Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-n4bck Total loading time: 0.57 Render date: 2022-08-08T09:31:33.671Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

35 - Individual and collective dignity

from Part III - Systematic conceptualization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Micha Werner
Affiliation:
University of Greifswald
Marcus Düwell
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jens Braarvig
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Roger Brownsword
Affiliation:
King's College London
Dietmar Mieth
Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

Is there such a thing as collective dignity? Does it make sense to talk about the dignity of (some of such) entities as the human species as a whole, indigenous peoples, states, religious communities, women, baseball teams or green-eyed men who get up at 7:30? Can we even conceive of dignity as something that could be assigned to collectives? There is no easy answer to these questions, since both parts of the expression ‘collective dignity’ are problematic even before they are combined. Obviously, dignity is a heavily contested, multifaceted and ambiguous concept; moreover, there are different ways to understand the ‘collective’ character of ‘collective dignity’. Nevertheless, one finds a growing number of references to ‘collective dignity’ or ‘collective human dignity’ (for example, De Gaay Fortman 2011; Falk 2009: 58; Howard 1992: 84; International Law Association 2010: 40–3; Mann 2001: 34–6). However, most of them come without any effort to clarify the meaning of these terms. At the same time, the question of whether collective dignity can be warranted seems systematically relevant, at least in the context of certain branches of the human rights discourse. Let us just consider two rather obvious points. The first has to do with the discussion on ‘collective rights’: if one is of the opinion that collective human rights exist and if one, in addition, supposes that dignity is the normative basis or ‘source’ of human rights, it seems reasonable to ask whether collective human rights are also grounded in some form of collective dignity. The second point is related to one strategy of interpreting and vindicating dignity: if one argues that the normative basis of dignity is something like agency and if one, in addition, supposes that not only individuals but also collectives can be agents, it is again an obvious question whether collective dignity exists.

In what follows, I will first mention some of the most prominent uses of the term ‘collective dignity’ (2nd section) and then make some tentative remarks about the extent to which these uses are plausible (3rd section).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity
Interdisciplinary Perspectives
, pp. 343 - 352
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brune, J. P. 2010. Moral und Recht: Zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und der Demokratie von Jürgen Habermas. Freiburg im Breisgau: AlberGoogle Scholar
Cabral, A. 1972. ‘Identity and Dignity in the National Liberation Struggle’, Africa Today 19(4): 39–47Google Scholar
Cheah, P. 2006. Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. L. 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
De Gaay Fortman, B. 2011. ‘Minority Rights: A Major Misconception?’, Human Rights Quarterly 33(2): 265–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. A. 2009. Achieving Human Rights. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. W. 2006. All Rise: Somebodies, Nobodies, and the Politics of Dignity. San Francisco: Berrett-KoehlerGoogle Scholar
Galenkamp, M. 1995. ‘Collective Rights’, Advisory Committee on Human Rights and Foreign Policy of the Netherlands’, SIM Special 16: 53–106Google Scholar
Gan, S. 2009. ‘Human Dignity as a Right’, Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4(3): 370–84 ()CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, A. 1978. Reason and Morality. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, A. 1996. The Community of Rights. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2010. ‘The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights’, Metaphilosophy 41(4): 464–80 ()CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. E. 1992. ‘Dignity, Community and Human Rights’, in Na'im, A. A. A. (ed.). Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 81–102Google Scholar
International Law Association. 2010. Interim Report of The Hague Conference on Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Isensee, J. 2001. ‘Die alten Grundrechte und die biotechnische Revolution’, in Bohnert, J., Gramm, C., Kindhäuser cs, U.. (eds.) Verfassung – Philosophie – Kirche: Festschrift für Alexander Hollerbach zum 70. Geburtstag. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 243–66Google Scholar
Joerden, J. C. 2005. ‘Der Begriff “Menschheit” in Kants Zweckformel des kategorischen Imperativs und Implikationen für die Begriffe “Menschenwürde” und “Gattungswürde’, in Kaufmann, M. and Sosoe, L. (eds.). Gattungsethik – Schutz für das Menschengeschlecht?. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 177–92Google Scholar
Jovanovic, M. A. 2005. ‘Recognizing Minority Identities Through Collective Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 27(2): 625–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1968. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, in Werke: Akademie Textausgabe, vol. 4. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 385–464Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M., and Sosoe, L. (eds.). 2005. Gattungsethik – Schutz für das Menschengeschlecht?. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
Kiros, T. 2001. Explorations in African Political Thought: Identity, Community, Ethics. London, New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, V. 2011. ‘Immigration Detention System Robs Us of Our Collective Dignity’. (accessed 21 July 2012)
Malby, S. 2002. ‘Human Dignity and Human Reproductive Cloning’, Health and Human Rights 6(1): 102–35 ()CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. 2001. ‘Dignity and Health: The UDHR's Revolutionary First Article’, Health and Human Rights 3(2): 30–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, A. 1996. The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Margalit, A., and Raz, J. 1990. ‘National Self-Determination’, Journal of Philosophy 87(9): 439–61 ()CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Terpitz, R. 2007. Der Schutz des pränatalen Lebens: eine verfassungs-, völker- und gemeinschaftsrechtliche Statusbetrachtung an der Schwelle zum biomedizinischen Zeitalter. Tübingen: Mohr SiebeckGoogle Scholar
Neuhäuser, C. 2011. ‘Humiliation: The Collective Dimension’, in Kaufmann, P., Kuch, H. and Neuhäuser, C. (eds.). Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated. New York: Springer, 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlüter, J. 2008. Schutzkonzepte für menschliche Keimbahnzellen in der Fortpflanzung-smedizin. Münster: LIT VerlagGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D. 1981. The Ethnic Revival. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Tamir, Y. 1999. ‘Against Collective Rights’, in Joppke, C. and Lukes, S. (eds.) Multicultural Questions. Oxford University Press, 158–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, S. 2007. ‘Collective Rights and Individual Autonomy’, Ethics 117(2): 234–64 ()CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×