Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T22:58:13.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Accessing public, media, electoral, and governmental agendas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John D. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America
Mayer N. Zald
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Doug McAdam
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
John D. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America, Washington DC
Mayer N. Zald
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Social movements are involved in struggles over meaning as they attempt to influence public policy. An essential task in these struggles is to frame social problems and injustices in a way that convinces a wide and diverse audience of the necessity for and utility of collective attempts to redress them. Movement frames typically embody two essential components: the diagnostic element, or the definition of the problem and its source; and the prognostic element, the identification of an appropriate strategy for redressing the problem (Snow and Benford 1988). Movements usually lack the political and/or material resources necessary for routine access to political decision-makers and therefore must rely primarily on “outsider” strategies to draw the attention of publics and policymakers to the problems they wish to have resolved. Lipsky (1968) identified a fundamental logic of movement strategy as a conscious attempt to draw third parties into the conflict in order to raise the stakes in the conflict and bring favorable pressure to bear on the policy process. While movements' ultimate targets are typically policymakers, movements must mobilize people and resources within the wider society in order to influence this authoritative elite. These third parties include both the mass public and the reference elites, the people with whom the authoritative elite interacts and consults. A major tool in this process is the mass media, which can reach a much larger audience than social movement actors can reach directly.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements
Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings
, pp. 291 - 311
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×