. 2003 Kinematics of extreme water waves. Appl. Ocean Res. 25, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grue, J. & Fructus, D. In press Model for fully nonlinear ocean wave simulations derived using Fourier inversion of integral equations in 3D. In Advances in Numerical Simulation of Nonlinear Water Waves (ed. Ma, Q. W.), in the series of Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering. The World Scientific.Google Scholar
Grue, J. & Jensen, A. 2006 Experimental velocities and accelerations in very steep wave events in deep water. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 25, 554–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, K. 2004 Navier–Stokes simulation of steep breaking water waves with coupled air–water interface. Sc. D. Dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, K. & Yue, D. K. P. 2006 Navier–Stokes simulations of unsteady small-scale breaking waves at a coupled air–water interface. In Proceedings of The Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Office of Naval Research.Google Scholar
Iafrati, A. 2006 Numerical analysis of the momentum transfer induced by breaking waves. In Proceedings of The Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Office of Naval Research.Google Scholar
Iafrati, A. & Campana, E. F. 2003 A domain decomposition approach to compute wave breaking. Intl J. Num. Meth. Fluids 41, 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iafrati, A. & Campana, E. F. 2005 Free surface fluctuations behind microbreakers: space–time behavious and subsurface flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 529, 311–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iafrati, A., Di Mascio, A. & Campana, E. F. 2001 A level-set technique applied to unsteady free surface flows. Intl J. Num. Meth. Fluids 35, 281–297.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1985 Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 59, 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmoun, O. & Branger, H. 2007 A particle image velocimetry investigation on laboratory surf-zone breaking waves over a sloping beach. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 353–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarre, E. & Melville, W. K. 1991 Air entrainment and dissipation in breaking waves. Nature 351, 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1978 Waves in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, J. C. & Rockwell, D. 1995 Evolution of a quasi-steady breaking wave. J. Fluid Mech. 302, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1992 Capillary rollers and bores. J. Fluid Mech. 240, 659–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubin, P., Vincent, S., Abadie, S. & Caltagirone, J.-P. 2006 Three-dimensional large eddy simulation of air entrainment under plunging breaking waves. Coast. Engng 53, 631–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, W. K., Veron, F. & White, C. J. 2002 The velocity field under breaking waves: coherent structures and turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 454, 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohring, S. & Lugt, H. J. 1991 Interaction of a viscous vortex pair with a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, H. & Duncan, J. H. 2001 Gentle spilling breakers: crest flow-field evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 439, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, M. M. & Moin, P. 1991 Direct simulations of turbulent flow using finite-difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 96, 15–53.Google Scholar
Rapp, R. J. & Melville, W. K. 1990 Laboratory measurements of deep-water breaking waves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 331, 735–800.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., Kwak, D. & Vinokur, M. 1991 A fractional step solution method for the unsteady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in generalized coordinate system. J. Comput. Phys. 94, 102–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. & Suthon, P. 1991 Interaction of a vortex couple with a free surface. Exp. Fluids 11, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardovelli, R. & Zaleski, S. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of free surface and interfacial flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 567–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqui, M. H. K., Loewen, M. R., Asher, W. E. & Jessup, A. T. 2004 Coherent structures beneath wind waves and their influence on air–water gas transfer. J. Geophys. Res. 109, C03024.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, M. H. K., Loewen, M. R., Richardson, C., Asher, W. E. & Jessup, A. T. 2001 Simultaneous particle image velocimetry and infrared imagery of microscale breaking waves. Phys. Fluids 13, 1891–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, C. & Sirviente, A. I. 2004 A numerical study of breaking waves. Phys. Fluids 16, 2649–2667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., McWilliams, J. C. & Melville, W. K. 2004 The oceanic boundary layer driven by wave breaking with stochastic variability. Part 1: Direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 507, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., McWilliams, J. C. & Melville, W. K. 2007 Surface gravity wave effects in the oceanic boundary layer: large-eddy simulation with vortex force and stochastic breakers. J. Fluid Mech. 593, 405–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, M., Smereka, P. & Osher, S. 1994 A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J. Comput. Phys. 114, 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 2004 Langmuir circulation. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unverdi, S. O. & Tryggvason, G. 1992 A front-tracking method for viscous, incompressible, multi-fluid flows. J. Comput. Phys. 100, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Vorst, H. A. 1992 Bi-CGSTAB: fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 13, 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., Saeki, H. & Hosking, R. J. 2005 Three-dimensional vortex structures under breaking waves. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 291–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Zang, Y., Street, R. L. & Koseff, J. R. 1994 A non-staggered grid, fractional step method for time-dependent incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in curvilinear coordinates. J. Comput. Phys. 114, 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar