Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:15:29.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the expulsion phase of Trichinella spiralis on Hymenolepis diminuta infection in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. M. Behnke ,
P. W. Bland  and
D. Wakelin
J. M. Behnke
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH.
P. W. Bland
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH.
D. Wakelin
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The rapid elimination of the intestinal phase of Trichinella spiralis in NIH mice is associated with progressive inflammation of the intestinal tract. The non-specific effects of this inflammation were studied in. mice concurrently infected with an unrelated parasite, Hymenolepis diminuta, which does not stimulate a visible inflammatory response but is also immunologically rejected by this strain of mice.

It was demonstrated that the rejection phase of T. spiralis infection had a marked effect upon the growth and survival of H. diminuta,. The cestode either failed to establish or to grow; if the worms were already strobilate when inflammation developed then destrobilation occurred. There was no cross–immunity between the parasites, nor was the interaction a direct consequence of inter–specific competition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , August 1977 , pp. 79 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Befus, A. D. & Featherston, D. W. (1974). Delayed rejection of single Hymenolepis diminuta in primary infections of young mice. Parasitology 69, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bland, P. W. (1976). The immune response of the mouse to the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Bruce, R. G. & Wakelin, D. (1977). Immunological interactions between Trichinella spiralis and Trichuris muris in the intestine of the mouse. Parasitology 74, 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, G. A., Cotter, M. V., Ferguson, J. D. & Gordon, C. W. (1973). Trichinosis: physiologic factors possibly altering the course of infection. Journal of Parasitology 59, 268–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtney, C. H. & Forrester, D. J. (1973). Interspecific interactions between Hymenolepis microstoma (Cestoda) and Heligmosomides polygyrus (Nematoda) in mice. Journal of Parasitology 59, 480–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, H. W. (1952). The effects of concurrent infection with the dog hookworm, Ancylostoma caninum, on the natural and acquired resistance of mice to Trichinella spiralis. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 68, 222–35.Google Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. (1973). The sites occupied by some parasitic helminths in the alimentary tract of vertebrates. Biological Reviews 48, 27–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972). The development of Hymenolepis diminuta in primary and secondary infections in mice. Parasitology 64, 401–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsh, J. E. Jr. & Campbell, C. H. (1952). The effect on the natural resistance of mice to Hymenolepis nana var. fraterna of a simultaneous infection with Trichinella spiralis. Journal of Parasitology 38 (Suppl.), 20–1.Google Scholar
Larsh, J. E. Jr. & Donaldson, A. W. (1944). The effect of concurrent infection with Nippostrongylus on the development of Hymenolepis in mice. Journal of Parasitology 30, 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsh, J. E. Jr., Ottolenghi, A. & Weatherly, N. F. (1974). Trichinella spiralis: phospholipase in challenged mice and rats. Experimental Parasitology 36, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsh, J. E. Jr. & Race, G. J. (1975). Allergic inflammation as a hypothesis for the expulsion of worms from tissues: a review. Experimental Parasitology 37, 251–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louch, C. D. (1962). Increased resistance to Trichinella spiralis in the laboratory rat following infection with Nippostrongylus muris. Journal of Parasitology 48, 24–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, R. J., Ogilvie, B. M. & McLaren, D. J. (1976). The immune mechanism which expels the intestinal stage of Trichinella spiralis from rats. Immunology 30, 7–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Ogilvie, B. M. & Jones, V. E. (1973). Immunity in the parasitic relationship between helminths and hosts. In Progress in Allergy, Vol. 17 (ed. Kallos, P., Waksman, B. H. and de Weck, A.), pp. 93–144. Basel, München, Paris, London, New York, Sydney: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, B. M. & Love, R. J. (1974). Co-operation between antibodies and cells in immunity to a nematode parasite. Transplantation Reviews 19, 147–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Podesta, R. B. & Mettrick, D. F. (1974). Pathophysiology of cestode infections: effect of Hymenolepis diminuta on oxygen tensions, pH and gastrointestinal function. International Journal for Parasitology 4, 277–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. & Rothman, A. H. (1957). The role of carbohydrates in the biology of cestodes. IV. Some effects of host dietary carbohydrate on growth and reproduction of Hymenolepis. Experimental Parasitology 6, 294–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saowakontha, S. (1975). The effect of trichinosis on weight gain and food intake of rats fed low and high protein diet. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 6, 247–50.Google Scholar
Schad, G. A. (1966). Immunity, competition and natural regulation of helminth populations. The American Naturalist 100, 359–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1975). Immune expulsion of Trichuris muris from mice during a primary infection: analysis of the components involved. Parasitology 70, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. & Lloyd, M. (1976 a). Immunity to primary challenge infections of Trichinella spiralis in mice: a re-examination of conventional parameters. Parasitology 72, 173–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. & Lloyd, M. (1976b). Accelerated expulsion of adult Trichinella spiralis in mice given lymphoid cells and serum from infected donors. Parasitology 72, 307–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinmann, C. J. (1964). Host resistance to Hymenolepis nana. II. Specificity of resistance to reinfection in the direct life cycle. Experimental Parasitology 15, 514–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar