Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T20:07:55.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Soliloquy and self-existence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Brian Stock
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Etenim qui secum loqui poterit, sermonem alterius non requiret.

Cicero, Tusc. Disp., 5.117

Nearly all my writings are private conversations with myself. Things that I say to myself tête-à-tête.

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Culture and Value

INTRODUCTION

In the previous chapter I attempted to provide a sketch of some of the factors which contributed to Augustine's adoption of the soliloquy as his preferred form of spiritual exercise. Among these I singled out (1) the lengthy tradition of “spiritual exercises” in ancient thought; (2) Augustine's incorporation of interiorist themes into his outlook before joining the priesthood; (3) his discovery of Cicero's Hortensius, which convinced him of the value of philosophy; (4) his interest in Scepticism and Platonism, and the rôle of Platonism in providing a historical rationale for “Christian philosophy”; (5) his innovative thinking about body and mind, which abandoned the Platonic and Neoplatonic disdain for corporality in favour of a doctrine inspired by his reading of Paul, in which the body plays a central part in spiritual progress; and finally (5) his approach to interpretation, which encompassed his studies in grammar and rhetoric and was shaped into a powerful tool for inward self-scrutiny.

In this chapter I focus on one element in this group of forces, namely the soliloquy itself, and its use in the demonstration of self-existence. My argument is that Augustine is not only interested in refuting the Sceptical view that nothing can be known for certain, as he states in Contra Academicos and elsewhere, but that he also, and perhaps principally, envisages the cogito as an important element in constructing a narrative philosophy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Augustine's Inner Dialogue
The Philosophical Soliloquy in Late Antiquity
, pp. 62 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bermon, Emmanuel, Le “cogito” dans la pensée de saint Augustin (Paris, 2001), pp. 9–30Google Scholar
Stock, B., “Ludwig Wittgenstein: réflexions sur le rôle d'Augustin dans sa vie et pensée,” in B. Stock, Bibliothèques intérieures (Paris, 2005), pp. 227–252Google Scholar
Tasso, Torquato, Dell'arte del dialogo, chs. 3–9, ed. Baldassari, Guido, intro., Ordine, Nuccio (Naples, 1998), pp. 38–42Google Scholar
Bede, , Soliloquium de Psalmo 41 (CCSL 122 [1955], p. 447)
Abelard, Peter, Soliloquium, ed. Charles Burnett (Studi medievali 25 [1984], 885–891)
,Bernard of Clairvaux, Soliloquium (ed. Leclercq, J., S. Bernardi Opera 6.2 [Rome, 1972], pp. 239–240)Google Scholar
Kempis, Thomas à, Soliloquium Animae, ed. M. J. Pohl, vol. I (1910), pp. 191–346
Montaigne, , Essais, 39, ed. Villey, Pierre, vol. i (Paris, 1965), p. 241Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Idea, 2nd edn (1844), trans. Haldane, R. B. and Kemp, J. (London, 1883), book 3, respectively pp. 263–264 and 246Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew, The Poems of Matthew Arnold, ed. Allot, Kenneth (London, 1965), p. 591Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S., “Shakespeare and the Stoicism of Seneca,” Selected Essays 1917–1932 (London, 1932), p. 129.Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut, Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung (Berlin, 1969), pp. 142–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, The Inner Citadel: The “Meditations” of Marcus Aurelius, trans. Chase, Michael (Cambridge, MA.: 1998), pp. 88–89Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H., Plotinus, vol. i (Cambridge, MA, 1989), pp. 29, 31
Magee, John, “Boethius' Anapestic Dimeters (Atatalectic), with regard to the Structure and Argument of the Consolatio,” in Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs, ed. Galonnier, A. (Paris, 2003), pp. 147–169Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth, Boethius and Dialogue: Literary Method in “The Consolation of Philosophy. ” (Princeton, 1985), pp. 90, 152, and 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Nicholas P., in Plato: Complete Works, ed. Cooper, John M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (Indianapolis and Cambridge, 1997), p. 288
McLeod, Colin, Collected Essays (Oxford, 1983), pp. 262–291Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut, “Épicure et l'enseignement philosophique hellénistique et romain,” Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé (Paris, 1969), pp. 347–354Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B., The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A Study (Oxford, 1989), pp. 16–17Google Scholar
Lim, Richard, “Manichaeans and Public Disputation in Late Antiquity,” RA 26 (1992), 236–237Google Scholar
Conybeare, Catherine, The Irrational Augustine (Oxford, 2006), pp. 61–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madec, Goulven, “L'historicité des Dialogues à Cassiciacum,” RA 32 (1986), 207–231Google Scholar
Andrieu, Jean, Le dialogue antique: Structure et présentation (Paris, 1954), p. 283Google Scholar
Dekkers, Eligius, “Saint Augustin éditeur,” Troisième centenaire de l'édition mauriste de saint Augustin … (Paris, 1990), pp. 235–244.Google Scholar
Saenger, Paul, Space Between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading (Stanford, 1997), chs. 1–2Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry, “History and Symbolism in the Garden of Milan,” in From Augustine to Eriugena: Essays on Neoplatonism and Christianity in Honor of John O'Meara, ed. Martin, F. X. and Richmond, J. A. (Washington, DC, 1991), pp. 42–55Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre, Recherches sur les Confessions de saint Augustin, 2nd edn (Paris, 1968), pp. 188–201Google Scholar
Stock, B., Augustine the Reader: Meditation, Self-knowledge, and the Ethics of Interpretation (Cambridge, MA, and London, 1996), pp. 20–111Google Scholar
Morrison, Karl F., Conversion and Text: The Cases of Augustine of Hippo, Herman-Judah, and Constantine Tsatsos (Charlottesville, 1992)Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, “On Philosophy and its Method,” no. 6, in Parerga and Perilipomena, trans. Payne, E. F. J. (Oxford, 1974), vol. ii, p. 7Google Scholar
Stock, B., “Intelligo me esse: Eriugena's ‘Cogito’,” in Jean Scot Erigène et l'histoire de la philosophie (Paris, 1977), pp. 327–335Google Scholar
Jeauneau, Edouard, “Le Cogito érigénien,” Traditio 50 (1995), 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janowski, Zbigniew, Index Augustino-Cartésien: Textes et commentaire (Paris, 2000), pp. 20–106Google Scholar
Janowski, , Cartesian Theodicy: Descartes' Quest for Certitude (Dordrecht, 2000), pp. 141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J., “Between and Beyond Augustine and Descartes: More than a Source of the Self,” Augustinian Studies 32 (2001), 65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geneviève, [Rodis]-Lewis, “Augustinisme et cartésianisme,” in AM, vol. ii (Paris, 1954), pp. 1087–1104; repr. in L'Anthropologie cartésienne (Paris, 1990), pp. 101–125Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne, “Le Cogito et la tradition augustinienne,” in Études sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien 2nd edn (Paris, 1930), pp. 190–201yearGoogle Scholar
Gilson, , The Unity of Philosophical Experience (New York, 1937), pp. 125–198Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri, Cartésianisme et Augustinisme au xvii siècle (Paris, 1978)Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc, Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes (Paris, 1981)Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen, Descartes and Augustine (Cambridge, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois-Gironde, Sacha, Reconstruction analytique du cogito (Paris, 2001), esp. pp. 132–155Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B., “Augustine on the Mind's Search for Itself,” Faith and Philosophy 20 (2003), 415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M., “The First Person,” in Mind and Language, ed. Guttenplan, Samuel (Oxford, 1975), p. 44Google Scholar
Biographia Literaria, ed. Shawcross, J. (London, 1907), vol. i, pp. 94–95
McFarland, Thomas, “Coleridge and Descartes,” in Coleridge and the Pantheist Tradition (Oxford, 1969), pp. 320–323Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. Gibson, R. W. Royce (New York, 1962), part 2, chs. 3–4Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Emmanuel Kants Werke (in Gemeinschaft mit Hermann Cohen et al.), ed. Cassirer, Ernst (Berlin, 1912–1922), vol. iii, p. 647Google Scholar
Leibniz, , see Die philosophische Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, ed.Gerhardt, C. J. (Berlin, 1895–1890), vol. iv, p. 468Google Scholar
Bochet, Isabelle, Saint Augustin et le désir de Dieu (Paris, 1982), pp. 118–130Google Scholar
Martin, J., Symposion: Die Geschichte einer literarischen Form (Paderborn, 1931)Google Scholar
Pantel, Pauline Schmitt, Le cité au banquet: Histoire du repas public dans les cités grecques (Rome, 1992)Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Idea, 2nd edn (1844), trans. Haldane, R. B. and Kemp, J. (London, 1883), p. 253Google Scholar
Madec, Goulven, Saint Augustin et la philosophie. Notes critiques (Paris, 1996), pp. 21–23Google Scholar
Cipriani, Nello, “La schema dei tria vitia (voluptas, superbia, curiositas) nel De vera religione: Antropologia sogiacente e fonti,” AUG 38 (1998), 158–161Google Scholar
Stock, , Augustine the Reader, pp. 23–33, 126–206
Studer, Basil, “History and Faith in Augustine's De Trinitate,” Augustinian Studies 28.1 (1997), 14–15Google Scholar
Williams, “The Paradoxes of Self-Knowledge in the De Trinitate,” in Augustine: Presbyter factus sum: Collectanea Augustiniana, ed. Lienhard, J. (New York, 1993), pp. 121–134Google Scholar
Gioia, Luigi, The Theological Epistemology of Augustine's “De Trinitate, ” (Oxford, 2008), pp. 6–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, E., Augustine, Saint, The Trinity in The Works of Saint Augustine 1.5 (New York, 1991), pp. 18–59Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis, “Between Athens and Jerusalem: Prolegomena to Anthropology in De Trinitate,” Modern Theology 8.1 (1992), 53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, , “The Discipline of Self-Knowledge in Augustine's De trinitate Book x,” in The Passionate Intellect, ed. Ayres, Lewis (Brunswick, NJ, 1995), pp. 261–296Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J., “Self-Knowledge and God as Other in Augustine: Problems for a Postmodern Revival,” Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 4 (1999), 83–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×