Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:31:41.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Hybrid Presidentialism and Democratization: The Case of Bolivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Eduardo A. Gamarra
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Scott Mainwaring
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Matthew Soberg Shugart
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Bolivia's democratization efforts in the past decade confirm many of the perils associated with Latin American presidentialism. Owing to the complex and hybrid nature of the Bolivian presidential system, however, generalizations to other Latin American cases are difficult to make. Because it includes certain features normally associated with parliamentarism, Bolivia's system is not strictly presidential (Shugart and Carey 1992:81–85).

The most important difference between the Bolivian system and other contemporary Latin American presidential systems lies in the selection of the Bolivian president. When no candidate achieves an absolute majority, Congress must elect the chief executive – from among the top three finishers (before the constitutional reform in 1994) or from the top two (since then). While selection of the chief executive by the legislature is often seen as a positive aspect of parliamentarism, in Bolivia it has at times served to weaken and even destabilize executives. As this chapter will show, when coalitions in the National Congress are stable, the congressional election of the head of state has also served to strengthen the executive. Although Congress elects the president, there is no dependence of the executive branch on parliamentary confidence. Thus, Bolivia's system is a hybrid that combines features of both presidentialism and parliamentarism. I shall call this form of government hybrid presidentialism.

Owing to a congressional electoral system based on single-member districts, the full hybrid nature of the system did not manifest itself until after the 1952 Movimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (MNR)-led revolution.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×