Microscopy: Enhancing Visualization in the Surgical Challenge

doi:10.1017/9781009597852.016

Chapter 10 - Microscopy: Enhancing Visualization in the Surgical Challenge

from Section IV - The Surgeon’s Armamentarium

Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN

Kate Rosen ,

Evan Bander and

Theodore H. Schwartz

Edited by

Benjamin Hartley ,

Philip E. Stieg ,

Rohan Ramakrishna and

Michael L. J. Apuzzo

Show author details

Benjamin Hartley: Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical Center
Philip E. Stieg: Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College
Rohan Ramakrishna: Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College
Michael L. J. Apuzzo: Affiliation:
Adjunct of Yale Medical School and Weill Cornell Medical College

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The chapter discusses the evolution of neurosurgical visualization techniques, drawing an analogy to Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave.” Traditional medical imaging provides an incomplete view of reality, similar to shadows on a cave wall. Neurosurgeons, however, can “escape the cave” by directly observing the body’s internal structures during surgery. The chapter highlights the advancements in magnification and visual augmentation tools, such as operating microscopes, endoscopes, and exoscopes. These tools have significantly improved surgical precision and outcomes. Fluorescent molecules such as fluorescein and 5-ALA enhance the surgeon’s ability to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. The chapter also explores the future potential of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in neurosurgery, which could further revolutionize surgical practices by providing enhanced visualization and planning capabilities.

Keywords

Neurosurgical Visualization Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Operating Microscope Endoscope Exoscope Fluorescent Molecules Augmented Reality (AR)Virtual Reality (VR)Surgical Precision Medical Imaging

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Neurosurgery
Beyond the Cutting Edge
, pp. 209 - 220

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009597852.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Qafiti, FN, Marsh, AM, Yi, S, Lopez-Viego, MA, Buicko, JL. Under the microscope: the evolution of surgical loupes. Am Surg 2022; 88(9): 2100–2.Google Scholar PubMed

Schultheiss, D, Denil, J. History of the microscope and development of microsurgery: a revolution for reproductive tract surgery. Andrologia 2002; 34(4): 234–41.10.1046/j.1439-0272.2002.00499.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Surgical loupes market to reach $713.7 million, globally, by 2032 at 5.6% CAGR: Allied Market Research. Globe Newswire, 2023.10.1016/j.focat.2023.08.006CrossRef Google Scholar

Kriss, TC, Kriss, VM. History of the operating microscope: from magnifying glass to microneurosurgery. Neurosurgery 1998; 42(4): 899–907.10.1097/00006123-199804000-00116CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hoerenz, P. Magnification: loupes and the operating microscope. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23(4): 1151–62.10.1097/00003081-198012000-00021CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rigante, L, Borghei-Razavi, H, Recinos, PF, Roser, F. An overview of endoscopy in neurologic surgery. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2019; 86(10): 16ME–24ME.10.3949/ccjm.86.me.18142CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goyal, A, Lu, VM, Yolcu, YU, Elminawy, M, Daniels, DJ. Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst 2018; 34(9): 1627–37.10.1007/s00381-018-3852-4CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Langer, DJ, White, TG, Schulder, M, Boockvar, JA, Labib, M, Lawton, MT. Advances in intraoperative optics: a brief review of current exoscope platforms. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2020; 19(1): 84–93.10.1093/ons/opz276CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Montemurro, N, Scerrati, A, Ricciardi, L, Trevisi, G. The exoscope in neurosurgery: an overview of the current literature of intraoperative use in brain and spine surgery. J Clin Med 2021; 11(1).10.3390/jcm11010223CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Roethe, AL, Landgraf, P, Schröder, T, Misch, M, Vajkoczy, P, Picht, T. Monitor-based exoscopic 3D 4k neurosurgical interventions: a two-phase prospective-randomized clinical evaluation of a novel hybrid device. Acta Neurochirurgica 2020; 162(12): 2949–61.10.1007/s00701-020-04361-2CrossRef Google Scholar

Burkhardt, BW, Csokonay, A, Oertel, JM. 3D-exoscopic visualization using the VITOM-3D in cranial and spinal neurosurgery. What are the limitations? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 198: 106101.10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106101CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shinoda, J, Yano, H, Yoshimura, S-I, et al. Fluorescence-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme by using high-dose fluorescein sodium. J Neurosurg 2003; 99(3): 597–603.10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0597CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koc, K, Anik, I, Cabuk, B, Ceylan, S. Fluorescein sodium-guided surgery in glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective evaluation. Br J Neurosurg 2008; 22(1): 99–103.10.1080/02688690701765524CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neira, JA, Ung, TH, Sims, JS, et al. Aggressive resection at the infiltrative margins of glioblastoma facilitated by intraoperative fluorescein guidance. J Neurosurg 2016: 1–12.10.3171/2016.7.JNS16232CrossRef Google Scholar

Pichlmeier, U, Bink, A, Schackert, G, Stummer, W, Group tALAGS. Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: an RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients. Neuro-Oncology 2008; 10(6): 1025–34.10.1215/15228517-2008-052CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lacroix, M, Abi-Said, D, Fourney, DR, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 2001; 95(2): 190–8.10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Haddad, AF, Young, JS, Morshed, RA, Berger, MS. FLAIRectomy: resecting beyond the contrast margin for glioblastoma. Brain Sci 2022; 12(5).10.3390/brainsci12050544CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schucht, P, Beck, Jr, Abu-Isa, J, et al. Gross total resection rates in contemporary glioblastoma surgery: results of an institutional protocol combining 5-aminolevulinic acid intraoperative fluorescence imaging and brain mapping. Neurosurgery 2012; 71(5): 927–35; discussion 35–36.10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826d1e6bCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hadjipanayis, CG, Stummer, W. 5-ALA and FDA approval for glioma surgery. J Neuro-Oncol 2019; 141(3): 479–86.10.1007/s11060-019-03098-yCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lau, D, Hervey-Jumper, SL, Chang, S, et al. A prospective Phase II clinical trial of 5-aminolevulinic acid to assess the correlation of intraoperative fluorescence intensity and degree of histologic cellularity during resection of high-grade gliomas. J Neurosurg 2016; 124(5): 1300–9.10.3171/2015.5.JNS1577CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stummer, W, Tonn, Jr-C, Goetz, C, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic acid-derived tumor fluorescence: the diagnostic accuracy of visible fluorescence qualities as corroborated by spectrometry and histology and postoperative imaging. Neurosurgery 2014; 74(3): 310–19; discussion 9–20.10.1227/NEU.0000000000000267CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Aldave, G, Tejada, S, Pay, E, et al. Prognostic value of residual fluorescent tissue in glioblastoma patients after gross total resection in 5-aminolevulinic acid-guided surgery. Neurosurgery 2013; 72(6): 915–20; discussion 20–1.10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828c3974CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Giantini-Larsen, AM, Parker, WE, Cho, SS, et al. The evolution of 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence visualization: time for a headlamp/loupe combination. World Neurosurg 2022; 159: 136–43.10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.089CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hadjipanayis, CG, Widhalm, G, Stummer, W. What is the surgical benefit of utilizing 5-aminolevulinic acid for fluorescence-guided surgery of malignant gliomas? Neurosurgery 2015; 77(5): 663–73.10.1227/NEU.0000000000000929CrossRef Google Scholar

Choi, C, Ganji, SK, DeBerardinis, RJ, et al. 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nature Med 2012; 18(4): 624–9.10.1038/nm.2682CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Teng, CW, Huang, V, Arguelles, GR, et al. Applications of indocyanine green in brain tumor surgery: review of clinical evidence and emerging technologies. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 50(1): E4.10.3171/2020.10.FOCUS20782CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Madajewski, B, Judy, BF, Mouchli, A, et al. Intraoperative near-infrared imaging of surgical wounds after tumor resections can detect residual disease. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18(20): 5741–51.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1188CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferroli, P, Acerbi, F, Albanese, E, et al. Application of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for CNS tumors: results on the first 100 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011; 109: 251–7.10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5_40CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sandow, N, Klene, W, Elbelt, U, Strasburger, CJ, Vajkoczy, P. Intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography for identification of pituitary adenomas using a microscopic transsphenoidal approach. Pituitary 2015; 18(5): 613–20.10.1007/s11102-014-0620-7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cho, SS, Lee, JYK. Intraoperative fluorescent visualization of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2019; 30(4): 401–12.10.1016/j.nec.2019.05.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bielenberg, DR, Zetter, BR. The contribution of angiogenesis to the process of metastasis. Cancer J 2015; 21(4): 267–73.10.1097/PPO.0000000000000138CrossRef Google Scholar

Cho, SS, Sheikh, S, Teng, CW, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy following the coadministration of delta-aminolevulinic acid and second window indocyanine green in rodent and human glioblastomas. Mol Imaging Biol 2020; 22(5): 1266–79.10.1007/s11307-020-01504-wCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mallidi, S, Luke, GP, Emelianov, S. Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance. Trends Biotechnol 2011; 29(5): 213–21.10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.01.006CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thawani, JP, Amirshaghaghi, A, Yan, L, Stein, JM, Liu, J, Tsourkas, A. Photoacoustic-guided surgery with indocyanine green-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle clusters. Small 2017; 13(37).10.1002/smll.201701300CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Raabe, A, Beck, J, Seifert, V. Technique and image quality of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography during aneurysm surgery using surgical microscope integrated near-infrared video technology. Zentralbl Neurochir 2005; 66(1): 1–6; discussion 7–8.Google Scholar PubMed

Washington, CW, Zipfel, GJ, Chicoine, MR, et al. Comparing indocyanine green videoangiography to the gold standard of intraoperative digital subtraction angiography used in aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 2013; 118(2): 420–7.10.3171/2012.10.JNS11818CrossRef Google Scholar

Lane, BC, Cohen-Gadol, AA. A prospective study of microscope-integrated intraoperative fluorescein videoangiography during arteriovenous malformation surgery: preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36(2): E15.10.3171/2013.11.FOCUS13483CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Oppenlander, ME, Wolf, AB, Snyder, LA, et al. An extent of resection threshold for recurrent glioblastoma and its risk for neurological morbidity. J Neurosurg 2014; 120(4): 846–53.10.3171/2013.12.JNS13184CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mascitelli, JR, Schlachter, L, Chartrain, AG, et al. Navigation-linked heads-up display in intracranial surgery: early experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 15(2): 184–93.Google Scholar PubMed

Louis, RG, Steinberg, GK, Duma, C, et al. Early experience with virtual and synchronized augmented reality platform for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation: a case series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21(4): 189–96.Google Scholar PubMed

Sommer, F, Hussain, I, Kirnaz, S, et al. Safety and feasibility of augmented reality assistance in minimally invasive and open resection of benign intradural extramedullary tumors. Neurospine 2022; 19(3): 501–12.10.14245/ns.2244222.111CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.