Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten
- Feminist Judgments Series Editors
- Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Commentary on Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875)
- 3 Commentary on Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892)
- 4 Commentary on United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
- 5 Commentary on United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923)
- 6 Commentary on Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982)
- 7 Commentary on Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)
- 8 Commentary on Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985)
- 9 Commentary on Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)
- 10 Commentary on Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)
- 11 Commentary on Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002)
- 12 Commentary, Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010)
- 13 Commentary on Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012)
- 14 Commentary on Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. CT. 830 (2018)
- 15 Commentary on Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020)
- Subject Index
15 - Commentary on Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2023
- Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten
- Feminist Judgments Series Editors
- Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Commentary on Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875)
- 3 Commentary on Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892)
- 4 Commentary on United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
- 5 Commentary on United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923)
- 6 Commentary on Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982)
- 7 Commentary on Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)
- 8 Commentary on Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985)
- 9 Commentary on Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)
- 10 Commentary on Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)
- 11 Commentary on Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002)
- 12 Commentary, Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010)
- 13 Commentary on Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012)
- 14 Commentary on Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. CT. 830 (2018)
- 15 Commentary on Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020)
- Subject Index
Summary
This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions that deal with the source of the power to regulate immigration, state and local regulation of immigration, citizenship law, racial discrimination, employment law, access to public education, the rights of criminal defendants, the detention of noncitizens, and more. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters in this book reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors here demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors here center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten , pp. 316 - 342Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023