Part I - Basics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- How to Read an EEG , pp. 1 - 68Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
References
Benbadis, SR, Tatum, WO. Overinterpretation of EEGs and misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2003 Feb 1;20(1):42–4.10.1097/00004691-200302000-00005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Vaque, TJ. The history of EEG. Hans Berger: psychophysiologist. A historical vignette. Journal of Neurotherapy. 1999 Apr 1;3(2):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, PL, Holmes, GL. Childhood absence epilepsies. In Pediatric epilepsy: diagnosis and therapy; Pellock, JM, Bourgeois, BFD, Dodson, WE, Eds. (pp. 323–34). Demos Medical Publishing, New York; 2008.Google Scholar
Jasper, H, Kershman, J. Electroencephalographic classification of the epilepsies. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry. 1941 Jun 1;45(6):903–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, JS. The early history of EEG data-processing at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Massachusetts General Hospital. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1997 Jun 1;26(1-3):443–54.10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00781-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, PK. Potential fields, EEG maps, and cortical spike generators. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1998 Feb 1;106(2):138–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, SW, Crunelli, V. Thalamic mechanisms of EEG alpha rhythms and their pathological implications. The Neuroscientist. 2005 Aug;11(4):357–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, R, Winter, AL, Crow, HJ, Walter, WG. Comparison of subcortical, cortical and scalp activity using chronically indwelling electrodes in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1965 Feb 1;18(3):217–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, AF, Bolger, DJ. The neurophysiological bases of EEG and EEG measurement: A review for the rest of us. Psychophysiology. 2014 Nov;51(11):1061–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worrell, GA, Lagerlund, TD, Buchhalter, JR. Role and limitations of routine and ambulatory scalp electroencephalography in diagnosing and managing seizures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2002 Sep 1;77(9):991–8.10.1016/S0025-6196(11)62269-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavazzuti, GB, Cappella, L, Nalin, A. Longitudinal study of epileptiform EEG patterns in normal children. Epilepsia. 1980 Feb;21(1):43–55.10.1111/j.1528-1157.1980.tb04043.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohlmann-Eden, B, Hoch, DB, Cochius, JI, Chiappa, KH. Periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges:a critical review. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 1996 Nov 1;13(6):519–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salinsky, M, Kanter, R, Dasheiff, RM. Effectiveness of multiple EEGs in supporting the diagnosis of epilepsy: an operational curve. Epilepsia. 1987 Aug;28(4):331–4.10.1111/j.1528-1157.1987.tb03652.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veldhuizen, R, Binnie, CD, Beintema, DJ. The effect of sleep deprivation on the EEG in epilepsy. Electroencephalography andCclinical Neurophysiology. 1983 May 1;55(5):505–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Fowle, AJ, Binnie, CD. Uses and abuses of the EEG in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2000 Mar;41:S10–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferree, TC, Luu, P, Russell, GS, Tucker, DM. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2001 Mar 1;112(3):536–44.10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00533-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homan, RW, Herman, J, Purdy, P. Cerebral location of international 10-20 system electrode placement. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1987 Apr 1;66(4):376–82.10.1016/0013-4694(87)90206-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeck, M, Koessler, L, Bast, T, et al. The standardized EEG electrode array of the IFCN. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2017 Oct 1;128(10):2070–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acharya, JN, Hani, AJ, Cheek, J, Thirumala, P, Tsuchida, TN. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guideline 2: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. The Neurodiagnostic Journal. 2016 Oct 1;56(4):245–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Sperling, MR, Engel, J Jr. Sphenoidal electrodes. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 1986 Jan 1;3(1):67–73.10.1097/00004691-198601000-00005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeJesus, PV, Masland, WS. The role of nasopharyngeal electrodes in clinical electroencephalography. Neurology. 1970 Sep 1;20(9):869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teplan, M. Fundamentals of EEG measurement. Measurement Science Review. 2002 Jan;2(2):1–11.Google Scholar
Sinha, SR, Sullivan, LR, Sabau, D, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guideline 1: minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. The Neurodiagnostic Journal. 2016 Oct 1;56(4):235–44.10.1080/21646821.2016.1245527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drees, C, Makic, MB, Case, K, et al. Skin irritation during video-EEG monitoring. The Neurodiagnostic Journal. 2016 Jul 2;56(3):139–50.10.1080/21646821.2016.1202032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cyngiser, TA. Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: a disease overview. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology. 2008 Sep 1;48(3):199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Niedermeyer, E. The EEG signal: polarity and field determination. In Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields; Niedermeyer, E, Lopes de Silva, FH, Eds. (pp. 79–83). Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore; 1987.Google Scholar
Sinha, SR, Sullivan, LR, Sabau, D et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guideline 1: minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. The Neurodiagnostic Journal. 2016 Oct 1;56(4):235–4.10.1080/21646821.2016.1245527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Lagerlund, TD. Manipulating the magic of digital EEG: montage reformatting and filtering. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology. 2000 Jun 1;40(2):121–36.10.1080/1086508X.2000.11079295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, JN, Acharya, VJ. Overview of EEG montages and principles of localization. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2019 Sep 1;36(5):325–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reference
Tatum, WO IV, Husain, AM, Benbadis, SR, Kaplan, PW. Normal adult EEG and patterns of uncertain significance. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2006 Jun 1;23(3):194–207.10.1097/01.wnp.0000220110.92126.a6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Kuratani, J, Pearl, PL, Sullivan, LR, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guideline 5: minimum technical standards for pediatric electroencephalography. The Neurodiagnostic Journal. 2016 Oct 1;56(4):266–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuchida, TN, Wusthoff, CJ, Shellhaas, RA, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society standardized EEG terminology and categorization for the description of continuous EEG monitoring in neonates: report of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Critical Care Monitoring Committee. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013 Apr 1;30(2):161–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisermann, M, Kaminska, A, Moutard, ML, Soufflet, C, Plouin, P. Normal EEG in childhood: from neonates to adolescents. Neurophysiologie clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013 Jan 1;43(1):35–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Tatum, WO IV, Husain, AM, Benbadis, SR, Kaplan, PW. Normal adult EEG and patterns of uncertain significance. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2006 Jun 1;23(3):194–207.10.1097/01.wnp.0000220110.92126.a6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villamar, MF, Gilliam, FG. Dyshormia in focal epilepsy. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2018 Jul;76(7):495–6.10.1590/0004-282x20180045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisermann, M, Kaminska, A, Moutard, ML, Soufflet, C, Plouin, P. Normal EEG in childhood: from neonates to adolescents. Neurophysiologie clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013 Jan 1;43(1):35–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
The PDF of this book
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.