Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:08:30.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Fertility preservation counseling

from Section 5 - Special topics in fertility counseling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

By
Allison B. Rosen
Edited by
Sharon N. Covington
Sharon N. Covington
Affiliation:
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Counseling
Clinical Guide and Case Studies
 , pp. 212 - 225
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cobo, A, Domingo, J, Perez, S, et al. Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2008;10:268–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, W, Sun, Y, Jin, H, et al. Clinical outcome of emergency egg vitrification for women when sperm extraction from the testicular tissues of the male partner is not successful. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2011;57:210–13.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Wallberg, KA, Oktay, K. Fertility preservation and pregnancy in women with and without BRCA mutation-positive breast cancer. Oncol. 2012;17:1409–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oktay, K, Rodriguez-Wallberg, KA, Sahin, G. Fertility preservation by ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in a 14-year-old adolescent with Turner syndrome mosaicism and impending premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:753, e15–753e19.Google Scholar
Cil, A, Seli, E. Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 June; 25(3):0.1097/GCO.0b013e32836091f4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wierckx, K, Van Caenegem, E, Pennings, G, et al. Reproductive wish in transsexual men. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):483–7.Google Scholar
Rudick, B, Opper, N, Paulson, R, et al. The status of oocyte cryopreservation in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2642–46.Google Scholar
Dondorp, W, de Wert, G, Pennings, G, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1231–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Stoop, D, Nekkebroeck, J, Devroey, P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):655–61.Google Scholar
Chen, C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986 Apr 19;1(8486):884–6.Google Scholar
Oktay, K, Cil, A, Bang, H. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:70–80.Google Scholar
The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte ccryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobo, A, Meseguer, M, Remohi, M. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2239–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, R, Milligan, R, Sokol, R. The lack of influence of age on male fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:818–22.Google Scholar
Peterson, B, Boivin, J, Norre, J, et al. An introduction to infertility counseling: a guide for mental health and medical professionals. J Assist Reprod Genet. Mar 2012; 29(3):243–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschudin, S, Bitzer, J. Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Human Reprod Update 2009;1(1):1–11.Google Scholar
Rosen, A, Rodriguez-Wallberg, K, Oktay, K. Psychological issues of cancer survivors. In: Donnez, J, Kim, S, eds. Principles and Practice of Fertility Preservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2011; pp. 473–84.Google Scholar
Partridge, A, Gelber, S, Peppercorn, J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4174–83.Google Scholar
Schover, L. Patient attitudes toward fertility preservation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:281–84.Google Scholar
Carter, J, et al. Gynecologic cancer treatment and the impact of cancer-related infertility. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:90–5.Google Scholar
Cobo, A, Garcia-Velasco, J, Domingo, J, Remohi, J, Pellicer, A. Is vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients. Fertil and Steril. May 2013;99(No 6):1485–95.Google Scholar
Lockwood, G. Social egg freezing: the prospect of reproductive “immortality” or a dangerous delusion? Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:334–40.Google Scholar
Vallejo, V, Lee, J, Schuman, L, Witkin, G, et al. Social and psychological assessment of women undergoing elective oocyte cryopreservation: a 7-year analysis. Open J Obstetric Gynecol. 2013;3:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, J, Engel, J, Schlesinger-Raab, A, Sauer, H, Hölzel, D. Communication, quality of life and age: Results of a 5-year prospective study in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:421–7.Google Scholar
Baile, W, Aaron, J. Patient-physician communication in oncology: Past, present, and future. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17(4):331–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, T, Degner, L, Parker, P. The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: A review. Psychooncol. 2005;14(10):831–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagerlind, H, Lindblad, A, Bergström, I, et al. Patient-physician communication during oncology consultations. Psychooncol. 2008;17(10):975–85.Google Scholar
Stanton, AL, Danoff-Burg, S, Cameron, CL, et al. Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological physical adjustment to breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(5):875–82.Google Scholar
Byrne, A, Ellershaw, J, Holcombe, C, et al. Patients’ experience of cancer: evidence of the role of “fighting” in collusive clinical communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:15–21.Google Scholar
Cimprich, B, Ronis, D, Martinez-Ramos, G. Age at diagnosis and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Pract. 2002;10:85–93.Google Scholar
Ganz, P, Greendale, G, Petersen, L, Kahn, B, Bower, J. Breast cancer in younger women: Reproductive and late health effects of treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4184–93.Google Scholar
Avis, N, Crawford, S, Manuel, J. Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. Psychooncol. 2004;13:295–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, P, Ennis, M, Pritchard, K, et al. Association of young age and chemotherapy with psychosocial distress and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the first year after breast cancer (BC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14s):732s.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Age-related fertility decline; a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S154–5.Google Scholar
Ubaldi, F, Anniballo, R, Romano, S, Baroni, L, et al. Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility program. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(5): 1199–1205.Google Scholar
Rienzi, L, Cobo, A, Paffoni, A, Scarduelli, C, Capalbo, A, Vajta, G, et al. Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1606–12. Level II-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cil, A, Oktay, K. Age-based success rates after elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC): a pooled analysis of 2281 thaw cycles. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(Suppl):S211. (P-354).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cil, A, Bang, H, Oktay, K. Probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;100(2):492–9.e3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodes-Wertz, B, Druckenmiller, S, Smith, M, et al. Tick Tock: can the clock be stopped? The use of elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) as a means to preserve fertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(Suppl):S235. (P417)Google Scholar
Mertes, H, Pennings, G. Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23:824–9.Google Scholar
Druckenmiller, S., Knopman, J, DeVore, S., Noyes, N. Psychology behavior and ethics of fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 November;28(11):1031–6.Google Scholar
Ubaldi, F, Anniballo, R, Romano, S, Baroni, A, et al. Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility program. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(5):1199–1205.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Childrearing ability and the provision of fertility services. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:864–7.Google Scholar
Glazer, E, Hubner, M. Coping with the double blow: Facing cancer and infertility. Resolve Fact Sheet, Boston, MA: Resolve Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. Third-party reproduction and adoption in cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;34: 91–93.Google Scholar
Galst, J. What's a young woman to do? The pros and cons of social egg freezing. Fact Sheet. American Fertility Association. http://www.theafa.org/article/whats-a-young-woman-to-do-the-pros-and-cons-of-social-egg-freezing/. Accessed October 21, 2013.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×