Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T10:03:01.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2023

Tim Wharton
Affiliation:
University of Brighton
Louis de Saussure
Affiliation:
Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, D. (2015a). More misrepresentation: A response to Behme and Evans 2015. Lingua 162: 160–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.005.Google Scholar
Adger, D. (2015b). Mythical myths: Comments on Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth.Lingua 158: 7680.Google Scholar
Allott, N. and Textor., M. (2017). Lexical modulation without concepts. Dialectica 71(3): 399424.Google Scholar
Alpi, A, Amrhein, N., Bertl, A. et al. (2007). Plant neurobiology: No brain, no gain? Trends in Plant Science 12(4): 135–6.Google Scholar
Ameka, F. (1992). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18; 101–18.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural re-use as a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioural Science 33: 245–66.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J. and Ducrot., O. (1983). L’Argumentation dans la Langue. Brussels: Éditions Madarga.Google Scholar
Arnauld, A. and Lancelot., C. (1966). Grammaire générale et raisonnée, ou La grammaire de Port-Royal. Volume 2. Stuttgart: Frommann. (Originally published 1665.)Google Scholar
Arnold, M. (1960a). Emotion and Personality, Vol. I. Psychological Aspects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. (1960b). Emotion and Personality, Vol. II. Neurological and Physiological Aspects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Arp, R. (2008). Scenario Visualization: An Evolutionary Account of Creative Problem Solving. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Arundale, R. (1991). Studies in the way of words: Grice’s new directions in conceptualizing meaning in conversational interaction. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL, 23–27 May 1991.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo. (1922). St. Augustine’s Treatise on the City of God, edited by Hitchcock, F.. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. (Originally published 426.)Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bach, K. (2006). Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Christopher Potts. Journal of Linguistics 42(2) (July): 490–5.Google Scholar
Bach, K. and Harnish., R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Badinter, R. (1981). Abolition de la peine de mort. Speech delivered at the Assemblé Nationale, Paris, September 17, 1981.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. (1987). Young infants’ reasoning about the physical and spatial characteristics of a hidden object. Cognitive Development 2: 179200.Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1905). Précis de Stylistique. Geneva: C. Eggimann.Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1909). Traité de Stylistique Française. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1910). L’étude systématique des moyens d’expression. Geneva: C. Eggimann.Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1926). La Langage et la Vie. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Baluska, F., and Mancuso., S. (2020). Plants, climates and humans: plant intelligence changes everything. EMBO Report 21(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050109.Google Scholar
Banfield, A. (1973). Grammar of quotation, free indirect style, and implications for a theory of narrative. Foundations of Language 10(1): 139.Google Scholar
Barber, C. (1972). The Story of Language. London: Pan.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577660.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 513–62.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (2005). Situated conceptualisation. In Cohen, H. and Lefebvre, C. (eds.), Handbook of Categorisation in Cognitive Science, 619–50. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1966). De la subjectivité dans la langue. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1, 259–60. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergquist, P. (1974). Phylum porifera. In Marshall, A. J., and Williams, W. D. (eds.), Textbook of Zoology Invertebrates, 7th ed., 76103. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Berkum, J. J. van. (2018). Language comprehension, emotion, and sociality: Aren’t we missing something? Rueschemeyer, In S. and Gaskell, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 644–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, B., and Kay, P.. (1969). Basic Color Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (2011). On the descriptive ineffability of expressive meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3537–50.Google Scholar
Block, N. (1983). Mental pictures and cognitive science. The Philosophical Review 93(4): 499541.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J. (2020). Linguistic relativity: From Whorf to now. In Gutzmann, D., Matthewson, L., Meier, C., Rullmann, H. and Zimmermann, T. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, 1st ed., 133. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2006). Linguistic relativity. Wiley Online Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/0470018860.s00567.Google Scholar
Briens, S. and Saussure, L. de. (2018). Littérature, émotion et expressivité: Pour un nouveau champ de recherche en littérature. Revue de littérature compare 365: 6782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rlc.365.0067.Google Scholar
Brody, B. (1969). Introduction. In Reid, T., Reid’s Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, xxvi. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G., and Levinson, S.. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Budanovic, N. (2017). ‘For sale: baby shoes, never worn’: Tracing the history of the shortest story ever told. Vintage News, 24 September. www.thevintagenews.com/2017/09/24/for-sale-baby-shoes-never-worn-tracing-the-history-of-the-shortest-story-ever-told/?chrome=1.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1933). Die Axiomatik der Sprachwissenschaften. Kant Studien 38(1–2): 1990.Google Scholar
Buridant, C. (2006). L’interjection: jeux et enjeux. Langages 161: 39.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. and Whiten, A (eds.) (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Caffi, C. and Janney, R. W. (1994). Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22(3–4): 325–73.Google Scholar
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. and Haggard., P. (2005). Action, observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 15(8): 1243–9.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2018). Figurative language, mental imagery and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol 33(3): 198217.Google Scholar
Cave, T. and Wilson., D. (2018). Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cesario, J., Johnson, D. J., and Eisthen, H. L. (2020). Your brain is not an onion with a tiny reptile inside. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3): 255–60.Google Scholar
Chao, L. L. and Martin, A.. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12: 478–84.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35(1): 2658.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2014). Science, mind, and limits of understanding. Talk at the Science and Faith Foundation (STOQ), The Vatican, January 2014. https://chomsky.info/201401–/.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. (1914). On Ends. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 40, Book III. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. (1883). De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri Quinque. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2016). Surfing Uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clough, P. and Halley., J. (2007). The Affective Turn: Theorising the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1999). Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, L. and Wharton., T. (2021). Before meaning: Creature construction, sea-sponges, lizards and human projection. In Ifantidou, E., de Saussure, L. and Wharton, T. (eds.), Beyond Meaning, 177–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31(3): 187276.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J.. (1987). From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In Dupré, J. (ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, 276306. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby., J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In Lewis, M. and Haviland Jones, J. (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 91115. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Crawford, R., Davis, S., Harding, R. et al. (2000). Initial impact of the Treasure oil spill on seabirds off western South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 22(1): 157–76.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–67.Google Scholar
Curea, A. (2015). Entre Expression et Expressivité: L’Ecole Linguistique de Genève de 1900 à 1940: Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye, Henri Frei. Lyons: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33(1–2): 2562.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1998). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Edited with foreword, commentary and afterword by Ekman, P.. London: Harper Collins. (Originally published by John Murray in 1872.)Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1978). What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry (Special issue on Metaphor) 5(1): 3147.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1981). Brainstorms: Philosophical Aims on Mind and Psychology. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Deonna, J., and Teroni., F. (2012). The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Sousa, R. (1987). The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dezecache, G., Mercier, H. and Scott-Phillips., T. (2013). An evolutionary approach to emotional communication. Journal of Pragmatics. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.007.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E. (1891). Wild nights! In Poems by Emily Dickinson, Second Series, 97. Edited by Higginson, T. and Loomis Todd, M.. Boston: Roberts Brothers.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. (1972). Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. (1973). Le preuve et le dire. Paris: Mame.Google Scholar
Dukes, D., Abrams, K., Adolphs, R. et al. (2021). The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour 5: 816–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8.Google Scholar
Dusenbery, D. (1992). Sensory Ecology: How Organisms Acquire and Respond to Information. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1972). Universal and cultural differences in facial expression of emotions. In Cole, J. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 207–83. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1989). The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. In Wagner, H. and Manstead, A. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychophysiology. New York: Wiley, 143–64.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotion. Cognition and Emotion 6 (3/4): 169200.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin 115(2): 268–87.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1999). Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals. In Messing, L. and Campbell, R. (eds.), Gesture, Speech and Sign, 4557. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., and Friesen., W. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17(2): 124–9.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. and Friesen., W. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science 4(164) (3875): 86–8.Google Scholar
Elffers, E. (2020). Significs and Jacques van Ginneken. History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences (online only). https://hiphilangsci.net/2020/09/14/significs-and-jacques-van-ginneken/.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review 5(2): 125–31.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. C. and Scherer, K. R.. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In Davidson, R., Scherer, K. and Goldsmith, H. (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, 572–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erdman, K. (1900). Die Bedeutung des Wortes. Leipzig: Haessel.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V. and Leonetti, M.. (2011). On the rigidity of procedural meaning. In Escandell-Vidal, V., Leonetti, M. and Ahern, A. (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 81102. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Escobar, B., Velasco, C., Motoki, K., Byrne, D. and Wang., Q. (2021). The temperature of emotions. PLoS ONE 16(6): e0252408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252408.Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2014). The Language Myth: Why Language Is Not an Instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fabb, N. (2022). A Theory of Thrills, Sublime and Epiphany in Literature. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Faris, P. (1967). Eroticism in Emily Dickinson’s ‘Wild Nights!’. The New England Quarterly 40: 269.Google Scholar
Feagin, S. L. (2018). Reading with Feeling: The Aesthetics of Appreciation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501721465.Google Scholar
Fehr, L. and Russell, J. A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 464–86.Google Scholar
Feldman Barrett, L. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science 1(1): 2858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x.Google Scholar
Feldman Barrett, L. (2011). Was Darwin wrong about emotional expressions? Current Directions in Psychological Science 20: 400–6.Google Scholar
Feldman Barrett, L. (2017a). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 12(1): 123.Google Scholar
Feldman Barrett, L. (2017b). How Emotions are Made. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fernández-Dols, J.-M., and Ruiz-Belda., M.-A (1995). Are smiles a sign of happiness? Gold medal winners at the Olympic Games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6): 1113–19.Google Scholar
Fischer, A., and Sauter., D. (2017). What the theory of affective pragmatics does and doesn’t do. Psychological Inquiry. 28: 190–3.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S. E.. (2008). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Flaubert, G. (1885). L’Education sentimentale. Paris. Quantin.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (2007). The revenge of the given. In McLaughlin, Brian P. and Cohen, Jonathan D. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind, 105–16. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (2008). LOT II: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. and Scherer., K. (2013). Emotion is for doing: The action tendency component. In Fontaine, J., Scherer, K. and Soriano, C. (eds.), Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook, 170–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foolen, A. (1997). The expressive function of language: Towards a cognitive semantic approach. In Niemeier, S. and Dirven, R. (eds.), The Language of Emotions, 1531. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. (1989). A new theory of communication. London Review of Books, 30 March. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v11/n07/alastair-fowler/a-new-theory-of-communication.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1948). Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review 57(3): 209–30.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1957). The unconscious. In Strachey, J. (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV, 159216. London: Vintage. (Originally published 1915.)Google Scholar
Fridland, E. (2015). Knowing how: Problems and considerations. European Journal of Philosophy 23(3): 703–27.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. (1992). Darwin’s anti-Darwinism in the ‘Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.’ In Strongman, K. T. (ed.). International Review of Studies on Emotion Vol. 2: 117–37. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. (1994). Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. (2017). On scorched earths and bad births: Scarantino’s misbegotten ‘theory of affective pragmatics’. Psychological Inquiry 28(2–3): 197205.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. (2007). The Laws of Emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Furberg, M. (1970). An analysis of non-natural meaning. In Dahlquist, T. and Pauli, T. (eds.), Logic and Value, 921. Uppsala: Filosofiska Föreningen Och Filosofiska Institutionen Vid Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Furberg, M. (1971). Saying and Meaning: A Main Theme in J. L. Austin’s Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Furberg, M. (2010). Ursus Philosophicus. In Philosophical Communications, Web Series, No. 32. (Online resource.) Gothenburg: Department of Philosophy, Gothenburg University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. (1932). The Theory of Speech and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Garrido, M. I., Barnes, G. R., Sahani, M. and Dolan, R. J.. (2012). Functional evidence for a dual route to amygdala. Current Biology 22(2): 129–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.056.Google Scholar
Garzon, P. and Keijzer., F. (2011). Plants: Adaptive behavior, root–brains, and minimal cognition. Adaptive Behavior 19(3): 155–71.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1983). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Todd., P. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, 334. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ginneken, J. van. (1907). Principes de Linguistique Psychologique. Paris: Rivière.Google Scholar
Ginneken, J. van. (1943). Het Mysterie der Menschelijke Taal. Haarlem: Bohn.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(1): 155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97000010.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist 66(6): Part 2; 133–6.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Golding, A. (2016). Metaphor in the embodied mind: Beyond the propositionality of figurative language. (PhD thesis, University of Brighton.)Google Scholar
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002). Cicero on the Emotions: Tuscan Disputations III and IV. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (1995). A model of the limbic system and basal ganglia. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, 1165–76. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenspan, P. (2002). Practical reasoning and emotion. In Mele, A. and Rawlings, P. (eds.), Rationality, 206–21. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195145399.003.0011.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review 66: 377–88.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1969). Utterer’s meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review 78: 147–77.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Method in philosophical psychology (from the banal to the bizarre). Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 2353.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1982). Meaning revisited. In Smith, N. (ed.), Mutual Knowledge. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. and Seigworth, G. (eds.) (2010). The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gutt, E.-A. (2013). How does the affective relate to ostensive-inferential communication? (Unpublished MS.)Google Scholar
Hall, A. (2007). Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures? Lingua 117(1): 149–74.Google Scholar
Hardwick, C. S. (ed.). (1977). Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence Between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. (1949). Imperative sentences. Mind 98 (529): 2138.Google Scholar
Hare, R. (1971). Practical Inferences. London: Red Globe Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. and Rapson, R.. (1994) Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch., T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it? Who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–79.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2023). The Grammar of Interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, E. S. and Chomsky, N.. (1988). Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hess, W. R. and Akert, K.. (1965). Experimental data on role of hypothalamus in mechanism of emotional behavior. A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 73: 127–9.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, F. R. M. (ed.). (1922). St. Augustine’s Treatise on the City of God. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American 203: 88111.Google Scholar
Hoggett, P. and Thompson, S.. (2012). Introduction. In Thompson, S. and Hoggett, P. (eds.), Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies, 120. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T. (2005). The production and perception of implicit performatives. Journal of Pragmatics 37(12): 2024–43.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von. (1999). ‘On Language’: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1836.)Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. (1984). Consciousness Regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huron, D. (2006). Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Izard, C. (1971). The Face of Emotion. New York: Appleton–Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Jackson, J., Watts, J., Henry, T. et al. (2019). Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science 20(366) (6472): 1517–22.Google Scholar
Jagoe, C. and Wharton., T. (2012). Meaning non-verbally: The neglected corners of the bi-dimensional continuum communication in people with aphasia. Journal of Pragmatics 178: 2130.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1929). Romantické všeslovanství – nová slavistika. [Romantic pan-Slavism – A new Slavistics.] Čin 1(1): 1012.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971). Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson, vol. 2, 386–92. Berlin: Mouton. (Original manuscript 1957.)Google Scholar
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind 9: 188205.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
January, D. and Kako., E. (2007). Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001). Cognition 104(2): 417–26.Google Scholar
Jenninger, Philip. (1988). Rede am 10. November 1988 im Deutschen Bundestag. Landesmedienzentruzm Baden-Wurtemberg. Online. www.lmz-bw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Handouts/2018-06-13-jenninger-rede.pdf. (Translation ours.)Google Scholar
Jowett, B. (trans.). (n.d.) Cratylus, by Plato. The Internet Classics Archive. www.classics.mit.edu/Plato/cratylus.html. (mit.edu).Google Scholar
Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., Merrifield, W. R. and Cook, R.. (2011). World Colour Survey. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Keen, S. (2015). Intersectional narratology in the study of narrative empathy. Narrative Theory Unbound: Queer and Feminist Interventions, 123–46. Ohio: Ohio State Press.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Oatley, K. and Jenkins, J.. (2019). Understanding Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerouac, J. (1977). Alone on a mountain top. In Lonesome Traveler, 116–30. St. Albans: Granada Press. (Originally published 1960.)Google Scholar
Kleiber, G. (2016). Du cri de douleur au signe de douleur: l’ interjection ‘Aïe’. Synergies Pays Scandinaves 11/12: 113–33.Google Scholar
Klemperer, V. (1998). I Will Bear Witness: A Diary of the Nazi Years – 1933–1941. London: Random House. (Originally published 1947.)Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H. (2015). The collection of grammatical sophismata in MS London, BL, Burney 330. An exploratory study. Vivarium 53: 294321.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (2004). Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, K. (1989). Leonard Bloomfield and the cours de linguistique générale. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 43: 5563.Google Scholar
Kolaiti, P. (2015). The poetic mind: A producer-oriented approach to literature and art. Journal of Literary Semantics 44(1): 2344.Google Scholar
Kolaiti, P. (2019). The Limits of Expression: Language, Literature, Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kolaiti, P. (2022).Perceptual relevance and art: Some tentative suggestions. Journal of Literary Semantics: 49: 2.Google Scholar
Kolaiti, P. (in press). From a Poetics of Language to a Poetics of Action: Literature and Art as a Cognitive Object. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kolaiti, P., and Wharton., T. (in press). Language, Literature and Art: The Composite Organism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Komatsu, E. and Harris., R. (1993). Saussure’s Third Course in General Linguistics (from the Notebooks of Emile Constantin). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
König, E. (1991). Identical values in conflicting roles: The use of German ausgerechnet, eben, genau and gerade as focus particles. In Werner, A. (ed.), Discourse Particles, 1136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koopman, E. and Hakemulder, F.. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory 9(1): 79111.Google Scholar
Kraut, R., and Johnston., R. (1979). Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 1529–53.Google Scholar
Land, S. (1986). The Philosophy of Language in Britain: Major Theories from Hobbes to Thomas Reid (AMS Studies in the Seventeenth Century). New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Lange, C. and James, W. (eds.). (1922). The Emotions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Company. (Original Om Sindsbevægelser, en Psyko-fysiologisk Studie, 1885.)Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York:McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1989). Cognitive emotional interactions in the brain. In Izard, C. (ed.), Development of Emotion Cognitive Relations, 267–89. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Emotion and the amygdala. In Aggleton, J. P. (ed.), The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction, 339–51. New York: Wiley–Liss.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Lee, K. and Tanfani, J.. (2016). Donald Trump’s claim that Hillary Clinton wants ‘open borders’ doesn’t hold up. Los Angeles Times, 19 October. www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-open-border-fact-check-20161019-snap-story.html.Google Scholar
Lepore, E. and Stone., M. (2010). Against metaphorical meaning. Topoi 29: 165–80.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. (1994). ToMM, ToBY and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In Hirschfeld, L. L. and German, S. (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain-Specificity in Communication and Culture, 119–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lettvin, J, Maturana, H., McCulloch, W. and Pitts., W. (1959). What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the IRE (September): 1940–51.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Lexical access in speech production. In Reuland, E. and Abraham, W. (eds.), Knowledge and Language, 241–51. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1840-8_11.Google Scholar
Levinson, R. (2003). Blood, sweat, and fears: The autonomic architecture of emotion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1000: 348–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1280.016.PMID:14766648.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leys, S. (2015). Elements of a ‘nervous system’ in sponges. Journal of Experimental Biology 218: 581–91.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. (2000). Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin 126: 109–37.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. (1970). Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 44(2): 265301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112070001830.Google Scholar
Liu, S. (2011). An experimental study of the classification and recognition of Chinese speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6): 1801–17.Google Scholar
Locke, J. and Bennett, J.. (1689/2004). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. N.p.: Jonathan Bennett.Google Scholar
Long, W. (2014). Understanding ‘relevance’ in psychology, New Ideas in Psychology 35: 2835.Google Scholar
Lycan, W. (1991). Review of Avramides, A. (1989) Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Mind and Language 6: 83–6.Google Scholar
Maillat, D., and Oswald, S.. (2011). Constraining context: A pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Maillat, D. and Oswald, S. (eds.). (2013). Biases and constraints in communication: argumentation, persuasion and manipulation. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics. Volume 59, Part B. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Malle, B. (2004). How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maratos, F. and Pessoa., L. (2019). What drives prioritized visual processing? A motivational relevance account. Progress in Brain Research 247: 111–48.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. (1998). How to acquire a concept. Mind and Language 13: 347–69.Google Scholar
Martinovic, J., Paramei, G. V. and MacInnes, W. J.. (2020). Russian blues reveal the limits of language influencing colour discrimination. Cognition. 201 (August): 104281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104281.Epub2020Apr7.PMID:32276236.Google Scholar
Marty, A. (1875). Ueber den Ursprung der Sprache (On the Origin of Language). Würzburg: Stuber.Google Scholar
McBeath, M., Shaffer, D. and Kaiser, M.. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science 268 (5210): 569–73.Google Scholar
McElvenny, J. (2014). Ogden and Richards’ The Meaning of Meaning and early analytic philosophy. Language Sciences Vol. 41, Part B: 212–21.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. (2004). Mindsight. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGuinness, B. (1966). The mysticism of the Tractatus. The Philosophical Review 75(3): 305–28.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1910). Compte-rendu: Ch. Bally – Traité de stylistique française. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 16: cxviiicxxii. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k321579/f125.image.Google Scholar
Melcher, J. and Schooler., J. (2004). Perceptual and conceptual training mediate the verbal overshadowing effect in an unfamiliar domain. Memory and Cognition 32: 618–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195853.Google Scholar
Montagrin, V., Sterpenich, T., Brosch, D. et al. (2018). Goal-relevant situations facilitate memory of neutral faces. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 18: 1269–82.Google Scholar
Moors, A. (2009). Theories of emotion causation: A review. Cognition and Emotion 23(4): 625–62.Google Scholar
Moors, A. (2014). Flavors of appraisal theories of emotion. Emotion Review 6(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914534477.Google Scholar
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P., Scherer, K. R. and Frijda, N. H.. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–24.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. (1999). Aquinas on our responsibility for our emotions. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8: 163205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naar, H. and Teroni., F. (2018). The Ontology of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nanni, N. di, Gnocchi, M., Moscatelli, M., Milanesi, L. and Mosca., E. (2020). Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks. Bioinformatics 36(3): 865–71.Google Scholar
Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(5): 509–59.Google Scholar
Nerlich, B., and Clark., D. (1996). Language, Action, and Context: The Early History of Pragmatics in Europe and America. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. and Djikic., M. (2018). Psychology of narrative art. Review of General Psychology, 22(2): 161–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000113.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1): 2950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408362.Google Scholar
Oatley, K., Keltner, D. and Jenkins., J. (2006). Understanding Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell. (Originally published 1996.)Google Scholar
Ogden, C. and Richards., I. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Olteanu, L., Golani, S, Eitam, B. and Kron, A.. (2019). The effect of relevance appraisal on the emotional response. Emotion 19(4): 715–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000473.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and the English language. Horizon, April. www.orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_polit.Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, M. (2009a). Might interjections encode concepts? More questions than answers. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5(2): 241–70.Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, M. (2009b). Towards an alternative relevance-theoretic approach to interjections. International Review of Pragmatics 1(1): 182206.Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1970). Teaching Children Thinking (AI Memo No. 247 and Logo Memo No. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.Google Scholar
Petrilli, S. (2009). Signifying and Understanding Reading the Works of Victoria Welby and the Signific Movement. Semiotics, Communication and Cognition, Vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petty, R. and Cacioppo., J. (1996). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. New York: Avalon Publishing.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of Reality in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pignocchi, A. (2012). The intuitive concept of art. Philosophical Psychology 27(3): 425–44.Google Scholar
Pilkington, A. (2000). Poetic Effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Piskorska, A. (2012). Cognition and emotions – a joint effort at obtaining positive cognitive effects? In Piskorska, A. (ed.), Relevance Studies in Poland, Vol. 4. Essays on Language and Communication, 102–11. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar
Plantin, C. (2004). On the inseparability of emotion and reason in argumentation. In Weigand, E. (ed.), Emotion in Dialogic Interaction (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 248), 265–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pool, E., Brosch, T., Delplanque, S. and Sander., D. (2016a). Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin 142(1): 79106.Google Scholar
Pool, E., Sennwald, V, Delplanque, S, Brosch, T. and Sander, D. (2016b). Measuring wanting and liking from animals to humans: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavoral Reviews 63(2016): 124–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.006.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1973). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potts, C. (2005). The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potts, C. (2007). The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–97.Google Scholar
Pozner, I. (2022). The relevance-affective model: Explaining narrative empathy within relevance theory. (Thesis, University of Neuchatel.)Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition 36(1): 116.Google Scholar
Premack, D. and Premack., A. (1994). Moral belief: Form versus content. In Hirschfeld, L. and German, S. (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain-Specificity in Communication and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin 80(1): 124.Google Scholar
Qiu, M. (In press). Communicating conceptual and perceptual dimensions: Mental imagery and a dual-route processing of metaphor. (PhD thesis, University of Brighton.)Google Scholar
Radcliffe, E. (1999). Hume on the generation of motives: Why beliefs alone never motivate. Hume Studies 25(1–2): 101–22.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., and Hirstein., W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(6–7): 1551.Google Scholar
Rayo, A. (2013). A plea for semantic localism. Noûs 47(4): 647–79.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (1998). Pragmatics. In Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 620–33. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reekum, C. van and Scherer., K. (1997). Levels of processing in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Advances in Psychology 124: 259300.Google Scholar
Reid, T. (1774). A brief account of Aristotle’s logic, Vol III, Book III, p. 309. In Home, H., Kames, Lord (ed.), Sketches of the History of Man. Edinburgh:W. Creech.Google Scholar
Reid, T. (1969). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, edited by Brody, B.. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published 1785.)Google Scholar
Rey, G. (1980). Functionalism and the emotions. In Rorty, A. (ed.), Explaining Emotions, 163–98. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rey, G. (1981). Introduction: What are mental images? In Block, N. (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology: 117–27. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. (2007). Creatures of the Intertidal Zone. Birmingham, UK: Cinnamon Press.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2018). The ontogeny of human self-consciousness. Current Directions in Psychological Science 27(5): 345–50.Google Scholar
Roseman, I. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review 5(2): 141–9.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1986). On the Origins of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (2009). Essai sur l’Origine des Langues. Paris: L’Harmattan. (Originally published 1761.)Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psychological Bulletin. Nov. 110(3): 426–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.426. PMID: 1758918.Google Scholar
Russell, J. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin 115: 102–41.Google Scholar
Russell, J. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review 110(1): 145–72.Google Scholar
Russell, J., and Feldman Barrett., L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(5): 805–19.Google Scholar
Salazar-López, E., Domínguez, E., Ramos, V. Juárez et al. (2015). The mental and subjective skin: Emotion, empathy, feelings and thermography. Consciousness and Cognition, 34: 149–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 4. PMID: 25955182.Google Scholar
Samuel, S., Cole, G. and Eacott., M. (2019). Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 26(6): 1767–86.Google Scholar
Sander, D., Grafman, J. and Zalla, T.. (2003). The human amygdala: An evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences 14: 303–16.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. London: Harvest.Google Scholar
Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 26(6): 321–43.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris:Payot.Google Scholar
Saussure, L. de. (2005). Manipulation and cognitive pragmatics: preliminary hypotheses. In de Saussure, L. and Schulz, P. (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Discourse, Language, Mind, 113–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Saussure, L. de. (2021). An experiential view on what makes literature relevant. In Ifantidou, E., de Saussure, L. and Wharton, T. (eds.), Beyond Meaning, 99118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Saussure, L. de and Schulz., P. (2009). Subjectivity out of irony. Semiotica 173(1–4): 397416.Google Scholar
Saussure, L. de and Wharton., T. (2020). Relevance, effect and affect. International Review of Pragmatics 12(2): 183205.Google Scholar
Scarantino, A. (2017a). How to do things with emotional expressions: The theory of affective pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry 28(2–3): 165–85.Google Scholar
Scarantino, A. (2017b). Twelve questions for the theory of affective pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry 28(2–3): 217–23.Google Scholar
Scarantino, A., and de Sousa., R. (2021). Emotion. In E. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/emotion.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. (1982). Emotion as a process: Function, origin and regulation. Social Science Information 21: 555–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004004.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. (1994a). An emotion’s occurrence depends on the relevance of an event to the organism’s goal/need hierarchy. In Ekman, P and Davidson, R. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions, 227–31. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. (1994b). Toward a concept of ‘modal emotions’. In Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions, 2531. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication 40(1–2): 227–56.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion 23: 1307–51.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. (2013). The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: Theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emotion Review 5: 150–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468166.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. and Moors, A.. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology 70: 719–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854.Google Scholar
Scherer, K., Schorr, A. and Johnstone., T. (2001). Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, A. M. (2014). 17th and 18th century theories of emotions. In Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotions-17th18th/.Google Scholar
Schooler, J., and Melcher., J. (1994). The ineffability of insight. In Smith, S. T. W. and Finke, R. (eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach, 97133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schuhmann, K. and Smith., B. (1990). Elements of speech act theory in the work of Thomas Reid. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7: 4766.Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2015). Speaking Our Minds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1965). What is a speech act? In Black, M. (ed.) Philosophy in America, 221–39. Melbourne: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7. (Reprinted in Searle 1979: 1–29.)Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the Psychology of Interest. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001.Google Scholar
Simmons, W. K., Martin, A and Barsalou, L. W.. (2005). Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cerebral Cortex 15: 1602–08.Google Scholar
Soteriou, M. (2018). The ontology of emotion. In Naar, H. and Teroni, F. (eds.), The Ontology of Emotions, 7189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 14(1): 29056.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2011). Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3565–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1975). Why are perfect animals, hybrids, and monsters food for symbolic thought? Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 8(2): 143–69.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In Sperber, D. (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, 117–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2001). An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics 29: 401–13.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2005). Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? In Carruthers, P., Laurence, S. and Stich, S. (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Content, 5368. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2019). Instincts or gadgets? Not the debate we should be having (Commentary on Heyes C. (2019) Précis of Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42: 35–7.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C. et al. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language 25: 359–93.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson., D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published 1986.)Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1998). The mapping between the mental and public lexicon. In Carruther, P. and Bouchers, J. (eds.) Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, 184200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind and Language 17(1&2): 323.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson., D. (2015). Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15(44): 117–49.Google Scholar
Sperber, H. (1914). Über den Affekt als Ursache der Sprachveränderung. Halle a.d. Saale: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 74(11): 1.Google Scholar
Stachenfeld, K., Botvinick, M. and Gershman, S. (2017). The hippocampus as a predictive map. Nature Neuroscience 20: 1643–53.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (2011). Know How. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sterling, P. (2004). Principles of allostasis. In Schulkin, J. (ed.). Allostasis, Homeostasis, and the Costs of Physiological Adaptation, 1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterling, P. (2012). Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology and Behavior, 106(1): 515.Google Scholar
Sterling, P. (2020). What Is Health? Allostasis and the Evolution of Human Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stussi, Y., Delplanque, S., Coraj, S., Pourtois, G. and Sander., D. (2018). Measuring Pavlovian appetitive conditioning in humans with the postauricular reflex.Psychophysiology 55(8): Article e13073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13073.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1996). The primacy of utterer’s meaning. In Grandy, R. and Warner, R. (eds.), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends, 109–29. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, L. (2000). Cerebral hemisphere regulation of motivated behaviour. Brain Research 886: 113–64.Google Scholar
Swee, G. and Schirmer., A. (2015). On the importance of being vocal: Saying ‘ow!’ improves pain tolerance. Journal of Pain 16(4): 326–34.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. (1941). Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar
Tervaniemi, M., Janhunen, L., Kruck, S., Putkinen, V. and Huotilainen., M. (2015). Auditory profiles of classical, jazz, and rock musicians: Genre-specific-sensitivity to musical sound features. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1900.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. and Hoggett, P. (eds.). (2012). Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. (1962). Affect, Imagery, Consciousness, Vol. 1. The Positive Effects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L.. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, 19136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trotter, D. (1992). Analysing literary prose: The relevance of relevance theory. Lingua 87: 1127.Google Scholar
Turner, M. (1998). Poetry for the newborn brain: A commentary on Terrence Deacon, The Symbolic Species. Bostonia Spring (1): 72–3.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–31.Google Scholar
Tye, M. (2004). On the non-conceptual content of experience. In Reicher, M. and Marek, J. (eds.), Experience and Analysis: Papers of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium, 221–39. Vienna: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.Google Scholar
Vergis, N. (In press). Emotion and speaker meaning: A review of experimental research on conversational inference. Cognition and Emotion.Google Scholar
Viano, C. (2018). Aristote et la rhétoriques des émotions: Théorie et mode d’emploi. Revista Ideação. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/ideac.v0i0.3006.Google Scholar
Wałaszeska, E. (2004). What to do with response cries in relevance theory? In Mioduszewska, E. (ed.), Relevance Studies in Poland. Volume I, 119–29. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Weil, H. (1844). De l’Ordre des Mots dans les Langues Anciennes Comparées aux Langues Modernes. Paris: Crapelet.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2001). Paul Grice, Saying and Meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 207–48.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2003a). Interjections, language and the ‘showing’/‘saying’ continuum. Pragmatics and Cognition 11(1) May: 3991.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2003b). Natural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind and Language. 18(5): 447–77.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2006). The evolution of pragmatics. In Brown, K. (ed.), The Elsevier Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 338–45. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2008). Meaning and showing: Gricean intentions and relevance–theoretic intentions. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 131–52.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2015). That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited. Lingua 75–6: 2035.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2022). Relevance: Communication and cognition and …? Pragmatics and Cognition 28 (2): 321–47.Google Scholar
Wharton, T., Dukes, D., Sander, D., Bonard, C. and Oswald., S. (2021). Relevance and emotion. In special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 181: 259–69.Google Scholar
Wharton, T. and Strey., C. (2019). Slave of the passions: Making emotions relevant. In Scott, K., Clark, B. and Carston, R. (eds.), Relevance: Pragmatics and Interpretation, 253–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). The semantics of interjection. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 159–92.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (2000). The semantics of human facial expression. Pragmatics and Cognition 8(1): 147–83.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1992). Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 119–58.Google Scholar
Williams, L. and Bargh., J. (2008) Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 24(322) (5901): 606–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548. PMID: 18948544; PMCID: PMC2737341.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (1991). Slave of the Passions. Basingstoke: Picador Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2011a). The conceptual-procedural distinction: past, present and future. In Escandell, V., Leonetti, M. and Ahern, A. (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 331. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2011b). Literature as an object of knowledge. Talk given at workshop on ‘Concepts’, part of the Balzan project, St John’s College, Oxford, September 2011.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2018). Relevance theory and literary interpretation. In Cave, T. and Wilson, D. (eds.), Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, 185204. Oxford, : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Carston, R.. (2019). Pragmatics and the challenge of non-propositional effects. Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31–8.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., and Sperber., D. (1981). On Grice’s theory of conversation. In Werth, P. (ed.), Conversation and Discourse, 155–78. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., and Sperber., D. (1988). Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In Dancy, J., Moravcsik, J. and Taylor, C. (eds.), Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, 77101. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber., D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1): 125.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber., D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind 111(443) (July): 583632.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Wharton., T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1559–79.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2016). Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics and Cognition 23(1): 92116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Tim Wharton, University of Brighton, Louis de Saussure, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
  • Book: Pragmatics and Emotion
  • Online publication: 13 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869867.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Tim Wharton, University of Brighton, Louis de Saussure, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
  • Book: Pragmatics and Emotion
  • Online publication: 13 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869867.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Tim Wharton, University of Brighton, Louis de Saussure, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
  • Book: Pragmatics and Emotion
  • Online publication: 13 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869867.009
Available formats
×