Fauser, BC, Tarlatzis, BC, Rebar, RW, Legro, RS, Balen, AH, Lobo, R, et al. Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(1): 28–38.Google Scholar

WHO. Adherence to Long-term Therapies: Evidence for Action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar

Stern, JE, Brown, MB, Luke, B, Wantman, E, Lederman, A, Missmer, SA, et al. Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 1334–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boivin, J, Domar, AD, Shapiro, DB, Wischmann, T, Fauser, BC, Verhaak, CM. Tackling burden in ART: An integrated approach for medical staff. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(4): 941–50.Google Scholar

Gameiro, S, Verhaak, CM, Kremer, JAM, Boivin, J. Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(2): 124–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gameiro, S, Boivin, J, Peronace, LA, Verhaak, CM. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(6): 652–69.Google Scholar

Brandes, M, van der Steen, JOM, Bokdam, SB, Hamilton, CJCM, de Bruin, JP, Nelen, WLDM, et al. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(12):3127–34.Google Scholar

Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS, Kohn, LT, Maguire, SK, Pike, KC. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Press; 2001.Google Scholar

Pedro, J, Canavarro, MC, Boivin, J, Gameiro, S. Postive experiences of patient-centred care are associated with intentions to comply with fertility treatment: Findings from the validation of the Portuguese version of the PCQ-Infertility. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(9):2462–72.Google Scholar

van Empel, IWH, Dancet, EAF, Koolman, XHE, Nelen, WLDM, Stolk, EA, Sermeus, W, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: A discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(3): 584–93.Google Scholar

Peddie, VL, van Teijlingen, E, Bhattacharya, S. A qualitative study of women's decision-making at the end of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(7):1944–51.Google Scholar

Rauprich, O, Berns, E, Vollmann, J. Information provision and decision-making in assisted reproduction treatment: results from a survey in Germany. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 2382–91.Google Scholar

Boden, J. When IVF treatment fails. Hum Fertil. 2007;10: 93–8.Google Scholar

Peddie, VL, van Teijlingen, E, Bhattacharya, S. Ending in-vitro fertilization: Women's perception's of decision making. Hum Fertil. 2004; 7(1): 31–7.Google Scholar

Boivin, J. Evidence-based approaches to infertility counselling. In: Covington, SN, Hammer, Burns L, editors. Infertility Counselling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar

Sackett, D, Strauss, SE, Richardson, WS, Rosenberg, W, Haynes, RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.Google Scholar

The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile: a committee option. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(1): e6–e9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malcolm, CE, Cumming, DC. Follow-up of infertile couples who dropped out of a specialist fertiliy clinic. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(2): 269–70.Google Scholar

Gameiro, S, Boivin, J, Domar, AD. Optimal IVF for 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 302–9.Google Scholar

Shariff, SZ, Math, B, Bejaimal, SAD, Sontrop, JM, Iansavichus, AV, Haynes, RB, et al. Retrieving clinical evidence: A comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(8): e164.Google Scholar

Bramer, WM, Giustini, D, Kramer, BMR, Anderson, FP. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searchers for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2013; 2: 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barry, JA, Kuckmierczyk, AR, Hardiman, PJ. Anxiety and depression in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 2442–51.Google Scholar

Dokras, A, Clifton, S, Futterweit, W, Wild, RA. Increased prevalence of anxiety symptoms in women with polycystic ovary syndrom: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(1): 225–30.Google Scholar

Dokras, A, Clifton, S, Futterweit, W, Wild, RA. Increased risk for abnormal depression scores in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(1): 145–52.Google Scholar

Veltman-Verhulst, S, Boivin, J, Eikjemans, E, Fauser, BC. Emotional distress in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(6): 638–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boivin, J, Griffiths, E, Venetis, CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. 2011; 342(d223).Google Scholar

Matthiesen, SM, Frederiksen, Y, Ingerlev, HJ, Zachariae, R. Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 2763–76.Google Scholar

Moran, LJ, Hutchison, SK, Norman, RJ, Teede, HJ. Lifestyle Changes in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. 06 July 2011 edn. Cochrane Library 2011.Google Scholar

Hartmann-Boyce, J, Johns, DJ, Jebb, SA, Aveyard, P, Behavioural Weight Management Review Group. Effect of behavioural techniques and delivery mode on effectiveness of weight management: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Obes Rev. 2014; 15: 598–609.Google Scholar

Phelps, C, Bennett, P, Hood, K, Brain, K, Murray, A. A self-help coping intervention can reduce anxiety and avoidant health behaviours whilst waiting for cancer genetic risk information: results of a phase III randomised trial. Psychooncology. 2012; 22: 836–44.Google Scholar

Bennett, P, Phelps, C, Brain, K, Hood, K, Gray, J. A randomized controlled trial of a brief self-help coping intervention designed to reduce distress when awaiting genetic risk information. J Psychosom Res. 2007; 63(1):59–64.Google Scholar

Lancastle, D, Boivin, J. A feasibility study of a brief coping intervention (PRCI) for the waiting period before a pregnancy test during fertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 2299–307.Google Scholar

Ockhuijsen, H, van den Hoogen, A, Eijkemans, M, Macklon, N, Boivin, J. The impact of a self-administered coping intervention on emotional well-being in women awaiting the outcome of IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29:1459–70.Google Scholar

Skiadas, CC, Terry, K, De Pari, M, Geoghegan, A, Lubetsky, L, Levy, S, et al. Does emotional support during the luteal phase decrease the stress of in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 1467–72.Google Scholar

Higgins, J, Green, S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011.Google Scholar

Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.Google Scholar

Lancastle, D. Reasons to be Cheerful: Part I, II, III. Dispositional Optimism, Positive Reappraisal Coping and Positive (Re)appraisals of the Situation: Effects on Emotional Well-being and Physical Outcomes. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing: Cardiff University; 2006.Google Scholar

Pinborg, A, Gaarslev, C, Hougaard, CO, Nyboe Anderson, A, Kragh, Anderson P, Boivin, J, et al. The influence of female body weight on assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures and live birth rates: A longitudinal multi-centre cohort study of 487 infertile couples. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23(4): 490–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, SA, Poynter, PS, Anderson, JW, Noar, SM, Conigliaro, J. Physician weight loss advice and patient weight loss behavior change: a literature review and meta-analysis of survey data. Int J Obes. 2013; 37(1):118–28.Google Scholar

Boivin, J, Takefman, J, Braverman, A. Giving bad news: It's time to stop. In: Macklon, N, editor. Assisted Reproduction in the Complicated Patients. London: Taylor & Francis; 2005. pp. 233–40.Google Scholar

Aarts, JWM, van den Haak, P, Nelen, WL, Tuil, WS, Faber, MJ, Kremer, JAM. Patient-focused intervent interventions in reproductive medicine: a scoping review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(2): 211–27.Google Scholar

Rimm, AA, Katayama, AC, Diaz, M, Katayama, KP. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2004; 21(12): 437–43.Google Scholar

Wen, J, Jiang, J, Chenyue, D, Juncheng, D, Liu, Y, Xia, Y, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(6): 1331–7.Google Scholar

Elwyn, G, Miron-Shatz, T. Deliberation before determination: The definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expect. 2009; 13:139–47.Google Scholar

Elwyn, G, Stiel, M, Durand, M-A, Boivin, J. The design on patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17:565–74.Google Scholar

von Neumann, J, Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1944.Google Scholar

Durand, M-A, Boivin, J, Elwyn, G. Stakeholder field-testing of amnioDex, a person-centered decision support intervention for amniocentesis. Int J Pers Cent Med. 2012; 2(3): 568–76.Google Scholar

Jones, ML, Cifu, DX, Backus, D, Sisto, SA. Instilling a research culture in an applied clinical setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94(1): S49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Glossary 2014 [April 4th 2014]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/?o=1116.Google Scholar

International Union of Psychological Science. Universal Declaration of Ethical Principles for Psychologists. 2008. www.sagepub.com/cac6study/pdf/UniversalDeclaration.pdf. http://www.sagepub.coms (Accessed May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

Hendricks, BE, Bradley, LJ, Southern, S, Oliver, M, Birdsall, B. Ethical code for the International Association of Marriage and Family Counselors. The Family Journal 2011; 19: 217–24. http://www.iamfconline.org/public/department3.cfm (Accessed October 21, 2014.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Federation of Social Workers. Second Draft Document: Ethics in Social Work Statement of Principles. 2012. http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/. (Accessed May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

Leach, MM, Glosoff, HL, Overmier, JB. International Ethics Codes-A Follow-up Study of Previously Unmatched Standards and Principles. IUPsyS Global Resource. 2009. http://e-book.lib.sjtu.edu.cn/iupsys/ethics/ethics2_info.htm. (Accessed May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

Leach, MM, Harbin, JJ. Psychological ethics codes: A comparison of twenty-four countries. Int J of Psychol 1997; 32: 181–92. http://e-book.lib.sjtu.edu.cn/iupsys/ethics/ethics_info.htm. (Accessed May 11, 2014.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th edn. New York, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kitchener, KS. Intuition, critical evaluation and ethical principles: The foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. Couns Psychol 1984; 12: 43–55.Google Scholar

Pettifor, JL. Professional ethics across national boundaries. Eur Psychol 2004; 9: 264–72.Google Scholar

Frith, L. The use of clinical ethics committees in infertility clinics. Hum Fertil 2009; 12: 89–94.Google Scholar

Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Counseling Special Interest Group of the Canadian Special Interest Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted Human Reproduction Counseling Guidelines. 2009. https://www.cfas.ca/index.php?option = com_content&view = article&id = 936%3Aassisted-human-reproduction-counselling-practice-guidelines&catid = 999%3Aguidelines-counsellors-sig-&Itemid = 521 (Accessed May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

ESHRE Psychology and Counselling Special Interest Group. Guidelines for Counselling in Infertility. 2001. http://www.eshre.eu. (Accessed on May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

Mental Health Professional Group of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Qualification guidelines for mental health professionals in reproductive medicine. In: Covington, SN and Burns, LH, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edn. New York, Cambridge University Press. 2006; 559–60.Google Scholar

Pope, KS, Vasquez, MJJ. Ethics in Psychotherapy and Counseling: A Practice Guide, 2nd edn. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 2011.Google Scholar

Koocher, GP, Keith-Spiegel, P. “What Should I Do?” Ethical Risks, Making Decisions, and Taking Action. 2012. http://www.continuingedcourses.net/active/courses/course050.php. (Accessed May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

Horowitz, JE, Galst, JP, Elster, N. Ethical Dilemmas in Fertility Counseling. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2010.Google Scholar

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 47–62.Google Scholar

Bankowski, BJ, Lyerly, AD, Faden, RR, et al. The social implications of embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 823–832.Google Scholar

Takahashi, K, Mukaida, T, Goto, T, et al. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: A 4-year follow-up study. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 88–92.Google Scholar

Wennerholm, UB, Soderstrom-Anttila, V, Bergh, C, et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: A systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2158–72.Google Scholar

Bangsboll, S, Pinborg, A, Yding, AC, et al. Patients’ attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2415–19.Google Scholar

Klock, SC, Sheinin, S, Kazer, RR. The disposition of unused frozen embryos. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 69–70.Google Scholar

Newton, CR, Fisher, J, Feyles, V, et al. Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 3124–8.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, including 2010 amendments. 2010. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx. (Accessed May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and the Law III. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1407–8.Google Scholar

United States Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR parts 210, 211, 820, 1271, Eligibility determination for donors of human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products; final rule and notice.Google Scholar

National Conference of State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/embryo-and-gamete-disposition-laws.aspx. (Accessed May 11, 2014.)Google Scholar

Brakman, S-V. Embryo adoption. The Lahey Clin Med Ethics J 2005; 12: 1–2.Google Scholar

de Lacey, S. Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: Why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1661–9.Google Scholar

Blind woman sues fertility clinic. Washington Times (Internet) 2003 Nov 12 [cited 2003 Nov 12]. Available from: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2003/nov/12/20031112-115222-2089r/?page=allGoogle Scholar

Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition, “Rocky Mountain Women's Health Care,” Accessed February 27, 2014,. Available from http://www.ccdconline.org/case/196.Google Scholar

Harkin, T. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Title 4, Chapter 126. Washington (DC). The United States Senate; 1990, July 26.Google Scholar

Morian, K (ed.) Kijuana Chambers v. Rocky Mountain Women's Health Care Center [Internet]. 2003. Accessed April 3, 2014. http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=00-CV-1794&s=CO&d=26278.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington: The American Psychological Association; 2010.Google Scholar

National Association of Social Workers. Code of Ethics [pamphlet]. Washington: National Association of Social Workers; 1996.Google Scholar

National Board for Certified Counselors. National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC) Code of Ethics [pamphlet]. Washington: 2013.Google Scholar

Klemmer, H. et al. Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry 2013 Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.Google Scholar

2012 Workgroup. Scope and Standards of Practice, Draft. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association; 2012.Google Scholar

British Infertility Counseling Association Accreditation Scheme [Internet]. Sheffield, UK: British Infertility Counseling Association; 2009 [cited 2014 May 31]. Available from: http://www.bica.net/accreditation-scheme.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority. Code of Practice, 8th Edition [Internet]. London: Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority; 2009 [Cited 2014 May 18]. Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/code.html.Google Scholar

Norman, RJ. Enquiry into scientific, ethical and regulatory aspects of human cloning. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (Australia). 2000, Feb. 4 p.Google Scholar

Mission statement for IICO [Internet]. [Cited 2014 May 22]. Available from: http://www.iico-infertilitycounseling.org/kinderbuecher/Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Child-rearing ability and the provision of fertility services. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 864–67.Google Scholar

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law 104–191. Washington (DC). The United States Senate; 1996, August 2.Google Scholar

PCI SSC Data Security Standards Overview [Internet]. [Cited 2014 May 29]. Available from: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/security_standards/index.php.Google Scholar

Hanafin, H. Surrogacy and gestational carrier participants. In: Covington, SN and Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians (2nd Edn.) Cambridge: 2006; 374.Google Scholar

Swain, ME. Legal issues in infertility counseling. In: Covington, SN and Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians (2nd Edn.) Cambridge: 2006; 530.Google Scholar

The American Psychological Association. Record keeping guidelines. Am Psychol. 2007; 62: 993–1004.Google Scholar

Thorn, P. Reproduktives Reisen – eine Expertise für den Pro Familia Bundesverband. Pro Familia Bundesverband. 2008 http://www.profamilia.de/fileadmin/publikationen/Fachpublikationen/expertise_reproduktives_reisen.pdf. (Accessed 14 April, 2014.)Google Scholar

Inhorn, MC, Patrizio, P. Rethinking reproductive “tourism” as reproductive “exile.” Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 904–6.Google Scholar

Blyth, E. Fertility patients’ experiences of cross-border reproductive care. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: e11–15.Google Scholar

Shenfield, F, de Mouzon, J, Pennings, G, et al. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1361–68.Google Scholar

Bergmann, S. Reproductive borders, agency, and imagination: the experience of Germans seeking egg donation abroad. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 600–8.Google Scholar

Hughes, E, DeJean, D. Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: e16–e19.Google Scholar

Infertility Network. The Infertility Network UK Fertility Tourism Survey Results. Unpublished survey results. 2008.Google Scholar

Inhorn, MC, Shrivastav, P. Globalization and reproductive tourism in the United Arab Emirates. Asia-Pacific J Pub Health/Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health 2010; 22(3 Suppl):68S–74S.Google Scholar

Kilani, Z, Shaban, M, Haj, Hassan L. Gender selection. In: Hédon, B, Mettler, L, Tinnneberg, HR. eds. Proceedings of the IFFS 2th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility. München, Lukn Verlagsgesellschaft. 2010; 110–14.Google Scholar

Smerdon, UR. Crossing bodies, crossing borders: international surrogacy between the United States and India. Cumberland Law Rev 2008; 39: 15–85.Google Scholar

Whittaker, AM. Reproduction opportunists in the new global sex trade: PGD and non-medical sex selection. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 609–17.Google Scholar

Hudson, N, Culley, L, Blyth, E, et al. Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature. Reprod BioMed Online 2011; 22: 673–85.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports 13. 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/art/artreports.htm. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar

Blyth, E, Thorn, P, Wischmannn, T. CBRC and psychosocial counselling: assessing needs and developing an ethical framework for practice. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 642–51.Google Scholar

McKelvey, A, David, A, Shenfield, F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity services. BJOG 2009; 116: 1520–3.Google Scholar

Inhorn, MC, Patrizio, P. The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 24: 158–63.Google Scholar

Thorn, P, Wischmann, T. German guidelines for psychosocial counselling in the area of “cross border reproductive services.” Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;287: 599–606.Google Scholar

Pennings, G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2689–94.Google Scholar

Shenfield, F, Pennings, G, De Mouzon, J, et al. ESHRE's good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1625–7.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Cross-border reproductive care: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 645–50.Google Scholar

Thorn, P, Wischmann, T, Blyth, E. Cross Border Reproductive Services – suggestions for an ethically based minimum standard of care in Europe. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2012; 33: 1–6.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. CETS No: 164. 1997. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar

Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. CETS No: 005. 1950. http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/005.htm. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and Gynecology by the FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. 2012. http://www.glowm.com/pdf/English%20Ethical%20Issues%20in%20Obstetrics%20a (Accessed October, 2014.)Google Scholar

International Alliance of Patients’ Organisations. What is Patient Centred Health Care? A Review of Definitions and Principles. 2007. http://www.patientsorganizations.org/pchreview. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar

Blyth, E, Hunt, J. A history of infertility counselling in the United Kingdom. In: Jennings, S. ed. Infertility Counselling. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. 1994; 175–90.Google Scholar

Blyth, E. 1988–2008: twenty years of BICA [British Infertility Counselling Association. J Fertil Counsel 2008; 15(1): 15–28.Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, D, Thorn, P, Wischmann, T. Kinderwunsch und professionelle Beratung. Das Handbuch des Beratungsnetzwerkes Kinderwunsch Deutschland (BKiD). Stuttgart, Kohlhammer. 2008.Google Scholar

Blyth, E. Guidelines for infertility counselling in different countries: is there an emerging trend? Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2046–57.Google Scholar

Pennings, G, de Wert, G, Shenfield, F, et al. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2182–84.Google Scholar

International Federation of Infertility Societies. IFFS Surveillance 2013. http://www.iffs-reproduction.org/?page = SurveillanceHidden. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar

Ferraretti, A.P., Goossens, V., Kupka, M., et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 2318–31.Google Scholar

Jungheim, E, Ryan, GL, Levens, ED, et al. Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1432–36.Google Scholar

American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 2006; 86(5 Suppl): S51–52.Google Scholar

The ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. 6. Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1976–9.Google Scholar

Trimmings, K, Beaumont, P. International Surrogacy Arrangements. Oxford, Hart Publishing. 2013.Google Scholar

Spiewak, M Verbotene Kinder. Die Zeit. 2010, April 22;17. http://www.zeit.de/2010/17/Leihmutterschaft?page = all. 07.05.2010. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:L:2004:102:0048:0058:en:PDF. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar

Janssens, PM, Nap, AW, Bancsi, LF. Reconsidering the number of offspring per gamete donor in the Dutch open-identity system. Hum Fertil 2011; 14: 106–14.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, N. Eggs-ploiting women: a critical feminist analysis of the different principles in transplant and fertility tourism. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 634–41.Google Scholar

Thorn, P, Wischmann, T. German guidelines for psychosocial counselling in the area of gamete donation. Hum Fertil 2009; 12: 73–80.Google Scholar

Triseliotis, J. Identity-formation and the adopted person revisited. In: Treacher, A, Katz, I. eds. The Dynamics of Adoption. Social and Personal Experiences. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 2000; 81–98.Google Scholar

Dickens, B. Cross-border reproductive services: FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. IJ Gynecol Obstet 2010; 111: 190–1.Google Scholar

Blyth, E, Farrand, A. Reproductive tourism – a price worth paying for reproductive autonomy? Crit Soc Pol 2005; 25: 91–114.Google Scholar

Blyth, E, Auffrey, M. International Policy on Cross Border Reproductive Services. Geneva, International Federation of Social Workers. 2008. http://ifsw.org/policies/cross-border-reproductive-services/ (Accessed April 14, 2014).Google Scholar

Culley, L, Hudson, N, Rapport, F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Hum Reprod 2012; 26: 2373–81.Google Scholar

Culley, L, Hudson, N, Rapport, F, et al, ‘What are you going to do, confiscate their passports?’ Professional perspectives on cross-border reproductive travel. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013; 31(1): 46–57.Google Scholar

Palattiyil, G, Blyth, E, Sidhva, D, et al. Globalisation and cross-border reproductive services: ethical implications of surrogacy in India for social work. I Soc Work 2010; 53: 686–700.Google Scholar