Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T21:29:17.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A sonar ring with continuous matched filtering and dynamically switched templates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2011

Damien C. Browne*
Affiliation:
Intelligent Robotics Research Centre, Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Australia
Lindsay Kleeman
Affiliation:
Intelligent Robotics Research Centre, Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: damien_browne@hotmail.com

Summary

Matched filtering optimally estimates the arrival time for a sonar sensor by correlating received signals with templates. This paper presents a sonar ring with continuous matched filtering on 48 receiver channels sampled at 500kHz. The design dynamically switches the matched filter templates to account for pulse shape variations with range. To achieve real-time, low-latency and optimal performance, processing is implemented on an field-programmable gate array (FPGA) transmitting sonar pulses (2 periods of a 45kHz sine wave) at repetition rate of 30-Hz to 5.7-m range. The paper describes the removal of secondary peaks of the correlation output of matched filtering and template selection. Results include sonar maps, accuracy measurements and localization of weak targets.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Browne, D. and Kleeman, L., “An Advanced Sonar Ring Design with 48 Channels of Continuous Echo Processing using Matched Filters,” In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009 (IROS 2009), St. Louis, MO, USA (Oct. 10–15, 2009) pp. 40404046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Browne, D., “Bearing Calculation of a Single Emitter Sonar Ring,” Technical Report 1 (Department of Electrical and Computer System Engineering, Monash University, Australia, June 2011).Google Scholar
3.Cristian, F., “Probabilistic clock synchronization,” Distrib. Comput. 3, 146158 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Diosi, A. and Kleeman, L., “Advanced Sonar and Laser Range Finder Fusion for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping,” In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2004, Sendai, Japan (Sep. 28–Oct. 2, 2004) pp. 18541859.Google Scholar
5.Fazli, S. and Kleeman, L., “A Low Sample Rate Real Time Advanced Sonar Ring,” Proceedings of Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation 2004 (2004).Google Scholar
6.Fazli, S. and Kleeman, L., “A Real Time Advanced Sonar Ring with Simultaneous Firing,” In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004 (IROS 2004) Sendai, Japan, vol. 2 (Sep. 28–Oct. 2, 2004), pp. 18721877.Google Scholar
7.Kleeman, L., Advanced Sonar and Odometry Error Modeling for Simultaneous Localisation and Map Building,” In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003, Las Vegas USA, vol. 1 (Oct. 2003) pp. 699704.Google Scholar
8.Kleeman, L. and Kuc, R., “Mobile robot sonar for target localization and classification,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 14, 295318 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kleeman, L. and Ohya, A., “The Design of a Transmitter with a Parabolic Conical Reflector for a Sonar Ring,” Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation 2006 (2006).Google Scholar
10.Longbottom, Roy, “Roy Longbottom's PC benchmark collection,” available at: http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/ (Jul. 2010).Google Scholar
11.Ming, A., Kajihara, K., Kajitani, M. and Shimojo, M., “Development of a Rapid Obstacle Sensing System using Sonar Ring for Mobile Robot,” In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002 (ICRA '02), Washington, DC, USA, vol. 3 (May 11–15, 2002) pp. 30683073.Google Scholar
12.MURATA, Estd01 Data Sheet (MURATA, Japan, 2006).Google Scholar
13.Reijniers, J. and Peremans, H., “Biomimetic sonar system performing spectrum-based localization,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 23 (6), 11511159 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Tungadi, F. and Kleeman, L., “Time Synchronisation and Calibration of Odometry and Range Sensors for High-Speed Mobile Robot Mapping,” Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008 (2008).Google Scholar
15.Tungadi, F. and Kleeman, L., “Loop Exploration for Slam with Fusion of Advanced Sonar Features and Laser Polar Scan Matching,” In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009 (IROS 2009) (Oct. 2009) pp. 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Walter, S., “The Sonar Ring: Obstacle Detection for a Mobile Robot,” In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1987, vol. 4 (1987), pp. 1574–1579.Google Scholar
17.Woodward, P. M., Probability and Information Theory with Applications to Radar (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).Google Scholar
18.Xie, Z., Li, Z., Sugiura, Y., Ming, A. and Shimojo, M., “Simultaneously Firing Sonar Ring Based High-Speed Navigation for Non-holonomic Mobile Robots in Unstructured Environments,” In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Mechatronics and Automation, 2004, Chengdu, China (Aug. 26–31, 2004) pp. 650655.Google Scholar
19.Yamauchi, B., “All-Weather Perception for Man-Portable Robots Using Ultra-Wideband Radar,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2010), Anchorage, Alaska, USA (May 3–8, 2010).Google Scholar