Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T06:53:29.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asymptotic properties of the overall sound pressure level of subsonic jet flows using isotropy as a paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2010

M. Z. AFSAR*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK
*
Present address: Ohio Aerospace Institute, 22800 Cedar Point Road, Cleveland, OH 44142, USA. Email address for correspondence: mohammed.afsar@cantab.net

Abstract

Measurements of subsonic air jets show that the peak noise usually occurs when observations are made at small angles to the jet axis. In this paper, we develop further understanding of the mathematical properties of this peak noise by analysing the properties of the overall sound pressure level with an acoustic analogy using isotropy as a paradigm for the turbulence. The analogy is based upon the hyperbolic conservation form of the Euler equations derived by Goldstein (Intl J. Aeroacoust., vol. 1, 2002, p. 1). The mean flow and the turbulence properties are defined by a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes calculation, and we use Green's function based upon a parallel mean flow approximation. Our analysis in this paper shows that the jet noise spectrum can, in fact, be thought of as being composed of two terms, one that is significant at large observation angles and a second term that is especially dominant at small observation angles to the jet axis. This second term can account for the experimentally observed peak jet noise (Lush, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 46, 1971, p. 477) and was first identified by Goldstein (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 70, 1975, p. 595). We discuss the low-frequency asymptotic properties of this second term in order to understand its directional behaviour; we show, for example, that the sound power of this term is proportional to the square of the mean velocity gradient. We also show that this small-angle shear term does not exist if the instantaneous Reynolds stress source strength in the momentum equation itself is assumed to be isotropic for any value of time (as was done previously by Morris & Farrasat, AIAA J., vol. 40, 2002, p. 356). However, it will be significant if the auto-covariance of the Reynolds stress source, when integrated over the vector separation, is taken to be isotropic in all of its tensor suffixes. Although the analysis shows that the sound pressure of this small-angle shear term is sensitive to the statistical properties of the turbulence, this work provides a foundation for a mathematical description of the two-source model of jet noise.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afsar, M. Z. 2008 Theory and modelling of jet noise. PhD thesis, Cambridge University, Engineering Department Accession No 50087.Google Scholar
Afsar, M. Z. 2009 Solution of the parallel shear layer Green's function using conservation equations. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 8 (6), 585602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afsar, M. Z. 2010 A complete theoretical foundation for the ‘two-source’ structure of jet noise. In International Congress of Mathematicians, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
Ahuja, K. K. 1973 Correlation and prediction of jet noise. J. Sound Vib. 25, 155168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alper, A. & Liu, J. T. C. 1978 On the interactions between large-scale structure and fine-grained turbulence in a round jet II. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 359, 497.Google Scholar
Anderssen, N. 2003 A study of Mach 0.75 jets and their radiated sound using large-eddy simulation. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Record No 16272.Google Scholar
Balsa, T. F. 1977 The acoustic field of sources in a shear flow with application to jet noise: convective amplification. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homegenous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, K. A., Ffowcs-Williams, J. E. & Smith, W. 1971 On the sources of the unsuppressed high-speed jet. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodony, D. J. 2004 Aeroacoustic prediction of turbulent free shear flows. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Thesis Call No 3781 2005 B.Google Scholar
Bodony, D. J. 2009 Heating effects on the structure of noise sources of high-speed jets. In 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 2009-291, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Bodony, D. J. & Lele, S. K. 2005 Generation of low-frequency sound in turbulent jets. In 12th AIAA/CEAS Conference, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
Bodony, D. J. & Lele, S. K. 2008 Low-frequency sound sources in high-speed turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 617, 231253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonius, T. & Freund, J. B. 2000 Application of Lighthill's equation to a Mach 1.92 turbulent jet. AIAA J. Tech. Notes 38 (2) 368370.Google Scholar
Colonius, T. & Lele, S. K. 2004 Computational aero-acoustics: progress on non-linear problems of sound generation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 40, 345416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonius, T., Lele, S. K. & Moin, P. 1997 Sound generation in a mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 375409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1969 The scale effect in compressible turbulence. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 65, 557565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1993 Computational aero-acoustics for low Mach number flows. In Computational Aero-Acoustics (ed. Hardin, J. C. & Hussaini, M. Y.), pp. 5068. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G., Dowling, A. P., Ffowcs-Williams, J. E., Heckl, W. & Leppington, F. 1992. Modern Methods in Analytical Acoustics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, S. C. 1970 Aerodynamic sound emission as a singular perturbation problem. Stud. Appl. Math. 49 (1), 2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, S. C. 1972 The acoustic gain of a turbulent jet. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. Paper IE. 6.Google Scholar
Dowling, A. P., Ffowcs-Williams, J. E. & Goldstein, M. E. 1978 Sound production in a moving stream. Proc. R. Soc. A 288, 321349.Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. 1964. The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Volume 1. Addison-Wesley Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ffowcs-Williams, J. E. & Kempton, A. J. 1978 The noise from the large scale structure of a jet. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 673694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, J. B. 2001 Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 277305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, J. B. 2003 Noise source turbulence statistics and the noise from a Mach 0.9 jet. Phys. Fluids 15, 17881800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1975 The low frequency sound from multipole sources in axisymmetric shear flows with application to jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 595604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1976 Aero-Acoustics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1982 High frequency sound emission from moving point multipole sources embedded in arbitrary transversely sheared mean flows. J. Sound Vib. 80, 499521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1984 Aero-acoustics of turbulent shear flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 263285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 2002 A unified approach to some recent developments in jet noise theory. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 1, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 2003 A generalized acoustic analogy. J. Fluid Mech. 488, 315333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 2005 Ninety degree acoustic spectrum of a high speed air jet. AIAA J. 43, 96102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. & Leib, S. J. 2005 The role of instability waves in predicting jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 3772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. & Leib, S. J. 2008 The aero-acoustics of slowly diverging supersonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 600, 291388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huerre, P. & Crighton, D. G. 1983 Sound generation by instability waves in a low Mach number jet. AIAA Paper 83-0661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabasov, S. K., Afsar, M. Z., Hynes, T. P., Dowling, A. P., McMullen, W. A., Pokora, C. D., Page, G. J. & McGuirk, J. J. 2010 Jet noise-acoustic analogy informed by large eddy simulation. AIAA J. 48 (7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebedev, N. N. 1972 Special Functions and Their Applications. Dover.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. Part I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. A 222, 564587.Google Scholar
Lilley, G. M. 1958 On the noise from air jets. ARC-20, 376, No. 40, Fm-2724, British Aeronautical Research Council.Google Scholar
Lilley, G. M. 1974 On the noise from jets. CP-131 AGARD, 13.1–13.12.Google Scholar
Liu, J. T. C. & Mankbadi, R. 1984 Sound generated aerodynamically revisited: large-scale structures in a turbulent jet as a source of sound. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 311 (1516), 183217.Google Scholar
Liu, J. T. C. & Merkine, L. 1976 On the interactions between large-scale structure and fine-grained turbulence in a round jet. Part I. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 352, 213.Google Scholar
Lush, P. A. 1971 Measurements of subsonic jet noise and comparison with theory. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 477500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollo-Christensen, E., Koplin, M. A. & Martucelli, J. R. 1964 Experiments on jet flows and jet noise, far-field spectra and directivity patterns. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 285301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P. D., Slot, H. J. & Boersma, B. J. 2007 Direct numerical simulation of low Reynolds number hot and cold jets. In 13th AIAA/CEAS Aero-Acoustics Conference, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Morris, P. J. 2008 Source modelling and prediction methodologies. In ERCOTAF Symposium on Sound Source Mechanisms in Turbulent Shear Flow, Poiters, France, July 7–9, 2008.Google Scholar
Morris, P. J. 2009 A note on noise generation by large scale turbulent structures in subsonic and supersonic jets. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 8, 4, 301316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, P. J. & Farrasat, F. 2002 Acoustic analogy and alternative theories for jet noise prediction. AIAA J. 40, 671680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, P. M. & Feshbach, H. 1953 Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part I. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mosedale, A. & Drikakis, D. 2007 Assessment of very high order of accuracy in LES models. ASME J. Fluids Engng 129, 1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayfeh, A. H. 1972 Perturbation Methods. Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Power, O., Kerherve, F., Fitzpatrick, J. & Jordan, P. 2004. Measurements of turbulence statistics in high Reynolds number jets. In 10th AIAA/CEAS Aero-Acoustics Conference, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Ribner, H. S. 1969 Quadrupole correlations governing the pattern of jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 38, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shur, M. L., Strelets, M. Kh. & Spalart, P. R. 2007. Numerical system for LES-based jet noise prediction: validation and application to evaluation of noise-reduction concepts. In West East High Speed Flow Conference, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
Stromberg, J. L., McLaughlin, D. K. & Troutt, T. R. 1980 Flow field and acoustic properties of a Mach 0.9 jet at a low Reynolds number. J. Sound Vib. 72, 159176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. 1971 Directional acoustic radiation from a supersonic jet generated by shear layer instability. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 757768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. 1995 Supersonic jet noise. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 27, 1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Auriault, L. 1998 Mean flow refraction effects on sound radiated from localized sources in a jet. J. Fluid Mech. 370, 149174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Auriault, L. 1999 Jet mixing noise from fine scale turbulence. AIAA J. 206, 145153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Burton, D. E. 1984 Sound generated by instability waves of supersonic flow. Part 2. Axi-symmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 273295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W., Viswanathan, K., Ahuja, K. K. & Panda, J. 2008 The sources of jet noise: experimental evidence. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 253292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Freund, J. B. & Lele, S. K. 2006 Computational prediction of flow generated sound. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 483512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. & Huerre, P. 2009 Low frequency sound radiated by a non-linearly modulated wavepacket of helical modes on a subsonic circular jet. Fluid Mech. 637, 173211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., McGuirk, J. J., Tristanto, I. H. & Page, G. J. 2005 Influence of nozzle modelling in LES of turbulent free jets. In 11th AIAA/CEAS Aero-Acoustics Conference, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar