Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I The Crato Formation Konservat Lagerstätte
- Part II The invertebrate fauna
- 7 Taphonomy and preservation of Crato Formation arthropods
- 8 Chilopoda: centipedes
- 9 Arachnida: spiders, scorpions and allies
- 10 Crustacea of the Crato Formation
- 11 Insects of the Crato Formation
- Part III The vertebrate fauna
- Part IV The flora
- Part V Miscellanea
- Appendix: species list for the Crato Formation
- Systematic index
- Plate section
- References
11 - Insects of the Crato Formation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 August 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I The Crato Formation Konservat Lagerstätte
- Part II The invertebrate fauna
- 7 Taphonomy and preservation of Crato Formation arthropods
- 8 Chilopoda: centipedes
- 9 Arachnida: spiders, scorpions and allies
- 10 Crustacea of the Crato Formation
- 11 Insects of the Crato Formation
- Part III The vertebrate fauna
- Part IV The flora
- Part V Miscellanea
- Appendix: species list for the Crato Formation
- Systematic index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
Introduction
Günter Bechly
Insects are by far the most diverse group of multicellular organisms on our planet. Of about 1,625,000 described species of prokaryotes, protoctists, fungi, plants and animals, more than 1 million is represented by arthropods, of which insects constitute the largest group with about 854,000 described species. The estimations of the number of still undescribed species, especially in the vanishing tropical rainforests, are ranging from 2 million to 80 million species! The most species-rich groups within insects are the holometabolous orders Coleoptera (beetles), Hymenoptera (ants, wasps and bees), Diptera (mosquitoes and flies) and Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies). Among the hemimetabolous orders, which lack a pupal stage in their ontogenetic development, the Hemiptera (aphids, scale insects, cicadas and bugs) are the largest group, while all other insect orders have much fewer species.
Even though relatively small animals, the extremely large number of individuals makes insects a very significant part of the total terrestrial biomass in many biotopes. For example, in tropical rainforests, the ants and termites have a higher total biomass than all the vertebrates combined.
Insects are not only diverse in terms of species number and number of individuals, but also in their astonishing anatomical and ecological variability. Insects populate nearly every available habitat on the planet, except for the open seas and the frozen polar regions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Crato Fossil Beds of BrazilWindow into an Ancient World, pp. 142 - 426Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
1967. Ueber die Anatomie des Kopfes von Raphidia flavipes Stein und die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Raphidiidae zu den Megaloptera. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere 84: 249–312.Google Scholar
and 1988. Spermatozoa of Megaloptera and Raphidioptera (Insecta, Neuropteroidea). Journal of Ultrastructural and Molecular Structure Research 101: 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. An exploratory analysis of cladistic relationships within the superfamily Apoidea, with special reference to sphecid wasps (Hymenoptera). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 1: 25–61.Google Scholar
Alexeev, A.V. 1994. Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous Buprestidae (Coleoptera) from Eurasia. Paleontological Journal27(I A): 9–34.
—1996. New taxa of metallic wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera, Buprestidae) from the Mesozoic of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia. Paleontological Journal 30: 310–117.
2000. On Mesozoic Buprestids (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) from Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia. Paleontological Journal 34 (suppl. 3): 323–326.Google Scholar
1998. Water striders from the Paleogene of Denmark with a review of the fossil record and evolution of semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera: Gerromorpha). Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter 50: 1–152.Google Scholar
and 2004. Australian water bugs. Their biology and identification (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Gerromoropha and Nepomorpha). Entomonograph 14: 1–344.Google Scholar
2001. Silky lacewings (Neuroptera: Psychopsidae) from the Eocene–Palaeocene transition of Denmark with a review of the fossil record and comments on phylogeny and zoogeography. Insect Systematics and Evolution 32: 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. New Oxycoryninae from Central and South America: phylogenetic and biogeographical implications (Coleoptera: Belidae). Systematic Entomology 30: 644–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. Redescription of Prohirmoneura jurassica Handlirsch 1906 (Diptera: Nemestrinidae) from the Lower Tithonian lithographic limestone of Eichstätt (Bavaria). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 2000: 235–243.Google Scholar
Anufriev, G. A. and Emeljanov, A. F. 1988. Tsikadovye (Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadinea). [Suborder Cicadinea (Auchenorrhyncha)], pp. 12–495. In Lehr, A. P. (ed), Oprelelitel' nasekomykh Dal'nego Vostoka SSSR. St Petersburg: Nauka.
, , and 1992. Mesozoic Coleoptera. Washington D C: Smithsonian Institution Libraries and The National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
1988. Preliminary thoughts on the phylogeny of Fulgoromorpha (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). Proceedings of the 6th Auchenorrhyncha Meeting, Turin, Italy, 7–11 September 1987, pp. 47–53.Google Scholar
and 2004. Two significant new snakeflies from Baltic amber, with discussion on autapomorphies of the order and its included taxa (Raphidioptera). Systematic Entomology 29: 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. New Cretaceous psychodid flies from Lebanese amber and Santana Formation (Chapada do Araripe, Brazil) (Diptera). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France (n.s.) 38: 253–262.Google Scholar
1980. Sur les Gerris des miroirs d'eau actuels et les Chresmoda des lagunes post-récifales portlandiennes de Solnhofen. Annales des Sciences Naturelles / Zoologie 2: 111–116.Google Scholar
1996. Review: SANTANA 1.0 (1996): CD-ROM by digital-fossil. Petalura2: http://www.bernstein.naturkundemuseum-bw.de/odonata/pet2p03.htm.
1997a. Die Libellen (und einige andere fossile Insekten) aus der Unterkreide von Brasilien (Santana). 4. Fachgespräch “Fossile Insekten”, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, 28–29 June 1997, Abstracts.Google Scholar
1998c. New fossil dragonflies from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of north-east Brazil (Insecta: Odonata). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 264: 1–66.Google Scholar
1998d. [Santana – Eldorado of Mesozoic fossils]. Catalogue of the Taipei Natural History Show 1998: 148–156.Google Scholar
1999a Phylogeny and Systematics of Fossil Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonatoptera) with Special Reference to some Mesozoic Outcrops. Published PhD thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
2000. Two new fossil dragonfly species (Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera: Araripegomphidae and Lindeniidae) from the Crato Limestone (Lower Cretaceous, Brazil). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 296: 1–16.Google Scholar
2002. Phylogenetic systematics of Odonata. In and (eds), Fundamentals of Odonatological Research. ODOLITonCD 1.0 (ISSN 1438–034x). www.dragonflyresearch.de/.
2003. The phylogenetic relationships of the three extant suborders of Odonata. Entomologische Abhandlungen 61: 127–128.Google Scholar
2005. A re-description of “Stenophlebia” casta (Insecta: Odonata: Parastenophlebiidae n. fam.) from the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Limestone in Germany. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 359: 1–12.Google Scholar
and 2002. The first fossil record and first New World record for the dragonfly clade Chlorogomphida (Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera: Araripechlorogomphidae n. fam.) from the Crato Limestone (Lower Cretaceous, Brazil). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 328: 1–11.Google Scholar
, and 1998. Four new dragonfly species from the Upper Jurassic of Germany and the Lower Cretaceous of Mongolia (Anisoptera: Hemeroscopidae, Sonidae, and Proterogomphidae fam. nov.). Odonatologica 27: 149–187.Google Scholar
,, , and 2001a. Ur-Geziefer – Die faszinierende Evolution der Insekten. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie C 49: 1–96.Google Scholar
,, and 2001b. New results concerning the morphology of the most ancient dragonflies (Insecta: Odonatoptera) from the Namurian of Hagen-Vorhalle (Germany). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 39: 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,et al. 2001c. A revision and phylogenetic study of Mesozoic Aeshnoptera, with description of several new families, genera and species (Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera). Neue paläontologische Abhandlungen 4: 1–219.Google Scholar
, and 2003. A new species of Stenophlebia (Insecta: Odonata: Stenophlebiidae) from the Nusplingen Lithographic Limestone (Upper Jurassic, SW Germany). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 338: 1–10.Google Scholar
Becker-Migdisova, E. E. 1946. Ocherki po sravnitel'noï morfologii sovremennykh i permskikh Homoptera. Chast' I. Izviestia AN SSSR, Biology Series6: 741–766.
1947. Cicadoprosbole sogutensis gen. et sp. nov. – perekhodnaya forma mezhdu permskimi Prosbolidae i sovremennymi Cicadidae. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 5: 445–448.Google Scholar
1949. Mezozoïskie Homoptera Sredneï Azii. Trudy Palaeontologicheskogo Instituta Nauk 22: 1–68.Google Scholar
1962a. Nekotorye novye poluzhestokrylye i senoedy. Palontologicheskiï Zhurnal 1: 89–104.Google Scholar
Becker-Migdisova, E. E. 1962b. Otryad Homoptera. Ravnokrylye, pp. 162–208. In (ed.), Osnovy paleontologii. Chlenistonogie trakheinye i khelitserovye. Moscow: Academy of Sciences USSR.Google Scholar
and 1963. Some representatives of Heteroptera from the Jurassic of Karatau. Palaeontological Journal of the Academy of Science USSR 2: 74–82.Google Scholar
1978. The biology and ecology of the Phasmatodea. Annual Review of Entomology 23: 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1968. Mantodea (Fangheuschrecken). Handbuch der Zoologie, vol. IV, Band Arthropoda, 2 Hälfte: Insecta. Zweite Auflage: 1–47.Google Scholar
Belayeva, N. V. 2002. Order Termitida, pp. 270–273. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. A primitive sapygid wasp in Burmese amber (Hymenoptera: Sapygidae). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 48B(1–2): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. Venation pattern and revision of Orthoptera sensu nov. and sister groups. Phylogeny of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Orthoptera sensu nov. Zootaxa 96: 1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2002. Raphogla rubra gen. n., sp. n., the oldest representative of the clade of modern Ensifera (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidea, Gryllidea). European Journal of Entomology 99: 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beutel, R. G. 1995. The Adephaga (Coleoptera): phylogeny and evolutionary history, pp. 173–217. In and (eds), Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera, vol. 1. Warsau: Muzeum I Instytut Zoologii PAN.Google Scholar
1927. Biologie der Hymenopteren, Eine Naturgeschichte der Hautflügler. Biologische Studienbücher.Berlin: J. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. The phylogenetic interrelationships of the higher taxa of apterygote insects. Zoologica Scripta 29: 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2007. How time flies for flies: diverse Diptera from the Triassic of Virginia and early radiation of the order. American Museum Novitates (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1953. Die Insektenfauna der Ostniedersächsischen oberen Lias. Palaeoentomographica A 103: 1–406.Google Scholar
and 1976. Sphecid wasps of the world. A generic revision. Los Angeles: University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bohn, H. 2003a. Ordnung Blattoptera, Schaben, pp. 197–223. In (ed), Lehrbuch der Speziellen Zoologie, Band 1, Teil 5 (Insecta). Heidelberg: Spektrum.Google Scholar
Bohn, H. 2003b. Ordnung Isoptera, Termiten, pp. 223–250. In (ed.), Lehrbuch der Speziellen Zoologie, Band 1, Teil 5 (Insecta). Heidelberg: Spektrum.Google Scholar
, , and 2004. Advanced early Jurassic termite (Insecta: Isoptera) nests: evidence from the Clarens Formation in the Tuli Basin, southern Africa. Palaios 19: 68–78.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1909. Neue Homologien zwischen Crustaceen und Hexapoden. Die Beißmandibel der Insekten und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Archi- und Metapterygota. Zoologischer Anzeiger 34: 100–125.Google Scholar
, and 1996. Life cycle of Forficula senegalensis Serv. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) and its relationship to the development of bulrush millet in Sundanese-Sahelian zone of Niger. Canadian Entomologist 128: 831–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1990. Sur deux cigales fossiles des terrains tertiaires de la France [Homoptera, Cicadoidea]. Revue Française d'Entomologie (n.s.) 12: 37–45.Google Scholar
Bourgoin, Th. 1993. Cladistic analysis of the Meenopliidae–Kinnaridae genera: the Kinnaridae, a paraphyletic family (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha). In, , and (eds), Proceedings of the 8th Auchenorrhyncha Congress, Delphi, Greece, 9–13 August 1993: 22–24.
Bourgoin, Th. and Campbell, B. C. 2002. Inferring a phylogeny for Hemiptera: falling into the ‘autapomorphic trap’, pp. 67–82. In (ed.), Zikaden – Leafhoppers, Planthoppers and Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Denisia 04, Zugleich Kataloge, Neue Folge Nr. 176, Linz: OÖ. Landesmuseums.Google Scholar
and 1997. Molecular phylogeny of Fulgoromorpha (Insecta, Hemiptera, Archaeorrhyncha). The enigmatic Tettigometridae: evolutionary affiliations and historical biogeography. Cladistics 17: 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1955. Notes on the synonymy, distribution and affinities of the subfamily Fedtschenkiinae of the Sapygidae (Hymenoptera). Entomological News 66: 230–233.Google Scholar
, and 1989. The earliest known fossil ant (First Southern Hemisphere mesozoic record) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmeciinae). Psyche 96: 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. Nota preliminar sobre os insetos da Formação Santana, Cretáceo inferior da Chapada do Araripe. XXXIII Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Rio de Janeiro: 530–535.Google Scholar
1987. Nota preliminar sobre uma nova efêmera do Cretáceo do Ceará (Insecta Ephemeroptera). Anais do X Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia 2: 593–597.Google Scholar
Brogniart, C. 1893. Recherches pour servir à l'Histoire des Insectes Fossiles des Temps Primaires, Précédées d'une Étude sur la Nervation des Ailes des Insects. Thèse préséntée à la Faculté des Sciences de Paris, no. 821; Paris.
1975. Phylogeny and classification of the aculeate Hymenoptera, with special reference to Mutillidae. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 50: 483–648.Google Scholar
and 1991. New records of South American Peloridiidae (Homoptera: Coleorrhyncha). Revista Chilena Entomologia 19: 71–75.Google Scholar
and 2002. An anomalous moss-bug from Southern Chile and notes on Pantinia darwini (Hemiptera, Coleorryncha, Peloridiidae). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft / Bulletin de la Société entomologique Suisse 75: 57–59.Google Scholar
1982. The wing vein homologies and phylogeny of the Odonata: a continuing debate. S.I.O. Rapid Communications 4: 1–66.Google Scholar
1995. Evolution, taxonomy, and biogeography of ancient Gondwanian Libelluloids, with comments on anisopterid evolution and phylogenetic systematics (Anisoptera: Libelluloidea). Odonatologica 24: 383–424.Google Scholar
and Wighton, D. C. 1990. Odonata, pp. 51–68. In (ed.), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 195.
1933. The Lower Permian Insects of Kansas. Part 6. Proceedings of the American Acadamy of Arts and Sciences 68: 411–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. The Lower Permian insects from Oklahoma. Part 2. Orders Ephemeroptera and Palaeodictyoptera. Psyche 86: 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1992. Superclass Hexapoda. In (ed), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, R, Arthropoda 4, 3/4. Boulder and Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas.Google Scholar
1982. The phylogenetic relationships and natural classification of the Vespoidea (Hymenoptera). Systematic Entomology 7: 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the Vespinae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Systematic Entomology 12: 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, M., Gross, G. F. and Woodward, T. E. 1992. Hemiptera, pp. 429–509. In (ed), The Insects of Australia. Melbourne: CSIRO and Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
and 2004. A fossil tiger beetle specimen from the Brazilian Mesozoic: Oxycheilopsis cretacicus n. gen., n. sp. Mitteilungen der Münchener entomologischen Gesellschaft 94: 75–81.Google Scholar
, , and 2002. Salt and water balance in Hexagenia limbata (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae) when exposed to brackish water. Florida Entomologist 85: 650–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1973. A new family of Coleoptera from the Lower Cretaceous of Kansu. Acta Entomologica Sinica 16: 169–179.Google Scholar
and 1996. Dinosaurs, dung beetles, and conifers: participants in a Cretaceous food web. Palaios 11: 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1917. Insects in Burmese amber. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 10: 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2003. Setting the molecular phylogenetic framework for the Dermaptera. Insect Systematics and Evolution 34: 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1991. Ants disperse the elaiosome-bearing eggs of an African stick insect. Psyche 98: 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1938. The interrelationships and lines of descent of living insects. Psyche45: 165–181.
2005. Molecular phylogeny of Cicadomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadoidea, Cercopoidea and Membracoidea): adding evidence to the controversy. Systematic Entomology 30: 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, D. C. and Grimaldi, D. 2000. A new blackfly (Diptera: Simuliidae) genus from mid-Cretaceous (Turonian) amber of New Jersey, pp. 473–485. In (ed), Studies on Fossils in Amber, with Particular Reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
1950. Ninfa de Efemerídeo fossil do Ceará. Anais Academia, Brasileira, Ciências 22: 419–420.Google Scholar
Darling, D. C. and Sharkey, M. J. 1990. Order Hymenoptera, pp. 123–153. In (ed.), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 195.
, and 1981. The most primitive Scoliidae (Hymenoptera). Journal of Natural History 15: 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitz, L. L. and Dietrich, C. H. 1993. Superfamily Membracoidea (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha). I. Introduction and revised classification with new family-group taxa. Systematic Entomology18: 287–296.
1955. Sur une larve siphlonuridienne d'Ephémère fossile du Brésil. Bulletin et Annales de la Société Royale d' Entomologie de Belgique 91: 270–271.Google Scholar
1971. Contribution a l'etude morphologique, systematique et phylogenique des Ephemeropteres Jurassiques (1). VI. L'aile postérieure des Hexagenites Scudder et les rapports Hexagenitidae-Chromarcyidae-Oligoneuriidae. Bulletin47(29): 1–10.Google Scholar
Desutter-Grandcolas, L. 2003. Phlogeny and the evolution of acoustic communication in extant Ensifera (Insecta, Orthoptera). Zoologica Scripta32: 252–261.
Dietrich, C. H. 1999. The role of grasslands in the diversification of leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae): a phylogenetic perspective, pp. 44–48. In Warwick, C. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth North American Prairie Conference. Bend, OR: Natural Areas Association.
— 2002. Evolution of Cicadomorpha (Insecta, Hemiptera), pp. 155–170. In (ed.), Zikaden – Leafhoppers, Planthoppers and Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha), Denisia, 4, Neue Folge Nr. 176, zugleich Kataloge des OÖ. Linz: Landesmuseums.Google Scholar
2005. Keys to the families of Cicadomorpha and subfamilies and tribes of Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Florida Entomologist 88: 502–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. Some remarkable new deltocephaline leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) from the Amazonian rainforest canopy. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 110: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKamey, S. H. and Dietz, L. L. 2001. Morphology-based phylogeny of the treehopper family Membracidae (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Membracoidea). Systematic Entomology26: 213–239.
Deitz, L. L. and Dietrich, C. H. 1993. Superfamily Membracoidea (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha). I. Introduction and revised classification with new family-group taxa. Systematic Entomology18: 287–296.
1883. Contribution to a proposed monograph of the homopterous family Cicadidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1883: 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. Trois nouveaux Elateridae fossiles du Mésozoïque supérieur de Chine (Coleoptera). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 107: 341–346.Google Scholar
1864. Sur un terrain jurassique a poissons et Insectes d'eau douce de la Siberie orietale. Bulletin de Societe Geologique de France 21: 19–25.Google Scholar
Emeljanov, A. F. 1991. K voprosu ob obeme i podrazdeleniyakh sem. Achlidae (Homoptera, Cicadina). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 70: 373–393. [Published in English as: 1992. Toward the problem of the limits and subdivisions of Achilidae (Homoptera, Cicadina). Entomological Review 71: 53–73].Google Scholar
1992. Opisanie trib podsem. Achilinae (Homoptera, Achilidae) i utochnenie ikh sostava. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 71: 574–594. [Published in English as: 1993. Description of tribes of the subfamily Achilinae (Homoptera, Achilidae) and revision of their composition. Entomological Review 72: 7–27].Google Scholar
1994 Pervaya iskopayemaya nakhodka semeistva Derbidae i pereopisanie paleogenovogo roda Hooleya Cockerell (Achilidae) (Insecta: Homoptera, Fulgoroidea). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 3: 76–82. [Published in English as: 1995. The first find of fossil Derbidae, and a redescription of Paleogene achilid Hooleya Cockerell (Insecta: Homoptera, Fulgoroidea). Paleontological Journal 28: 92–101].Google Scholar
1999. Notes on the delimitation of families of the Issidae group with description of a new species of Caliscellidae belonging to a new genus and tribe (Homoptera, Fulgoroidea). Zoosystematica Rossica 8: 61–72.Google Scholar
2002. Contribution to classification and phylogeny of the family Cixiidae (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha), pp. 103–112. In (ed), Zikaden – Leafhoppers, Planthoppers and Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) Denisia, 04, Zugleich Kataloge, Neue Folge Nr. 176, Linz: OÖ. Landesmuseums.
2001. A monograph of the Baltic amber bees and evolution of the Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 259: 1–192.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. The smallest snakefly (Raphidioptera: Mesoraphidiidae): a new species in Cretaceous amber from Myanmar, with a catalogue of fossil snakelies. American Museum Novitates 3363: 1–22.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. Early Cretaceous earwigs (Dermaptera) from the Sanatana Formation, Brazil. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 74: 219–226.Google Scholar
1949. The occurrence of the Mesozoic insect Chresmoda in the Far East. Insecta Matsumarana 17: 4–5.Google Scholar
1984. Dreïf materikov i problema isoricheskoï biogeografii, pp. 24–92. In: Faunogenez i filocenogenez. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
and 1986. On the origin of Trans-Pacific disjunctions. Zoologisches Jahrbuch für Systematik 113: 265–285.Google Scholar
1956. Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Hemiptera. Australian Journal of Zoology 4: 165–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. A review of the present knowledge of the family Peloridiidae and new genera and new species from New Zealand and New Caledonia (Hemiptera: Insecta). Records of the Australian Museum 34: 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. Catalogue of the Fossil Flies of the World (Insecta: Diptera). Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
, and 2004. The brain of the Remipedia (Crustacea) and an alternative hypothesis on their phylogenetic relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 3868–3873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1998. “Inordinate Fondness” explained: why are there so many beetles?Science 281: 555–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1954. The higher classification of the family Issidae (Hemiptera, Fulgoroidea), with description of new species. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society 105: 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1961. The occurrence of a Cixiinae Fulgoroid (Homoptera) in a Weald Clay. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 13: 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. A new genus and species of Cixiidae (Homoptera, Fulgoroidea) from Lower Cretaceous amber. Journal of Natural History 21: 1237–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and 2003. Phylogeny and classification of the Stenophlebioptera. (Insecta, Odonata, Epiproctophora). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (n.s.) 39: 55–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2002. The larvae of the Mesozoic family Aeschnidiidae and their phylogenetic implications (Insecta, Odonata, Anisoptera). Palaeontology 45: 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1997. The effectiveness of mitochondrial rRNA gene sequences for the reconstruction of the phylogeny of an insect order (Orthoptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. Inferences about orthopteroid phylogeny and molecular evolution from small subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Insect Molecular Biology 7: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and 1999. Combined molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and implications for their higher systematics. Systematic Biology 48: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and 2000. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Pneumoroidea (Orthoptera, Caelifera): molecular data resolve morphological character conflicts in the basal Acridomorpha. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15: 345–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontes, L. R. and Vulcano, M. A. 1998. Cupins fósseis do Novo Mundo, pp. 243–295. In and (eds), Cupins – O desafio do conhecimento. Piracicaba: Fundação de Estudios Agrários Luiz de Queiroz FEALQ.Google Scholar
Frank, J. H. and Thomas, M. C. 2002. http://creatures.ifas.ufl.edu/misc/ beetles/fl_rove_beetles.htm.
1957. A reclassification of the order Odonata, based on some new interpretations of the venation of the dragonfly wing. Handbook Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales 12: 1–133.Google Scholar
1994. Frank Morton Carpenter (1902–1994): academic biography and list of publications. Psyche 101: 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1988. The Hymenoptera. British Museum (Natural History). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and 1993. Oligocixia electrina gen. et sp. nov. (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cixiidae) from Dominican amber. Annales Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien 95A: 121–125.Google Scholar
1839. Die versteinerten Insekten Solenhofens. Nova Acta Leopoldina Carolina Akademia 19: 187–222.Google Scholar
and 1994. Recognition of a new subfamily of Cicadellidae from Costa Rica based on a phenetic analysis with similar taxa (Hemiptera Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha). Tropical Zoology 7: 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. A new fossil subgenus and species of the genus Ecdyonurus Eaton, 1868 from Eocene Baltic amber (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Genus 15: 323–328.Google Scholar
and 2006. Fossil mayfly collections of the Museum für Natukunde, Humboldt University, Berlin. I. Electroletus soldani gen. et sp. nov. (Ephemeroptera: Amelitidae) from the Eocene Baltic Amber.- Annales Zoologici 56: 437–441.Google Scholar
1984. Nuevos Paleontínidos del yacimiento Infracretácico de la ‘Pedrera de Meiá’ (Lérida). Boletin Geologico y Minero España 95: 301–309.Google Scholar
1986. Nuevos insectos fósiles de las calizas litográficas del Cretacico Inferior del Montsec (Lérida). Boletin Geologico y Minero España 97: 27–46.Google Scholar
2002. A new genus of water measurer from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation in Brazil (Insecta: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha: Hydrometridae). Stuttgarter Beiträge Naturkunde, Serie B 316: 1–9.Google Scholar
1992. Fossil stick insects (Phasmatoptera) from the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Trudy Paleontologicheski Instituta Rossioskyo Akademyi, Nauk 252: 112–116.Google Scholar
1994. Permian and Triassic walking sticks (Phasmatoptera) from Eurasia. Paleontological Journal 28: 83–97.Google Scholar
1995. The system and evolution of the suborder Ensifera (Orthoptera). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences 260(1): 1–223, 260(2): 1–212.Google Scholar
2000. Phasmomimidae: are they Orthoptera or Phasmatoptera?Paleontological Journal 34: 295–300.Google Scholar
2001. The most interesting finds of orthopteroid insects at the end of the 20th century and a new recent genus and species. Journal of Orthoptera Research 10: 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorochov, A. V. and Rasnitsyn, A. P. 2002. Superorder Gryllidea Laicharting, 1781 (= Orthopteroidea Handlirsch, 1903), pp. 293–303. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef
and 1993. Hymenoptera of the World: an Identification Guide to Families. Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication 1894/ EL.Google Scholar
and 2000. New Early Cretaceous weevil taxa from Spain (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Acta Geologica Hispanica 35: 37–46.Google Scholar
1990. Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 195: 5–191.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. 1991. The Santana Formation insects, pp. 379–406. In (ed), Santana Fossils: an Illustrated Atlas. Neptune City, NJ: T.F.H. Publications.Google Scholar
1999. The co-radiations of pollinating insects and angiosperms in the Cretaceous. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 373–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Insect evolutionary history from Handlirsch to Hennig, and beyond. Journal of Paleontology 75: 1152–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. A revision of Cretaceous mantises and their relationships, including new taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea). American Museum Novitates 3412: 1–47.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, D. and Maisey, J. G. 1990. Introduction, pp. 5–14. In (ed), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 195.
and 1999. Brachyceran Diptera in Cretaceous ambers and Mesozoic diversification of the Eremoneura. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 239: 1–124.Google Scholar
and 2002. Fossiliferous Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma): its rediscovery, biotic diversity, and paleontological significance. American Museum Novitates 3361: 1–71.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1955. Appunti intorno al Gen. Fedtschenkia Saussure (Hymenoptera: Sapygidae). Doriana Suppl. AgliII (55): 1–4.Google Scholar
1969. The history of the peculiar Genus Fedtschenkia Saussure (1880) (Hymenoptera: Fedtschenkiidae). Israel Journal of Entomology 4: 339–342.Google Scholar
1972. De la distribution géographique du genre Fedtschenkia (Saussure, 1880) (Hymenoptera: Fedtschenkiidae). Proceedings of the XIII Congress of Entomology, Moscow (1968) 1: 138–140.Google Scholar
1994. Das Vorkommen der Familie Sapygidae in Österreich. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Sapygidae). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 96B: 173–188.Google Scholar
1996. Beitrag zur Kenntnis paläarktischer Sapyginae (Hymenoptera, Sapygidae). Linzer biologische Beiträge 28: 23–38.Google Scholar
1997. Über Funde von Sapygidae aus dem östlichen Mittelmeergebiet (Sapygidae, Hymenoptera). Linzer biologische Beiträge 29: 105–108.Google Scholar
and 2004. Evolution of locomotory attachment pads in the Dermaptera (Insecta). Arthropod Structure and Development 33: 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2000. Elastic joints in dermapteran hind wings: Materials and wing folding. Arthropod Structure and Development 29: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2001. Dermaptera hind wing structure and folding: new evidence for familial, ordinal and superordinal relationships within Neoptera (Insecta). European Journal of Entomology 98: 445–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, F. and Klass, K.-D. 2003. The basal phylogenetic relationships in the Dermaptera, pp. 138–142. In (ed), Proceedings of the 1st Dresden Meeting on Insect Phylogeny: Phylogenetic Relationships within the Insect Orders, Dresden, 19–21, September 2003. Entomologische Abhandlungen61.Google Scholar
1890. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der fossilen Arachniden. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft 42: 629–657.Google Scholar
1971. A remarkable fossil homopteran from Canadian Cretaceous amber representing a new family. Canadian Entomologist 103: 943–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. The insect wing, Part III. Venation of the orders. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society45: 145–162.
1983. Classification, morphology and phylogeny of the family Cicadellidae (Rhynchota: Homoptera), pp. 15–37. In Knight, W. J. (ed), International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Economic Importance. London: Commonwealth Institute of Entomology.
1990. Homoptera, pp. 82–122. In (ed), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History195.
1992. Lower Cretaceous Homoptera from the Koonwarra Fossil Bed in Australia with a New Superfamily and Synopsis of Mesozoic Homoptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 85: 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, K. G. A. 1996. Cretaceous Homoptera from Brazil: Implications for Classification, pp. 89–110. In (ed), Studies on Hemipteran Phylogeny. Langham, MD: Thomas Say Publications in Entomology. Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
1999. The ground–dwelling leafhoppers Myerslopiidae, new family and Sagmatiini, new tribe (Homoptera: Membracoidea). Invertebrate Taxonomy 13: 207–235.Google Scholar
1906–1908. Die fossilen Insekten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen. Ein Handbuch für Paläontologen und Zoologen. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. 1925. Palaeontologie, pp. 117–306. In (ed), Handbuch der Entomologie3. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
1939. Neue Untersuchungen über die fossilen Insekten mit Ergänzungen und Nachträgen sowie Ausblicken auf phylogenetische, palaeogeograpgische und allgemein biologische Probleme, II Theil. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 48: 1–240.Google Scholar
and 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of the insect order Odonata using 28S and 16S rDNA sequences: a comparison between data sets with different evolutionary rates. Entomological Science 9: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1995. Termite (Insecta: Isoptera) nest ichnofossils from the Triassic Chinle Formation, Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona. Ichnos 4: 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,, and 1997. Giant termite (Insecta: Isoptera) nests from the base of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, northwestern New Mexico. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program 28: A461.Google Scholar
Heads, S. W. 2008. The first fossil Proscopiidae (Insecta, Orthoptera, Eumastacidae) with comments on the historical biogeography and evolution of the family. Palaeontology (in press).
— and 2005. An exceptionally preserved antlion (Insecta, Neuroptera) with colour pattern preservation from the Cretaceous of Brazil. Palaeontology 48: 1409–1417.Google Scholar
1953. Kritische Bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insekten. Beiträge zur Entomologie 3: 1–85.Google Scholar
1973. Diptera (Zweiflügler). InHandbuch der Zoologie, IV. Band: Arthropoda – 2. Hälfte: Insecta – 2. Teil: Spezielles, 31. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Herczek, A. and Popov, Yu. A. 2001. Redescription of the oldest plant bugs from the Upper Jurassic of the Southern Kazakhstan (Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha, Miridae). Annals of the Upper Silesian Museum in Bytom, Entomology10–11: 121–128.
2001. Catalog of the Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). 1758 to the end of the second millennium. I. introduction, history, biographical Sketches, and omaliine group. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 265: 1–650.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2006. Vibrational signalling in a Gondwanan relict insect (Hemiptera: Coleorrhyncha: Peloridiidae). Biology Letters 2: 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , ., and 2001. Towards a phylogeny of the Cixiidae (Fulgoromorpha) and its major subgroups: preliminary results. 2nd European Hemiptera Congress, 20–24 June 2001, Fiesa, Slovenia: 19.Google Scholar
Emeljanov, A. F. and Kammerlander, I. 2002. The family Cixiidae – a review, pp. 113–138. In (ed), Zikaden – Leafhoppers, Planthoppers and Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Denisia, 04, Zugleich Kataloge Neue Folge Nr. 176, Linz: OÖ. Landesmuseums.
1982. Mesozoic Fossil Insects of Jiuquan Basin, Gansu Province. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
1994. Ein fossiler Tenebrionidae Ceropria? messelense n. sp. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Diaperinae) aus dem Mitteleozän der Grube Messel bei Darmstadt. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 170: 75–83.Google Scholar
2006. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic issues in dragonfly systematics (Insecta: Odonata). PhD thesis, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. D. and Kukalová-Peck, J. 1980. Permian mayfly nymphs: new taxa and systematic characters, pp. 19–31. In Flannagan, F. F. and Marshall, K. E. (eds), Advances in Ephemeroptera Biology. New York: Plenum Press.
and 1981. The fossil Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera): A systematic and phylogenetic review. Journal of Paleontology 55: 810–813.Google Scholar
and 1992. Capitula on stick insect eggs and elaiosomes on seeds: convergent adaptations for burial by ants. Functional Ecology 6: 642–648.Google Scholar
1968. Ephemeroptera (Eintagsfliegen). Handbuch der Zoologie IV (Arthropoda) 2 (Insecta) 5: 1–63.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. D. and Sukatsheva. I. D. 2002. Order Trichoptera Kirby, 1813. The Caddisflies, pp. 199–220. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, M. T. 1981. Stratiomyidae, pp. 497–511. In and (eds), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Ottawa: Biosystematics Research Institute.Google Scholar
, and 2005. A phylogeny of earwigs (Insecta: Dermaptera) based on molecular and morphological evidence: reconsidering the classification of Dermaptera. Systematic Entomology 30: 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. New insects from the Weald Clay of the Weald. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 9: 71–93.Google Scholar
,, , , and 1998. The Mesozoic non-calopterygoid Zygoptera: description of new genera and species from the Lower Cretaceous of England and Brazil and their phylogenetic significance (Odonata, Zygoptera, Coenagrionoidea, Hemiphlebioidea, Lestoidea). Cretaceous Research 19: 403–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1986. Invertebrates, mainly insects, from the freshwater Lower Cretaceous, Koonwarra Fossil Bed (Korumburra Group), South Gippsland, Victoria, pp. 111–205. In Plants and Invertebrates from the Lower Cretaceous Koonwarra Fossil Bed, South Gippsland, Victoria. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists3.Google Scholar
and 1984. Eine neue Schwarzkäfer-Gattung und -Art aus Dominikanischem Bernstein (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 109: 1–6.Google Scholar
Key, K. H. L. 1991. Phasmatodea, pp. 394–403. In (ed), The Insects of Australia: a Textbook for Students and Research Workers, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Relationships among the tiphid wasp subfamilies (Hymenoptera). Systematic Entomology 16: 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1990. Fossil beetles of the Peltidae and Nitidulidae families (Coleoptera). Paleontological Journal 24: 79–90.Google Scholar
1997a. The external male genitalia and the phylogeny of Blattaria and Mantodea. Boner Zoologische Monographien 42: 1–341.Google Scholar
1997b. The ovipositor of Dictyoptera (Insecta): Homology and ground-plan of the main elements. Zoologischer Anzeiger 236: 69–101.Google Scholar
2001. Morphological evidence on Blattaria phylogeny: “Phylogenetic histories and stories” (Insecta, Dictyoptera). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 48: 223–265.Google Scholar
1986. Recent mayfly species (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae) in Baltic amber. Paleontological Journal 2: 111–112.Google Scholar
1996. A new suborder of Thysanura for the Carboniferous insect originally described as larva of Bojophlebia, with comments on characters of the orders Thysanura and Ephemeroptera. Zoosystematica Rossica 4: 71–75.Google Scholar
1998. Phylogeny and higher classification of Ephemeroptera. Zoosystematica Rossica 7: 255–269.Google Scholar
2004. The Phylogenetic System of Ephemeroptera, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,, and 1995. A reclassification of Siphlonuroidea (Ephemeroptera). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 68: 103–32.Google Scholar
, and 2006. A new mayfly family (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from Eocene Baltic amber. Annales Zoologici 56: 181–185.Google Scholar
1997. Monophyly and phylogenetic position of the Diplura (Hexapoda). Pedobiologia 41: 9–12.Google Scholar
2003. Towards a phylogenetic system of the Zygentoma. Entomologische Abhandlungen 61: 122–124.Google Scholar
1976. Das phylogenetische System der Hymenoptera, Sapygidae. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift N.F. 25(IV–V): 406–409.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M. V., Ivanov, V. D. and Rasnitsyn, A. P. 2002. Order Lepidoptera Linné, 1758. The butterflies and moths, pp. 220–227. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. The fossil record of Mesozoic and Tertiary Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Invertebrate Taxonomy 2000: 871–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, K. 1990. Isoptera, pp. 76–81. In (ed), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History195.Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P. 1991. Phylogeny of extant hexapods, pp. 125–140. In (ed), The Insects of Australia: a Textbook for Students and Research Workers, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
1995. Forty years' insect phylogenetic systematics: Hennig's “Kritische Bemerkungen” and subsequent developments. Zoologische Beiträge (NF) 36: 83–124.Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P. 1998. The groundplan and basal diversification of the hexapods, pp. 281–293. In and (eds), Arthropod Relationships. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzeminski, W. and Evenhuis, N. L. 2000. Review of Diptera paleontological records, pp. 535–564. In and (eds), Contributions to a Manual of Plaearctic Diptera, vol. 1 L. Budapest: Science Herald.Google Scholar
1978. Origin and evolution of insect wings and their relation to metamorphosis, as documented by the fossil record. Journal of Morphology 156: 53–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1983. Origin of the insect wing and wing articulation from the arthropodan leg. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61: 1618–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. Ephemeroid wing venation based upon new gigantic Carboniferous mayflies and basic morphology, phylogeny, and metamorphosis of pterygote insects (Insecta, Ephemerida). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 933–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. New Carboniferous Diplura, Monura, and Thysanura, the hexapod ground plan, and the role of thoracic side lobes in the origin of wings (Insecta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 2327–2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukalová-Peck, J. 1991. Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures, pp. 141–179. In Naumann, I. D. (ed), The Insects of Australia; a Textbook for Students and Research Workers, vol. 1. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
2003. Nemonychidae, Belidae, Brentidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Fauna of New Zealand45: 1–100. Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
and 2002. Seasonality of forest invertebrates in Hong Kong, South China. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18: 637–644.Google Scholar
, and 1997. Subtree analysis, Nothofagus and Pacific biogeography. Cladistics 13: 125–129.Google Scholar
1917. Étude sur l'evolution des Ephéméres. Bulletin de Societe Zoologique de France 42: 41–81.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, K. E. 1973. Schlüsselereignisse in der Evolution der Stammgruppe der Euarthropoda. Zoologische Beiträge, Neue Folge19: 251–299.
1999. The Australian Ommatidae (Coleoptera: Archostemata): new species, larva and discussion of relationships. Invertebrate Taxonomy 13: 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, J. F. and Newton, Jr. A. F. 1995. Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names), pp. 779–1006. In and (eds), Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera, vol. 2. Warsaw: Muzeum I Instytut Zoologii PAN.Google Scholar
, and 2001. Description of Caenoephemera shangyuanensis, gen. nov., sp. nov. (Ephemeroptera), from the Yixian Formation. Canadian Entomologist 133: 747–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of the Mesozoic dragonfly family Liupanshaniidae (Insecta: Aeshnoptera: Odonata). Cretaceous Research 23: 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , . and 2003. Evidence for cocladogenesis between diverse dictyopteran lineages and their intracellular endosymbionts. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 907–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1996. Das Phylogenetische System der Anisoptera (Odonata). Entomologische Zeitschrift106(6): 209–252; 106(7): 253–296; 106(9): 360–367.Google Scholar
1982. On the origin of the bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Sphecidae). Entomologica Scandinavica 13: 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Paracupes svitkoi (Coleoptera: Cupedidae), a new species from the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 46 (suppl. Fossil Insects): 189–194.Google Scholar
and 2005. Permocoleus, New Genus, the First Permian Beetle (Coleoptera) from North America. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98: 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, D. R. 1995. Coptoclavidae. http://tolweb.org/tree/tree?group=Coptoclavidae.
(ed.). 1991. Santana Fossils: an Illustrated Atlas. Neptune City, NJ: T.F.H. Publications.Google Scholar
Makarkin, V. N. and Menon, F. 2007. First record of fossil ‘rapismatid-like’ Ithionidae (Insecta, Neuroptera) from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of Brazil. Cretaceous Research (in press).
1968. Genesis of the Hymenoptera and the Phases of their Evolution. LondonMethuen & Co.Google Scholar
and 2005. Rowing locomotion by a stonefly that possesses ancestral pterygote condition of co-occurring wings and abdominal gills. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1988. Grasshoppers and allied insects of Great Britain and Ireland. Colchester: Harley Books.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1993. Fossils of the Santana and Crato Formations, Brazil. The Palaeontological Association Field Guides to Fossils, 5. London: The Palaeontological Association.Google Scholar
and 1995. Colour patterning preserved in Lower Cretaceous birds and insects: the Crato-Formation of N.E. Brazil. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 2: 118–128.Google Scholar
and 1996. A new dragonfly from the Crato Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian) of N. E. Brazil. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 5: 279–292.Google Scholar
1982. Catalogo sistematico de los insectos fosiles de America del Sur. Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Serie Ciencias de la Tierra 1: 29–83.Google Scholar
1989. Chresmoda aquatica n. sp. insecto Chresmodidae del Cretácico inferior de la Sierra del Montsech (Lleida, España). Revista Española de Paleontología 4: 67–74.Google Scholar
, Nel, A., Azar, D., Bechly, G., Dunlop, J. A., Engel, M. S. and Heads, S. 2007. The enigmatic, Mesozoic family Chresmodidae (Polyneoptera: Archaeorthoptera): New palaeobiological and phylogenetic data, with the description of a new species from Brazil – New palaeobiological and phylogenetical data. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie – Abhandlungen (in press).
1987a. Um novo gênero de Orthoptera (Insecta, Grylloidea) da Formação Santana, Bacia do Araripe (Cretáceo Inferior) nodeste do Brasil. 10ο Congresso Brasiliera de Paleontologia, Rio de Janeiro: 599–609.Google Scholar
1987b. A paleoentomofauna Brasileira: estagio actual do concimento. Anais 10th Congresso Brasileiro Paleontologia, Rio de Janeiro v. II: 567–591.Google Scholar
1987c. Descrição de três novos géneros e três novas espécies de Orthoptera (Insecta, Acridoidea) da Formação Santana, Bacia do Araripe (Cretáceo Inferior) nordeste do Brasil, representando três familias, sendo que duas novas: Archaeopneumoridae nov. fam. e Bouretidae nov. fam. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 59: 444.Google Scholar
1988a. A new fossil insect (Homoptera, Cixiidae) from the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Araripe Basin, Northeast Brasil. Interciencia 13: 313–316.Google Scholar
1988b. Neuropteros (Insecta: Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, nordeste do Brasil. I. Familia Chrysopidae. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 60: 189–201.Google Scholar
1989a. A new fossil insect (Homoptera, Cixiidae) from the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous) Araripe Basin, Northeast Brazil. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 26: 7–14.Google Scholar
1989b. Primeiro registro de Phasmatodea (Insecta: Orthopteromorpha) na Formação Santana, Bacia do Araripe (Cretáceo Inferior), nordeste do Brasil. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia (Estudos Tecnológicos) 12: 91–104.Google Scholar
1990a. Primeiro registro de Dermpatera (Insecta, Orthopteromorpha) na Formação Santana (Cretáceo inferior), Bacia do Araripe, nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 34: 775–784.Google Scholar
1990b. Neurópteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. VI. Ensaio filogenético das espécie do genera Blittersdorffia Martins-Neto and Vulcano, com descrição de nova espécie. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 13: 3–12.Google Scholar
1990c. The family Locustopsidae (Insecta, Caelifera) in the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, northeast Brazil). I. – Description of two new species of the genus Locustopsis Handlirsch and three new species of the genus Zessinia n. gen. Atlas do I Simpósio sobre a Bacia do Araripe e Bacias Interiores do n Nordeste Crato, 14 a 16 Junho de 1990: 277–91.Google Scholar
1990d. Um novo gênero e duas nova espécies de Tridactylidae (Insecta, Orthopteridea na Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior do nordeste do Brasil). Annais Academia Brasil Ciencias 62: 51–59.Google Scholar
1991a. Sistemática dos Ensifera (Insecta, Orthopteroida) da Formação Santana, Cretáceo Inferior do nordeste do Brasil. Estudio Technológicos, Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 32: 3–162.Google Scholar
1991b. Cratogryllus cigueli, nova espécie de Ensifera (Insecta, Grylloidea) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior) Bacia do Araripe, nordeste do Brasil. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 33: 153–156.Google Scholar
1991c. Evidências de especiação alocrônica na fauna de Ensifera (Insecta, Orthopteroida) da Formação Santana, Cretáceo do nordeste do Brasil. Revista de Geologia 4: 61–80.Google Scholar
1991d. A Paleoentomofauna do Nordeste Brasileiro: Estado da Arte. Atas XIV Simposio de Geologia do Nordeste, Recife 12: 59–62.Google Scholar
1992a. Neurópteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. V. Aspectos filogenéticos, paleoecológicos, paleobiogeográficos e descrição de novos taxa. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 64: 117–148.Google Scholar
1992b. Neurópteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. VII. Palaeoleontinae, nova subfamilia de Myrmeleontidae e descrição de novos táxons. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 36: 803–815.Google Scholar
1992c. Nova ocorrência, variabilidade morfológica e relações filogenéticas do gênero Cratoelcana Martins-Neto, 1991 (Insecta, Ensifera, Elcanidae), da Formação Santana, Bacia do Araripe, Brasil. Revista Brasil Entomologia 36: 817–830.Google Scholar
1992d. A paleoentomofauna das bacias mesozoicas brasileiras e seu potencial para possiveis correlacoes bioestratigraficas entre depositos nao-marinhos. In I. Encontro sobre a sedimentacao continental das bacias mesozoicas brasileiras. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 36: 125–126.Google Scholar
1994. Neurópteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. IX. Primeiros resultados da composição da fauna e descrição de novos táxons. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 17: 269– 288.Google Scholar
1995a. Araripelocustidae, fam. n. uma nova família de gafanhotos (Insecta, Caelifera) da Formação Santana, Cretáceo Inferior do nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasil Entomologia 39: 311–319.Google Scholar
1995b. Complementos ao estudo sobre os Ensifera (Insecta, Orthopteroida) da Formação Santana, Cretáceo Inferior do nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasil Entomologia 39: 321–345.Google Scholar
1996a. New mayflies (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) from the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Araripe Basin, Northeastern Brazil. Revista Española de Paleontologia 11: 177–192.Google Scholar
1996b. Interaçao inseto / flora e consideraçoes sobre a origem das angiospermas. Revista UnG, Série Geociências 1: 31–36.Google Scholar
1997a. Neurópteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. X. Descrição de novos táxons (Chrysopidae, Babinskaiidae, Myrmeleontidae, Ascalaphidae e Psychopsidae). Revista Universidade de Guarulhos, Série Ciências Exatas e Technológicas 2: 68–83.Google Scholar
1997b. Cratotetraspinus nov. nom., novo nome para Tetraspinus Martins-Neto, 1995 (nom. preoc.). Revista Universidade Guarulhos, Geociências 2: 105.Google Scholar
1998a. A new genus of the family Locustopsidae (Insecta, Caelifera) in the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, northeast Brazil). Revista Española de Paleontología 13: 133–138.Google Scholar
1998b. A new subfamily of Ensifera (Insecta, Grylloidea) from the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Araripe Basin, NE Brazil. Proceedings of the First International Palaeoentomological Conference, Moscow 1998: 91–97.Google Scholar
1998c. Conan barbarica n. gen. et n. sp. (Insecta, Coleoptera, Coptoclavidae) – uma gigantesca larva da Formação Santana, Cretáceo Inferior, Bacia do Araripe, Brasil. Geociências São Paulo 17: 109–114.Google Scholar
1998d. Neurópteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. Ⅺ. Descrição de novos táxons de Myrmeleontidae (Palaeoleontinae e Pseudonymphinae). Revista Universidade de Guarhulhos, Série Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde 3: 38–42.Google Scholar
1998e. The paleoentomo fauna from Tremembé Formation (Taubaté Basin) Oligocene of São Paulo State: new Hemiptera, Auchenorhyncha, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera and Diptera (Parte II) (Insecta). Revista Universidade Guaralhos, Serie Geociências 3: 58–70.Google Scholar
1998f. Novos registro de Palaeontinideos (Insecta: Hemiptera) na formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 21: 69–74.Google Scholar
1999a. Estado actual del conocimiento de la paleoentomofauna brasileña. Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 58: 71–85.Google Scholar
1999b. New genus and new species of Lepidoptera (Insecta, Eolepidopterigidae) from Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, northeast Brazil). 5ο Simpósio sobre o Cretáceo do Brasil, Rio Claro. Boletim: 531–535.Google Scholar
2000. Remarks on the neuropterofauna (Insecta, Neuroptera) from the Brazilian Cretaceous, with keys for the identification of the known taxa. Acta Geologica Hispanica 35: 97–118.Google Scholar
2001a. Review of some Insecta from Mesozoic and Cenozoic Brazilian deposits with descriptions of new taxa. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 24: 115–124.Google Scholar
2001b. Primeiro registro de Trichoptera (Insecta) na Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil, com descrição de sete novos táxons. Simpósio sobre a Bacia do Araripe e bacias interiores do Nordeste, 1 e 2, Crato, 1990/1997. Boletim: 212–226.Google Scholar
2002a. The Santana Formation Paleoentomofauna reviewed. Part I. Neuropteroida (Neuroptera and Raphidioptera): systematic and phylogeny, with descriptions of new taxa. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 25: 35–66.Google Scholar
2002b. Insetos fósseis como bioindicadores em depósitos sedimentares: um estudo de caso para o mesozóico sul-americano. São Leopoldo: CPGEO, UNISINOS.Google Scholar
2003a. Systematics of the Caelifera (Insecta, Orthopteroidea) from the Santana Formation, Araripe Basin (Lower Cretaceous, northeast Brazil), with a description of new genera and species. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 46 (suppl.): 205–228.Google Scholar
2003b. The fossil Tabanids (Diptera Tabanidae): When they began to appreciate warm blood and when they began transmit diseases?Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 98 (suppl. I): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. New Neuroptera (Nymphidae and Araripeneuridae) from Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Araripe Basin, Northeast Brasil). Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 27.Google Scholar
2005a. The Santana Formation palaeoentomofauna reviewed: Polyneoptera (Isoptera, Blattoptera, Dermaptera, Orthoptera) with description of six new species, one new genus and one new combination. 3rd International Congress of Palaeoentomology, Abstracts, 7–11 February 2005, Pretoria, South Africa. 1: 24.Google Scholar
2005b. Estágio atual da paleoartropologia brasileira: Hexápodes, miriápodes, crustáceos (Isopoda, Decapoda, Eucrustacea e Copepoda) e quelicerados. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro 63: 471–494.Google Scholar
and 1989a. Primeiro registro de Raphidioptera (Neuropteroidea) na Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 34: 241–249.Google Scholar
and 1989b. Amphiesmenoptera, (Trichoptera + Lepidoptera) na Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior) Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. I – Lepidoptera (Insecta). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 61: 459–465.Google Scholar
and 1989c Neuropteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. 1. Familia Chrysopidae. Anais Academia Brasileira de Ciências 60: 189–201.Google Scholar
and 1990. Efêmeras escavadoras (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Ephemeroidea) na Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe Nordeste do Brasil: Descrição de três novos gêneros e três novas espécies (ninfas). Atas do I Simpósio sobre a Bacia do Araripe e Bacias Interiores do Nordeste Crato, 1990: 265–275.Google Scholar
and 1990a. Neuropteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, nordeste do Brasil. III – Superfamilia Mantispoidea. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 34: 619–625.Google Scholar
and 1990b. Neuropteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, nordeste do Brasil. VI – Ensaio filogenético das espécies do gênero Blittersdorfia, com descrição de nova espécie. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 31: 3–12.Google Scholar
and 1991. Primeiro registro de Eumastacoidea (Insecta, Caelifera) da Formação Santana, Cretáceo Inferior do nordeste do Brasil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 63: 91–92.Google Scholar
and 1992. Un nouveau fossile de Raphidioptère de la formation Santana, Crétacé inférieur du Brésil (Neuropteroidea, Raphidioptera). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 97: 425–428.Google Scholar
and 1994. Um novo gênero e una nova espécie de Mutuca (Insecta, Diptera, Tabanidae) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 39: 289–297.Google Scholar
and 1997. Neuropteros (Insecta, Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, nordeste do Brasil. VIII – Descrição de novos taxa de Myrmeleontidae, Ascalaphidae e Nemopteridae. Revista Universidade Guarulhos, Série Ciências Biológicas 2: 64–81.Google Scholar
and 1998. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Orthopteroida from South America. 1st Paleoentomological Conference, Abstracts, 30 August–4 September 1998, Moscow: 24.Google Scholar
and Szwedo, J. 2007. Taxonomic changes in fossil Cixiidae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha) 1 – Cretofennahia nom. nov. pro Fennahia Martins-Neto. Alevisia1: 117.
, and 1999. First South Hemisphere Cretaceous record of Coreoidea (Insecta, Heteroptera) from Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Northeast Brazil), representing a new genus et species. Bolletim do 5ο Simposio Sobre o Cretáceo do Brasil: 525–530.Google Scholar
, and 2006. New fossils (Isoptera: Hodotermitidae), from the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Araripe Basin, Northeast Brazil), with descriptions of new taxa including a new subfamily. Sociobiology 47: 125–134.Google Scholar
, Melo, A. C. and Prezoto, F. 2007. A new species of wasp (Symphyta, Sepulcidae) from the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Northeast Brazil). Journal of the Entomological Research Society9(1): 1–6.
1925. Über zwei Grundtypen der Flügel bei den Insecten und ihre Evolution. Zeitschrift zur Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 4: 465–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martynova, O. M. 1962 (reprinted 1991). Order Phasmatodea, pp. 213–215. In (ed), Fundamentals of Paleontology, vol. 9, Arthropoda, Tracheata, Chelicerata. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Libraries and The National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
and 2005. Reproductive biology and nymphal development in the basal earwig Tagalina papua (Insecta: Dermaptera: Pygidicranidae), with a comparison of brood care in Dermaptera and Embioptera. Entomologische Abhandlungen 62: 99–116.Google Scholar
and 2000. Cratomyia macrorrhyncha, a Lower Cretaceous brachyceran fossil from the Santana Formation, Brazil, representing a new species, genus and family of the Stratiomyomorpha (Diptera). Insect Systematics & Evolution 31: 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1984. Ontogenia de los notonectidos (Insecta, Heteroptera) del Cretácico inferior de San Luis, Argentina. Memoria III Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología: 388–395.Google Scholar
and 1987. Corixidae (Insecta, Heteroptera) del Cretácico Inferior de la Sierra del Gigante, San Luis, Argentina. Actas IV Congresso Latinoamerica Palaeontologia, Bolivia 2: 731–738.Google Scholar
McCafferty, W. P. 1990. Ephemeroptera, pp. 20–50. In (ed), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History195.Google Scholar
1991. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Ephemeroptera (Insecta): a commentary on systematics. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84: 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, W. P. 1997. Ephemeroptera, pp. 89–117. In and (eds), Nomina Insecta Nearctica, a Checklist of the Insects of North America, vol. 4. Non-holometabolous Orders. Rockville, MD: Entomological Informational Service.Google Scholar
McCafferty, W. P. 1998. Ephemeroptera and the great American interchange. Journal of the North American Benthological Society17: 1–20.
2004. Higher classification of the burrowing mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Shapphodonta). Entomological News 115: 84–92.Google Scholar
and 1979. The higher classification of the Ephemeroptera and its evolutionary basis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 72: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpine, J. F. 1981. Morphology and terminology – adults, pp. 9–63. In and (eds), Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol. 1. Ottawa: Biosystematics Research Institute.Google Scholar
1999. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the major lineages of Apoidea (Hymenoptera), with emphasis on the crabronid wasps. Scientific Papers of the Natural History Museum, University of Kansas 14: 1–55.Google Scholar
1997a. A first contribution to the study of the Dominican amber Zygentoma (Insecta), family Ateluridae. Pedobiologia 41: 40–43.Google Scholar
1998a. Second contribution to the study of the Dominican amber Zygentoma (Insecta): Family Lepismatidae. Canadian Entomologist 130: 899–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, M. 1991a. A utilização de caracteres morfológicos alternativos na Sistematica dos Blatoptera (Insecta) da Fromação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe. Nordeste do Brasil. XII Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, 1991, São Paulo, Boletim de Resumos1: 54.
— 1991b. Raphidiomimidae (Insecta, Blatoptera) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. XII Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, 1991, São Paulo, Boletim de Resumos1: 55.
— 1993. Um novo gênero da Familia Blattidae (Insecta, Blattoptera) na Formação Santana, Cretáceo do Nordeste do Brasil. XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Plaeontologia, 1993, São Leopoldo, Boletim de Resumos1: 115.
— 1995. Três Novas Espécies do Gênero Mesoblattina (Insecta, Blattoptera) na Formação Santana, Cretáceo do Nordeste do Brasil. XIV Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, 1995, Uberaba, Boletim de Resumos1: 98.
— 1997b. Duas Novas Espécies do Gênero Mesoblattinopsis (Insecta, Blattoptera, Blattidae) na Formação Santana, Cretáceo do Nordeste do Brasil. XV Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, 1997, São Pedro, Boletim de Resumos1: 58.
— 1998a. An attempt at taphonomic simulation in blattopteras from Araripe (Lower Cretaceous), from the North East of Brazil. 1st Paleoentomological Conferece, Abstracts, 30 August–4 September 1998, Moscow: 25.
— 1998b. An Attempt at taphonomic simulation in Blattopteras from Araripe (Lower Cretacean) from the NE of Brazil. AMBA projects International98: 99–101.
— 2000. Novos Blattodeas (Insecta, Blattopteroida) da Formação Santana, Cretáceo Inferior do Nordeste do brasil. Revista Universidade de Guarulhos - Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas5(6): 25–35.
2005. New record of Tettigarctidae (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea) from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Zootaxa 1087: 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. New species of Palaeontinidae (Insecta: Cicadomorpha) from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of Brazil. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 357: 1–11.Google Scholar
, and 2005. New Palaeontinidae (Insecta: Cicadomorpha) from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of Brazil. Cretaceous Research 26: 837–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973. Über den Ovipositor der Neuropteroidea und Coleoptera und seine phylogenetische Bedeutung (Insecta, Holometabola). Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere 74: 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999a. A molecular approach to the phylogeny of extant Odonata. Zoology 102 (suppl. II): 9.Google Scholar
and 2000. The first brachycerous flies (Diptera: Rhagionidae) from the Lower Jurassic of Gondwana. Paleontological Journal 34 (suppl. 3): 367–369.Google Scholar
and 2000. New Nemestrinoidea (Diptera: Brachycera) from the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous of Eurasia, taxonomy and paleobiology. Entomological Problems 31: 137–148.Google Scholar
, and 2003. Horseflies and athericids (Diptera: Tabanidae, Athericidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of England and Transbaikalia. Paleontological Journal 37: 162–169.Google Scholar
Moulds, M. S. 1990. Australian Cicadas. Kensington, NSW: New South Wales University Press.
2005. An appraisal of the higher classification of cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) with special reference to the Australian Fauna. Records of the Australian Museum 57: 375–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. A review of extinct Mesozoic genera and families of Brachycera (Insecta, Diptera, Orthorrhapha). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 134: 95–192.Google Scholar
and Rozkosny, R. 2000. Xylomyidae, pp. 369–378. In and (eds), Manual of Palaearctic Diptera, vol. 2. Budapest: Science Herald.Google Scholar
1969. A new taxon of the family Heterogynidae Latreille (Hym. Aculeata). Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Staatsinstitut und Zoologischen Museum Hamburg 64: 299–303.Google Scholar
1960. On the family Cupedidae, Coleoptera. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 72: 12–20.Google Scholar
1996. Un Tettigarctidae fossile du Lias Européen (Cicadomorpha, Cicadoidea, Tettigarctidae). Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Biologie et Evolution des Insectes 9: 83–94.Google Scholar
and . 1992. Les Heteroptera aquatiques fossils, état actuel des connaissances (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha et Gerromorpha). Entomologica Gallica 3: 159–182.Google Scholar
and 1993. Essai de révision des Aeschnidioidea (Insecta, Odonata, Anisoptera). Cahiers de Paléontologie1993: 1–99.Google Scholar
Nel, A. and Paicheler, J.-C. 1993. Les Isoptera fossiles, pp. 103–179. In, and Essai de révision des Aeschnidioidea [Insecta, Odonata, Anisoptera] / Les Isoptera fossiles [Insecta, Dictyoptera]. Paris: CNRS Editions (Cahiers de Paléontologie).Google Scholar
and 1994. A new dragonfly from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Palaeontology 37: 923–930.Google Scholar
and 1994a. Les Gomphidae fossiles. Un inventaire critique (Odonata: Gomphidae). Annales de la Société Entomologie de France (n.s.) 30: 55–77.Google Scholar
and 1994b. Les Libelluloidea fossiles autres que Libellulidae. Un inventaire critique (Odonata, Corduliidae, Macromiidae, Synthemistidae, Chlorogomphidae et Mesophlebiidae). Nouvelle Revue d'Entomologie (N.S.) 11: 321–334.Google Scholar
and 2000. The oldest known fossil Hydrometridae from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha). Journal of Natutal History 34: 2315–2322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006. A giant water bug from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of Brazil (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae: Lethocerinae). Zootaxa 1220: 63–68.Google Scholar
and 1990. Un Raphidioptera fossile du Crétacé inférieur du Brésil (Neuropteroidea). Neuroptera International 6: 27–37.Google Scholar
—, Martínez-Delclós, Paicheler, J.-C. and Henrotay, M. 1993, Les ``Anisozygoptera'' fossiles. Phylogénie et classification. (Odonata). Martinia, Numéro hors-série3: 1–311.
—,, and 1998. A revision of the fossil petalurid dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera: Petalurida). Paleontologia Lombarda 10: 1–68.Google Scholar
—, and 1998. Liassotettigarcta africana sp. n. (Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadoidea: Tettigarctidae), the first Mesozoic insect from Tunisia. European Journal of Entomology 95: 593–598.Google Scholar
—,, and 2004. A new Upper Cretaceous species of Chresmoda from Lebanon – a latest representative of Chresmodidae (Insecta: Polyneoptera inc. sed.): first record of homeotic mutations in the fossil record of insects. European Journal of Entomology 101: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
—,, and 2004. The oldest ants in the Lower Cretaceous amber of Charente – Maritime (SW France) (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Geologica Acta 2: 23–29.Google Scholar
—,, , and 2005. A new extraordinary neuropterid family from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of Brazil: a new insect order? (Insecta, Neuropterida). Cretaceous Research 26: 845–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
—, and . 2005. Mesozoic chrysopid-like Planipennia: a phylogenetic approach (Insecta: Neuroptera). Annales de la Société Entomologie de France (n.s.) 41: 29–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Jr, A. F. and Thayer, M. K. 1995. Protopselaphinae new subfamily for Protopselaphus new genus from Malaysia, with a phylogenetic analysis and review of the Omaliine Group of Staphylinidae including Pselaphidae (Coleoptera), pp. 219–320. In and (eds), Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera, vol 1. Warsaw: Muzeum I Instytut Zoologii PAN.Google Scholar
1992. Taxonomic criteria and generic composition of mesozoic lamellicorn beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Paleontological Journal 26: 96–111.Google Scholar
Novokschonov, V. G. 2002. Order Panorpida Latreille, 1802. The scorpionflies, pp. 194–199. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, L. B. 2002. The wild wonderful world of Fulgoromorpha, pp. 83–102. In (ed), Zikaden – Leafhoppers, Planthoppers and Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Denisia 04, Zugleich Kataloge, Neue Folge Nr. 176. Linz: OÖ, Landesmuseums.Google Scholar
and 2003. The problem with the “Paleoptera Problem:” sense and sensitivity. Cladistics 19: 432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Phylogeny of Ephemeroptera (mayflies) based on molecular evidence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution37: 625–643.
1995. Die phylogenetischen Beziehungen von Grabwespen und Bienen: Stand der Forschung, Probleme, Perspektiven. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie 10: 629–632.Google Scholar
1996. Die phylogenetischen Beziehungen der Sphecinae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: “Sphecidae”) aufgrund morphologischer Merkmale des Exoskellets. Zoologische Beiträge (n. f.) 37: 3–40.Google Scholar
2000. Das phylogenetische System der aculeaten Hymenopteren sensu stricto – Stand der Forschung, Probleme, Perspektiven. Beiträge der Hymenopterologen-Tagung Stuttgart2000: 10–13.Google Scholar
and Bleidorn, C. 2006. The phylogenetic position of the enigmatic wasp family Heterogynaidae based on molecular data, with description of a new, nocturnal species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Systematic Entomology31: 321–337.
, , and 1978. Cyclic change in Late Triassic lacustrine communities. Science 201: 729–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and 1990. Leafhoppers (Cicadellidae): a Bibliography, Generic Check-list and Index to the World Literature 1956–1985. Wallingford: CAB International Institute of Entomology.Google Scholar
1987. Ein neuer Fundort von Proscolia spectator Day, 1981 (Hymenoptera, Aculeata). Entomofauna 8: 361–365.Google Scholar
1988. Die Mundwerkzeuge von Proscolia spectator Day (Hymenoptera: Aculeata). Ein Beitrag zur Phylogenie der “Scolioidea”. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Ser. A 414: 1–30.Google Scholar
1993. The enigmatic Genus Proscolia, its distribution and phylogenetic relationships. Biologia Gallo – Hellenica 20: 177–182.Google Scholar
2001. Beitrag zur Scoliiden – Fauna der Insel Phuket (Thailand) (Hymenoptera, Scoliidae). Entomofauna 22: 433–444.Google Scholar
2004. Verbreitungsmuster bei Scoliiden – Ein Beitrag zu ihrer Evolution. Beiträge der Hymenopterologen-Tagung Stuttgart2004: 7–9.Google Scholar
2005. Checkliste der Dolchwespen der Welt (Insecta: Hymenoptera, Scoliidae). Bericht der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Augsburg 62: 1–62.Google Scholar
1990. Raphidioptera, pp. 154–163. In (ed), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History195.Google Scholar
, , . and 2000. 18S rRNA secondary structure and phylogenetic position of Peloridiidae (Insecta, Hemiptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1946. The generic names of the Sapygidae and their type species (Hymenoptera: Aculeata). Entomological News 57: 219–221.Google Scholar
1947. Neotropical Sapygidae with a conspectus of the family (Hymenoptera: Aculeata. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 4: 393–426.Google Scholar
Peters, W. L. and Peters, J. G. 2000. Discovery of a new genus of Leptophlebiidae: Leptophlebiinae (Ephemeroptera) in Cretaceous amber from New Jersey, pp. 127–131. In (ed), Studies on Fossils in Amber, with Particular Reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
1998. First hanging fly fossil from South America. 1st Paleoentomological Conference, Abstracts, 30 August–4 September 1998, Moscow: 34.Google Scholar
and 2001. A bittacid from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Legal, ethical and systematic aspects. Acta Geologcal Leopoldensia 24: 125–127.Google Scholar
and 2007. A new proterogomphid dragonfly from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Palaeontology 50 (in press).Google Scholar
1950. Fossil arthropods from onyx marble. Bulletin of the Southern Californian Academy of Sciences 49: 101–104.Google Scholar
1951. Fossil arthropods from onyx marble. Bulletin of the Southern Californian Academy of Sciences 50: 44–49.Google Scholar
Pinto, J. D. 1989. A second new blattoid from the Cretaceous of Brazil. Resumo das Comunicaçåes do Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia11: 295–300.
— and Ornellas, L. P. 1974. New Cretaceous Hemiptera (Insects) from Codo Formation – Northern Brazil. Anais 28th Congresso Brasileiro do Geologia: 289–304.
and 1986. A new blattoid from the Cretaceous of Brazil. Pesquisas Instituto de Geociências Universidad Federal do Rio Grande do Sul 18: 5–10.Google Scholar
and 2006. A fossil bee from Early Cretaceous Burmese amber. Science 314: 614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2001. Inferences regarding the feeding behavior and morphoecological patterns of fossil mayfly nymphs (Insecta Ephemeroptera) from the Lower Cretaceous Santana Formation of northeastern Brazil. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 24: 145–160.Google Scholar
1977. Palaeozoic members of Megaloptera (Insecta). Paleontologischeskiy Zhurnal1977: 78–86.Google Scholar
1986. Scarabaeiformes incertae sedis, pp. 110–112. In (ed), Nasekomye v rannemelovykh ekosistemakh Zapadonoy Mongolii. Trudy Sovmestnaya Sovetsko – Mongol'skaya Paleontologicheskaya Ehkspeditsiya 28: 1–213.Google Scholar
1987. New Mesozoic water beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) from Asia. Paleontological Journal 21: 79–92.Google Scholar
1997. New beetles of the Family Cupedidae from the Mesozoic of Mongolia. Ommatini, Mesocupedini, Priacmini. Paleontological Journal 31: 389–399.Google Scholar
2000. New alderflies (Megaloptera: Parasailidae) and glosselytrodeans (Glosselytrodea: Glosselytridae) from the Permian of Mongolia. Paleontological Journal, suppl 3 34: 309–311.Google Scholar
2003. Ecological evolution of beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 46 (suppl. Fossil Insects): 319–328.Google Scholar
and 2000. New beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain. Acta Geologica Hispanica 35: 47–52.Google Scholar
1990. Dermaptera, pp. 69–75. In (ed), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 195.Google Scholar
Popov, Yu. A. 1971. The historical development of Hemiptera infraorder Nepomorpha (Heteroptera). Proceedings of the Paleontological Institute, Academy of Sciences, USSR129.
1986. Peloridiina (=Coleorrhyncha) et Cimicina (= Heteroptera). Insects in Early Cretaceous ecosystems of western Mongolia. Proceedings of the Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expeditions, Nauka, Moscow 28: 50–83.Google Scholar
1990. Description of fossil insects. True bugs. Cimicina. In Late Mesozoic insects of Eastern Transbaikalia. Proceedings of the Paleontological Institute, Academy of Sciences, USSR, Nauka 239: 20–39.Google Scholar
and 1991. Mesozoic Peloridioidea and their ancestors (Insecta: Hemiptera, Coleorrhyncha). Geologica et Palaeontologica 25: 215–235.Google Scholar
Popov, Yu. A. and Shcherbakov. D. E. 1996. Origin and evolution of the Coleorrhyncha as shown by the fossil record, pp. 9–30. In (ed), Studies on Hemipteran Phylogeny. Proceedings. Entomological Society of America. Lanham, MD: Thomas Say Publications in Entomology.Google Scholar
and 2000. On some mesozoic burrower bugs (Heteroptera: Cydnidae). Paleontological Journal 34 (suppl. 3): 298–302.Google Scholar
, and 1994. British Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic Heteroptera and Coeleorrhyncha (Insecta: Hemiptera). Genus 5: 307–347.Google Scholar
1998. The Comparative Morphology and Phylogeny of Apoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Dissertation thesis, University of California, Berkley.Google Scholar
, , , and 1993. Did the first insects live in water or in air?Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 49: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2005. Discovery of the oldest known Pterygota in the Lower Carboniferous of the Upper Silesian Basin in the Czech Republic (Insecta: Archaeorthoptera). Geobios 38, 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. Cretobestiola, a replacement name for Bestiola Pulawski and Rasnitsyn, 1999 (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Acta Geologica Hispanica 35: 53.Google Scholar
1977. A new subfamily of scoliid wasps (Hymenoptera, Scoliidae, Proscoliinae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 56: 522–529.Google Scholar
1986a. Review of the fossil Tiphiidae, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera). Psyche 93: 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. An outline of evolution of the hymenopterous insects (Order Vespida). Oriental Insects 22: 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Archaeoscoliinae, an extinct subfamily of scoliid wasps (Insecta: Vespida = Hymenoptera: Scoliidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 2: 85–96.Google Scholar
2002. Infraclass Gryllones, pp. 254–256. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrech: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. New Cretaceous Scoliidae (Vespida = Hymenoptera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain and Brazil. Cretaceous Research 20: 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. Wasps (Insecta: Vespida = Hymenoptera) from the Early Cretaceous of Spain. Acta Geologica Hispanica 35: 65–95.Google Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A. P. and Pritykina, L. N. 2002. Superorder Libellulida Laicharting, 1781. Order Odonata Fabricius, 1792. The dragonflies, pp. 97–106. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A. P. and Zherikhin, V. V. 2002. 4. Appendix: alphabetic list of selected insect fossil sites 4.1. impression fossils, pp. 437–444. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
—, and 1998. Wasps (Insecta: Vespida = Hymenoptera) from the Purbeck and Wealden (Lower Cretaceous) of Southern England and their biostratigraphical and paleoenvironmental significance. Cretaceous Research 19: 329–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
—, and 1999. Cretaceous digger wasps of the new genus Bestiola Pulawski and Rasnitsyn (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Angarosphecinae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 8: 23–34.Google Scholar
2003. Phylogenetic analysis of higher-level relationships of Odonata. Systematic Entomology 28: 181–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. First record of fossil stick-insects from China with analyses of some palaeobiological features (Phasmatodea: Hagiphasmatidae fam. nov.). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 22: 268–282.Google Scholar
1998. Late Jurassic [sic: Early Cretaceous] Brachycera from northeastern China (Insecta: Diptera). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 23: 65–83.Google Scholar
,, , and 1995. [Faunae and Stratigraphy of Jurassic- Cretaceous of Beijing and adjacent areas]. Beijing: Seismic Publishing House.Google Scholar
, and 1998a. Late Jurassic palaeontinids (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha) from the Hebei and Liaoning provinces in China. Entomologica Sinica 5: 222–232.Google Scholar
, and 1998b. New planthoppers and froghoppers from the Late Jurassic of Northeast China (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 23: 281–288.Google Scholar
1996. Grasshopper country: the abundant orthopteroid insects of Australia. Sydney: New South Wales University Press.Google Scholar
Ren, D. and Su, Y. N. 2003. Orthoptera (grasshoppers, locusts, katydids, crickets), pp. 827–839. In and (eds), Encyclopedia of Insects. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
and 1999. A new Tipulidae (Insecta, Diptera) from the Santana Formation (Araripe Basin, Lower Cretaceous, Northeastern Brazil). Boletim do 5th Simpósio sobre o Cretáco do Brasil (UNESP, Sao Paulo) 1999: 207–212.Google Scholar
and 2000. New information on Limoniidae (Diptera: Tipulomorpha) from the Lower Cretaceous Santana Formation (northeastern Brazil). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 69: 451–457.Google Scholar
2002. The Tetraconata concept: hexapod-crustacean relationships and the phylogeny of Crustacea. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 2: 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1974. Upper Triassic insects from the Molteno Formation, South Africa. Palaeontologica Africana 17: 19–31.Google Scholar
Rohdendorf, B. B. 1977. The rationalization of names of higher taxa in zoology. Paleontological Journal11: 149–155.
— (ed.) 1991. Fundamentals of Paleontology 9: Arthropoda, Tracheata, Chelicerata. New Dehli: Amerind Publishers.
, , , and 1986. Oldest termite nest from the Upper Cretaceous of west Texas. Geology 14: 87–88.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Fossil evidence regarding the evolution of Nothofagus Blume. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. The beetle-mimicking cockroach genera Prosoplecta and Areolaria, with a description of Tomeisneria furthi gen. n., sp. n. (Blattellidae: Pseudophyllodromiinae). Entomologica Scandinavica 24: 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. Phylogeny of the Caelifera and the Orthoptera as derived from ribosomal gene sequences. Journal of Orthoptera Research 7: 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozkosny, R. 2000. Stratiomyidae, pp. 387–411. In and (eds), Manual of Palaearctic Diptera, vol. 2. Budapest: Science Herald.Google Scholar
, and 2005. New Heteroptera (Insecta) from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous (Northeastern Brazil), with description of a new family and new taxa of Naucoridae and Gelastocoridae. Gaea 1: 68–74.Google Scholar
1995. Hemerobiidae (Insecta, Planipennia), eine bisher noch nicht entdeckte Familie der Santana Formation aus der brasilianischen Unterkreide. Bericht der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Augsburg 55: 46–61.Google Scholar
1979. Sobre algumas espécies brasileiras de Deois Fennah, 1948 (Homoptera, Cercopidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 39: 9–30.Google Scholar
Samuelson, G. A. 1994. Pollen consumption and digestion by leaf beetles, pp. 179–183. In, and (eds), Novel Aspects of the Biology of Chrysomelidae. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santiago-Blay, J. A. 1994. Paleontology of leaf beetles, pp. 1–68. In, and (eds.), Novel Aspects of the Biology of Chrysomelidae. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971. Um novo artrópodo da Formação Areado, Estado de Minas Gerais. Annais Academia do Brasil, Ciencias 43: 415–420.Google Scholar
Schaefer, C. W. (ed.). 1996. Studies on Hemiptera Phylogeny. Langham, MD: Thomas Say Publications in Entomology; Proceedings Entomological Society of America.
1969. Morphologie und Symbiose; ihre Beweiskraft für die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Coleorrhyncha (Insecta, Hemiptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie C 210: 1–27.Google Scholar
1990. Fossil insect localities in Gondwanaland. Entomologia Generalis 15: 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholtz, C. H. and Chown, S. L. 1995. The evolution of habitat use and diet in the Scarabaeoidea: a phylogenetic approach, pp. 355–374. In and (eds), Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera, vol. 1. Warsaw: Muzeum I Instytut Zoologii PAN.Google Scholar
and 1995. True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) – Classification and Natural History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1880. The Devonian Insects of New Brunswick. Anniversary Memoires of the Boston Society of Natural History.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. Phasmida (stick insect) eggs from the Eocene of Oregon. Palaeontology 37: 913–921.Google Scholar
1997. Descriptive terminology of the phasmid egg capsule, with an extended key to the phasmid genera based on egg structure. Systematic Entomology 22: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The micropylar plate of the eggs of Phasmida, with a survey of the range of plate form within the order. Systematic Entomology 23: 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1968. Phylogeny of the Orthopteroidea. Trudy Palaeontologicheskogo Instituta, Nauk 118: 1–251.Google Scholar
, , , et al. 1984. Early land animals in North America. Science 224: 492–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1986 (1985). Nasekomye v rannemelovykh ekosistemach zapadnoi Mongolii. Transactions of the joint Soviet–Mongolian Paleontological Expedition 28: 47–50.Google Scholar
1988. New cicadas (Cicadina) from the later Mesozoic of Transbaikalia. Paleontological Journal 4: 52–63.Google Scholar
1992. The earliest leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Karajassidae n. fam.) from the Jurassic of Karatau. Neues Jahrbuche für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1: 39–51.Google Scholar
Shcherbakov, D. E. 1996. Origin and evolution of the Auchenorrhyncha as shown by the fossil record, pp. 31–45. In (ed.), Studies on Hemipteran Phylogeny. Lanham, MD: Thomas Say Entomological Publications. Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
2000. The most primitive white-flies (Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae, Bernaeinae subfam. nov.) from the Mesozoic of Asia and Burmese amber with an overview of Burmese amber hemipterans. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, Geology 56: 29–37.Google Scholar
Shcherbakov, D. E. 2002. Order Forficulida. The earwigs and protelytropterans, pp. 288–291, 298–301. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shcherbakov, D. E. 2004. Fossil adult and nymphal Tettigarctidae, pp. 71–73. In (ed), Third European Hemiptera Congress. St. Petersburg, June 8–11, 2004. Abstracts. St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, St. Petersburg Scientific Centre, Zoological Institute.Google Scholar
Shcherbakov, D. E. and Popov, Yu. A. 2002. 2.2.1.2.5. Superorder Cimicidea Laicharting, 1781 Order Hemiptera Linné, 1758. The Bugs, Cicadas, Plantlice, Scale Insects, etc. (= Cimicida Laicharting, 1781, = Homoptera Leach, 1815 + Heteroptera Latreille, 1810), pp. 143–157. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1912. Die Thysanuren des Baltischen Bernsteins. Schriftreihe der physikalisc-öekonomischen Gesellschaft Königsberg 53: 42–66.Google Scholar
1975. Mayfly nymphs of the family Hexagenitidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal1975: 82–86.Google Scholar
1986. Mayflies. Ephemerida (=Ephemeroptera), In (ed.), Insects in the Early Cretaceous Ecosystems of the Western Mongolia. Transactions of the Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition. Moscow. Nauka 28: 45–46.Google Scholar
2000. The first fossil prosopistomatid mayfly from Burmese amber (Ephemeroptera: Prosopistomatidae). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of London (Geology) 56: 23–26.Google Scholar
and 2002. The first mayfly from the Lower Cretaceous of southern England (Insecta: Ephemerida =Ephemeroptera). Creataceous Research 23: 461–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2005. The Ephemeridea (Insecta) from the Grès à Voltzia (early Middle Triassic) of the Vosges (NE France). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 79: 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. 1995. Dates and rates in ancient lakes: 40Ar–39Ar evidence for an Early Cretaceous age for the Jehol Group, Northeast China. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 32: 1426–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1995. Non–monophyly of Auchenorrhyncha (“Homoptera”), based upon 18S rDNA phylogeny: eco-evolutionary and cladistic implications within pre-Heteropterodea Hemiptera (s.l.) and a proposal for new monophyletic sub-orders. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 71: 31–60.Google Scholar
1987. Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen zu R. Keilbachs Bibliographie und Liste der Bernsteinfosslilien-Ordnung Hymenoptera. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 127: 1–121.Google Scholar
Staniczek, A. H. 1997. The morphology of Siphlaenigma janae Penniket (Ephemeroptera, Siphlaenigmatidae), and its significance for the ground plan of the Baetoidea, pp. 536–549. In and (eds), Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera: Biology-Ecology-Systematics. Freibourg: Mauron + Tinguely & Lachat SA.Google Scholar
2000. The mandible of Silverfish (Insecta: Zygentoma) and Mayflies (Ephemeroptera): its morphology and phylogenetic significance. Zooogischer Anzeiger 239: 147–178.Google Scholar
2003. New fossil mayflies from Dominican amber (Insecta: Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (B)341: 1–22.Google Scholar
and 2002. First fossil record of the mayfly family Baetiscidae from Baltic amber (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (B)322: 1–11.Google Scholar
2001. Pruning the tree: a critical review of classifications of the Homeodactyla (Diptera, Brachycera), with new perspectives and an alternative classification. Studia Dipterologica 8: 3–41.Google Scholar
1998. Erstnachweis fischchenartiger Insekten (Zygentoma, Insecta) für das Mesozoikum (Untere Kreide, Brasilien). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 78: 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. Two new species of Nicoletiidae (Zygentoma, ‘Apterygota’, Insecta) in Dominican amber. American Museum Novitates 3226: 1–11.Google Scholar
and 2001. Archaeognatha. Handbuch der Biologie Band 37/ IV. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion.Google Scholar
and 2004. Phylogeny of Mantodea based on molecular data: evolution of a charismatic predator. Systematic Entomology 29: 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, M. H. 1996. Comparative external morphology of the pregenital abdomen of the Hemiptera, pp. 119–158. In (ed), Studies on Hemiptera Phylogeny. Langham, MD: Thomas Say Publications in Entomology; Proceedings Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
, , , and 1999. Cretaceous age for the feathered dinosaurs from Liaoning, China. Nature 400: 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Amber and amber inclusions of planthoppers, leafhoppers and their relatives (Hemiptera, Archaeorrhyncha et Clypaeorrhyncha), pp. 37–56. In (ed.), Zikaden – Leafhoppers, Planthoppers and Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Denisia, 04, Zugleich Kataloge, Neue Folge Nr. 176, Linz: OÖ. Landesmuseums.Google Scholar
2004a. A new genus and six new species of ground-dwelling leafhoppers from Chile and New Zealand (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Myerslopiidae). Zootaxa 424: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004b. An annotated checklist of Myerslopiidae with notes on the distribution and origin of the group (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha). Zootaxa 425: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004c. Niryasaburnia gen. nov. for ‘Liburnia’ burmitina Cockerell, 1917 from Burmese amber (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha: Achilidae). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 2: 105–107.CrossRef
2006. A new genus Waghilde gen. nov. representing a new tribe of the planthopper family Achilidae from the Eocene Baltic amber (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha). Annales Zoologici 56: 167–174.Google Scholar
and . 1999. First fossil representatives of Aetalionidae (Homoptera, Membracoidea) from Oligocene / Miocene ambers of the New Word. 10th International Auchenorrhyncha Congress, Abstracts of Talks and Posters, 6–10 September 1999, Cardiff, Wales: 3–4.Google Scholar
and 2001. Ptychogroehnia reducta gen. and sp. n. of the fossil tribe Ptychoptilini from the Eocene Baltic amber (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Achilidae). Annales Zoologici 51: 95–101.Google Scholar
,. and 2004. Fossil Planthoppers (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha) of the World. An Annotated Catalogue with Notes on Hemiptera Classification. Warsaw: Studio 1.
, and 2005. New ommatids from the Late Jurassic of western Liaoning, China (Coleoptera: Archostemata). Insect Science 12: 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Phytogeographic and phylogenetic history of the genus Nothofagus Bl. (Fagaceae) in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of the Faculty of Science Hokkaido University 21: 505–582.Google Scholar
Thorne, B. L., Grimaldi, D. A. and Krishna, K. 2000. Early fossil history of the termites, pp. 77–94. In Abe, T., Bignell, D. E. and Higashi, M. (eds), Termites – Evolution, Sociality, Symbiosis, Ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
and 2002. Comparative social biology of basal taxa of ants and termites. Annual Review of Entomology 48: 283–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2000. The fossil record of Phasmida (Insecta: Neoptera). Insect Systematics and Evolution 31: 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1922. Mesozoic insects of Queensland. Nr. 9. Orthoptera and additioins to Protorthoptera, Odonata, Hemiptera and Plannipennia. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales 47: 447–470.Google Scholar
1932. Kansas Permian Insects. Part 15. The Order Plectoptera. American Journal of Science 223: 97–134, 237–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1965. Contribution to the knowledge of the family Fedtschenkiidae (Hymenoptera, Sapygoidea). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal XLIV: 706–715.Google Scholar
1996. A preliminary cladistic analysis of odonate wing venation. Odonatologica 25: 59–72.Google Scholar
Tshernova, O. A. 1962. Otrjad Ephemeroptera. Podenki, pp. 55–64. In (ed), Osnovy paleontologii. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
1965. Some fossil mayflies (Ephemeroptera Misthodotidae) from Permian-beds of the Urals. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 44: 353–361.Google Scholar
1967. Mayfly of the Recent family in Jurassic deposits of Transbaikalia (Ephemeroptera, Siphlonuridae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 46: 322–326.Google Scholar
1970. On the classification of Fossil and Recent Ephemeroptera. Entomological Review 49: 71–81.Google Scholar
and 1974. A new fossil genus and species of the mayfly family Hexagenitidae (Ephemeroptera) from the South of the European part of the USSR and its connection with Recent mayflies. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 53: 130–136.Google Scholar
1997. A new palaeontinid species from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil (Homoptera: Palaeontinidae). Bulletin of the Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History 16: 99–104.Google Scholar
1886. Die Hymenopteren des Bernsteins. Schriften der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Danzig (N.F.) 6: 278–279.Google Scholar
Vršanský, P. 1999a. Lower Cretaceous Blattaria, pp. 167–176. In (ed), Proceedings of the First Palaeoentomological Conference Moscow 1998. Bratislava: AMBA Projects International.Google Scholar
1999b. Two new species of Blattaria (Insecta) from the Lower Cretaceous of Asia, with comments on the origin and phylogenetic position of the families Polyphagidae and Blattulidae. Entomological Problems 30: 85–91.Google Scholar
2003a. Umenocoleoidea – an amazing lineage of aberrant insects (Insecta, Blattaria). AMBA Projekty 7: 1–32.Google Scholar
Vršanský, P. 2003b. Unique assemblage of Dictyoptera (Insecta – Blattaria, Mantodea, Isoptera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Bon Tsagaan Nuur in Mongolia. Entomological Problems33(1–2), 119–151.
Vršanský, P. 2004. Cretaceous Gondwanian Cockroaches (Insecta: Blattaria). Entomological Problems34(1–2): 49–54.
Vršanský, P. 2005. Evolúcia druhohorných švábov. Ph. D.-thesis. Geological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences. 40 pp + 14 supplements.
—,Vršanský, P. Vishniakova, V. N. and Rasnitsyn, A. P. 2002a. Order Blattida Latreille, 1810. The cockroaches, pp. 263–269. In and (eds), History of Insects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
—,, and 2002b. Early Cretaceous climate changes suggested on the basis of cockroach wing variations. Proceedings of the XVII Congress of Carpathian–Balkan Geological Association, 1–4 September 2002 (CD), Bratislava. Geologica Carpathica 33 (special issue).Google Scholar
Vulcano, M. A. 1985. Cretaceosimulium araripensis gen. et sp. nov. da Chapada do Araripe, Ceará, Brasil (Diptera: Simuliidae). Resumos do Congresso Brasileiro de Zoologia12: 107.
— and 1975. Cupesidae (Coleoptera). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico São Paulo 42: 31–68.Google Scholar
and 1987. Entomofauna fóssil da Chapada do Araripe, Ceará, Brasil – Cretaceimelittomoides cearensis gen. nov., sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Pyrochroidae). X Congreso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, 1987, Rio de Janeiro. Resumo das Comunicações: 27.Google Scholar
, and 1996. Variation morphologique des pieces buccales chez quelques Dermapteres. Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 101: 523–533.Google Scholar
, and 2006a. Some Jurassic Palaeontinidae (Insecta, Hemiptera) from Daohugou, Inner Mongolia, China. Palaeoworld15: 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2006b. Gansucossus, a replacement name for Yumenia Hong, 1982 (Insecta, Hemiptera, Palaeontinidae), with description of a new genus. Zootaxa1268: 59–68.Google Scholar
and and Zhang, Z. 2006c. A new genus and species of Palaeontinidae (Insecta: Hemiptera) from the Middle Jurassic of Daohugou, China. Annales Zoologici56: 757–762.
and 2007. Middle Jurassic Palaeontinidae (Insecta, Hemiptera) from Daohugou of China. Alavesia1: 89–104.
, et al. 2004. A new study on the stratotype and biostratigraphy of the Yixian stage in Yixian-Beipiao region, Liaoning – establishment and study of stratotypes of the Yixian stage. Acta Geologica Sinica 78: 433–447.Google Scholar
, et al. 2005. The age of the Yixian stage and the boundary of Jurassic-Cretaceous – the establishment and study of stratotypes of the Yixian stages. Geological Review 51: 234–242.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. and Ren, D. 2006. Middle Jurassic Pseudocossus fossils from Daohugou, Inner Mongolia in China (Homoptera, Palaeontinidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica31: 289–293.
—, Ren, D. and Shih, C.-K. 2007a. Discovery of Middle Jurassic Palaeontinids from Inner Mongolia, China (Homoptera: Palaeontinidae). Progress in Natural Science17: 112–116.
—, Ren, D. and Shih, C.-K. 2007b. New discovery of palaeontinid fossils from the Middle Jurassic in Daohugou, Inner Mongolia (Homoptera, Palaeontinidae). Science in China, Series D: Earth Sciences50: 481–486.
Wappler, T., Hinsken, S., Brocks, J. J., Wetzel, A. and Meyer, C. A. 2005. A fossil sawfly of the genus Athalia (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) from the Eocene-Oligocene boundary of Altkirch, France. Palevol4: 7–16.
Weber, H. 1933. Lehrbuch der Entomologie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
1874. Varia zoological et paleontologica. Periodico Zoologico, Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 1: 77–111.Google Scholar
1983. A survey of recent and fossil cicadas (Insecta, Hemiptera–Homoptera) in Britain. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology) 37: 139–47.Google Scholar
and 1985. Fossil insects from the Lithographic Limestone of Montsech (Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous), Lerida Province, Spain. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology) 38: 381–412.Google Scholar
, , , and 2001. The phylogeny of the extant hexapod orders. Cladistics 17: 113–169, 403–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1914. Twenty new Coleoptera from the Florissant shales. Transactions of the Entomological Society of America 40: 257–270.Google Scholar
2006. The cervical sclerites of Mantodea discussed in the context of dictyopteran phylogeny (Insecta: Dictyoptera). Entomologische Abhandlungen 63: 51–76.Google Scholar
1987. Gomphaeschna obliqua spec. nov., a new species of Gomphaeschninae from the Lower Cretaceous of northeastern Brazil (Anisoptera, Aeshnidae). Odonatologica 16: 311–314.Google Scholar
1988. Odonate fossils from the Lower Cretaceous of Northeastern Brazil. Proceeding of the 18th International Congress on Entomology, Vancouver, Abstracts: 64.Google Scholar
, , , et al. 2000. Timing the radiations of leaf beetles: hispines on gingers from Latest Cretaceous to Recent. Science 289: 291–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willmann, R. 1978. Mecoptera (Insecta, Holometabola). In (ed), Fossilium Catalogus Animalia, Pars124. The Hague: Junk.Google Scholar
1987. The phylogenetic system of the Mecoptera. Systematic Entomology 12: 519– 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Evolution und Phylogenetisches System der Mecoptera (Insecta: Holometabola). Abhandlungen Senckenberg Naturforschungsinstitut, Gesellschaft 544: 1–153.Google Scholar
1994. Raphidiodea aus dem Lias und die Phylogenie der Kamelhalsfliegen (Insecta: Holometabola). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 68: 167–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. The Upper Carboniferous Lithoneura lameerei (Insecta, Ephemereoptera?). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 73: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Die phylogenetischen Beziehungen der Insecta: offene Fragen und Probleme. Verhandlungen Westdeutscher Entomologentag2003: 1–64.Google Scholar
2006. Die Stammgruppenvertreter der Ephemeroptera und ihre Systematik (Insecta: Ephemerida, = Ephemeroptera, = Plectoptera; Eintagsfliegen). Species, Phylogeny & Evolution 1: 23–31.Google Scholar
1985. Ants from the Cretaceous and Eocene Amber of North America. Psyche 92: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1967. The first Mesozoic Ants, with the description of a new Subfamily. Psyche 74: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2000. Filling the Mesozoic gap: Terrestrial arthropods from the Crato Formation of Brazil. Palaeontological Association 44th Annual Meeting, Abstracts and Programme, University of Edinburgh: 38.Google Scholar
and 2001. A new Japygid Dipluran from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Palaeontology 44: 1025–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Parhadrestiinae, a new subfamily for Parhadrestia James and Cretaceogaster Teskey (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Systematic Entomology 11: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1961. On a surviving representative of the Lepidotrichidae (Thysanura). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 54: 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Preliminary thoughts on the phylogeny of Coleorrhyncha-Heteroptera (Hemiptera). Formosan Entomologist 22: 297–305.Google Scholar
and 2000. The External Genitalia of Hemiptera (Homoptera – Heteroptera). Taichung, Taiwan: Shih Way Publishers.Google Scholar
1999. Congruence and controversy: toward a higher-level phylogeny of diptera. Annual Review of Entomology 44: 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1996. Apioceridae (Insecta: Diptera): cladistic reappraisal and biogeography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 116: 247–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2005. A molecular phylogeny of planthoppers (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) inferred from mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Zoological Studies 44: 519–535.Google Scholar
and 2001. Sapygidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeatat) of Turkey. Linzer biologische Beiträge 33: 671–675.Google Scholar
2001. Contribution to the knowledge of the aquatic paleoentomofauna from Santana Formation (Araripe Basin, Lower Cretaceous, Northeast Brazil) with description of new taxa. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 24: 129–135.Google Scholar
1944. Notes on Eocene Homoptera from the Isle of Mull, Scotland. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 11: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Jurassic palaeontinids from Karamai, Xinjiang, with a discussion of Palaeontinidae (Homoptera: Palaeontinidae) in China. Entomologia Sinica 4: 312–323.Google Scholar
, and 2002. The oldest known scoliid wasps (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Scoliidae) from Jehol biota of western Liaoning, China. Cretaceous Research 23: 77–86.Google Scholar
Zhang, J.-F. 1994. Discovery of primitive earwigs (Insecta) from Late Jurassic of Laiyang, Shandong and its significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica33: 229–245.
2002. New Early Cretaceous lalacid from Jingxi Basin of Beijing, China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 27: 20–23.Google Scholar
and 2004. Fossil Curculionoid Beetles (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) from the Lower Cretaceous of Northeastern Brazil. Paleontological Journal 38: 528–537.Google Scholar
and 2003. The nymph of Siphluriscus chinensis and additional imaginal description: a living mayfly with Jurassic origins (Siphluriscidae new family: Ephemeroptera). Florida Entomologist 86: 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by