Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:06:24.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Circulations and density distributions in a deep, strongly stratified, two-layer estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Robert R. Long
Robert R. Long
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Materials Science, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper discusses a theoretical model of statistically steady flow in a strongly stratified estuary. A halocline is assumed to be present and the lower layer is taken to be deep and non-turbulent. The outflowing upper fluid mixes with the salty lower fluid and the flux of the brackish water increases with distance from the head of the estuary. The mixing is assumed to be similar to that in laboratory models of mixing across density interfaces.

Two equations of mass conservation are used, one for the steady-state mass flux across a vertical section from top to bottom of the channel and one for the mass flux into a section of the upper fluid. A buoyancy conservation equation is used for the buoyancy flux across a vertical section. A final equation is obtained by integrating the horizontal equation of motion across a section of the upper fluid. The flow in this layer is assumed to be opposed by a frictional force proportional to the square of the velocity averaged over the layer. The pressure-gradient force arising from the slope of the free surface is solved for in terms of the thickness of the upper layer, the buoyancy difference across the interface, the slope of the interface and the horizontal density gradient in the upper layer. The derivation shows that the horizontal pressure-gradient force vanishes in the lower layer.

The mathematical problem reduces to two ordinary differential equations for the flux in the upper layer and its thickness. Attention is confined to the solution for subcritical flow, in which the interface falls with distance from the head, reaching a maximum depth at a certain section of the estuary. Beyond this the interface rises. At the mouth, where, by definition, the width of the estuary increases rapidly, it is shown that there must be a transition from subcritical to supercritical flow. This condition, applied to the solution for uniform width, determines a remaining unknown related to the depth of the halocline at the head of the estuary and the complete solution is obtained as a function of the freshwater influx per unit width, the r.m.s. turbulent velocity, the estuary length and the buoyancy of sea water.

The solution is complicated but has reasonable behaviour for variations of the given parameters of the problem. A basic feature for values of the constants appropriate to fjord-type estuaries is the dominance of friction, omitted in an earlier, incomplete investigation by Stommel. This is also revealed by the large drop in the free surface over the length of the estuary.

A comparison with two estuaries, Oslofjord and Knight Inlet, British Columbia, indicates that the former is very different from the model of this paper but that the latter may have a similar nature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , 14 October 1975 , pp. 529 - 540
Copyright
© 1975 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dyer, K. R. 1973 Estuaries, a Physical Introduction. Wiley.
Gade, H. 1970 Hydrographic Investigations in the Oslofjord, a Study of Water Circulation and Exchange Processes, vols. I-III. Geophys. Inst., University of Bergen, Norway.
Kato, H. & Phillips, O. M. 1969 On the penetration of a turbulent layer into a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 643–655.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1975a The influence of shear on mixing across density interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 305–320.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1975b On the depth of the halocline in an estuary. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 5, 551–557.Google Scholar
Moore, M. J. & Long, R. R. 1971 An experimental investigation of turbulent stratified shearing flow. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 635–655.Google Scholar
Pickard, G. L. & Rodgers, K. 1959 Current measurements in Knight Inlet, British Columbia. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 16, 635–678.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. W. 1952 Estuarine hydrography. Adv. in Geophys. 1, 243–280.Google Scholar
Rattray, M. & Hansen, D. V. 1962 A similarity solution for circulation in an estuary. J. Mar. Res. 20, 121–133.Google Scholar
Rouse, H. & Dodu, J. 1955 Turbulent diffusion across a density discontinuity. Houille Blanche, 10, 405–410.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1955 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Stommel, H. 1951 Recent developments in the study of tidal estuaries. Tech. Rep. W.H.O.I. no. 51.33.
Tully, J. P. 1949 Oceanography and prediction of pulp mill pollution in Alberni Inlet. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 83, 1–169.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1968 The influence of molecular diffusivity on turbulent entrainment across a density interface. J. Fluid Mech. 33, 639–656.Google Scholar
Welander, P. 1974 Two-layer exchange in an estuary basin with special reference to the Baltic Sea. J. Phys. Oceanog. 4, 542–556.Google Scholar