Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T06:39:03.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INCIDENTAL LEARNING OF COLLOCATIONS FROM MEANINGFUL INPUT

A LONGITUDINAL STUDY INTO THREE READING MODES AND FACTORS THAT AFFECT LEARNING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2021

Duy Van Vu Open the ORCID record for Duy Van Vu [Opens in a new window]  and
Elke Peters Open the ORCID record for Elke Peters [Opens in a new window]
Duy Van Vu*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven; Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Elke Peters
Affiliation:
KU Leuven
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Duy Van Vu, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: vuvan.duy@kuleuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This longitudinal study investigates the effect of mode of reading on the incidental learning of collocations and factors that affect learning. One hundred Vietnamese pre-intermediate learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) were assigned to either an experimental group or a control group (no treatment). In 9 weeks, the experimental group read three graded readers containing 32 target collocations in three counterbalanced reading modes: reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual input enhancement (i.e., underlining). Learning gains were measured by a form recall pretest and delayed posttest. The results showed that reading mode had a significant effect on incidental collocation learning. Reading with textual input enhancement resulted in significantly higher learning gains than the other reading modes. Reading-while-listening was also more beneficial for collocation learning than reading-only. Learners’ prior vocabulary knowledge and congruency of collocations were significant predictors of the learning gains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 685 - 707
Check for updates
Open Practices
Open materials
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Handling Editor Andrea Révész and anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback that helped improve our manuscript significantly. We also thank Lizz Huntley for her great support during our manuscript submissions. We are thankful to Eva Puimège (KU Leuven) for her feedback on our earlier draft of this manuscript. Thanks also go to Dr. Vu Thi Thanh Nha (Dean), Ms. Hoang Thi Phuong Loan, and students of the Faculty of English, University of Languages and International Studies—Vietnam National University Hanoi for their help during the data collection. This study was supported by the KU Leuven’s Global Minds Doctoral Scholarships provided by VLIR-UOS and the Belgian Development Cooperation.

The experiment in this article earned an Open Materials badge for transparent practices. The materials are available at https://www.iris-database.org/iris/app/home/detail?id=york:939399

References

REFERENCES

Bartoń, K. (2020). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference (version 1.43.17). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, S. A., & Williams, J. N. (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2014). Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2014). Some explanations for the slow acquisition of L2 collocations. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 41–62.Google Scholar
Breslow, N. E., & Clayton, D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 9–25.Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2011). What aspects of vocabulary knowledge do textbooks give attention to? Language Teaching Research, 15, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2002). Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. (2017). Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T. (n.d.). Web VP Classic v.4 [Computer Program]. https://www.lextutor.ca/vp/eng/ Google Scholar
Conklin, K., Alotaibi, S., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. (2020). What eye-tracking tells us about reading-only and reading-while-listening in a first and second language. Second Language Research, 36, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2014). Assessing lexical proficiency using analytic ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 36, 570–590.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English. http://www.english-corpora.org/coca/ Google Scholar
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20, 29–62.Google Scholar
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41, 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, F. (2020). DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models (version 0.3.3.0). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied predictive modeling. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning , 61, 647–672.Google Scholar
Lee, S. K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R. (2018). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means (version 1.3.0). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, P. M. (2012). Sound evidence: The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics, 33, 342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, N., & Nation, I. S. P. (1985). Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal, 16, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F. (2012). Formulaic language and language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T. M. H., & Webb, S. (2017). Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21, 298–320.Google Scholar
Northbrook, J., & Conklin, K. (2019). Is what you put in what you get out? Textbook-derived lexical bundle processing in beginner English learners. Applied Linguistics, 40, 816–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21, 381–402.Google Scholar
Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20, 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019). Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: an exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. The Language Learning Journal, 47, 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2020). Learning formulaic sequences through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 525–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.0.1) [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Rodgers, M. P., & Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning through viewing television. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 171, 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Springer.Google Scholar
Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y. (2021). Time distribution and intentional vocabulary learning through repeated reading: A partial replication and extension. Language Awareness, 1–19. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1894162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N. (2008). L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommet, N., & Morselli, D. (2017). Keep calm and learn multilevel logistic modeling: A simplified three-step procedure using Stata, R, Mplus, and SPSS. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63, 121–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szudarski, P. (2012). Effects of meaning-and form-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb-noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research, 1, 3–37.Google Scholar
Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26, 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomer, M., & Elgort, I. (2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69, 405–439.Google Scholar
Uchihara, T., Webb, S., & Yanagisawa, A. (2019). The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Language Learning, 69, 559–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61, 219–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilkaitė, L. (2017). Incidental acquisition of collocations in L2: Effects of adjacency and prior vocabulary knowledge. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 248–277.Google Scholar
Vu, D. V., & Michel, M. (2021). An exploratory study on the aspects of vocabulary knowledge addressed in EAP textbooks. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vu, D. V., & Peters, E. (in press). The role of formulaic sequences in L2 speaking. In Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Thomson, R. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking. Routledge.Google Scholar
Vu, D. V., & Peters, E. (2020). Learning vocabulary from reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual input enhancement: Insights from Vietnamese EFL learners. RELC Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220911485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 225–239). Routledge.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S. (2012). Vocabulary learning through assisted and unassisted repeated reading. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S. (2015a). How does prior word knowledge affect vocabulary learning progress in an extensive reading program? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 651–675.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S. (2015b). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading with audio support: How do frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research, 19, 667–686.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S. (2020). How does mode of input affect the incidental learning of collocations? Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. C. S. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 33–69.Google Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32, 430–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar