Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:25:14.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2021

Rob Boddice
Affiliation:
Tampere University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Humane Professions
The Defence of Experimental Medicine, 1876–1914
, pp. 186 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Aenosch, Eusebius, Die Vivisektion, das grosse Verbrechen des 19. Jahrhunderts (Dresden: H. Beringer, 1899).Google Scholar
American Humane Association, Human Vivisection: A Statement and an Inquiry, 3rd edn (Fall River, MA: American Humane Association, 1900).Google Scholar
Bain, Alexander, Emotions and the Will, 3rd edn (London: Longmans, Green, 1875).Google Scholar
Bishop of Ely, Humanity and Science (London: Research Defence Society, 1910).Google Scholar
Bowditch, Henry Pickering, ‘The Advancement of Medicine by Research’, Science, 4 (1896).Google Scholar
Bruce, David, The Extinction of Malta Fever (A Lesson in the Use of Animal Experimentation) (London: Macmillan, 1908).Google Scholar
Burdon Sanderson, John, ed., Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory, by Klein, E., Burdon Sanderson, John, Foster, Michael and Brunton, Thomas Lauder, 2 vols (London: J & A Churchill, 1873).Google Scholar
Burdon Sanderson, Lady, Sir John Burdon Sanderson: A Memoir (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911).Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., Animal Experimentation and Its Benefit to Mankind (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1912).Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., ‘Medical Control of Vivisection’, North American Review, 191 (1910): 814–21.Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., ‘The Right and Wrong of Making Experiments on Human Beings’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 67 (1916): 1372–3.Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., Some Characteristics of Antivivisection Literature (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1911).Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., The Way of an Investigator: A Scientist’s Experiences in Medical Research (New York: W. W. Norton, 1945).Google Scholar
Churchman, John W., ‘The Value of Animal Experimentation as Illustrated by Recent Advances in the Study of Syphilis’ (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1911).Google Scholar
Clover, George F., Animal Experimentation as Viewed by the Superintendent of a Hospital (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Curtis, John G., Why Are Special Laws to Restrict Animal Experimentation Unwise? (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Cushny, A. R., ‘Vivisecton and Medicine: Have Experiments on Animals Advanced Therapeutics’ (1908).Google Scholar
Dana, Charles L., The Service of Animal Experimentation to the Knowledge and Treatment of Nervous Diseases (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man (London: John Murray, 1871).Google Scholar
Darwin, Francis, ed., The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols (London: John Murray, 1887).Google Scholar
Darwin, Francis, and Seward, A. C., eds, More Letters of Charles Darwin (London: John Murray, 1903).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, The Ethics of Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Dunn, Charles Hunter, Animal Experimentation in Relation to Epidemic Cerebrospinal Meningitis (Chicago: AMA, 1911).Google Scholar
Eliot, Charles W., ‘Animal Experimentation’, in Animal Experimentation: A Series of Statements Indicating Its Value to Biological and Medical Science, ed. Ernst, Harold C., 13 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1902).Google Scholar
Ernst, , Harold C., ed., Animal Experimentation: A Series of Statements Indicating Its Value to Biological and Medical Science (Boston: Little, Brown, 1902).Google Scholar
Ewing, James, Animal Experimentation and Cancer (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar
Ferrier, David, ‘The Croonian Lecture – Experiments on the Brain of Monkeys’ [read by John Burdon Sanderson], Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 165 (1875): 433–88.Google Scholar
Flexner, Simon, Animal Experimentation and Infectious Diseases (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar
Flexner, Simon, The So-Called ‘Affidavits Concerning the Atrocities of Vivisection’: A Refutation. Pamphlet, reprinted from New York Times (17 January 1910).Google Scholar
Foerster, Paul, Die Vivisektion, die wissenschafltliche Tierfolter (Munich: Kupferschmid, 1913).Google Scholar
Foerster, Paul, Die Vivisektion: ein Wort zur Verständigung und Mahnung, gerichtet an die vom 17. bis 24. Juli in Paris versammelten Vertreter des Tierschutzes von Dr. Paul Förster (Berlin: Tierschutz-Verein in Comm., 1900).Google Scholar
Gay, Frederick P., Immunology: A Medical Science Developed through Animal Experimentation (Chicago: AMA, 1910).Google Scholar
Goltz, Friedrich, Wider die Humanaster. Rechtfertigung eines Vivisektors (Strassburg: Hansard, 1883).Google Scholar
Harnack, Erich, Tierschutz und Vivisektion (Berlin: Hüpeden & Merzyn, 1906).Google Scholar
Hatcher, Robert A., Animal Experimentation and the Actions of Drugs (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909)Google Scholar
Heidenhain, Rudolf, Die Vivisection im Dienste der Heilkunde, 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1879).Google Scholar
Hendrick, Burton J., ‘American Contributions to Medical Science’, Harper’s Monthly, 129 (1914): 2532.Google Scholar
Hendrick, Burton J., ‘Conquering Spinal Meningitis: What the Rockefeller Institute Has Done for Children’, McClure’s Magazine, 32 (1909): 594604.Google Scholar
Hendrick, Burton J., ‘Work at the Rockefeller Institute: The Transplanting of Animal Organs’, McClure’s Magazine, 32 (1909): 367–83.Google Scholar
Hermann, L., Die Vivisectionsfrage. Für das grössere Publicum beleuchtet (Leipzig: F. C. W. Vogel, 1877).Google Scholar
Hodge, C. F., ‘The Vivisection Question’. Reprinted from Appleton’s Popular Science Monthly (September/October 1896).Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian, ‘The Tissue-Culture King’, Cornhill Magazine, new series 60 (1926): 422–58.Google Scholar
Huxley, Leonard, ed., Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2nd edn, 3 vols (London: Macmillan, 1913).Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., Collected Essays (London: Macmillan, 1894).Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., Method and Results: Essays (New York: D. Appleton, 1898).Google Scholar
Iatros, [Ernst Grysanowski], Die Vivisektion, ihr wissenschaftlicher Wert und ihre ethische Berechtigung (Leipzig, 1877).Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., Animal Experimentation and Medical Progress (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1914).Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., The Influence of Antivivisection on Character (Chicago: AMA, 1912).Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., ‘The Inveracities of Antivivisection’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 67 (1916): 1390–91.Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., ‘Recent Surgical Progress: A Result Chiefly of Experimental Research’, Harper’s Monthly, 118 (1909): 764–73Google Scholar
Kirchwey, George W., The Legal Aspect of Animal Experimentation in the State of New York (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Laab, Artur, Fort mit der Vivisektion! Fort mit den experimentellen Mißbräuchen and lebenden Menschen und Tieren!; Ein ernster Mahnruf and die Menschheit (Graz: Verl. des Bundes gegen die Vivisektion in Österreich, 1905).Google Scholar
Lee, F. S., The Publications of the New York Anti-Vivisection Society (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Lee, F. S., ‘The Role of Experiment in Medicine: The Public and the Medical Profession’, in Scientific Features of Modern Medicine, 154–76 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1911).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, F. S., The Sense of Pain in Man and the Lower Animals (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar
Lubarsch, Otto, Über die sogenannte Vivisektion (Halle: C. Marhold, 1905).Google Scholar
Ludwig, C., ‘Die “Vivisection” vor dem Richterstuhl der Gegenwart: Ein Wort zur Vermittelung’, Die Gartenlaube (1879): 417–19.Google Scholar
Lusk, Graham, Animal Experimentation and Diabetes (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Mac Cormac, William, ed., Transactions of the International Medical Congress (London, J. W. Kolckmann, 1881).Google Scholar
Meltzer, S. J., The Function of the Thyroid Glands: An Important Chapter in Modern Medicine Based upon Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Mendel, Lafayette B., Animal Experimentation and Nutrition (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Milena, Elpis [Marie-Espérance von Schwartz], Gemma oder Tugend and Laster (Franz, 1877).Google Scholar
Moore, Veranus A., The Relation of Animal Experimentation to the Live Stock Industry (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Oeffentliche Disputation über die Vivisektion, gehalten im Physiologischen Institute der Universität Bern am 31. Januar 1903: Nebst einem Vorwort (Dresden: Internat. Ver. z. Bekämpfung d. wiss. Tierfolter, 1904).Google Scholar
Official Circular Addressed to the German Universities by the Minister of Public Instruction Enjoining Safeguards against Abuses of Vivisection, with an Appendix Containing the Statements of the Several Medical Faculties (London: J. W. Kolckmann, 1885).Google Scholar
Paget, James, Owen, Richard and Wilks, Samuel, ‘Vivisection: Its Pains and Its Uses’, Nineteenth Century, 10 (1881): 902–48.Google Scholar
Paget, Stephen, Experiments on Animals (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1900).Google Scholar
Paget, Stephen, ed., For and Against Experiments on Animals: Evidence before the Royal Commission on Vivisection (London: H. K. Lewis, 1912).Google Scholar
Park, William H., ‘Animal Experimentation and Diphtheria’ (1909).Google Scholar
Philanthropos, [Gerald Yeo], Physiological Cruelty: or, Fact v. Fancy. An Inquiry into the Vivisection Question (London: Tinsley Bros., 1883).Google Scholar
Research Defence Society, Evidence of Lord Justice Fletcher Moulton before the Royal Commission on Vivisection (London: Macmillan, 1908).Google Scholar
Romanes, E., The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, New edn (London: Longmans, Green, 1896).Google Scholar
Rutherford, William, ‘The Chief Medical Schools of the Continent’, Edinburgh Medical Journal, 11 (1865): 341–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Schurman, Jacob Gould, President Schurman on Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Simon, John, ‘An Address Delivered at the Opening of the Section of Public Medicine’, British Medical Journal (August 6, 1881): 219–23.Google Scholar
Simon, John, English Sanitary Institutions, 2nd edn (London: John Murray, 1897).Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert, Principles of Psychology (1899; Osnabrück: Otto Zeller, 1966).Google Scholar
Stenz, Hermann, Die Vivisektion, der wissenschaftliche Wahnsinn unserer Zeit: kurze Darlegung der Unhaltbarkeit, Verwerflichkeit und allgemeinen Schädlichkeit, sowie die Entbehrlichkeit des Folterns lebender Tiere zu wissenschaftlichen Zwecken (Dresden: Weltbund gegen d. Vivisektion, 1900).Google Scholar
Trudeau, Edward L., Animal Experimentation and Tuberculosis (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Appendix to the First Report of the Commissioners, C. 3326 (1907).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Appendix to the Fourth Report of the Commissioners, C. 3955 (1908).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Appendix to the Third Report of the Commissioners, C. 3757 (1907).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Final Report of the Departmental Committee on Tuberculosis, C. 6641 (1913).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Final Report of the Royal Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Relation of Human and Animal Tuberculosis, C. 5761 (1911).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Report of the Royal Commission on the Practice of Subjecting Live Animals to Experiments for Scientific Purposes, C. 1397 (1876).Google Scholar
US Government, Vivisection: Hearing before the Senate Committee on the District of Columbia, February 21, 1900, on the Bill (S. 34) for the Further Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1900).Google Scholar
Weber, Ernst, von, Die Folterkammern der Wissenschaft. Eine Sammlung von Thatsachen für das Laien-Publikum (Berlin, 1879).Google Scholar
Welch, W. H., ‘The Interdependence of Medicine and Other Sciences of Nature’, in Papers and Addresses, 3:315–33 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1920).Google Scholar
Welch, William H., ‘On Some of the Humane Aspects of Medical Science’, in Papers and Addresses, 3:3–8 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1920).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Island of Dr Moreau (London: Heinemann, 1896).Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891; New York: Mondial, 2015).Google Scholar
Wile, Udo, ‘Experimental Syphilis in the Rabbit Produced by the Brain Substance of the Living Paretic’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 23 (1916): 199202.Google Scholar
Wolf, Richard, Mensch, Tier und Vivisektion (Leipzig: Altmann, [1900]).Google Scholar
Arluke, Arnold, and Sax, Boria, ‘Understanding Nazi Animal Protection and the Holocaust’, Anthrozoös, 5 (1992): 631.Google Scholar
Asdal, Kristin, ‘Subjected to Parliament: The Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and the Animal Body’, Social Studies of Science, 38 (2008): 899917.Google Scholar
Atalic, Bruno, and Fatovic-Ferencic, Stella, ‘Emanuel Edward Klein – The Father of British Microbiology and the Case of the Animal Vivisection Controversy of 1875’, Toxicologic Pathology, 37 (2009): 708–13.Google Scholar
Barton, Ruth, ‘Men of Science: Language, Identity and Professionalization in the Mid-Victorian Scientific Community’, History of Science, 41:1 (2003): 73119.Google Scholar
Bates, A. W. H., Anti-Vivisection and the Profession of Medicine in Britain (London: Palgrave, 2017).Google Scholar
Beers, Diane L., For the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States (Ohio: Swallow Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bellon, Richard, ‘Joseph Dalton Hooker’s Ideals for a Professional Man of Science’, Journal of the History of Biology, 34:1 (2001): 73119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benison, Saul, ‘Simon Flexner: The Evolution of a Career in Medical Science,’ Institute to University.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Carin, ‘Disputed Discovery: Vivisection and Experiment in the 19th Century’, Endeavour, 30 (2006): 98102.Google Scholar
Beromeu-Sánchez, José Ramón, ‘Animal Experiments, Vital Forces and Courtrooms: Mateu Orfila, François Magendie and the Study of Poisons in Nineteenth-Century France’, Annals of Science, 69 (2012): 126.Google Scholar
Bittel, Carla, ‘Science, Suffrage, and Experimentation: Mary Putnam Jacobi and the Controversy over Vivisection in Late Nineteenth-Century America’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 79 (2005): 664–94.Google Scholar
Bliss, Michael, William Osler: A Life in Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, A History of Attitudes and Behaviours toward Animals in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain: Anthropocentrism and the Emergence of Animals (Lewiston: Mellen, 2009).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, A History of Feelings (London: Reaktion, 2019).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘Bestiality in a Time of Smallpox: Dr Jenner and the “Modern Chimera”’, in Exploring Animal Encounters: Philosophical, Cultural and Historical Perspectives, ed. Ohrem, Dominik and Calarco, Matthew, 155–78 (London: Palgrave, 2018).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘The End of Anthropocentrism’, in Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments, ed. Boddice, Rob, 118 (Leiden: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘German Methods, English Morals: Physiological Networks and the Question of Callousness, c.1870–1881’, in Anglo-German Scholarly Relations in the Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Ellis, Heather and Kirchberger, Ulrike, 84102 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘The Historical Animal Mind: “Sagacity” in Nineteenth-Century Britain’, in Experiencing Animals: Encounters between Animal and Human Minds, ed. Mitchell, Robert W. and Smith, Julie, 6578 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, The History of Emotions (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cachet’, JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture and Politics, 30:3–4 (2010): 457–89.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, The Science of Sympathy: Morality, Evolution and Victorian Civilization (Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘Species of Compassion: Aesthetics, Anaesthetics and Pain in the Physiological Laboratory’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, 15 (2012).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘Vivisecting Major: A Victorian Gentleman Scientist Defends Animal Experimentation, 1876–1885’, Isis, 102 (2011): 215–37.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, and Smith, Mark, Emotion, Sense, Experience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna, The Story of Pain: From Prayer to Painkillers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna, What It Means to Be Human: Reflections from 1791 to the Present (London: Virago, 2011).Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., ‘Lankester, Sir (Edwin) Ray (1847–1929)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Bretschneider, H., Der Streit um die Vivisektion im 19. Jahrhundert. Verlauf – Argumente – Ergebnisse (Stuttgart, 1962).Google Scholar
Brock, D. Heyward, ‘The Doctor as Dramatic Hero’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 34 (1991): 279–95.Google Scholar
Bryder, Linda, ‘Tuberculosis and the MRC’, in Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC: Essays in the History of the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom and Its Predecessor, the Medical Research Committee, 1913–1953, ed. Austoker, Joan and Bryder, Linda, 121 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Buettinger, Craig, ‘Antivivisection and the Charge of Zoophil-Psychosis in the Early Twentieth Century’, The Historian, 55 (1992): 277–88.Google Scholar
Buettinger, Craig, ‘Women and Antivivisection in Late Nineteenth-Century America’, Journal of Social History, 30 (1997): 857–72.Google Scholar
Butler, Stella V. F., ‘Centers and Peripheries: The Development of British Physiology, 1870–1914’, Journal of the History of Biology, 21 (1988): 473500.Google Scholar
Catlet, Stephen, ‘Huxley, Hutton and the “White Rage”: A Debate on Vivisection at the Metaphysical Society’, Archives of Natural History, 11 (1983): 181–9.Google Scholar
Colby, Robert A., ‘“How It Strikes a Contemporary”: The “Spectator” as Critic’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 11 (1956): 182206.Google Scholar
Corner, George W., A History of the Rockefeller Institute 1901–1953, Origins and Growth (New York: Rockefeller Institute Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, and Williams, Perry, eds, The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Cushing, Harvey, The Life of Sir William Osler (Oxford, 1940).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter, Objectivity (New York: Zone Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Davis, John, ‘Higher Education Reform and the German Model: A Victorian Discourse’, in Anglo-German Scholarly Relations in the Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Ellis, Heather and Kirchberger, Ulrike, 3962 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dror, Otniel, ‘The Affect of Experiment: The Turn to Emotions in Anglo-American Physiology, 1900–1940’, Isis, 90 (1999): 205–37.Google Scholar
Elston, Mary Ann, ‘The Anti-Vivisectionist Movement and the Science of Medicine’, in Challenging Medicine, ed. Gabe, Jonathan, Kelleher, David and Williams, Gareth, 160–80 (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
Elston, Mary Ann, ‘Women and Anti-Vivisection in Victorian England, 1870–1900’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas A., 259–94 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Flexner, James Thomas, An American Saga: The Story of Helen Thomas and Simon Flexner (New York: Fordham University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
French, Richard D., Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Friedman, David M., The Immortalists; Charles Lindbergh, Dr. Alexis Carrel, and Their Daring Quest to Live Forever (New York: Harper, 2007).Google Scholar
Fye, W. Bruce, ‘Carl Ludwig and the Leipzig Physiological Institute: “A Factory of New Knowledge”’, Circulation, 74 (1986): 920–28.Google Scholar
Fye, W. Bruce, The Development of American Physiology: Scientific Medicine in the Nineteenth Century (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Geison, Gerald L., Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology: The Scientific Enterprise in Late Victorian Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Gere, Cathy, Pain, Pleasure, and the Greater Good: From the Panopticon to the Skinner Box and Beyond (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Geroulanos, Stephanos, and Meyers, Todd, The Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe: Brittleness, Integration, Science, and the Great War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gest, Howard, ‘Dr. Martin Arrowsmith: Scientist and Medical Hero’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 35 (1991): 116–24.Google Scholar
Gill, Rebecca, Calculating Compassion: Humanity and Relief in War, Britain, 1870–1914 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Gollin, Alfred M., The Observer and J. L. Garvin, 1908–1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Goodman, Jordan, and McElligot, Anthony, eds, Useful Bodies: Humans in the Service of Medical Science in the Twentieth Century (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gossel, Patricia Peck, ‘William Henry Welch and the Antivivisection Legislation in the District of Columbia, 1896–1900’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 40 (1985): 397419.Google Scholar
Gradmann, Christoph, ‘“It Seemed about Time to Try One of Those Modern Medicines”: Animal and Human Experimentation in the Chemotherapy of Sleeping Sickness 1905–1908’, in Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subjects Research: Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations, ed. Roelcke, Volker, 8397 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2004).Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Patrizia, ‘Moritz Schiff (1823–96): Experimental Physiology and Noble Sentiment in Florence’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas A., 105–24 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Halttunen, Karen, ‘Humanitarianism and the Pornography of Pain in Anglo-American Culture’, American Historical Review, 100 (1995): 303–34.Google Scholar
Halverson, Kristin, ‘Physiological Cruelty? Discussing and Developing Vivisection in Great Britain, 1875–1901’, MA thesis, Södertörn University (2016).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Susan, ‘Reading and the Popular Critique of Science in the Victorian Anti-Vivisection Press: Frances Power Cobbe’s Writing for the Victoria Street Society’, Victorian Review, 36 (2010): 6679.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bert, ‘Medical History for the Masses: How American Comic Books Celebrated Heroes of Medicine in the 1940s’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 78 (2004): 148–91.Google Scholar
Hanson, Elizabeth, ‘Women Scientists at the Rockefeller Institute, 1901–1940’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 211–25 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L., ‘Capitalism and the Origins of the Humanitarian Sensibility’, parts I and II, American Historical Review, 90 (1985): 339–61, 547–66.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russel, The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Honigsbaum, Frank, ‘Christopher Addison: A Realist in Pursuit of Dreams’, in Doctors, Politics and Society: Historical Essays, ed. Porter, Dorothy and Porter, Roy, 229–46 (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993).Google Scholar
Hornsby, Asha, ‘Unfeeling Brutes? The 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection and the Science of Suffering’, Victorian Review, 45 (2019): 97115.Google Scholar
Hutchison, John, Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Institute to University: A Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Colloquium, June 8, 1976 (New York: Rockefeller University, 1976).Google Scholar
John C. Dalton, Jr. (1825–1889) Experimental Physiologist’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 203 (1968): 221–22.Google Scholar
Kean, Hilda, ‘“The Smooth Cool Men of Science”: The Feminist and Socialist Response to Vivisection’, History Workshop Journal, 40 (1995): 1638.Google Scholar
Lambert, R., Sir John Simon, 1816–1904 and English Social Administration (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1963).Google Scholar
Landecker, Hannah, Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Landsborough Thomson, A., ‘Origin of the British Legislative Provision for Medical Research’, Journal of Social Policy, 2 (1973): 4154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansbury, Coral, The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers and Vivisection in Edwardian England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘The Controversy over Animal Experimentation in America, 1880–1914’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 236–58 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘Hideyo Noguchi’s Luetin Experiment and the Antivivisectionists’, Isis, 76 (1985): 3148.Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘Orphans as Guinea Pigs: American Children and Medical Experimenters, 1890–1930’, in In the Name of the Child: Health and Welfare, 1880–1940, ed. Cooter, Roger, 96123 (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘Political Animals: The Shaping of Biomedical Research Literature in Twentieth-Century America’, Isis, 83 (1992): 6179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederer, Susan, Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lemov, Rebecca, World as Laboratory: Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men (New York: Hill and Wang, 2006).Google Scholar
Leroy, Gaylord C., ‘Richard Holt Hutton’, PMLA, 56 (1941): 809–40.Google Scholar
Libell, Monica, Morality beyond Humanity: Schopenhauer, Grysanowski, and Schweitzer on Animal Ethics (Lund, 2001).Google Scholar
Loveridge, Ann, ‘Historical, Fictional and Illustrative Readings of the Vivisected Body 1873–1913’, doctoral thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University (2017).Google Scholar
Lyons, Dan, ‘Protecting Animals versus the Pursuit of Knowledge: The Evolution of the British Animal Research Policy Process’, Society & Animals, 19 (2011): 356–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNalty, Arthur Salusbury, Sir William Collins, Surgeon and Statesman (London: Chadwick Trust, 1949).Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas Holger, Doctors, Honour and the Law: Medical Ethics in Imperial Germany (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2009).Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘The Ethical Discourse on Animal Experimentation, 1650–1900’, in Doctors and Ethics: The Earlier Historical Setting of Professional Ethics, ed. Wear, A., Geyer-Kordesch, J. and French, R., 203–51. The Wellcome Series in the History of Medicine, Clio Medica, vol. 24 (Amsterdam, 1993).Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘Organisierte Tierversuchsgegner: Gründe und Grenzen ihrer gesellschaftlichen Wirkung, 1879–1933’, in Medizinkritische Bewegungen im Deutschen Reich (ca. 1870–ca. 1933), ed. Dinges, M., 109–25. Medizin, Gesellschaft und Geschichte suppl. vol. 9 (Stuttgart, 1996).Google Scholar
Mayer, Jed, ‘The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Laboratory Animals’, Victorian Studies, 50:3 (2008): 399417.Google Scholar
McKellar, Shelley, ‘Innovation in Modern Surgery: Alexis Carrel and Blood Vessel Repair’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 131–50 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Mckibbin, Ross, ‘Politics and the Medical Hero: A.J. Cronin’s The Citadel’, English Historical Review, 123 (2008): 651–78.Google Scholar
Miller, Ian, ‘Necessary Torture? Vivisection, Suffragette Force-Feeding, and Responses to Scientific Medicine in Britain c. 1870–1920’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 64 (2009): 333–72.Google Scholar
Morantz, Regina Markell, ‘Feminism, Professionalism, and Germs: The Thought of Mary Putnam Jacobi and Elizabeth Blackwell’, American Quarterly, 34 (1982): 459–78.Google Scholar
Morgan, K., ‘Addison, Christopher, First Viscount Addison (1869–1951), Politician’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Moruno, Dolores Martín, Edgar, Brenda Lynn and Leyder, Marie, ‘Feminist Perspectives on the History of Humanitarian Relief (1870–1945)’, Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 36 (2020): 218.Google Scholar
Neff, Roland, Der Streit um den wissenschaftlichen Tierversuch in der Schweiz des 19. Jahrhunderts (Basel: Schwabe, 1989).Google Scholar
Otis, Laura, ‘“Howled out of the Country”: Wilkie Collins and H.G. Wells Retry David Ferrier’, in Neurology and Literature, 1860–1920, ed. Stiles, Anne, 2751 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2007).Google Scholar
Preece, Rod, ‘Darwin, Christianity and the Great Vivisection Debate’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64 (2003): 399419.Google Scholar
Richards, Stewart, ‘Anaesthetics, Ethics and Aesthetics: Vivisection in the Late Nineteenth-Century British Laboratory’, in The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine, ed. Cunningham, Andrew and Williams, Perry, 142–69 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Richards, Stewart, ‘Drawing the Life-Blood of Physiology: Vivisection and the Physiologists’ Dilemma, 1870–1900’, Annals of Science, 43 (1986): 2756.Google Scholar
Robb-Smith, A. H. T., ‘Medical Education’, in The History of the University of Oxford, ed. Brock, M. G. and Curthoys, M. C., 6: 563–82 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Romano, Terrie M., Making Medicine Scientific: John Burdon Sanderson and the Culture of Victorian Science (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Charles E., ‘Martin Arrowsmith: The Scientists as Hero’, American Quarterly, 15 (1963): 447–58.Google Scholar
Ross, Karen D., ‘Recruiting “Friends of Medical Progress”: Evolving Tactics in the Defense of Animal Experimentation, 1910s and 1920s’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 70 (2015): 365–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rupke, Nicolaas, ‘Pro-Vivisection in England in the Early 1880s: Arguments and Motives’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 188208 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas, ed., Vivisection in Historical Perspective (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Salvatici, Silvia, A History of Humanitarianism, 1755–1989: In the Name of Others (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Sauerteig, Lutz, ‘Ethische Richtlinien, Patientenrechte and ärztliches Verhalten bei der Arzneimittelerprobung (1892–1931)’, Medizinhistorisches Journal, 35 (2000): 303–34.Google Scholar
Sax, Boria, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust (New York: Continuum, 2000).Google Scholar
Schickore, Jutta, About Method: Experimenters, Snake Venom, and the History of Writing Scientifically (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulf, Secret Science: A Century of Poison Warfare and Human Experiments (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulf, and Frewer, A., eds, History and Theory of Human Experimentation: The Declaration of Helsinki and Modern Medical Ethics (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2007).Google Scholar
Shmuely, Shira Dina, ‘The Bureaucracy of Empathy: Vivisection and the Question of Animal Pain in Britain, 1876–1912’, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2017).Google Scholar
Stapleton, Darwin H., ed., Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Stiles, Anne, Popular Fiction and Brain Science in the Late Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Taithe, Bertrand, ‘“Cold Calculation in the Faces of Horrors?” Pity, Compassion and the Making of Humanitarian Protocols’, in Medicine, Emotion and Disease, 1700–1950, ed. Alberti, Fay Bound, 7999 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2006).Google Scholar
Taithe, Bertrand, and Borton, John, ‘History, Memory and “Lessons Learnt” from Humanitarian Practitioners’, European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire, 23 (2016): 210–24.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Aya, ‘Hideyo Noguchi, the Pursuit of Immunity and the Persistence of Fame: A Reappraisal’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 227–39 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M., ‘“The Queen Has Been Dreadfully Shocked”: Aspects of Teaching Experimental Physiology Using Animals in Britain, 1876–1986’, Advances in Physiology Education, 19 (1998): 1833.Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M., ‘The Wellcome Physiological Research Laboratories 1894–1904: The Home Office, Pharmaceutical Firms, and Animal Experiments’, Medical History, 33 (1989): 141.Google Scholar
Tröhler, Ulrich, and Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘Anti-Vivisection in Nineteenth-Century Germany and Switzerland: Motives and Methods’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 149–87 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Unti, Bernard, ‘“The Doctors Are So Sure That They Only Are Right”: The Rockefeller Institute and the Defeat of Vivisection Reform in New York, 1908–1914’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 175–90 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Waller, J. C., ‘Gentlemanly Men of Science: Sir Francis Galton and the Professionalization of the British Life-Sciences’, Journal of the History of Biology, 34:1 (2001): 83114.Google Scholar
Warner, John Harley, ‘Ernst, Harold Clarence’, in American National Biography(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Weisz, George, Divide and Conquer: A Comparative History of Medical Specialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Westacott, E., A Century of Vivisection and Anti-Vivisection: A Study of Their Effect upon Science, Medicine and Human Life during the Past Hundred Years (Ashingdon, UK: C. W. Daniel, 1949).Google Scholar
Westermann-Cicio, Mary L., ‘Of Mice and Medical Men: The Medical Profession’s Response to the Vivisection Controversy in Turn of the Century America’, PhD thesis, State University of New York (2001).Google Scholar
Wetherby, Aelwen D., Private Aid, Political Activism: American Medical Relief to Spain and China, 1936–1949 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2017).Google Scholar
White, Paul S., ‘Darwin Wept: Science and the Sentimental Subject’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 16 (2011): 195213.Google Scholar
White, Paul S., ‘The Experimental Animal in Victorian Britain’, in Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Mitman, Gregg, 5981 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
White, Paul S., ‘Sympathy under the Knife: Experimentation and Emotion in Late Victorian Medicine’, in Medicine, Emotion and Disease, 1700–1950, ed. Alberti, Fay Bound, 100–24 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2006).Google Scholar
Willis, Martin, ‘Unmasking Immorality: Popular Opposition to Laboratory Science in Late Victorian Britain’, in Repositioning Victorian Sciences: Shifting Centres in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thinking, ed. Clifford, David, 207–18 (London: Anthem Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Wilson, David A. H., ‘The Public Relations of Experimental Animal Psychology in Britain in the 1970s’, Contemporary British History, 18 (2004): 2746.Google Scholar
Woodfield, Malcolm, ‘Victorian Weekly Reviews and Reviewing after 1860: R.H. Hutton and the Spectator’, Yearbook of English Studies, 16 (1986): 7491.Google Scholar
Woolsey, Thomas A., and Burke, Robert E., ‘The Playwright, the Practitioner, the Politician, the President, and the Pathologist: A Guide to the 1900 Senate Document Titled “Vivisection”’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30 (1987): 235–58.Google Scholar
Worboys, Michael, ‘Klein, Edward Emanuel (1844–1925)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aenosch, Eusebius, Die Vivisektion, das grosse Verbrechen des 19. Jahrhunderts (Dresden: H. Beringer, 1899).Google Scholar
American Humane Association, Human Vivisection: A Statement and an Inquiry, 3rd edn (Fall River, MA: American Humane Association, 1900).Google Scholar
Bain, Alexander, Emotions and the Will, 3rd edn (London: Longmans, Green, 1875).Google Scholar
Bishop of Ely, Humanity and Science (London: Research Defence Society, 1910).Google Scholar
Bowditch, Henry Pickering, ‘The Advancement of Medicine by Research’, Science, 4 (1896).Google Scholar
Bruce, David, The Extinction of Malta Fever (A Lesson in the Use of Animal Experimentation) (London: Macmillan, 1908).Google Scholar
Burdon Sanderson, John, ed., Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory, by Klein, E., Burdon Sanderson, John, Foster, Michael and Brunton, Thomas Lauder, 2 vols (London: J & A Churchill, 1873).Google Scholar
Burdon Sanderson, Lady, Sir John Burdon Sanderson: A Memoir (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911).Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., Animal Experimentation and Its Benefit to Mankind (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1912).Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., ‘Medical Control of Vivisection’, North American Review, 191 (1910): 814–21.Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., ‘The Right and Wrong of Making Experiments on Human Beings’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 67 (1916): 1372–3.Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., Some Characteristics of Antivivisection Literature (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1911).Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B., The Way of an Investigator: A Scientist’s Experiences in Medical Research (New York: W. W. Norton, 1945).Google Scholar
Churchman, John W., ‘The Value of Animal Experimentation as Illustrated by Recent Advances in the Study of Syphilis’ (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1911).Google Scholar
Clover, George F., Animal Experimentation as Viewed by the Superintendent of a Hospital (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Curtis, John G., Why Are Special Laws to Restrict Animal Experimentation Unwise? (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Cushny, A. R., ‘Vivisecton and Medicine: Have Experiments on Animals Advanced Therapeutics’ (1908).Google Scholar
Dana, Charles L., The Service of Animal Experimentation to the Knowledge and Treatment of Nervous Diseases (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man (London: John Murray, 1871).Google Scholar
Darwin, Francis, ed., The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols (London: John Murray, 1887).Google Scholar
Darwin, Francis, and Seward, A. C., eds, More Letters of Charles Darwin (London: John Murray, 1903).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, The Ethics of Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Dunn, Charles Hunter, Animal Experimentation in Relation to Epidemic Cerebrospinal Meningitis (Chicago: AMA, 1911).Google Scholar
Eliot, Charles W., ‘Animal Experimentation’, in Animal Experimentation: A Series of Statements Indicating Its Value to Biological and Medical Science, ed. Ernst, Harold C., 13 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1902).Google Scholar
Ernst, , Harold C., ed., Animal Experimentation: A Series of Statements Indicating Its Value to Biological and Medical Science (Boston: Little, Brown, 1902).Google Scholar
Ewing, James, Animal Experimentation and Cancer (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar
Ferrier, David, ‘The Croonian Lecture – Experiments on the Brain of Monkeys’ [read by John Burdon Sanderson], Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 165 (1875): 433–88.Google Scholar
Flexner, Simon, Animal Experimentation and Infectious Diseases (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar
Flexner, Simon, The So-Called ‘Affidavits Concerning the Atrocities of Vivisection’: A Refutation. Pamphlet, reprinted from New York Times (17 January 1910).Google Scholar
Foerster, Paul, Die Vivisektion, die wissenschafltliche Tierfolter (Munich: Kupferschmid, 1913).Google Scholar
Foerster, Paul, Die Vivisektion: ein Wort zur Verständigung und Mahnung, gerichtet an die vom 17. bis 24. Juli in Paris versammelten Vertreter des Tierschutzes von Dr. Paul Förster (Berlin: Tierschutz-Verein in Comm., 1900).Google Scholar
Gay, Frederick P., Immunology: A Medical Science Developed through Animal Experimentation (Chicago: AMA, 1910).Google Scholar
Goltz, Friedrich, Wider die Humanaster. Rechtfertigung eines Vivisektors (Strassburg: Hansard, 1883).Google Scholar
Harnack, Erich, Tierschutz und Vivisektion (Berlin: Hüpeden & Merzyn, 1906).Google Scholar
Hatcher, Robert A., Animal Experimentation and the Actions of Drugs (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909)Google Scholar
Heidenhain, Rudolf, Die Vivisection im Dienste der Heilkunde, 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1879).Google Scholar
Hendrick, Burton J., ‘American Contributions to Medical Science’, Harper’s Monthly, 129 (1914): 2532.Google Scholar
Hendrick, Burton J., ‘Conquering Spinal Meningitis: What the Rockefeller Institute Has Done for Children’, McClure’s Magazine, 32 (1909): 594604.Google Scholar
Hendrick, Burton J., ‘Work at the Rockefeller Institute: The Transplanting of Animal Organs’, McClure’s Magazine, 32 (1909): 367–83.Google Scholar
Hermann, L., Die Vivisectionsfrage. Für das grössere Publicum beleuchtet (Leipzig: F. C. W. Vogel, 1877).Google Scholar
Hodge, C. F., ‘The Vivisection Question’. Reprinted from Appleton’s Popular Science Monthly (September/October 1896).Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian, ‘The Tissue-Culture King’, Cornhill Magazine, new series 60 (1926): 422–58.Google Scholar
Huxley, Leonard, ed., Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2nd edn, 3 vols (London: Macmillan, 1913).Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., Collected Essays (London: Macmillan, 1894).Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., Method and Results: Essays (New York: D. Appleton, 1898).Google Scholar
Iatros, [Ernst Grysanowski], Die Vivisektion, ihr wissenschaftlicher Wert und ihre ethische Berechtigung (Leipzig, 1877).Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., Animal Experimentation and Medical Progress (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1914).Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., The Influence of Antivivisection on Character (Chicago: AMA, 1912).Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., ‘The Inveracities of Antivivisection’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 67 (1916): 1390–91.Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., ‘Recent Surgical Progress: A Result Chiefly of Experimental Research’, Harper’s Monthly, 118 (1909): 764–73Google Scholar
Kirchwey, George W., The Legal Aspect of Animal Experimentation in the State of New York (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Laab, Artur, Fort mit der Vivisektion! Fort mit den experimentellen Mißbräuchen and lebenden Menschen und Tieren!; Ein ernster Mahnruf and die Menschheit (Graz: Verl. des Bundes gegen die Vivisektion in Österreich, 1905).Google Scholar
Lee, F. S., The Publications of the New York Anti-Vivisection Society (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Lee, F. S., ‘The Role of Experiment in Medicine: The Public and the Medical Profession’, in Scientific Features of Modern Medicine, 154–76 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1911).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, F. S., The Sense of Pain in Man and the Lower Animals (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar
Lubarsch, Otto, Über die sogenannte Vivisektion (Halle: C. Marhold, 1905).Google Scholar
Ludwig, C., ‘Die “Vivisection” vor dem Richterstuhl der Gegenwart: Ein Wort zur Vermittelung’, Die Gartenlaube (1879): 417–19.Google Scholar
Lusk, Graham, Animal Experimentation and Diabetes (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Mac Cormac, William, ed., Transactions of the International Medical Congress (London, J. W. Kolckmann, 1881).Google Scholar
Meltzer, S. J., The Function of the Thyroid Glands: An Important Chapter in Modern Medicine Based upon Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Mendel, Lafayette B., Animal Experimentation and Nutrition (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Milena, Elpis [Marie-Espérance von Schwartz], Gemma oder Tugend and Laster (Franz, 1877).Google Scholar
Moore, Veranus A., The Relation of Animal Experimentation to the Live Stock Industry (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Oeffentliche Disputation über die Vivisektion, gehalten im Physiologischen Institute der Universität Bern am 31. Januar 1903: Nebst einem Vorwort (Dresden: Internat. Ver. z. Bekämpfung d. wiss. Tierfolter, 1904).Google Scholar
Official Circular Addressed to the German Universities by the Minister of Public Instruction Enjoining Safeguards against Abuses of Vivisection, with an Appendix Containing the Statements of the Several Medical Faculties (London: J. W. Kolckmann, 1885).Google Scholar
Paget, James, Owen, Richard and Wilks, Samuel, ‘Vivisection: Its Pains and Its Uses’, Nineteenth Century, 10 (1881): 902–48.Google Scholar
Paget, Stephen, Experiments on Animals (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1900).Google Scholar
Paget, Stephen, ed., For and Against Experiments on Animals: Evidence before the Royal Commission on Vivisection (London: H. K. Lewis, 1912).Google Scholar
Park, William H., ‘Animal Experimentation and Diphtheria’ (1909).Google Scholar
Philanthropos, [Gerald Yeo], Physiological Cruelty: or, Fact v. Fancy. An Inquiry into the Vivisection Question (London: Tinsley Bros., 1883).Google Scholar
Research Defence Society, Evidence of Lord Justice Fletcher Moulton before the Royal Commission on Vivisection (London: Macmillan, 1908).Google Scholar
Romanes, E., The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, New edn (London: Longmans, Green, 1896).Google Scholar
Rutherford, William, ‘The Chief Medical Schools of the Continent’, Edinburgh Medical Journal, 11 (1865): 341–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Schurman, Jacob Gould, President Schurman on Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
Simon, John, ‘An Address Delivered at the Opening of the Section of Public Medicine’, British Medical Journal (August 6, 1881): 219–23.Google Scholar
Simon, John, English Sanitary Institutions, 2nd edn (London: John Murray, 1897).Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert, Principles of Psychology (1899; Osnabrück: Otto Zeller, 1966).Google Scholar
Stenz, Hermann, Die Vivisektion, der wissenschaftliche Wahnsinn unserer Zeit: kurze Darlegung der Unhaltbarkeit, Verwerflichkeit und allgemeinen Schädlichkeit, sowie die Entbehrlichkeit des Folterns lebender Tiere zu wissenschaftlichen Zwecken (Dresden: Weltbund gegen d. Vivisektion, 1900).Google Scholar
Trudeau, Edward L., Animal Experimentation and Tuberculosis (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Appendix to the First Report of the Commissioners, C. 3326 (1907).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Appendix to the Fourth Report of the Commissioners, C. 3955 (1908).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Appendix to the Third Report of the Commissioners, C. 3757 (1907).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Final Report of the Departmental Committee on Tuberculosis, C. 6641 (1913).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Final Report of the Royal Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Relation of Human and Animal Tuberculosis, C. 5761 (1911).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, Report of the Royal Commission on the Practice of Subjecting Live Animals to Experiments for Scientific Purposes, C. 1397 (1876).Google Scholar
US Government, Vivisection: Hearing before the Senate Committee on the District of Columbia, February 21, 1900, on the Bill (S. 34) for the Further Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1900).Google Scholar
Weber, Ernst, von, Die Folterkammern der Wissenschaft. Eine Sammlung von Thatsachen für das Laien-Publikum (Berlin, 1879).Google Scholar
Welch, W. H., ‘The Interdependence of Medicine and Other Sciences of Nature’, in Papers and Addresses, 3:315–33 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1920).Google Scholar
Welch, William H., ‘On Some of the Humane Aspects of Medical Science’, in Papers and Addresses, 3:3–8 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1920).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Island of Dr Moreau (London: Heinemann, 1896).Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891; New York: Mondial, 2015).Google Scholar
Wile, Udo, ‘Experimental Syphilis in the Rabbit Produced by the Brain Substance of the Living Paretic’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 23 (1916): 199202.Google Scholar
Wolf, Richard, Mensch, Tier und Vivisektion (Leipzig: Altmann, [1900]).Google Scholar
Arluke, Arnold, and Sax, Boria, ‘Understanding Nazi Animal Protection and the Holocaust’, Anthrozoös, 5 (1992): 631.Google Scholar
Asdal, Kristin, ‘Subjected to Parliament: The Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and the Animal Body’, Social Studies of Science, 38 (2008): 899917.Google Scholar
Atalic, Bruno, and Fatovic-Ferencic, Stella, ‘Emanuel Edward Klein – The Father of British Microbiology and the Case of the Animal Vivisection Controversy of 1875’, Toxicologic Pathology, 37 (2009): 708–13.Google Scholar
Barton, Ruth, ‘Men of Science: Language, Identity and Professionalization in the Mid-Victorian Scientific Community’, History of Science, 41:1 (2003): 73119.Google Scholar
Bates, A. W. H., Anti-Vivisection and the Profession of Medicine in Britain (London: Palgrave, 2017).Google Scholar
Beers, Diane L., For the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States (Ohio: Swallow Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bellon, Richard, ‘Joseph Dalton Hooker’s Ideals for a Professional Man of Science’, Journal of the History of Biology, 34:1 (2001): 73119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benison, Saul, ‘Simon Flexner: The Evolution of a Career in Medical Science,’ Institute to University.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Carin, ‘Disputed Discovery: Vivisection and Experiment in the 19th Century’, Endeavour, 30 (2006): 98102.Google Scholar
Beromeu-Sánchez, José Ramón, ‘Animal Experiments, Vital Forces and Courtrooms: Mateu Orfila, François Magendie and the Study of Poisons in Nineteenth-Century France’, Annals of Science, 69 (2012): 126.Google Scholar
Bittel, Carla, ‘Science, Suffrage, and Experimentation: Mary Putnam Jacobi and the Controversy over Vivisection in Late Nineteenth-Century America’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 79 (2005): 664–94.Google Scholar
Bliss, Michael, William Osler: A Life in Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, A History of Attitudes and Behaviours toward Animals in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain: Anthropocentrism and the Emergence of Animals (Lewiston: Mellen, 2009).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, A History of Feelings (London: Reaktion, 2019).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘Bestiality in a Time of Smallpox: Dr Jenner and the “Modern Chimera”’, in Exploring Animal Encounters: Philosophical, Cultural and Historical Perspectives, ed. Ohrem, Dominik and Calarco, Matthew, 155–78 (London: Palgrave, 2018).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘The End of Anthropocentrism’, in Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments, ed. Boddice, Rob, 118 (Leiden: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘German Methods, English Morals: Physiological Networks and the Question of Callousness, c.1870–1881’, in Anglo-German Scholarly Relations in the Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Ellis, Heather and Kirchberger, Ulrike, 84102 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘The Historical Animal Mind: “Sagacity” in Nineteenth-Century Britain’, in Experiencing Animals: Encounters between Animal and Human Minds, ed. Mitchell, Robert W. and Smith, Julie, 6578 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, The History of Emotions (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cachet’, JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture and Politics, 30:3–4 (2010): 457–89.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, The Science of Sympathy: Morality, Evolution and Victorian Civilization (Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘Species of Compassion: Aesthetics, Anaesthetics and Pain in the Physiological Laboratory’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, 15 (2012).Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘Vivisecting Major: A Victorian Gentleman Scientist Defends Animal Experimentation, 1876–1885’, Isis, 102 (2011): 215–37.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, and Smith, Mark, Emotion, Sense, Experience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna, The Story of Pain: From Prayer to Painkillers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna, What It Means to Be Human: Reflections from 1791 to the Present (London: Virago, 2011).Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., ‘Lankester, Sir (Edwin) Ray (1847–1929)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Bretschneider, H., Der Streit um die Vivisektion im 19. Jahrhundert. Verlauf – Argumente – Ergebnisse (Stuttgart, 1962).Google Scholar
Brock, D. Heyward, ‘The Doctor as Dramatic Hero’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 34 (1991): 279–95.Google Scholar
Bryder, Linda, ‘Tuberculosis and the MRC’, in Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC: Essays in the History of the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom and Its Predecessor, the Medical Research Committee, 1913–1953, ed. Austoker, Joan and Bryder, Linda, 121 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Buettinger, Craig, ‘Antivivisection and the Charge of Zoophil-Psychosis in the Early Twentieth Century’, The Historian, 55 (1992): 277–88.Google Scholar
Buettinger, Craig, ‘Women and Antivivisection in Late Nineteenth-Century America’, Journal of Social History, 30 (1997): 857–72.Google Scholar
Butler, Stella V. F., ‘Centers and Peripheries: The Development of British Physiology, 1870–1914’, Journal of the History of Biology, 21 (1988): 473500.Google Scholar
Catlet, Stephen, ‘Huxley, Hutton and the “White Rage”: A Debate on Vivisection at the Metaphysical Society’, Archives of Natural History, 11 (1983): 181–9.Google Scholar
Colby, Robert A., ‘“How It Strikes a Contemporary”: The “Spectator” as Critic’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 11 (1956): 182206.Google Scholar
Corner, George W., A History of the Rockefeller Institute 1901–1953, Origins and Growth (New York: Rockefeller Institute Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, and Williams, Perry, eds, The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Cushing, Harvey, The Life of Sir William Osler (Oxford, 1940).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter, Objectivity (New York: Zone Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Davis, John, ‘Higher Education Reform and the German Model: A Victorian Discourse’, in Anglo-German Scholarly Relations in the Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Ellis, Heather and Kirchberger, Ulrike, 3962 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dror, Otniel, ‘The Affect of Experiment: The Turn to Emotions in Anglo-American Physiology, 1900–1940’, Isis, 90 (1999): 205–37.Google Scholar
Elston, Mary Ann, ‘The Anti-Vivisectionist Movement and the Science of Medicine’, in Challenging Medicine, ed. Gabe, Jonathan, Kelleher, David and Williams, Gareth, 160–80 (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
Elston, Mary Ann, ‘Women and Anti-Vivisection in Victorian England, 1870–1900’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas A., 259–94 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Flexner, James Thomas, An American Saga: The Story of Helen Thomas and Simon Flexner (New York: Fordham University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
French, Richard D., Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Friedman, David M., The Immortalists; Charles Lindbergh, Dr. Alexis Carrel, and Their Daring Quest to Live Forever (New York: Harper, 2007).Google Scholar
Fye, W. Bruce, ‘Carl Ludwig and the Leipzig Physiological Institute: “A Factory of New Knowledge”’, Circulation, 74 (1986): 920–28.Google Scholar
Fye, W. Bruce, The Development of American Physiology: Scientific Medicine in the Nineteenth Century (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Geison, Gerald L., Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology: The Scientific Enterprise in Late Victorian Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Gere, Cathy, Pain, Pleasure, and the Greater Good: From the Panopticon to the Skinner Box and Beyond (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Geroulanos, Stephanos, and Meyers, Todd, The Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe: Brittleness, Integration, Science, and the Great War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gest, Howard, ‘Dr. Martin Arrowsmith: Scientist and Medical Hero’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 35 (1991): 116–24.Google Scholar
Gill, Rebecca, Calculating Compassion: Humanity and Relief in War, Britain, 1870–1914 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Gollin, Alfred M., The Observer and J. L. Garvin, 1908–1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Goodman, Jordan, and McElligot, Anthony, eds, Useful Bodies: Humans in the Service of Medical Science in the Twentieth Century (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gossel, Patricia Peck, ‘William Henry Welch and the Antivivisection Legislation in the District of Columbia, 1896–1900’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 40 (1985): 397419.Google Scholar
Gradmann, Christoph, ‘“It Seemed about Time to Try One of Those Modern Medicines”: Animal and Human Experimentation in the Chemotherapy of Sleeping Sickness 1905–1908’, in Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subjects Research: Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations, ed. Roelcke, Volker, 8397 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2004).Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Patrizia, ‘Moritz Schiff (1823–96): Experimental Physiology and Noble Sentiment in Florence’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas A., 105–24 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Halttunen, Karen, ‘Humanitarianism and the Pornography of Pain in Anglo-American Culture’, American Historical Review, 100 (1995): 303–34.Google Scholar
Halverson, Kristin, ‘Physiological Cruelty? Discussing and Developing Vivisection in Great Britain, 1875–1901’, MA thesis, Södertörn University (2016).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Susan, ‘Reading and the Popular Critique of Science in the Victorian Anti-Vivisection Press: Frances Power Cobbe’s Writing for the Victoria Street Society’, Victorian Review, 36 (2010): 6679.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bert, ‘Medical History for the Masses: How American Comic Books Celebrated Heroes of Medicine in the 1940s’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 78 (2004): 148–91.Google Scholar
Hanson, Elizabeth, ‘Women Scientists at the Rockefeller Institute, 1901–1940’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 211–25 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L., ‘Capitalism and the Origins of the Humanitarian Sensibility’, parts I and II, American Historical Review, 90 (1985): 339–61, 547–66.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russel, The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Honigsbaum, Frank, ‘Christopher Addison: A Realist in Pursuit of Dreams’, in Doctors, Politics and Society: Historical Essays, ed. Porter, Dorothy and Porter, Roy, 229–46 (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993).Google Scholar
Hornsby, Asha, ‘Unfeeling Brutes? The 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection and the Science of Suffering’, Victorian Review, 45 (2019): 97115.Google Scholar
Hutchison, John, Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Institute to University: A Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Colloquium, June 8, 1976 (New York: Rockefeller University, 1976).Google Scholar
John C. Dalton, Jr. (1825–1889) Experimental Physiologist’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 203 (1968): 221–22.Google Scholar
Kean, Hilda, ‘“The Smooth Cool Men of Science”: The Feminist and Socialist Response to Vivisection’, History Workshop Journal, 40 (1995): 1638.Google Scholar
Lambert, R., Sir John Simon, 1816–1904 and English Social Administration (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1963).Google Scholar
Landecker, Hannah, Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Landsborough Thomson, A., ‘Origin of the British Legislative Provision for Medical Research’, Journal of Social Policy, 2 (1973): 4154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansbury, Coral, The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers and Vivisection in Edwardian England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘The Controversy over Animal Experimentation in America, 1880–1914’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 236–58 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘Hideyo Noguchi’s Luetin Experiment and the Antivivisectionists’, Isis, 76 (1985): 3148.Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘Orphans as Guinea Pigs: American Children and Medical Experimenters, 1890–1930’, in In the Name of the Child: Health and Welfare, 1880–1940, ed. Cooter, Roger, 96123 (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Lederer, Susan, ‘Political Animals: The Shaping of Biomedical Research Literature in Twentieth-Century America’, Isis, 83 (1992): 6179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederer, Susan, Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lemov, Rebecca, World as Laboratory: Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men (New York: Hill and Wang, 2006).Google Scholar
Leroy, Gaylord C., ‘Richard Holt Hutton’, PMLA, 56 (1941): 809–40.Google Scholar
Libell, Monica, Morality beyond Humanity: Schopenhauer, Grysanowski, and Schweitzer on Animal Ethics (Lund, 2001).Google Scholar
Loveridge, Ann, ‘Historical, Fictional and Illustrative Readings of the Vivisected Body 1873–1913’, doctoral thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University (2017).Google Scholar
Lyons, Dan, ‘Protecting Animals versus the Pursuit of Knowledge: The Evolution of the British Animal Research Policy Process’, Society & Animals, 19 (2011): 356–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNalty, Arthur Salusbury, Sir William Collins, Surgeon and Statesman (London: Chadwick Trust, 1949).Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas Holger, Doctors, Honour and the Law: Medical Ethics in Imperial Germany (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2009).Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘The Ethical Discourse on Animal Experimentation, 1650–1900’, in Doctors and Ethics: The Earlier Historical Setting of Professional Ethics, ed. Wear, A., Geyer-Kordesch, J. and French, R., 203–51. The Wellcome Series in the History of Medicine, Clio Medica, vol. 24 (Amsterdam, 1993).Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘Organisierte Tierversuchsgegner: Gründe und Grenzen ihrer gesellschaftlichen Wirkung, 1879–1933’, in Medizinkritische Bewegungen im Deutschen Reich (ca. 1870–ca. 1933), ed. Dinges, M., 109–25. Medizin, Gesellschaft und Geschichte suppl. vol. 9 (Stuttgart, 1996).Google Scholar
Mayer, Jed, ‘The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Laboratory Animals’, Victorian Studies, 50:3 (2008): 399417.Google Scholar
McKellar, Shelley, ‘Innovation in Modern Surgery: Alexis Carrel and Blood Vessel Repair’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 131–50 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Mckibbin, Ross, ‘Politics and the Medical Hero: A.J. Cronin’s The Citadel’, English Historical Review, 123 (2008): 651–78.Google Scholar
Miller, Ian, ‘Necessary Torture? Vivisection, Suffragette Force-Feeding, and Responses to Scientific Medicine in Britain c. 1870–1920’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 64 (2009): 333–72.Google Scholar
Morantz, Regina Markell, ‘Feminism, Professionalism, and Germs: The Thought of Mary Putnam Jacobi and Elizabeth Blackwell’, American Quarterly, 34 (1982): 459–78.Google Scholar
Morgan, K., ‘Addison, Christopher, First Viscount Addison (1869–1951), Politician’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Moruno, Dolores Martín, Edgar, Brenda Lynn and Leyder, Marie, ‘Feminist Perspectives on the History of Humanitarian Relief (1870–1945)’, Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 36 (2020): 218.Google Scholar
Neff, Roland, Der Streit um den wissenschaftlichen Tierversuch in der Schweiz des 19. Jahrhunderts (Basel: Schwabe, 1989).Google Scholar
Otis, Laura, ‘“Howled out of the Country”: Wilkie Collins and H.G. Wells Retry David Ferrier’, in Neurology and Literature, 1860–1920, ed. Stiles, Anne, 2751 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2007).Google Scholar
Preece, Rod, ‘Darwin, Christianity and the Great Vivisection Debate’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64 (2003): 399419.Google Scholar
Richards, Stewart, ‘Anaesthetics, Ethics and Aesthetics: Vivisection in the Late Nineteenth-Century British Laboratory’, in The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine, ed. Cunningham, Andrew and Williams, Perry, 142–69 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Richards, Stewart, ‘Drawing the Life-Blood of Physiology: Vivisection and the Physiologists’ Dilemma, 1870–1900’, Annals of Science, 43 (1986): 2756.Google Scholar
Robb-Smith, A. H. T., ‘Medical Education’, in The History of the University of Oxford, ed. Brock, M. G. and Curthoys, M. C., 6: 563–82 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Romano, Terrie M., Making Medicine Scientific: John Burdon Sanderson and the Culture of Victorian Science (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Charles E., ‘Martin Arrowsmith: The Scientists as Hero’, American Quarterly, 15 (1963): 447–58.Google Scholar
Ross, Karen D., ‘Recruiting “Friends of Medical Progress”: Evolving Tactics in the Defense of Animal Experimentation, 1910s and 1920s’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 70 (2015): 365–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rupke, Nicolaas, ‘Pro-Vivisection in England in the Early 1880s: Arguments and Motives’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 188208 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas, ed., Vivisection in Historical Perspective (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Salvatici, Silvia, A History of Humanitarianism, 1755–1989: In the Name of Others (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Sauerteig, Lutz, ‘Ethische Richtlinien, Patientenrechte and ärztliches Verhalten bei der Arzneimittelerprobung (1892–1931)’, Medizinhistorisches Journal, 35 (2000): 303–34.Google Scholar
Sax, Boria, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust (New York: Continuum, 2000).Google Scholar
Schickore, Jutta, About Method: Experimenters, Snake Venom, and the History of Writing Scientifically (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulf, Secret Science: A Century of Poison Warfare and Human Experiments (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulf, and Frewer, A., eds, History and Theory of Human Experimentation: The Declaration of Helsinki and Modern Medical Ethics (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2007).Google Scholar
Shmuely, Shira Dina, ‘The Bureaucracy of Empathy: Vivisection and the Question of Animal Pain in Britain, 1876–1912’, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2017).Google Scholar
Stapleton, Darwin H., ed., Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Stiles, Anne, Popular Fiction and Brain Science in the Late Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Taithe, Bertrand, ‘“Cold Calculation in the Faces of Horrors?” Pity, Compassion and the Making of Humanitarian Protocols’, in Medicine, Emotion and Disease, 1700–1950, ed. Alberti, Fay Bound, 7999 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2006).Google Scholar
Taithe, Bertrand, and Borton, John, ‘History, Memory and “Lessons Learnt” from Humanitarian Practitioners’, European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire, 23 (2016): 210–24.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Aya, ‘Hideyo Noguchi, the Pursuit of Immunity and the Persistence of Fame: A Reappraisal’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 227–39 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M., ‘“The Queen Has Been Dreadfully Shocked”: Aspects of Teaching Experimental Physiology Using Animals in Britain, 1876–1986’, Advances in Physiology Education, 19 (1998): 1833.Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M., ‘The Wellcome Physiological Research Laboratories 1894–1904: The Home Office, Pharmaceutical Firms, and Animal Experiments’, Medical History, 33 (1989): 141.Google Scholar
Tröhler, Ulrich, and Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘Anti-Vivisection in Nineteenth-Century Germany and Switzerland: Motives and Methods’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 149–87 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
Unti, Bernard, ‘“The Doctors Are So Sure That They Only Are Right”: The Rockefeller Institute and the Defeat of Vivisection Reform in New York, 1908–1914’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 175–90 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Waller, J. C., ‘Gentlemanly Men of Science: Sir Francis Galton and the Professionalization of the British Life-Sciences’, Journal of the History of Biology, 34:1 (2001): 83114.Google Scholar
Warner, John Harley, ‘Ernst, Harold Clarence’, in American National Biography(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Weisz, George, Divide and Conquer: A Comparative History of Medical Specialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Westacott, E., A Century of Vivisection and Anti-Vivisection: A Study of Their Effect upon Science, Medicine and Human Life during the Past Hundred Years (Ashingdon, UK: C. W. Daniel, 1949).Google Scholar
Westermann-Cicio, Mary L., ‘Of Mice and Medical Men: The Medical Profession’s Response to the Vivisection Controversy in Turn of the Century America’, PhD thesis, State University of New York (2001).Google Scholar
Wetherby, Aelwen D., Private Aid, Political Activism: American Medical Relief to Spain and China, 1936–1949 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2017).Google Scholar
White, Paul S., ‘Darwin Wept: Science and the Sentimental Subject’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 16 (2011): 195213.Google Scholar
White, Paul S., ‘The Experimental Animal in Victorian Britain’, in Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Mitman, Gregg, 5981 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
White, Paul S., ‘Sympathy under the Knife: Experimentation and Emotion in Late Victorian Medicine’, in Medicine, Emotion and Disease, 1700–1950, ed. Alberti, Fay Bound, 100–24 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2006).Google Scholar
Willis, Martin, ‘Unmasking Immorality: Popular Opposition to Laboratory Science in Late Victorian Britain’, in Repositioning Victorian Sciences: Shifting Centres in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thinking, ed. Clifford, David, 207–18 (London: Anthem Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Wilson, David A. H., ‘The Public Relations of Experimental Animal Psychology in Britain in the 1970s’, Contemporary British History, 18 (2004): 2746.Google Scholar
Woodfield, Malcolm, ‘Victorian Weekly Reviews and Reviewing after 1860: R.H. Hutton and the Spectator’, Yearbook of English Studies, 16 (1986): 7491.Google Scholar
Woolsey, Thomas A., and Burke, Robert E., ‘The Playwright, the Practitioner, the Politician, the President, and the Pathologist: A Guide to the 1900 Senate Document Titled “Vivisection”’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30 (1987): 235–58.Google Scholar
Worboys, Michael, ‘Klein, Edward Emanuel (1844–1925)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×