Kirmeyer, SE, Hamilton, BE. Childbearing differences among three generations of U.S. women. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief no.68: Hyattsville, MD; 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db68.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Johnson, J, Tough, S. SOGC Committee Opinion. Delayed child-bearing. JOCG 2012; 34(1): 80–93.Google Scholar

Yogev, Y, Melamed, N, Bardin, R et al. Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203(6): 558 e1–7.Google Scholar

Laufner, N, Simon, A, Samueloff, A, et al. Successful spontaneous pregnancies in women older than 45 years. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1328–32.Google Scholar

Gielchinsky, Y, Mazor, M, Simon, A, et al. Natural conception after 45 in Bedouin women, a uniquely fertile population. J Assist Reprod Gen 2006; 23: 305–9.Google Scholar

Dratva, J, Gomez, Real F, Schinder, C, et al. Is age at menopause increasing across Europe? Results on age at menopause and determinants from two population-based studies. Menopause 2009; 16(2): 385–94.Google Scholar

Matthews, TJ, Hamilton, BE. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. NCHS Data Brief, Number 21, August 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db21.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Vranes, HS, Gall, V. Secular trends in parental age in Croatia from 1985–2009. Anthropol Anz 2013; 70(3): 347–55.Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. Births: Final Data for 2008. National Vital Statistics Reports; Volume 59, Number 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2010. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_01.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Buster, J. The first live birth donation. Sex Reprod Menopause 2008; 6(4): 23–8.Google Scholar

van Balen, F, Trimbos-Kemper, TCM. Involuntarily childless couples: their desire to have children and their motives. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 16(3): 137–44.Google Scholar

Tough, S, Tofflemire, K, Benzies, K, et al. Factors influencing childbearing decisions and knowledge of perinatal risks among Canadian men and women. Matern Child Health J 2007; 11(2): 189–98.Google Scholar

Benzies, K, Tough, S, Tofflemire, K, et al. Factors influencing women's decisions about timing of motherhood. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2006; 35(5): 625–33.Google Scholar

Zweifel, JE, Covington, SN, Applegarth, LD. “Last-chance kids”: a good deal for older parents – but what about the children? Sex Reprod Menopause 2012; 10(2): 4–12.Google Scholar

Minino, AM, Heron, MP, Smith, BL. Deaths: Preliminary Data from 2004. National Vital Statistics Reports; Volume 54, Number 19. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr54/nvsr54_19.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. Growing older in America: expectations v reality. June 29, 2009. Available at: http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1269/aging-survey-expectations-versus-reality. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Caplan, AL, Patrizio, P. Are you ever too old to have a baby? The ethical challenges of older women using infertility services. Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28(4): 281–86.Google Scholar

Billari, FC, Goisis, A, Liefbroer, AC, et al. Social age deadlines for the childbearing of women and men. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(3): 616–22.Google Scholar

Bowman, MC, Saunders, DM. Community attitudes to maternal age and pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: too old at 50 years? Hum Reprod 1994; 9(1): 176–71.Google Scholar

Weiss, D, Freund, AM. Still young at heart: Negative age-related information motivates distancing from same-aged people. Psychol Aging 2012; 27(1): 173–180.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. The Child's Conception of the World. London: Kegan Paul Trench Trubner; 1929.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced age: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 100(2): 337–40.Google Scholar

D'Onofrio, BM, Rickert, ME, Frans, E, et al. Paternal age at childbearing and offspring psychiatric and academic morbidity. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; Published online February 26, 2014.Google Scholar

Bray, I, Grunell, D, Smith, GD. Advanced paternal age: how old is too old? J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60(10): 851–53.Google Scholar

Faro, R, Santolaya-Forgas, J, Canterino, JC, et al. Paternal age and risk for cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal and Neonatal Med 2012; 25(12): 2713–16.Google Scholar

MacDougall, K, Beyene, Y, Nachtigall, RD. ‘Inconvenient biology’: advantages and disadvantages of first-time parenting after age 40 using in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(4): 1058–65.Google Scholar

Arias, E. United States life tables, 2006. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 58, no 21. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2010. (Tables 11.2, 11.3). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_21.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Morris, M. Last-chance Children: Growing Up with Older Parents. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1988.Google Scholar

Yarrow, A. Latecomers: Children of Parents over 35. New York, NY: Free Press, MacMillian; 1991.Google Scholar

Menken, J. Age and fertility: How late can you wait? Demography 1985; 22(4): 469–483.Google Scholar

Molla, MT, Madans, JH, Wagner, DK, Crimmins, EM. Healthy People 2010. Summary Measures of population Health: Report of Findings on Methodologic and Data Issues. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD; 2003. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/pophealth.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Lackey, NR, Gates, MF. Adults’ recollections of their experiences as young caregivers of family members with chronic physical illnesses. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34 (3): 320–8.Google Scholar

Bauman, LJ, Foster, G, Silver, EJ, et al. Children caring for their ill parents with HIV/AIDS. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud 2006; 1(1): 56–70.Google Scholar

Biank, NM, Werner-Lin, A. Growing up with grief: revisiting the death of a parent over the life course. Omega 2011; 63(3): 271–90.Google Scholar

http://politiskfilosofi.com/2006/06/08/financing-policies-of-ivf-in-sweden/ Retrieved from the website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.hfea.gov.uk/fertility-treatment-cost-nhs.html. Retrieved from the website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israeli-health-ministry-considers-cutting-fertility-treatment-subsidies-for-older-women-1.434194. Retrieved from the website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.touchpoint.dk/xdoc/wss/74/docs/289/Infertility_lecture_2003.pdf. Retrieved from the website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

LeRay, C, Scherier, S, Anselem, O, et al. Association between oocyte donation and maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 43 years or older. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 896–901.Google Scholar

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385185/Baby-vacuum-Germany-start-paying-families-IVF-reverse-dwindling-birthrate.html. Retrieved from the website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.children.gov.on.ca/htdocs/English/infertility/report/caretoproceed.aspx. Retrieved March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.embryoland.gr/en/pages/ivf-abroad-greece/Legal-Issues-IVF-Greece.asp. Retrieved from website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.ivf.net/ivf/finland-passes-new-fertility-legislation-o2315.html. Retrieved from the website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/ivf-is-not-a-treatment-but-provision-of-a-commodity/story-fn562txd-1226249710890. Retrieved from website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.ivf.net/ivf/world%92s-oldest-ivf-mother-dies-from-cancer-two-years-after-giving-birth-o4339.html. Retrieved from website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

http://www.ivf-worldwide.com/Education/policy-of-reimbursement.html. Retrieved from website March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. ASRM Ethics Committee report: child-rearing ability and the provision of fertility services. Fertil Steril 2009; 92(3): 864–867.Google Scholar

Blyth, E, Frith, L, Crawashaw, M. Ethical objections to sex selection for non-medical reasons. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16 Suppl 1: 41–45.Google Scholar

Appel, JM. Motherhood: Is it ever too late? Huffington Post Healthy Living. July 15, 2009. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-m-appel/motherhood-is-it-ever-too-late_b_233916.html. Accessed March 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Landau, R. The promise of post-menopausal pregnancy (PMP). Soc Work Health Care. 2004; 40(1): 53–69.Google Scholar

Paulson, RJ, Sauer, MV. Pregnancies in post-menopausal women. Oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age: “How old is too old?” 1994; Hum Reprod 9(4): 571–2.Google Scholar

Artificial insemination: Its socio-legal aspects. Minn Law Rev 1949; 145: 150–1.Google Scholar

Curie-Cohen, M, Luttrell, L, Shapiro, S. Current practice of artificial insemination by donor in the United States. N Engl J Med 1979 Mar 15; 300(11): 585–90.Google Scholar

Kerr, MG, Rogers, C. Donor insemination. J Med Ethics 1975; 1: 30–3.Google Scholar

Strong, C, Schinfeld, JS. The single woman and artificial insemination by donor. J Reprod Med 1984 May; 29(5): 293–9.Google Scholar

Baetens, P, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I, Devroey, P, Van Steirteghem, AC. Artificial insemination by donor: an alternative for single women. Hum Reprod 1995 Jun; 10(6): 1537–42.Google Scholar

Englert, Y. Artificial insemination of single women and lesbian women with donor semen. Artificial insemination with donor semen: particular requests. Hum Reprod 1994 Nov; 9(11): 1969–71.Google Scholar

Kritchevsky, B. The unmarried woman's right to artificial insemination: a call for an expanded definition of family. Harv Women's Law J 1981 Spring; 4(1): 1–42.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 1333–35.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (c. 22), (2008).Google Scholar

International Federation of Fertility Societies. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010. Available from: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iffs-reproduction.org/resource/resmgr/newsletters/iffs_surveillance_2010.pdf. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar

Hamilton, BE, Martin, JA, Ventura, SJ. Births: Preliminary data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Report [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60_02.pdf. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar

Mosher, WD, Jones, J, Abma, JC. Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010. National Health Statistics Reports [Internet]. 2012; 55. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60_02.pdf. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar

French, HW. Single mothers in China forge a difficult path. The New York Times. 6 April 2008.Google Scholar

United Kingdom Office of National Statistics. Statistical Bulletin: Families and Households, 2013. 2013.Google Scholar

Pakizegi, B. Emerging family forms: single mothers by choice – demographic and psychosocial variables. Matern Child Nurs J 1990 Spring; 19(1): 1–19.Google Scholar

McCartney, CF. Decision by single women to conceive by artificial donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 4(4): 321–8.Google Scholar

Mechaneck, R, Klein, E, Kuppersmith, J. Single mothers by choice: A family alternative. Women Ther 1987; 6(1–2): 263–81.Google Scholar

Eiduson, BT, Kornfein, M, Zimmerman, IL, Weisner, TS. Comparative socialization practices in traditional and alternative families. In: Lamb, M, editor. Nontraditional Families. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1982.Google Scholar

Jadva, V, Badger, S, Morrissette, M, Golombok, S. ‘Mom by choice, single by life's circumstance…’ Findings from a large scale survey of the experiences of single mothers by choice. Human Fertil (Camb) 2009 Dec; 12(4): 175–84.Google Scholar

Lamb, ME. Mothers, fathers, families, and circumstances: Factors affecting children's adjustment. Appl Dev Sci 2012; 16(2): 98–111.Google Scholar

Patterson, CJ. Children of lesbian and gay parents: Psychology, law, and policy. Am Psychol 2009; 64(8): 727–36.Google Scholar

Golombok, S, Tasker, F, Murray, C. Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: family relationships and the socioemotional development of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997 Oct; 38(7): 783–91.Google Scholar

Murray, C, Golombok, S. Solo mothers and their donor insemination infants: follow-up at age 2 years. Hum Reprod 2005 Jun; 20(6): 1655–60.Google Scholar

Maccallum, F, Golombok, S. Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: a follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers at early adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004 Nov; 45(8): 1407–19.Google Scholar

Golombok, S, Spencer, A, Rutter, M. Children in lesbian and single-parent households: psychosexual and psychiatric appraisal. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1983 Oct; 24(4): 551–72.Google Scholar

Shechner, T, Slone, M, Meir, Y, Kalish, Y. Relations between social support and psychological and parental distress for lesbian, single heterosexual by choice, and two-parent heterosexual mothers. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2010 Jul; 80(3): 283–92.Google Scholar

Navarro, M. The bachelor life includes a family. The New York Times. 7 September 2008.Google Scholar

Tuttle, I. Single fathers by choice: The newest trend. National Review Online. July 2, 2012.Google Scholar

Morrissette, M. Choosing Single Motherhood: The Thinking Woman's Guide. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2008.Google Scholar

Reichenberg, A, Gross, R, Weiser, M, Bresnahan, M, Silverman, J, Harlap, S, et al. Advancing paternal age and autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 Sep; 63(9): 1026–32.Google Scholar

Scheib, JE, Cushing, RA. Open-identity donor insemination in the United States: is it on the rise? Fertil Steril 2007 Jul; 88(1): 231–2.Google Scholar

Scheib, JE, Riordan, M, Rubin, S. Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents’ perspective 13–18 years later. Hum Reprod 2003 May; 18(5): 1115–27.Google Scholar

Pakizegi, B. Single-parent adoptions and clinical implications. In: Javier, RA, Baden, AL, Biafora, FA, Camacho-Gingerich, A, editors. Handbook of Adoption: Implications for Researchers, Practitioners, and Families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2007. pp. 190–216.Google Scholar

Jadva, V, Freeman, T, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Reprod 2009 Aug; 24(8): 1909–19.Google Scholar

Scheib, JE, Riordan, M, Rubin, S. Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12–17 year olds. Hum Reprod 2005 Jan; 20(1): 239–52.Google Scholar

Murray, C, Golombok, S. Going it alone: solo mothers and their infants conceived by donor insemination. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2005 Apr; 75(2): 242–53.Google Scholar

Beeson, DR, Jennings, PK, Kramer, W. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Hum Reprod 2011 Sep; 26(9): 2415–24.Google Scholar

Scheib, JE, Ruby, A. Contact among families who share the same sperm donor. Fertil Steril 2008 Jul; 90(1): 33–43.Google Scholar

Freeman, T, Jadva, V, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor. Hum Reprod 2009 Mar; 24(3): 505–16.Google Scholar

Allen, KR, Demo, DH. The families of lesbians and gay men: A new frontier in family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1995; 57(1): 111–27.Google Scholar

Goldberg, AE. Lesbian and Gay Parents and Their Children: Research on the Family Life Cycle. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.Google Scholar

Gates, GJ, Ost, J. The Gay and Lesbian Atlas. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 2004.Google Scholar

Baetens, P, Camus, M, Devroey, P. Counselling lesbian couples: Requests for donor insemination on social grounds. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2003 Jan–Feb; 6(1): 75–83.Google Scholar

Pratesi, A. A respectable scandal: Same-sex parenthood, emotional dynamics, and social change. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 2012; 8: 305–33.Google Scholar

Agigain, A. Baby Steps: How Lesbian Alternative Insemination Is Changing the World. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press; 2004.Google Scholar

Mamo, L. Queering Reproduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2007.Google Scholar

Embryology ESoHRa. Comparative Analysis of Medically Assisted Reproduction in the EU: Regulation and Technologies. Brussels, Belgium; 2013.Google Scholar

ILGA-Europe. ILGA-Europe: Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe, 2013. Brussels, Belgium: ILGA-Europe, 2013.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive M. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertility and Sterility 2006 Nov; 86(5): 1333–5.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertility and Sterility 2009 Oct; 92(4): 1190–3.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 2013 Dec; 100(6): 1524–7.Google Scholar

North Coast Women's Care Medical Group v. Benitez, 44 Cal. 4th 1145 (2008).Google Scholar

Wykes, KA. Fertility services for same-sex couples: Policy and practice. British Journal of Nursing 2012 Jul 26–Aug 8; 21(14): 871–5.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (c. 22), (2008).Google Scholar

Corbett, SL, Frecker, HM, Shapiro, HM, Yudin, MH. Access to fertility services for lesbian women in Canada. Fertility and Sterility 2013 Oct; 100(4): 1077–80.Google Scholar

Chabot, JM, Ames, BD. “It wasn't ‘Let's get pregnant and go do it’:” Decision making in lesbian couples planning motherhood via donor insemination. Family Relations 2004; 53(4): 348–56.Google Scholar

Rank, N. Barriers for access to assisted reproductive technologies by lesbian women: The search for parity within the healthcare system. Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy 2010; 10: 115–46.Google Scholar

Johnson, KM. Excluding lesbian and single women? An analysis of U.S. fertility clinic websites. Women's Studies International Forum 2012; 35: 394–402.Google Scholar

Baetens, P, Brewaeys, A. Lesbian couples requesting donor insemination: An update of the knowledge with regard to lesbian mother families. Human Reproduction Update 2001 Sep–Oct; 7(5): 512–19.Google Scholar

Ross, LE, Steele, LS, Epstein, R. Service use and gaps in services for lesbian and bisexual women during donor insemination, pregnancy, and the postpartum period. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2006 Jun; 28(6): 505–11.Google Scholar

Kissil, K, Davey, M. Health dispartities in procreation: Unequal access to assisted reprodutive techologies. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 2012; 24(3): 197–212.Google Scholar

Smith, D. What are the reproductive options when a same-sex couple wants a family? Sexuality, Reproduction & Menopause 2011; 9(3): 30–6.Google Scholar

Human Rights Campaign. Parenting Laws: Joint Adoption. HRC [Internet]. June 4, 2013. Retrieved from: www.hrc.org.Google Scholar

Child Welfare Information Gateway. Frequently Asked Questions from Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Prospective Foster and Adoptive Parents. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Children's Bureau; 2011.Google Scholar

Kinkler, LA, Goldberg, AE. Working with what we've got: Perceptions of barriers and supports among small-netropolitan same-sex adopting couples. Family Relations 2011 Oct 1; 60(4): 387–403.Google Scholar

Patterson, CJ. Children of lesbian and gay parents: Psychology, law, and policy. American Psychologist 2009; 64(8): 727–36.Google Scholar

Kranz, KC, Daniluk, JC. Living outside the box: Lesbian families created through the use of anonymous donor insemination. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 2006; 56: 1–33.Google Scholar

Goldberg, AE. The transition to parenthood for lesbian couples. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 2006; 2: 13–42.Google Scholar

Amato, PR, Jacob, MC. Providing fertility services to lesbian couples: The lesbian baby boom. Sexuality, Reproduction & Menopause 2004; 2(2): 83–8.Google Scholar

Ben-Ari, A, Livni, T. Motherhood is not a given thing: Experiences and constructed meanings of biological and nonbiological lesbian mothers. Sex Roles 2006; 54(7–8): 521–31.Google Scholar

Gurmankin, AD, Caplan, AL, Braverman, AM. Screening practices and beliefs of assisted reproductive technology programs. Fertility and Sterility 2005 Jan; 83(1): 61–7.Google Scholar

Lawrence, RE, Rasinski, KA, Yoon, JD, Curlin, FA. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ beliefs about assisted reproductive technologies. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2010 Jul; 116(1): 127–35.Google Scholar

Herek, GM, Gillis, JR, Cogan, JC. Internalized stigma among sexual minority adults: Insights from a social psychological perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2009; 56: 32–43.Google Scholar

Meyer, IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin 2003 Sep; 129(5): 674–97.Google Scholar

Yager, C, Brennan, D, Steele, LS, Epstein, R, Ross, LE. Challenges and mental health experiences of lesbian and bisexual women who are trying to conceive. Health & Social Work 2010 Aug; 35(3): 191–200.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive M. Cross-border reproductive care: A committee opinion. Fertil Sterility 2013 Sep; 100(3): 645–50.Google Scholar

Ferraretti, AP, Pennings, G, Gianaroli, L, Natali, F, Magli, MC. Cross-border reproductive care: a phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2010 Feb; 20(2): 261–6.Google Scholar

Shenfield, F, de Mouzon, J, Pennings, G, Ferraretti, AP, Andersen, AN, de Wert, G, et al. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Human Reproduction 2010 Jun; 25(6): 1361–8.Google Scholar

Ross, LE, Steele, L, Sapiro, B. Perceptions of predisposing and protective factors for perinatal depression in same-sex parents. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2005 Nov–Dec; 50(6): e65–70.Google Scholar

Goldberg, AE. Gay Dads: Transitions to Adoptive Fatherhood. New York, NY: New York University Press; 2012.Google Scholar

Murphy, TF. The ethics of helping transgender men and women have children. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2010 Winter; 53(1): 46–60.Google Scholar

De Sutter, P, Kir, K, Verschoor, A, Hotimsky, A. The desire to have children and the perservation of fertility in transsexual women. The International Journal of Transgenderism 2002; 6(3).Google Scholar

Murphy, TF. The ethics of fertility preservation in transgender body modifications. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2012 Sep; 9(3): 311–6.Google Scholar

Cousineau, TM, Domar, AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Practice & Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2007 Apr; 21(2): 293–308.Google Scholar

Petok, WD. The psychology of gender-specific infertility diagnoses. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, editors. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 37–60.Google Scholar

Burns, LH, Covington, SN. Psychology of infertility. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, editors. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Ehrensaft, D. Just Molly and me, and donor makes three: Lesbian motherhood in the age of assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Lesbian Studies 2008; 12(2–3): 161–78.Google Scholar

Ross, LE, Steele, LS, Epstein, R. Lesbian and bisexual women's recommendations for improving the provision of assisted reproductive technology services. Fertility and Sterility 2006 Sep; 86(3): 735–8.Google Scholar

Englert, Y. Artificial insemination of single women and lesbian women with donor semen. Artificial insemination with donor semen: Particular requests. Human Reproduction 1994 Nov; 9(11): 1969–71.Google Scholar

Hague Adoption Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Inter-Country Adoption. Available from: http://www.hcch.net. Accessed February 8, 2014.Google Scholar

Volkman, TA (ed). Cultures of Transnational Adoption. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Babb, LA. Ethics in contemporary adoption practice. In: Groza, V and Rosenberg, K, eds. Clinical Practice Issues in Adoption: Bridging the gap between Adoptees Placed as Infants and as Older Children, revised and expanded. Westport, CT: Bergen and Garvey, 2001: 105–55.Google Scholar

Van IJzendoorn, MH, Juffer, F. The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 2006: Adoption as intervention. Meta-analytic evidence of massive catch-up and plasticity in physical, socio-emotional, and cognitive development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2006; 47: 1228–45.Google Scholar

Freundlich, M, Lieberthal, JK. Adoption and Ethics: The Impact of Adoption on Members of the Triad. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America, 2001.Google Scholar

Cole, ES, Donley, KS. History, values, and placement policy issues in adoption. In: Brodzinsky, D. and Schechter, M., eds. The Psychology of Adoption. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990: 273–94.Google Scholar

Selman, P. From Bucharest to Beijing: Changes in countries sending children for international adoption 1990 to 2006. In: Wrobel, G and Neil, E, eds. International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice. New York: Wiley, 2009a: 41–69.Google Scholar

Herszenhorn, DM, Eckholm, E. Putin signs bill that bars US adoptions, upending families New York Times December 27, 2012; Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/28/world/europe/putin-to-sign-ban-on-us-adoptions-of-russian-children.html?pa. Accessed April 6, 2014.Google Scholar

Selman, P. The rise and fall of intercountry adoption in the 21st century. International Social Work 2009b; 52 (5): 1–20.Google Scholar

U.S. Department of State: FY 2012 Annual Report on Intercountry Adoption, January 2013; Available from: http://travel.state.gov/content/dam/aa/pdfs/fy2012_annual_report.pdf. Accessed October 24, 2014.Google Scholar

Selman, P. The movement of children for international adoption: Developments and trends in receiving states and states of origin, 1998–2004. In: Marre, D and Briggs, L, eds. International Adoption: Global Inequalities and the Circulation of Children. New York: New York University Press, 2009: 32–51.Google Scholar

Selman, P. Key Tables for Intercountry Adoption: Receiving States 2003–2012; States of Origin 2003–2011; Available from: http://www.hcch.net/upload/2013selmanstats33.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2014.Google Scholar

U.S. Department of State: FY 2013 Annual Report on Intercountry Adoption, March 2014 Available from: http://travel.state.gov/content/dam/aa/pdfs/fy2013_annual_report.pdf Accessed October 24, 2014.Google Scholar

Wall Street Journal for the Associated Press, March 22, 2014 Available from: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB20001424052702303802104579453521021718870. Accessed March 23, 2014.Google Scholar

Kirk, HD. Shared Fate. New York: Free Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Brodzinsky, DA. Stress and coping model of adoption adjustment. In: Brodzinsky, D, Schechter, M., eds. The Psychology of Adoption. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990: 3–24.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2: Separation. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar

Daniluk, JC, Hurtig-Mitchell, J. Themes of hope and healing: Infertile couples’ experiences of adoption. Journal of Counseling and Development 2003; 81, Fall: 389–99.Google Scholar

Hendry, A, Netherwood, PA. Child at last: Adoption and infertility. In: Crawshaw, M and Balen, R, eds., Adopting after Infertility: Messages from Practice, Research, and Personal Experience. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2010: 151–63.Google Scholar

Shapiro, V, Shapiro, J, Paret, I. Complex Adoption and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. New York: Guilford Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Palacios, J. The ecology of adoption. In: Wrobel, GM and Neil, E, eds. International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009: 71–94.Google Scholar

Grotevant, HD, Dunbar, N, Kohler, JK, Esau, AL. Adoptive identity: How contexts within and beyond the family shape developmental pathways. Family Relations, 2000; 49: 379–87.Google Scholar

Lee, RM. The transracial adoption paradox: History, research, and counseling implications of cultural socialization. The Counseling Psychologist, 2003; 31 (6): 711–44.Google Scholar

Wrobel, GM, Kohler, J, Grotevant, HD, McRoy, R. The Family Adoption Communication (FAC) Model: Identifying pathways of adoption-related communication. Adoption Quarterly 2003, 7 (2): 53–84.Google Scholar

Palacios, J, Brodzinsky, DM. Review: Adoption research: Trends, topics, outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2010; 34 (3), 270–84.Google Scholar

Van IJzendoorn, MH, Juffer, F. The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 2006: Adoption as intervention. Meta-analytic evidence of massive catch-up and plasticity in physical, socio-emotional, and cognitive development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2006; 47, 1228–45.Google Scholar

Vandivere, S, Malm, K, Radel, LF. Adoption USA: A Chartbook Based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 2009.Google Scholar

Jones, J. Adoption experiences of women and men and demand for children to adopt by women 18–44 years of age in the United States, 2002. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.August 2008, Series 23, Number 27, pages 1–18. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_027.pdf Accessed October 24, 2014.Google Scholar

Pinborg, A, Hougaard, CO, Andersen, AN, Molbo, D, Schmidt, L. Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment. Human Reproduction 2009; 24 (4): 991–99.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y, Lee, GR. Intercountry versus transracial adoption: Analysis of adoptive parents’ motivations and preferences in adoption. Journal of Family Issues 2011; 32 (1): 75–98.Google Scholar

Hogström, L, Johansson, M, Janson, PO, Berg, M, Francis, J, Sogn, J, Hellström, AL, Adolfsson, A. Quality of life after adopting compared with childbirth with or without assisted reproduction. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavia 2012 Sep; 91 (9):1077–85. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22708621. Accessed October 27, 2012.Google Scholar

Triseliotis, J, Feast, J, Kyle, F. The Adoption Triangle Revisited: A Study of Adoption, Search and Reunion Experiences. London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering, 2005.Google Scholar

Weir, KN. Adoptive family “leap frogging” patterns. Adoption Quarterly 2003; 7: 1: 27–41.Google Scholar

McKay, K, Ross, LE, Goldberg, AE. Adaptation to parenthood during the post-adoption period: A review of the literature. Adoption Quarterly 2010; 13: 125–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2010.481040. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A, Gonet, P. Strengthening adoption practice, listening to adoptive families. Child Welfare 2007; 86: 87–104.Google Scholar

Klevian, M. Resolving race: How adoptive parents discuss choosing the race of their child. Adoption Quarterly 2012; 15: 2: 88–115.Google Scholar

Brodzinsky, D. Children's understanding of adoption: Developmental and clinical implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 2011; 42: 2: 200–7.Google Scholar

Brodzinsky, D. Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children. Adoption Quarterly 2006; 9: 4: 1–18.Google Scholar

Smith, B, Surrey, JL, Watkins, M. “Real” mothers”: Adoptive mothers resisting marginalization and recreating motherhood. In: Wegar, K, ed. Adoptive Families in a Diverse Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2006: 146–61.Google Scholar

Wrobel, GM, Dillon, K. Adopted adolescents: who and what are they curious about? In: Wrobel, GM and Neil, E, eds. International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009: 217–44.Google Scholar

Howe, D, Feast, J. Adoption, Search and Reunion: The Long-Term Experience of Adopted Adults. London: BAAF, 2000.Google Scholar

Fisher, AP. “Not quite as good as having your own”? Towards a sociology of adoption. Annual Reviews of Sociology 2003; 29: 335–61.Google Scholar