Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gromov, Vladimir S. 2017. The spatial-and-ethological population structure, cooperation, and the evolution of sociality in rodents. Behaviour, Vol. 154, Issue. 6, p. 609.

    Arango, Alejandro 2016. Animal groups and social ontology: an argument from the phenomenology of behavior. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 403.

    Teichroeb, Julie A. White, Maxine M. J. and Chapman, Colin A. 2015. Vervet (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) Intragroup Spatial Positioning: Dominants Trade-Off Predation Risk for Increased Food Acquisition. International Journal of Primatology, Vol. 36, Issue. 1, p. 154.

    Hirsch, Ben T. and Morrell, Lesley J. 2011. Measuring marginal predation in animal groups. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 648.

    Morrell, Lesley J. and Romey, William L. 2008. Optimal individual positions within animal groups. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 909.

    Fernández-Juricic, Esteban and Beauchamp, Guy 2008. An Experimental Analysis of Spatial Position Effects on Foraging and Vigilance in Brown-Headed Cowbird flocks. Ethology, Vol. 114, Issue. 2, p. 105.

    Romey, William L. and Wallace, Abigail C. 2007. Sex and the selfish herd: sexual segregation within nonmating whirligig groups. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 18, Issue. 5, p. 910.

    Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. and Kunz, Hanspeter 2005. Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 178.

    Beauchamp, G. 2005. Low Foraging Success of Semipalmated Sandpipers at the Edges of Groups. Ethology, Vol. 111, Issue. 9, p. 785.

    Ebensperger, Luis A. and Wallem, Petra K. 2002. Grouping increases the ability of the social rodent, Octodon degus, to detect predators when using exposed microhabitats. Oikos, Vol. 98, Issue. 3, p. 491.

    Gauthier, S. and Rose, G. A. 2002. Acoustic observation of diel vertical migration and shoaling behaviour in Atlantic redfishes. Journal of Fish Biology, Vol. 61, Issue. 5, p. 1135.

    Charlwood, J. D. Pinto, J. Sousa, C. A. Ferreira, C. and Rosario, V. E. Do 2002. Male size does not affect mating success (of Anopheles gambiae in Sao Tome). Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 109.

    Ebensperger, Luis A. 2001. A review of the evolutionary causes of rodent group-living. Acta Theriologica, Vol. 46, Issue. 2, p. 115.

    Ritz, D.A. and Metillo, E.B. 1998. Costs and Benefits of Swarming Behaviour in Mysids: Does Orientation and Position in the Swarm Matter?. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Vol. 78, Issue. 03, p. 1011.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1997
  • Online publication date: June 2010

12 - Inside or outside? Testing evolutionary predictions of positional effects

from Part three - Behavioral ecology and evolution
Summary

The schooling phenomenon presents the student of animal behavior with a paradox. On the one hand, schooling is superficially a simple phenomenon and would seem to lend itself readily to quantification and casual analysis. On the other hand, there has been a notable lack of success in relating schooling to general biological principles, and there are no really convincing ethological, ecological, or evolutionary explanations. There is no vital function to which it seems to make an efficient contribution, and it can not be immediately assigned to reproductive, defensive, or any other category of adaptive behavior.

(Williams 1964: 351)

Introduction

During the three decades since the above statement was made a great deal of theoretical and empirical work has established a number of plausible functions for animal grouping. These functions typically relate to feeding efficiency or predator avoidance. Such generalizations may allow us to see overall patterns and generate hypotheses which can be tested experimentally. However, by considering the selection pressures on groups in general, there is the danger of missing some of the details. Instead, the relative advantages and disadvantages of group membership may vary in different parts of the group (Bertram 1978). For example, although individuals at the edge of a group may be more likely to be preyed upon than those at the center, they may also be more likely to obtain food. The costs and benefits to an organism as a function of location within the group has rarely been assessed. I hope to convince the reader that groups are not homogeneous units, and that different selective pressures operating in different locations within a group lead to position preferences by its members.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Animal Groups in Three Dimensions
  • Online ISBN: 9780511601156
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511601156
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×