Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T06:51:35.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new Eocene Dicranomyia Stephens, 1829 (Diptera: Limoniidae) from Baltic amber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2018

Wiesław Krzemiński
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, Pedagogical University of Kraków, Podbrzezie 3, 31-054 Kraków, Poland. Email: krzeminski@muzeum.pan.krakow.pl
Iwona Kania*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Rzeszów, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland. Email: ikania@univ.rzeszow.pl
Maciej Wojtoń
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Rzeszów, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland. Email: ikania@univ.rzeszow.pl
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

A new species of the genus Dicranomyia Stephens, 1829 (Diptera: Limoniidae) from Baltic amber is characterised, illustrated and described. This finding represents the second fossil of the subgenus Melanolimonia. The morphological features of the new species and the morphology comparison with its closest fossil relatives are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. References

Alexander, C. P. 1931. Crane flies of the Baltic Amber (Diptera). Bernstein-Forschungen 2, 1135.Google Scholar
Alexander, C. P. 1964. New or little-known Tipulidae from Eastern Asia (Diptera). Philippine Journal of Science 93, 423–78.Google Scholar
Alexander, C. P. 1965. New or little-known Tipulidae from Eastern Asia (Diptera). Philippine Journal of Science 93, 427–78.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1908. Descriptions of Tertiary insects. Part II. American Journal of Science 25(4), 227–32.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1922. New name for a fossil tipulid fly. Entomologist 55, 17.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. & Haines, F. H. 1921. Fossil Tipulidae from the Oligocene of the Isle of Wight (part). Entomologist, 54, 8184.Google Scholar
Evenhuis, N. L. 2015. Catalog of the fossil flies of the world (Insecta: Diptera) website. Version. 2.0. Last update 29 May 2015 Available at: http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/fossilcat/Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1787. Mantissa insectorum sistens species nuper detectas adiectis characteribus, genericis, differentiis, specificis, emendationibus, observationibus. Hafniae [= Copenhagen] 2, 1–382.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A. & Ross, A. J. 2017. Extraordinary Lagerstätten in Amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of Burma. In Fraser, N. C. & Sues, H.-D. (eds) Terrestrial Conservation Lagerstätten: Windows into the Evolution of Life on Land, 287342 Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press Ltd. 450 pp.Google Scholar
Henriksen, K. L. 1922. Eocene insects from Denmark. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse København 37(2), 136.Google Scholar
Kania, I. 2014. Subfamily Limoniinae Speiser, 1909 (Diptera, Limoniidae) from Baltic amber (Eocene). The genus Dicranomyia Stephens, 1829. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 170, 748–78.Google Scholar
Kania, I., Krzemiński, W. & Penar, A. 2013. A new species of Dicranomyia (Dicranomyia) Stephens, 1829 from Baltic amber (Diptera: Limoniidae). Annales Zoologici 63(1), 143–48.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W. 1993. Fossil Tipulomorpha (Diptera, Nematocera) from Baltic amber (Upper Eocene) – Revision of the genus Helius Lepeletier et Serville (Limoniidae). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 35, 597601.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W. 2000a. The Oligocene Tipulomorpha (Diptera) from Bolshaya Svetlovodnaya (Eastern Asia, Russia). Polish Journal of Entomology 69, 239–45.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W. 2000b. A new species and other representatives of the genus Dicranomyia (Diptera: Limoniidae) in the collection of the Museum of Amber Inclusions, University of Gdańsk. Polish Journal of Entomology 69, 347–53.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W. 2001. New fossil Tipuloidea (Diptera) from the Fur Formation of Denmark in the collection of the Natural History Museum in London. Polish Journal of Entomology 70, 333–39.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W., Kania, I. & Durak, R. 2015. A new species of Dicranomyia Stephens, 1829 (Diptera: Limoniidae) from Baltic amber (Eocene). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 277/2, 167–74.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W. & Gentlini, G. 1992. New information on Limoniidae from Monte Castellaro, Italy (Upper Miocene). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 35, 8795.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema nature per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum caracteribus, differentiis, synonymi, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Holmiae [= Stockholm]: L. Salvii. 824 pp.Google Scholar
Meunier, F. 1899. Révision des Diptères fossiles types de Loew conserves au Musée provincial de Koenigsberg. Entomology Miscellaneous 7, 161–65, 169–82.Google Scholar
Meunier, F. 1906. Monographie des Tipulidae et Dixidae de l'ambre de la Baltique. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie 4(9), 349401.Google Scholar
Meunier, F. 1916. Beitrag zur Monographie des Tipuliden des Bernsteins. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 68, 477–93.Google Scholar
Oosterbroek, P. 2016. Catalogue of the Craneflies of the World. (Diptera, Tipuloidea: Pediciidae, Limoniidae, Cylindrotomidae, Tipulidae). http://nlbif.eti.uva.nl/ccw/index.php. Last updated 28 December 2012. Accessed 11 January 2013.Google Scholar
Perkovsky, E. E., Rasnitsyn, A. P., Vlaskin, A. P. & Taraschuk, M. V. 2007. A comparative analysis of the Baltic and Rovno amber arthropod faunas: representative samples. African Invertebrates 48, 229–45.Google Scholar
Podenas, S. & Poinar, G. O. 1999. New crane flies (Diptera: Limoniidae) from Dominican amber. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 101(3), 595610.Google Scholar
Podenas, S., Poinar, G. O. 2012. New short-palped crane flies (Diptera: Limoniidae) from Mexican amber. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 114, 347–71.Google Scholar
Ritzkowski, S. 1997. K-Ar-Altersbestimmung der Bernsteinführenden Sedimente des Sammlandes (Paläogen, Bezirk Kaliningrad). Metalla (Sonderheft) 66, 1923.Google Scholar
Savchenko, E. N. 1967. New fossil limoniid fly (Diptera, Limoniidae) from the Baltic amber. Dopovidi Akademii Nauk URSR(B) 5, 469–73.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1877. The first discovered traces of fossil insects in the American tertiaries. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 3, 741–42.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1894. Tertiary Tipulidae, with special reference to those of Florissant, Colorado. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 32, 163245.Google Scholar
Speiser, P. 1909. 4 Orthoptera. Orthoptera Nematocera. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Zoologische Expededition nach Kilimandjaro. Meru 10 (Diptera), 3165.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1829. The nomenclature of British insects; being a compendious list of such species as are contained in the Systematic Catalogue of British Insects, and forming a guide to their classification, &c. &c. London: Baldwin & Cradock. ii + 68 pp.Google Scholar
Théobald, N. 1937. Les insectes fossils des terrains Oligocènes de France. Nancy: Imprimerie G. Thomas. 473 pp.Google Scholar
Wappler, T. 2003. Die Insekten aus dem Mittel-Eozän des Eckfelder Maares, Vulkaneifel. Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv 27. viii + 234 pp.Google Scholar
Wappler, T. 2005. The age of Baltic amber: could Eckfeld resolve this problem? Fossils X3, Insects – Arthropods – Amber. Programme and Abstracts, 3rd International Congress of Palaeoentomology with 2nd International Meeting on Palaeoarthropodology and 2nd World Congress on Amber and its Inclusions, 7th to 11th February 2005, Pretoria, South Africa, 53.Google Scholar
Weitschat, W. & Wichard, W. 2010. Baltic amber. In Penney, D. (ed.) Biodiversity of fossils in amber from major world deposits, 80115. Manchester: Siri Scientific Press. 304 pp.Google Scholar