Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Beckstein, Martin 2017. The concept of a living tradition. European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 491.

    Kavka, Martin and McCutcheon, Russell T. 2017. Justice, That Fraught Idea: A Response to “The Normal and Abnormal”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 85, Issue. 1, p. 244.

    Lennon, Mick 2017. On ‘the subject’ of planning’s public interest. Planning Theory, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 150.

    Mckay, Francis 2016. Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. p. 409.

    2016. Re-Imagining Nature: The Promise of a Christian Natural Theology. p. 184.

    Marenbon, John 2015. Relativism in the Long Middle Ages. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 345.

    Dawson, David 2009. Conflicting stories of virtue in UK healthcare: bringing together organisational studies and ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 95.

    Blackledge, Paul 2009. Alasdair MacIntyre: Social Practices, Marxism and Ethical Anti-Capitalism. Political Studies, Vol. 57, Issue. 4, p. 866.

  • Print publication year: 2003
  • Online publication date: November 2009

2 - Tradition in the Recent Workof Alasdair MacIntyre


In After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre develops a narrative of late modernity in which Enlightenment liberalism, attempting to construct a philosophy and a society on the basis of nonteleological reason, falls into intellectual and especially moral incoherence. The unhappy fate of the modern liberal, left with only therapists for comfort and bureaucrats for security, is contrasted with the happier situation of someone who aspires to a life of virtue in the Aristotelian sense. Yet it is not clear that this is an option today, given that classical and medieval versions of Aristotelian virtue ethics rest on a “metaphysical biology” which is no longer tenable (After Virtue, p. 162). MacIntyre accordingly offers a reformulation of Aristotelian virtue ethics in which participation in a tradition plays a role analogous to that played by Aristotle's metaphysical biology – that is to say, it gives a wider purpose and meaning to the narrative that unifies the individual life.

The idea of a tradition continues to play a central role in MacIntyre's works. In Whose Justice? Which Rationality? he develops a theory of rationality as tradition-guided inquiry, which he offers as an alternative to the untenable options of Enlightenment foundationalism on the one hand, and postmodern versions of perspectivism and relativism on the other hand. The project of Whose Justice? Which Rationality? is further developed in MacIntyre's Gifford Lectures, Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy and Tradition, in which tradition, as exemplified by the work of Augustine and Aquinas, is defended over and against its other two rivals.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Alasdair MacIntyre
  • Online ISBN: 9780511609961
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *