Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T06:15:33.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrothermal synthesis and sintering of ultrafine CeO2 powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Y.C. Zhou
Affiliation:
Institute of Metals Research, Academia Sinica, 72 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110015, People's Republic of China
M.N. Rahaman
Affiliation:
Ceramic Engineering Department, University of Missouri—Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401-0249
Get access

Abstract

Undoped CeO2 and Y2O3-doped CeO2 powders, with particle sizes of ≍10–15 nm, were prepared under hydrothermal conditions of 10 MPa at 300 °C for 4 h. The compacted powders were sintered freely in air or in O2 at constant heating rates of 1–10 °C/min up to 1350 °C. The undoped CeO2 started to sinter at ≍800–900 °C and reached a maximum density of 0.95 of the theoretical at 1200 °C, after which the density decreased slightly. Isothermal sintering at 1150 °C produced a sample with a relative density of ≍0.98 and an average grain size of ≍100 nm. The samples sintered above 1200 °C exhibited microcracking. The decrease in density and the microcracking above 1200 °C are attributed to a redox reaction leading to the formation of oxygen vacancies and the evolution of O2 gas. Doping with Y2O3 produced an increase in the temperature at which measurable sintering commenced and an increase in the sintering rate, compared with the undoped CeO2. Sintered samples of the doped CeO2 showed no microcracks. The CeO2 doped with up to 3 mol% Y2O3 was sintered to almost full density and with a grain size of ≍200 nm at 1400 °C.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Siegel, R. W.Ramasamy, S.Hahn, H.Zongquan, L.Ting, L. and Gronsky, R.J. Mater. Res. 3, 1367 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Hahn, H.Logas, J. and Averback, R.S.J. Mater. Res. 5, 609 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Wagner, W.Averback, R. S.Hahn, H.Petry, W. and Wieden-mann, A., J. Mater. Res. 6, 2193 (1991).Google Scholar
4Hahn, H. and Averback, R.S.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2918 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Mayo, M.J.Siegel, R. W.Narayanasamy, A. and Nix, W. D.J. Mater. Res. 5, 1073 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Nieman, G. W.Weertman, J. R. and Siegel, R. W.J. Mater. Res. 6, 1012 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Skandan, G.Hahn, H. and Parker, J. C.Script a Metall. 25, 2389 (1991).Google Scholar
8Birringer, R.Gleiter, H.Klein, H-P. and Marquardt, P.Phys. Lett. 102A, 365 (1984).Google Scholar
9Hahn, H. and Averback, R.S.J. Appl. Phys. 67, 1113 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Somiya, S.Yoshimura, M.Nakai, Z.Hishinuma, K. and Kumaki, T.Adv. Ceram. 21, 43 (1987).Google Scholar
11Komarneni, S.Fregeau, E.Breval, E. and Roy, R.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, C26 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Dawson, W.J.Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 67, 1673 (1988).Google Scholar
13Blumental, R. N.Brugner, F. S. and Garner, J.E.J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 1230 (1973).Google Scholar
14Wu, S.J. and Brook, R.J.Solid State Ionics 12, 123 (1984).Google Scholar
15Powell, B.R.Bloink, R.L. and Eickel, C. C.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, C104 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Fan, C.L. and Rahaman, M. N. unpublished work.Google Scholar
17Herring, C.J. Appl. Phys. 21, 301 (1950).Google Scholar
18Coble, R. L.J. Appl. Phys. 32, 787 (1961).Google Scholar
19Meriani, S.Mater. Sci. Eng. A109, 121 (1989).Google Scholar
20Rahaman, M.N. and Hu, C-L. in Synthesis and Processing of Ceramics: Scientific Issues, edited by Rhine, W. E.Shaw, T. M.Gottschall, R. J. and Chen, Y. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 249, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), p. 427.Google Scholar
21Rahaman, M.N. and Hu, C-L. to be published in Materials & Manufacturing Processes 8 (1993).Google Scholar
22Shannon, R.D.Act a Crystallogr. A3232, 751 (1976).Google Scholar