Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: March 2015

35 - Individual and collective dignity

from Part III - Systematic conceptualization


Is there such a thing as collective dignity? Does it make sense to talk about the dignity of (some of such) entities as the human species as a whole, indigenous peoples, states, religious communities, women, baseball teams or green-eyed men who get up at 7:30? Can we even conceive of dignity as something that could be assigned to collectives? There is no easy answer to these questions, since both parts of the expression ‘collective dignity’ are problematic even before they are combined. Obviously, dignity is a heavily contested, multifaceted and ambiguous concept; moreover, there are different ways to understand the ‘collective’ character of ‘collective dignity’. Nevertheless, one finds a growing number of references to ‘collective dignity’ or ‘collective human dignity’ (for example, De Gaay Fortman 2011; Falk 2009: 58; Howard 1992: 84; International Law Association 2010: 40–3; Mann 2001: 34–6). However, most of them come without any effort to clarify the meaning of these terms. At the same time, the question of whether collective dignity can be warranted seems systematically relevant, at least in the context of certain branches of the human rights discourse. Let us just consider two rather obvious points. The first has to do with the discussion on ‘collective rights’: if one is of the opinion that collective human rights exist and if one, in addition, supposes that dignity is the normative basis or ‘source’ of human rights, it seems reasonable to ask whether collective human rights are also grounded in some form of collective dignity. The second point is related to one strategy of interpreting and vindicating dignity: if one argues that the normative basis of dignity is something like agency and if one, in addition, supposes that not only individuals but also collectives can be agents, it is again an obvious question whether collective dignity exists.

In what follows, I will first mention some of the most prominent uses of the term ‘collective dignity’ (2nd section) and then make some tentative remarks about the extent to which these uses are plausible (3rd section).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Brune, J. P. 2010. Moral und Recht: Zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und der Demokratie von Jürgen Habermas. Freiburg im Breisgau: Alber
Cabral, A. 1972. ‘Identity and Dignity in the National Liberation Struggle’, Africa Today 19(4): 39–47
Cheah, P. 2006. Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Darwall, S. L. 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
De Gaay Fortman, B. 2011. ‘Minority Rights: A Major Misconception?’, Human Rights Quarterly 33(2): 265–303
Falk, R. A. 2009. Achieving Human Rights. New York: Routledge
Fuller, R. W. 2006. All Rise: Somebodies, Nobodies, and the Politics of Dignity. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler
Galenkamp, M. 1995. ‘Collective Rights’, Advisory Committee on Human Rights and Foreign Policy of the Netherlands’, SIM Special 16: 53–106
Gan, S. 2009. ‘Human Dignity as a Right’, Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4(3): 370–84 ()
Gewirth, A. 1978. Reason and Morality. University of Chicago Press
Gewirth, A. 1996. The Community of Rights. University of Chicago Press
Griffin, J. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford University Press
Habermas, J. 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Habermas, J. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity
Habermas, J. 2010. ‘The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights’, Metaphilosophy 41(4): 464–80 ()
Howard, R. E. 1992. ‘Dignity, Community and Human Rights’, in Na'im, A. A. A. (ed.). Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 81–102
International Law Association. 2010. Interim Report of The Hague Conference on Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Isensee, J. 2001. ‘Die alten Grundrechte und die biotechnische Revolution’, in Bohnert, J., Gramm, C., Kindhäuser cs, U.. (eds.) Verfassung – Philosophie – Kirche: Festschrift für Alexander Hollerbach zum 70. Geburtstag. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 243–66
Joerden, J. C. 2005. ‘Der Begriff “Menschheit” in Kants Zweckformel des kategorischen Imperativs und Implikationen für die Begriffe “Menschenwürde” und “Gattungswürde’, in Kaufmann, M. and Sosoe, L. (eds.). Gattungsethik – Schutz für das Menschengeschlecht?. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 177–92
Jovanovic, M. A. 2005. ‘Recognizing Minority Identities Through Collective Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 27(2): 625–51
Kant, Immanuel. 1968. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, in Werke: Akademie Textausgabe, vol. 4. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 385–464
Kaufmann, M., and Sosoe, L. (eds.). 2005. Gattungsethik – Schutz für das Menschengeschlecht?. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
Kiros, T. 2001. Explorations in African Political Thought: Identity, Community, Ethics. London, New York: Routledge
Korsgaard, C. M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University Press
Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Kymlicka, W. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford University Press
López, V. 2011. ‘Immigration Detention System Robs Us of Our Collective Dignity’. (accessed 21 July 2012)
Malby, S. 2002. ‘Human Dignity and Human Reproductive Cloning’, Health and Human Rights 6(1): 102–35 ()
Mann, J. 2001. ‘Dignity and Health: The UDHR's Revolutionary First Article’, Health and Human Rights 3(2): 30–8
Margalit, A. 1996. The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Margalit, A., and Raz, J. 1990. ‘National Self-Determination’, Journal of Philosophy 87(9): 439–61 ()
Müller-Terpitz, R. 2007. Der Schutz des pränatalen Lebens: eine verfassungs-, völker- und gemeinschaftsrechtliche Statusbetrachtung an der Schwelle zum biomedizinischen Zeitalter. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck
Neuhäuser, C. 2011. ‘Humiliation: The Collective Dimension’, in Kaufmann, P., Kuch, H. and Neuhäuser, C. (eds.). Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated. New York: Springer, 21–36
Schlüter, J. 2008. Schutzkonzepte für menschliche Keimbahnzellen in der Fortpflanzung-smedizin. Münster: LIT Verlag
Smith, A. D. 1981. The Ethnic Revival. Cambridge University Press
Tamir, Y. 1999. ‘Against Collective Rights’, in Joppke, C. and Lukes, S. (eds.) Multicultural Questions. Oxford University Press, 158–81
Wall, S. 2007. ‘Collective Rights and Individual Autonomy’, Ethics 117(2): 234–64 ()