Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:24:51.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further research of the collisional instability. An extensive study of growth and a notable influence of the boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

C. L. XAPLANTERIS*
Affiliation:
Plasma Physics Lab, IMS, NCSR ‘Demokritos’, Athens, Greece, Hellenic Military Academy, Vari Attica, Greece (lfilip@ims.demokritos.gr)

Abstract

In a cylindrical geometry, a low-pressure magnetized argon plasma is lit, using the rf upper hybrid resonance. As a radial dc electric field is formed, a perpendicular drift velocity is obtained on the charged particles and a collisional instability is raised. The description, study and identification of that wave were given in the last published work from NCSR ‘Demokritos’, both experimentally and theoretically. Since then, the research has been continued and significant results have been obtained concerning the fields of plasma parameters, wave further understanding, growth research and boundaries' strong influence. The aim of the present paper is to inform that the rising instability has many of the characteristics of drift instabilities that are caused by the density gradient, as well as the ability of it's frequency to overcome the ion gyro-frequency. In addition, it gives an answer to the well-known problem of the need to consider a small component of the wave vector in the parallel direction, in order the wave to rise through the electron-neutral collisions' proceedings; a strong influence of cavity length on wave amplitude has been observed and measured.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]D' Angelo, N. and Rynn, N. 1961 Phys. Fluids 4, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]D' Angelo, N. and Rynn, N. 1961 Phys. Fluids 4, 1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hendel, H. W., Coppi, B., Perkins, F. and Politzer, P. A. 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hendel, H. W., Chu, T. K. and Politzer, P. A. 1968 Phys. Fluids 11, 2426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ellis, R. F. and Motley, R. W. 1971 Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Politzer, P. A. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 2410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Marden-Marshall, E. 1980 PhD thesis, Dartmouth College Hanover.Google Scholar
[8]Vranjes, J. and Poedts, S. 2005 Phys. Plasma 12, 112103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Vranjes, J. and Poedts, S. 2009 Phys. Plasma 16, 022101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Anastassiades, A. and Xaplanteris, C. 1983 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 52, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Xaplanteris, C. 1987 Astrophys. Space Sci. 136, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Xaplanteris, C. 2009 J. Plasma Phys. 75 (3), 395406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Salimullah, M., Sandberg, I. and Shukla, P. K. 2003, Phys. Rev. E 68, 027403.Google Scholar
[14]Block, D., Piel, A., Schröder, Ch. and Klinger, T. 2001 Phys. Rev. E 63, 056401.Google Scholar
[15]Mikhailovskii, A. B., Galvao, R. O., et al. 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14, 112108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Wesson, J. 1997 Tokamaks, 2nd edn., Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, pp. 51, 394.Google Scholar
[17]Ellis, R., Marden-Marshall, E. and Majeski, R. 1980 Plasma Phys. 22, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Marden-Marshall, E., Ellis, R. F. and Walsh, J. E. 1986 Plasma Phys. 28 (9B), 1461.Google Scholar
[19]Vranjes, J. and Poedts, S. 2007 Phys. Plasma 14, 112106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Shukla, P. K., Sorasio, G. and Stenflo, L. 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66, 067401.Google Scholar
[21]Salimullah, M., Rizwan, A. M., Nambu, M. and Shukla, P. K. 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70, 026404.Google Scholar