Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T13:13:49.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

David L. Weimer
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Behavioral Economics for Cost-Benefit Analysis
Benefit Validity When Sovereign Consumers Seem to Make Mistakes
, pp. 140 - 160
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acland, Dan (2015) The Case for Ends Paternalism: Extending Le Grand and New’s Framework for Justification of Government Paternalism. Working Paper, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Acland, Dan and Levy, Matthew R. (2015) Naiveté, Projection Bias, and Habit Formation in Gym Attendance. Management Science 61(1), 146160.Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew D. (2016) Behavioral Economics, Happiness Surveys, and Public Policy. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 7(1), 196219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Matthew D. and Posner, Eric A. (1999) Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis. Yale Law Journal 109(2), 165247.Google Scholar
Agarwal, Sumit, Driscoll, John C., Gabaix, Xavier, and Laibson, David (2009) The Age of Reason: Financial Decisions over the Life-Cycle with Implications for Regulation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Fall), 51117.Google Scholar
Ainslie, George (1975) Specious Reward: A Behavioral Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulse Control. Psychological Bulletin 82(4), 463496.Google Scholar
Allais, Par M. (1953) Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 21(4), 503546. [English summary included.]Google Scholar
Allcott, Hunt and Rogers, Todd (2014) The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation. American Economic Review 104(10), 30033037.Google Scholar
American Association of Addiction Medicine (2016) Definition of Addiction. www.asam.org/quality-practice/definition-of-addiction.Google Scholar
Anderson, Soren T., Parry, Ian W. H., Sallee, James M., and Fischer, Carolyn (2011) Automobile Fuel Economy Standards: Impacts, Efficiency, and Alternatives. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(1), 89108.Google Scholar
Andersson, Henrik (2007) Willingness to Pay for Road Safety and Estimates of the Risk of Death: Evidence from a Swedish Contingent Valuation Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention 39(4), 853865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aos, Steve, Miller, Marna, and Drake, Elizabeth (2006) Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Future Prison Construction, Criminal Justice Costs, and Crime Rates. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1964) The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-Bearing. Review of Economic Studies 31(2), 9196.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J., Cropper, Maureen L., Gollier, Christian, Groom, Ben, Heal, Geoffrey M., Newell, Richard G., Nordhaus, William D., Pindyck, Robert S., Pizer, William A., Portney, Paul R., Sterner, Thomas, Tol, Richard S. J., and Weitzman, Martin L. (2012) How Should Benefits and Costs Be Discounted in an Intergenerational Context? The Views of an Expert Panel. Resources for the Future. Discussion Paper 12–53. December.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth, Solow, Robert, Portney, Paul, Leamer, Edward, Radner, Roy, and Schuman, Howard (1993) Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58(10), 46014614.Google Scholar
Arvidson, Malin, Lyon, Fergus, McKay, Stephen, and Moro, Domenico (2013) Valuing the Social? The Nature and Controversies of Measuring Social Return on Investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review 4(1), 318.Google Scholar
Ashley, Elizabeth M., Nardinelli, Clark, and Lavaty, Rosemarie A. (2015) Estimating the Benefits of Public Health Policies that Reduce Harmful Consumption. Health Economics 24(5), 617624.Google Scholar
Auld, M. Christopher and Grootendorst, Paul (2004) An Empirical Analysis of Milk Addiction. Journal of Health Economics 23(6), 11171133.Google Scholar
Australia, Productivity Commission (1999) Australia’s Gambling Industries. Inquiry Report No. 10, 26 November.Google Scholar
Australia, Productivity Commission (2015) Productivity Update. July.Google Scholar
Badger, Gary J., Bickel, Warren K., Giordano, Louis A., Jacobs, Eric A., Loewenstein, George, and Marsch, Lisa (2007) Altered States: The Impact of Immediate Craving on the Valuation of Current and Future Opioids. Journal of Health Economics 26(5), 865876.Google Scholar
Ballard, Charles L., Shoven, John B., and Whalley, John (1985). General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States. American Economic Review 75(1), 128138.Google Scholar
Barke, Richard P. and Jenkins‐Smith, Hank C. (1993) Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy. Risk Analysis 13(4), 425439.Google Scholar
Bateman, Ian J. and Langford, Ian H. (1997) Budget-Constraint, Temporal, and Question-Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies. Environment and Planning A 29(7), 12151228.Google Scholar
Bateman, Ian J. and Willis, Kenneth G., Editors. (1999) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Murphy, Kevin M. (1988) A Theory of Rational Addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96(4), 675700.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., Grossman, Michael, and Murphy, Kevin M. (1994) An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. American Economic Review 84(3), 396418.Google Scholar
Becker, Gordon M., DeGroot, Morris H., and Marschak, Jacob (1964) Measuring Utility by a Single‐Response Sequential Method. Behavioral Science 9(3), 226232.Google Scholar
Begley, Sharon and Clarke, Toni (2015) Exclusive: US To Roll Back “Lost Pleasure” Approach on Health Rules. Reuters. March 18.Google Scholar
Benington, John and Moore, Mark H., eds. (2010) Public Value: Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas (2009) Behavioral Welfare Economics. Journal of the European Economic Association 7(2–3), 267319.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas (2016) The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Unified Approach to Behavioral Welfare Economics. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 7(1), 1268.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas and Rangel, Antonio (2004) Addiction and Cue-Triggered Decision Processes. American Economic Review 94(5), 15581590.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas and Rangel, Antonio (2007) Toward Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics. American Economic Review 97(2), 464470.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas and Rangel, Antonio (2009) Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(1), 51104.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas, Fradkin, Andrey, and Popov, Igor (2015) The Welfare Economics of Default Options in 401(k) Plans. American Economic Review 105(9), 27982837.Google Scholar
Berrens, Robert P., Bohara, Alok K., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Silva, Carol L., and Weimer, David L. (2004) Information and Effort in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Application to Global Climate Change Using National Internet Samples. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47(2), 331363.Google Scholar
Beshears, John, Choi, James J., Laibson, David, and Madrian, Brigitte C. (2008) How Are Preferences Revealed? Journal of Public Economics 92(8), 17871794.Google Scholar
Beshears, John, Choi, James J., Laibson, David, and Madrian, Brigitte C. (2009) The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Saving Outcomes: Evidence from the United States. In Brown, Jeffrey, Liebman, Jeffrey, and Wise, David A., editors, Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 167195.Google Scholar
Bhargava, Saurabh and Loewenstein, George (2015) Behavioral Economics and Public Policy 102: Beyond Nudging. American Economic Review 105(5), 396401.Google Scholar
Bickel, Warren K., Johnson, Matthew W., Koffarnus, Mikhail N., MacKillop, James, and Murphy, James G. (2014) The Behavioral Economics of Substance Use Disorders: Reinforcement Pathologies and their Repair. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 641677.Google Scholar
Bickel, Warren K. and Marsch, Lisa A. (2001) Toward a Behavioral Economic Understanding of Drug Dependence: Delay Discounting Processes. Addiction 96(1), 7386.Google Scholar
Bishop, Richard C. and Heberlein, Thomas A. (1990) The Contingent Valuation Method. In Johnson, Rebecca L. and Johnson, Gary V., Editors, Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications. Boulder: Westview Press, 81104.Google Scholar
Blackorby, Charles and Donaldson, David (1990) A Review Article: The Case against the Use of the Sum of Compensating Variations in Cost-benefit Analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics 23(3), 471494.Google Scholar
Bleichrodt, Han, Pinto, Jose Luis, and Wakker, Peter P. (2001) Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility. Management Science 47(11), 14981514.Google Scholar
Blomquist, Glenn C. and Whitehead, John C. (1998) Resource Quality Information and Validity of Willingness to Pay in Contingent Valuation. Resource and Energy Economics 20(2), 179196.Google Scholar
Blumenschein, Karen, Blomquist, Glenn C., Johannesson, Magnus, Horn, Nancy, and Freeman, Patricia (2008) Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Economic Journal 118(525), 114137.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin W. (1974) The Welfare Foundation of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Economic Journal 84(336), 926939.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin W. and Bruce, Neil (1984) Welfare Economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boardman, Anthony E., Greenberg, David H., Vining, Aidan R., and Weimer, David L. (2011) Cost–Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Boyer, Marcel (1983) Rational Demand and Expenditures Patterns under Habit Formation. Journal of Economic Theory 31(1), 2753.Google Scholar
Bradford, David F. (1975) Constraints on Government Investment Opportunities and the Choice of Discount Rate. The American Economic Review 65(5), 887899.Google Scholar
Brennan, Timothy J. (2014) Behavioral Economics and Policy Evaluation. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 5(1), 89109.Google Scholar
Brookshire, David S. and Coursey, Don L. (1987) Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures. American Economic Review 77(4), 554566.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W. (1990) The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19(1), 86107.Google Scholar
Bronsteen, John, Buccafusco, Christopher J., and Masur, Jonathan S. (2013) Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis. Duke Law Journal 62(8), 16031689.Google Scholar
Burgess, David F. and Zerbe, Richard O.. (2011) Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 2(2), 120.Google Scholar
Burgess, David F. and Zerbe, Richard O.. (2013) The Most Appropriate Discount Rate. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 4(3), 391400.Google Scholar
Bushong, Benjamin, King, Lindsay M., Camerer, Colin F., and Rangel, Antonio (2010) Pavlovian Processes in Consumer Choice: The Physical Presence of a Good Increases Willingness-to-Pay. American Economic Review 100(4), 15561571.Google Scholar
Cadena, Brian C. and Keys, Benjamin J. (2015) Human Capital and the Lifetime Costs of Impatience. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7(3), 126153.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin, Loewenstein, George, and Weber, Martin (1989) The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Political Economy 97(5), 12321254.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. (1987) Do Biases in Probability Judgment Matter in Markets? Experimental Evidence. American Economic Review 77(3), 981997.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. (2004) Prospect Theory in the Wild: Evidence from the Field. In Cramerer, Colin F., Loewenstein, George, and Rabin, Matthew, Editors, Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 148161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. and Loewenstein, George (2004) Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. In Camerer, Colin F., Loewenstein, George, and Rabin, Matthew, Editors, Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 351.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. and Kunreuther, Howard (1989) Decision Processes for Low Probability Events: Policy Implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8(4), 565592.Google Scholar
Cameron, Trudy Ann (2010) Euthanizing the Value of a Statistical Life. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4(2), 161178.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. and Stanley, Julian C. (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Campbell, John Y., Jackson, Howell E., Madrian, Brigitte C., and Tufano, Peter (2011) Consumer Financial Protection. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(1), 91114.Google Scholar
Canada, Treasury Board (2007) Canadian Cost-Benefit Analysis Guide: Regulatory Proposals. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Carlson, Deven E., Ripberger, Joseph T., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Silva, Carol L., Gupta, Kuhika, Berrens, Robert P., and Jones, Benjamin A. (2016) Contingent Valuation and the Policymaking Process: An Application to Used Nuclear Fuel in the United States. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 7(3), 459487.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Fredrik, Johansson‐Stenman, O. L. O. F., and Martinsson, Peter (2007) Do You Enjoy Having More than Others? Survey Evidence of Positional Goods. Economica 74(296), 586598.Google Scholar
Carson, Richard T. (2012) Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative when Prices Aren’t Available. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4), 2742.Google Scholar
Carson, Richard T., Flores, Nicholas E., and Meade, Norman F. (2001) Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19(2), 173210.Google Scholar
Carson, Richard T. and Groves, Theodore (2007) Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 37(1), 181210.Google Scholar
Carter, Steven and McBride, Michael (2013) Experienced Utility versus Decision Utility: Putting the “S” in Satisfaction. The Journal of Socio-Economics 42(1), 1323.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Edward (2011) Behavioral Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chabris, Christopher F., Laibson, David I., and Schuldt, Jonathon P. (2008) Intertemporal Choice. In Durlauf, Steven N. and Blume, Lawrence E., editors, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 112.Google Scholar
Chaloupka, Frank J., Gruber, Jonathan, and Warner, Kenneth E. (2015) Accounting for “Lost Pleasure” in Cost-Benefit Analysis of Government Regulation: The Case of Food and Drug Administration’s Proposed Cigarette Labeling Regulation. Annals of Internal Medicine 161(1), 6465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, John R. and Windschitl, Paul D. (2004) Biases in Social Comparative Judgments: The Role of Nonmotivated Factors in Above-Average and Comparative-Optimism Effects. Psychological Bulletin 130(5), 813838.Google Scholar
Champ, Patricia A., Bishop, Richard C., Brown, Thomas C., and McCollum, Daniel W. (1997) Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33(2), 151162.Google Scholar
Cherry, Todd L., Crocker, Thomas D., and Shogren, Jason F. (2003) Rationality Spillovers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(1), 6384.Google Scholar
Chetty, Raj (2015) Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective. American Economic Review 105(5), 133.Google Scholar
Chetty, Raj, Looney, Adam, and Kroft, Kory (2009) Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence. American Economic Review 99(4), 11451177.Google Scholar
Chichilnisky, Graciela (1996) An Axiomatic Approach to Sustainable Development. Social Choice and Welfare 13(2), 231257.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, Charles J. and Freeman, A. Myrick III (1971) Option Demand and Consumer Surplus: Further Comment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85(3), 528539.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harry and Byford, Martin (2009) Addictive Drug Use Management Policies in a Long‐Run Economic Model. Australian Economic Papers 48(2), 151165.Google Scholar
Compton, Wilson M. and Volkow, Nora D. (2006) Abuse of Prescription Drugs and the Risk of Addiction. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 83(S1), S4S7.Google Scholar
Copeland, Curtis W. (2011) Cost-Benefit and Other Analysis Requirements in the Rulemaking Process. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Corso, Phaedra S., Hammitt, James K., and Graham, John D. (2001) Valuing Mortality-Risk Reduction: Using Visual Aids to Improve the Validity of Contingent Valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23(2), 165184.Google Scholar
Courtney, Kelly E., Schacht, Joseph P., Hutchison, Kent, Roche, Daniel JO, and Ray, Lara A. (2016) Neural Substrates of Cue Reactivity: Association with Treatment Outcomes and Relapse. Addiction Biology 21(1), 322.Google Scholar
Cox, James C. and Grether, David M. (1996) The Preference Reversal Phenomenon: Response Mode, Markets and Incentives. Economic Theory 7(3), 381405.Google Scholar
Cox, James C. and Isaac, R. (1984) In Search of the Winner’s Curse. Economic Inquiry 22(4), 579592.Google Scholar
Cropper, Maureen, Hammitt, James K., and Robinson, Lisa A. (2011) Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions: Progress and Challenges. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3, 313336.Google Scholar
Cutler, David M., Jessup, Amber, Kenkel, Donald, and Starr, Martha A. (2015) Valuing Regulations Affecting Addictive or Habitual Goods. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 6(2), 247280.Google Scholar
Dahlby, Bev (2008) The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Theory and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, Kent and Hirshleifer, David (2015) Overconfident Investors, Predictable Returns, and Excessive Trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(4), 6188.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus and Muellbauer, John (1980) Economics and Consumer Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Bekker‐Grob, Esther W., Ryan, Mandy, and Gerard, Karen. (2012) Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature. Health Economics 21(2), 145172.Google Scholar
Deighton-Smith, Rex, Erbacci, Angelo, and Kauffmann, Céline (2016) Promoting Inclusive Growth through Better Regulation: The Role of Regulatory Impact Assessment. OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers, No. 3 (Paris: OECD Publishing).Google Scholar
DellaVigna, Stefano and Malmendier, Ulrike (2006) Paying Not to Go to the Gym. The American Economic Review 96(3), 694719.Google Scholar
del Saz-Salazar, Salvador, García-Menéndez, Leandro, and Feo-Valero, María (2012) Meeting the Environmental Challenge of Port Growth: A Critical Appraisal of the Contingent Valuation Method and an Application to Valencia Port, Spain. Ocean and Coastal Management 59(April), 3139.Google Scholar
DiFranza, Joseph R., Savageau, Judith A., Fletcher, Kenneth, O’Loughlin, Jennifer, Pbert, Lori, Ockene, Judith K., McNeill, Ann D., Hazelton, Jennifer, Friedman, Karen, Dussault, Gretchen, Wood, Connie, and Wellman, Robert J. (2007) Symptoms of Tobacco Dependence after Brief Intermittent Use: The Development and Assessment of Nicotine Dependence in Youth–2 Study. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 161(7), 704710.Google Scholar
Do, Amy M., Rupert, Alexander V., and Wolford, George (2008) Evaluations of Pleasurable Experiences: The Peak-End Rule. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(1), 9698.Google Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel (1961) Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75(4), 643669.Google Scholar
Ericson, Keith M., White, John Myles, Laibson, David, and Cohen, Jonathan D. (2015) Money Earlier or Later? Simple Heuristics Explain Intertemporal Choices Better than Delay Discounting Does. Psychological Science 26(6), 826833.Google Scholar
Evans, Dorla A. (1997) The Role of Markets in Reducing Expected Utility Violations. Journal of Political Economy 105(3), 622636.Google Scholar
Flores, Nicholas E. and Carson, Richard T. (1997) The Relationship between the Income Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33(3), 287295.Google Scholar
Florio, Massimo (2006) Cost-Benefit Analysis and the European Union Cohesion Fund: On the Social Cost of Capital and Labour. Regional Studies 40(2), 211224.Google Scholar
Fon, Vincy and Otani, Yoshihiko (1979) Classical Welfare Theorems with Non-Transitive and Non-Complete Preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 20(3), 409418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Chris and Albertson, Kevin (2011) Payment by Results and Social Impact Bonds in the Criminal Justice Sector: New Challenges for the Concept of Evidence-Based Policy? Criminology and Criminal Justice 11(5), 395413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, Shane, Loewenstein, George, and O’Donoghue, Ted (2002) Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 40(2), 351401.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. Myrick III, Herriges, Joseph A., and Kling, Catherine L. (2014) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew and Levina, David K. (2011) Risk, Delay, and Convex Self-Control Costs. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3(3), 3468.Google Scholar
Gately, Dermot (1980) Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables: Comment. Bell Journal of Economics 11(1), 373374.Google Scholar
Gayer, Ted and Viscusi, W. Kip (2013) Overriding Consumer Preferences with Energy Regulations. Journal of Regulatory Economics 43(3), 248264.Google Scholar
Gollier, Christian and Hammitt, James K. (2014) The Long-Run Discount Rate Controversy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 6(1), 273295.Google Scholar
Goodman, Aviel (2008) Neurobiology of Addiction: An Integrative Review. Biochemical Pharmacology 75(1), 266322.Google Scholar
Goodman, Madeline, Finnegan, Robert, Mohadjer, Leyla, Krenzke, Tom, and Hogan, Jacquie (2013) Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments Among US Adults: Results from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies 2012: First Look. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Gowdy, John M. (2004) The Revolution in Welfare Economics and Its Implications for Environmental Valuation and Policy. Land Economics 80(2), 239257.Google Scholar
Graham, Daniel A. (1981) Cost-Benefit Analysis under Uncertainty. American Economic Review 71(4), 715725.Google Scholar
Groves, Theodore and Ledyard, John (1977) Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the “Free Rider” Problem. Econometrica 45(4), 783809.Google Scholar
Grubb, Michael D. (2015) Overconfident Consumers in the Marketplace. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(4), 936.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jonathan and Kӧszegi, Botond (2001) Is Addiction “Rational”? Theory and Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), 12611303.Google Scholar
Gul, Faruk and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang (2004) Self-Control, Revealed Preference and Consumption Choice. Review of Economic Dynamics 7(2), 243264.Google Scholar
Gul, Faruk and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang (2005) The Revealed Preference Theory of Changing Tastes. Review of Economic Studies 72(2), 429448.Google Scholar
Gul, Faruk and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang (2007) Harmful Addiction. Review of Economic Studies 74(1), 147172.Google Scholar
Haab, Timothy C. and McConnell, Kenneth E. (2003) Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. and Tetlock, Paul C. (2008) Has Economic Analysis Improved Regulatory Decisions? Journal of Economic Perspectives 22(1), 6784.Google Scholar
Hall, Wayne, Carter, Adrian, and Forlini, Cynthia (2015) The Brain Disease Model of Addiction: Is It Supported by the Evidence and Has It Delivered on Its Promises? Lancet Psychiatry 2(1), 105110.Google Scholar
Hammitt, James K. (2015) Implications of the WTP–WTA Disparity for Benefit–Cost Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 6(1), 207216.Google Scholar
Hammitt, James K. and Graham, John D. (1999) Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18(1), 3362.Google Scholar
Hammond, Peter J. (1981) Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Welfare Optimality under Uncertainty. Economica 48(191), 235250.Google Scholar
Hammond, Richard J. (1966) Convention and Limitation in Benefit-Cost Analysis. Natural Resources Journal 6(2), 195222.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W. Michael (1991) Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? American Economic Review 81(3), 635647.Google Scholar
Hanley, Nick and Shogren, Jason F. (2005) Is Cost–Benefit Analysis Anomaly-Proof? Environmental and Resource Economics 32(1), 1324.Google Scholar
Hanley, Nick and Spash, Clive L. (1993) Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard and Olewiler, Nancy (1979) The Welfare Economics of Ex Post Optimality. Economica 46(182), 137147.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glenn W. and Rutström, E. Elisabet (2009) Expected Utility Theory and Prospect Theory: One Wedding and a Decent Funeral. Experimental Economics 12(2), 133158.Google Scholar
Harrison, Mark, Rigby, Dan, Vass, Caroline, Flynn, Terry, Louviere, Jordan, and Payne, Katherine (2014) Risk as an Attribute in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Patient 7(2), 151170.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A. (1979) Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables. Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 3354.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A. (2012) Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4), 4356.Google Scholar
Haveman, Robert H. and Weimer, David L. (2015) Public Policy Induced Changes in Employment: Valuation Issues for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 6(1), 112153.Google Scholar
Hawkins, James, Hollingworth, William, and Campbell, Rona (2010) Long-Term Smoking Relapse: A Study Using the British Household Panel Survey. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 12(12), 12281235.Google Scholar
Heberlein, Thomas A., Wilson, Matthew A., Bishop, Richard C., and Schaeffer, Nora Cate (2005) Rethinking the Scope Test as a Criterion for Validity in Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(1), 122.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard J., Loewenstein, George F., Prelec, Drazen, and Vaughan, William (1993) Utility Maximization and Melioration: Internalities in Individual Choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 6(3), 149185.Google Scholar
Hershey, John C. and Schoemaker, Paul J. H. (1985) Probability Versus Certainty Equivalence Methods in Utility Measurement: Are They Equivalent? Management Science 31(10), 12131231.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. (1939) The Foundations of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal 49(196), 696712.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. (1940) The Valuation of the Social Income. Economica 7(26), 105124.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. (1941) The Rehabilitation of Consumers’ Surplus. Review of Economic Studies 8(2), 108116.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. (1942) Consumers’ Surplus and Index-Numbers. Review of Economic Studies 9(2), 126137.Google Scholar
Hersch, Joni (2005) Smoking Restrictions as a Self-Control Mechanism. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31(1), 521.Google Scholar
Horowitz, John K. and McConnell, Kenneth E. (2002) A Review of WTA/WTP Studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(3), 426447.Google Scholar
Horwich, George, Jenkins-Smith, Hank, and Weimer, David L. (1988) The International Energy Agency’s Mandatory Oil-Sharing Agreement: Tests of Efficiency, Equity, and Practicality. In Horwich, George and Weimer, David L., eds., Responding to International Oil Crises (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy), 104133.Google Scholar
Hotelling, Harold (1938) The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates. Econometrica 6(3), 242269.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, Laurence R. (1986) Addiction and Satiation. Economics Letters 21(1), 9599.Google Scholar
Ida, Takanori (2014) A Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting Approach to Smoking Behavior. Health Economics Review 4(1), 111.Google Scholar
Independent Evaluation Group (2010) Cost-Benefit Analysis in World Bank Projects. World Bank Fast Track Brief 57037. June 4.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, Nicolas, Joule, Robert-Vincent, Luchini, Stéphane, and Shogren, Jason F. (2013) Preference Elicitation under Oath. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65(1), 110132.Google Scholar
Jin, Lawrence, Kenkel, Don, Liu, Feng, and Wang, Hua (2015). Retrospective and Prospective Benefit-Cost Analyses of US Anti-Smoking Policies. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 6(1), 154186.Google Scholar
Johnson, Sara B., Blum, Robert W., and Giedd, Jay N. (2009) Adolescent Maturity and the Brain: The Promise and Pitfalls of Neuroscience Research in Adolescent Health Policy. Journal of Adolescent Health 45(3), 216221.Google Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. W., Hammerton, M., and Philips, P. R. (1985) The Value of Safety: Results of a National Sample Survey. Economic Journal 95(377), 4972.Google Scholar
Just, Richard W., Hueth, Darrell L., and Schmitz, Andrew (2004) The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. (2013) Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study. Judgment and Decision Making 8(4), 407424.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Jenkins-Smith, Hank, Tarantola, Tor, Silva, Carol L., and Braman, Donald (2015) Geoengineering and Climate Change Polarization Testing a Two-Channel Model of Science Communication. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658(1), 192222.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel (1994) New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150(1), 1836.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H. (1990) Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98(6), 13251348.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Sugden, Robert (2005) Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics 32(1), 161181.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Thaler, Richard H. (1991) Economic Analysis and the Psychology of Utility: Applications to Compensation Policy. American Economic Review 81(2), 341346.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Thaler, Richard H. (2006) Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1), 221234Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263291.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1984) Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist 39(4), 341350.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Wakker, Peter P., and Sarin, Rakesh (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375405.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas (1939) Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. Economic Journal 49(195), 549552.Google Scholar
Kanbur, Ravi, Pirttilä, Jukka, and Tuomala, Matti (2008) Moral Hazard, Income Taxation and Prospect Theory. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110(2), 321337.Google Scholar
Karsenty, Alain, Vogel, Aurélie, and Castell, Frédéric (2014) “Carbon Rights,” REDD+ and Payments for Environmental Services. Environmental Science & Policy 35(January), 2029.Google Scholar
Klaiber, H. Allen and Smith, V. Kerry (2012) Developing General Equilibrium Benefit Analyses for Social Programs: An Introduction and Example. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 3(2), 152.Google Scholar
Knetsch, Jack L. (1990) Environmental Policy Implications of Disparities between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded Measures of Values. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18(3), 227237.Google Scholar
Knetsch, Jack L. (2015) The Curiously Continuing Saga of Choosing the Measure of Welfare Changes. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 6(1), 217225.Google Scholar
Knetsch, Jack L., Riyanto, Yohanes E., and Zong, Jichuan (2012) Gain and Loss Domains and the Choice of Welfare Measure of Positive and Negative Changes. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 3(4), 118.Google Scholar
Kőszegi, Botond and Rabin, Matthew (2008) Choices, Situations, and Happiness. Journal of Public Economics 92(8), 18211832.Google Scholar
Kniesner, Thomas J., Kip Viscusi, W., and Ziliak, James P. (2014). Willingness to Accept Equals Willingness to Pay for Labor Market Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 48(3), 187205.Google Scholar
Kozel, Nicholas J. and Adams, Edgar H. (1986) Epidemiology of Drug Abuse: An Overview. Science 234(4779), 970974.Google Scholar
Krishna, Vijesh V., Drucker, Adam G., Pascual, Unai, Raghu, Prabhakaran T., and Oliver King, E.D. Israel (2013) Estimating Compensation Payments for On-Farm Conservation of Agricultural Biodiversity in Developing Countries. Ecological Economics 87(March), 110123.Google Scholar
Laibson, David (1997) Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2), 443477.Google Scholar
Laibson, David (2001) A Cue-Theory of Consumption. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1), 81119.Google Scholar
Larrick, Richard P. and Soll, Jack B. (2008) The MPG Illusion. Science 320(5883), 15931594.Google Scholar
Larson, Douglas M. and Flacco, Paul R. (1992) Measuring Option Prices from Market Behavior. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22(2), 178198.Google Scholar
Laux, Fritz L. (2000) Addiction as a Market Failure: Using Rational Addiction Results to Justify Tobacco Regulation. Journal of Health Economics 19(4), 421437.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Julian and New, Bill (2015) Government Paternalism: Nanny State or Helpful Friend? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leshner, Alan I. (1997) Addiction Is a Brain Disease, and It Matters. Science 278(5335), 4547.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil (2013) Addiction Is Not a Brain Disease (and It Matters). Frontiers in Psychiatry 4(24.10), 33893395.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel S. and Friedman, David (1994) The Revenge of the Redwoods? Reconsidering Property Rights and the Economic Allocation of Natural Resources. University of Chicago Law Review 61(2), 493526.Google Scholar
Lewis, Marc (2015) The Biology of Desire: Why Addiction Is Not a Disease. New York: PublicAffairs,Google Scholar
Li, Chuan-Zhong, and Mattsson, Leif (1995) Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28(2), 256269.Google Scholar
Li, Hui, Berrens, Robert P., Bohara, Alok K., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Silva, Carol L., and Weimer, David L. (2005) Testing for Budget Constraint Effects in a National Advisory Referendum Survey on the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(2), 350366.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Sarah and Slovic, Paul, Editors (1971) Reversals of Preferences between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89(1), 4655.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Sarah and Slovic, Paul, Editors (2006) The Construction of Preferences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Sarah, Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, Layman, Mark, and Combs, Barbara (1978) Judged Frequency of Lethal Events. Journal of Experimental Psychology 4(6), 551578.Google Scholar
Lindhjem, Henrik, Navrud, Ståle, Braathen, Nils Axel, and Biausque, Vincent (2011) Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions from Environmental, Transport, and Health Policies: A Global Meta‐Analysis of Stated Preference Studies. Risk Analysis 31(9), 13811407.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George and Lerner, Jennifer S. (2003) The Role of Affect in Decision Making. Handbook of Affective Science 3, 619642.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George, O’Donoghue, Ted, and Rabin, Mathew (2003) Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4), 12091248.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George and Prelec, Drazen (1992) Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2), 573597.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George and Ubel, Peter A. (2008) Hedonic Adaptation and the Role of Decision and Experience Utility in Public Policy. Journal of Public Economics 92(8), 17951810.Google Scholar
Long, David A., Mallar, Charles D., and Thornton, Craig V.D. (1981) Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of the Job Corps. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1(1), 5576.Google Scholar
Loomis, John B. (2014) Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39(1), 3446.Google Scholar
Loomis, John B. and duVair, Pierre H. (1993) Evaluating the Effect of Alternative Risk Communication Devices on Willingness to Pay: Results from a Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Experiment. Land Economics 69(3), 287298.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Christian C. (2013) Discounting of Delayed Rewards Is Not Hyperbolic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 39(4), 12741279.Google Scholar
Lusardi, Annamaria and Mitchell, Olivia S. (2007) Baby Boomer Retirement Security: The Roles of Planning, Financial Literacy, and Housing Wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics 54(1), 205224.Google Scholar
Lutter, Randall (2013) Regulatory Policy: What Role for Retrospective Analysis and Review? Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 4(1), 1738.Google Scholar
Lyon, Randolph M. (1990) Federal Discount Rate Policy, the Shadow Price of Capital, and Challenges for Reforms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18(2), S29S50.Google Scholar
Machina, Mark J. (1982) “Expected Utility” Analysis without the Independence Axiom. Econometrica 50(2), 277323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrian, Brigitte C. (2014) Applying Insights from Behavioral Economics to Policy Design. Annual Review of Economics 6, 663688.Google Scholar
Madrian, Brigitte C. and Shea, Dennis F. (2001) The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), 11491187.Google Scholar
Malmendier, Ulrike and Taylor, Timothy (2015) On the Verges of Overconfidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(4), 38.Google Scholar
Mäntymaa, Erkki (1999) Pennies from Heaven? A Test of the Social Budget Constraint in a Willingness to Accept Compensation Elicitation Format. Journal of Forest Economics 5(1), 169192.Google Scholar
McFadden, Daniel (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Zarembka, Paul, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 105142.Google Scholar
McClelland, Gary H., Schulze, William D., and Coursey, Don L. (1993) Insurance for Low-Probability Hazards: A Bimodal Response to Unlikely Events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7(1), 95116.Google Scholar
Melberg, Hans O. and Rogeberg, Ole J. (2010) Rational Addiction Theory: A Survey of Opinions. Journal of Drug Policy Analysis 3(1), 19.Google Scholar
Millar, Ross and Hall, Kelly (2013) Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement. Public Management Review 15(6), 923941.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. (1956) The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review 63(2), 8196.Google Scholar
Mishan, Ezra J. (1976) The Use of Compensating and Equivalent Variation in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Economica 43(170), 185197.Google Scholar
Monterosso, John, Piray, Payam, and Luo, Shan (2012) Neuroeconomics and the Study of Addiction. Biological Psychiatry 72(2), 107112.Google Scholar
Moore, Mark A., Boardman, Anthony E., and Vining, Aidan R.. (2013a) More Appropriate Discounting: The Rate of Social Time Preference and the Value of the Social Discount Rate. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 4(1), 116.Google Scholar
Moore, Mark A., Boardman, Anthony E., and Vining, Aidan R.. (2013b) The Choice of the Social Discount Rate and the Opportunity Cost of Public Funds. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 4(3), 401409.Google Scholar
Moore, Mark A., Boardman, Anthony E., Vining, Aidan R., Weimer, David L., and Greenberg, David H. (2004) “Just Give Me a Number!”: Practical Values for the Social Discount Rate. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(4), 789812.Google Scholar
Moore, Mark H. (1995) Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael J. and Viscusi, W. Kip (1988) Doubling the Estimated Value of Life: Results Using New Occupational Fatality Data. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7(3), 476490.Google Scholar
Morewedge, Carey K., Gilbert, Daniel T., Myrseth, Kristian Ove R., Kassam, Karim S., and Wilson, Timothy D. (2010) Consuming Experience: Why Affective Forecasters Overestimate Comparative Value. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(6), 986992.Google Scholar
Morrison, Edward R. (1998) Judicial Review of Discount Rates Used in Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analyses. University of Chicago Law Review 65(4), 13331369.Google Scholar
Nechyba, Thomas J. (2000) Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers. American Economic Review 90(1), 130146.Google Scholar
Newell, Richard G. and Siikamaki, Juha (2015) Individual Time Preferences and Energy Efficiency. American Economic Review 105(5), 196200.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A. Jr. (1991) A Reflection on Bureaucracy and Representative Government. In Blaise, André and Dion, Stéphane, Editors, The Budget Maximizing Bureaucrat: Appraisals and Evidence. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1331.Google Scholar
Noonan, Douglas S. (2003) Contingent Valuation and Cultural Resources: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature. Journal of Cultural Economics 27(3–4), 159176.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, Ted and Rabin, Matthew (1999) Doing It Now or Later. American Economic Review 89(1), 103124.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, Ted and Rabin, Matthew (2015) Present Bias: Lessons Learned and to be Learned. American Economic Review 105(5), 273279.Google Scholar
Oliver, Adam, ed. (2013) Behavioral Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1965) Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Persky, Joseph (2001) Retrospectives: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Classical Creed. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4), 199208.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. and Pollak, Robert A. (1968) On Second-Best National Saving and Game-Equilibrium Growth. Review of Economic Studies 35(2), 185199.Google Scholar
Plott, Charles R. and Zeiler, Kathryn (2005) The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations. American Economic Review 95(3), 530545.Google Scholar
Quiggin, John (1982) A Theory of Anticipated Utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 323343.Google Scholar
Randall, Alan and Stoll, John R. (1980) Consumer’s Surplus in Commodity Space. American Economic Review 70(3), 449455.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Frank P. (1928) A Mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal 38(152), 543559.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, Eric (2012) Internalities and Paternalism: Applying the Compensation Criterion to Multiple Selves across Time. Social Choice and Welfare 38(4), 601615.Google Scholar
Read, Daniel and Loewenstein, George (1995) Diversification Bias: Explaining the Discrepancy in Variety Seeking between Combined and Separated Choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1(1), 3449.Google Scholar
Redish, A. David, Jensen, Steve, and Johnson, Adam (2008) A Unified Framework for Addiction: Vulnerabilities in the Decision Process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(4), 415437.Google Scholar
Reyna, Valerie F. (2004) How People Make Decisions That Involve Risk: A Dual-Process Approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13(2), 6066.Google Scholar
Richards, Timothy J. and Hamilton, Stephen F. (2012) Obesity and Hyperbolic Discounting: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37(2), 181198.Google Scholar
Richter, Linda and Foster, Susan E. (2014) Effectively Addressing Addiction Requires Changing the Language of Addiction. Journal of Public Health Policy 35(1), 6064.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lisa A. and Hammitt, James K. (2011) Behavioral Economics and the Conduct of Benefit-Cost Analysis: Towards Principles and Standards. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 2(2), 151.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lisa A. and Hammitt, James K. (2013) Skills of the Trade: Valuing Health Risk Reductions in Benefit-Cost Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 4(1), 107130.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lisa A. and Hammitt, James K. (2016) Valuing Reductions in Fatal Illness Risks: Implications of Recent Research. Health Economics 25(8), 10391052.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lisa, Hammitt, James K., and Zeckhauser, Richard (2016) Attention to Distribution in US Regulatory Analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10(2), 308328.Google Scholar
Robson, Arthur J. and Szentes, Balazs (2014) A Biological Theory of Social Discounting. American Economic Review 104(11), 34813497.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel (2003) “Economics and Psychology”? The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting. International Economic Review 44(4), 12071216.Google Scholar
Ryder, Harl E. and Heal, Geoffrey M. (1973) Optimal Growth with Intertemporally Dependent Preferences. Review of Economic Studies 40(1), 131.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. (1937) A Note on Measurement of Utility. Review of Economic Studies 4(2), 155161.Google Scholar
Sandmo, Agnar (1983) Ex Post Welfare Economics and the Theory of Merit Goods. Economica 50(197), 1933.Google Scholar
Sayman, Serdar and Öncüler, Ayşe (2005) Effects of Study Design Characteristics on the WTA–WTP Disparity: A Meta Analytical Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology 26(2), 289312.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor (1941) A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics. Review of Economic Studies 9(1), 7788.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1990) Rational Behaviour. In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, Editors, The New Palgrave: Utility and Probability, 198216.Google Scholar
Scharff, Robert L. and Viscusi, W. Kip (2011) Heterogeneous Rates of Time Preference and the Decision to Smoke. Economic Inquiry 49(4), 959972.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1984) Self-Command in Practice, in Policy, and in a Theory of Rational Choice. American Economic Review 74(2), 111.Google Scholar
Schkade, David A. and Kahneman, Daniel (1998) Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction. Psychological Science 9(5), 340346.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, Richard (1972) Option Demand and Consumer’s Surplus: Valuing Price Changes under Uncertainty. American Economic Review 62(5), 813824.Google Scholar
Schmeidler, David (1989) Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 571587.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulrich, Starmer, Chris and Sugden, Robert (2008) Third-Generation Prospect Theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36(3), 203223.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stuart and Morrall, John F. III (2012) The Triumph of Regulatory Politics: Benefit–Cost Analysis and Political Salience. Regulation & Governance 6(2), 189206.Google Scholar
Shogren, Jason F. and Thunström, Linda (2016) Do We Need a New Behavioral Benchmark for BCA? Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 7(1), 92106.Google Scholar
Sims, Sally and Dent, Peter (2005) High-Voltage Overhead Power Lines and Property Values: A Residential Study in the UK. Urban Studies 42(4), 665694.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., Smith, Vincent Kerry, and Taylor, Donald H. (2003) The Smoking Puzzle: Information, Risk Perception, and Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., Kip Viscusi, W., Chesson, Harrell W., Conover, Christopher J., and Whetten-Goldstein, Kathryn (1998) Alternative Approaches to Valuing Intangible Health Losses: The Evidence for Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Health Economics 17(4), 475497.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul (1987) Perception of Risk. Science 236(4799), 280285.Google Scholar
Smith, David E. (2012) The Process Addictions and the New ASAM Definition of Addiction. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 44(1), 14.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon L. (1980) Experiments with a Decentralized Mechanism for Public Good Decisions. American Economic Review 70(4), 584599.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon L. (1985) Experimental Economics: Reply. American Economic Review 75(1), 265272.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry and Desvousges, William H. (1987) An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes. Journal of Political Economy 95(1), 89114.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry and Moore, Eric M. (2010). Behavioral Economics and Benefit Cost Analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics 46(2), 217234.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry, Taylor, Donald H., and Sloan, Frank A. (2001) Longevity Expectations and Death: Can People Predict their Own Demise? American Economic Review 91(4), 11261134.Google Scholar
Song, Anna V., Brown, Paul, and Glantz, Stanton A. (2014) When Health Policy and Empirical Evidence Collide: The Case of Cigarette Package Warning Labels and Economic Consumer Surplus. American Journal of Public Health 104(2), e42e51.Google Scholar
Starmer, Chris (2000) Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38(2), 332382.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. and Becker, Gary S. (1977) De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review 67(2), 7690.Google Scholar
Strotz, R. H. (1955–56) Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Review of Economic Studies 23(3), 165180.Google Scholar
Sturman, David A. and Moghaddam, Bita (2011) The Neurobiology of Adolescence: Changes in Brain Architecture, Functional Dynamics, and Behavioral Tendencies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 35(8), 17041712.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (2004) The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences. American Economic Review 94(4), 10141033.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (2005) Coping with Preference Anomalies in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A Market-Simulation Approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 32(1), 129160.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (2008) Why Incoherent Preferences Do Dot Justify Paternalism. Constitutional Political Economy 19(3), 226248.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (2009) On Nudging: A Review of Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. International Journal of the Economics of Business 16(3), 365373.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. (1981) Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency. Economics Letters 8(3), 201207.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. (1988) Anomalies: The Winner’s Curse. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2(1), 191202.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. and Benartzi, Shlomo (2004) Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy 112(S1), S164S187.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R. (2003) Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review 93(2), 175179.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Fred and Rizova, Polly (2015) Understanding and Creating Public Value: Business Is the Engine, Government the Flywheel (and also the Regulator). Public Management Review 17(4), 565586.Google Scholar
Trumbull, William N. (1990) Who Has Standing in Cost‐Benefit Analysis? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9(2), 201218.Google Scholar
Tunçel, Tuba and Hammitt, James K. (2014) A New Meta-Analysis on the WTP/WTA Disparity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68(1), 175187.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1974) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185(4157), 11241131.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1992) Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4), 297323.Google Scholar
Ubel, Peter A., Loewenstein, George, and Jepson, Christopher (2003) Whose Quality of Life? A Commentary Exploring Discrepancies between Health State Evaluations of Patients and the General Public. Quality of Life Research 12(6), 599607.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, HM Treasury (2003) The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
United States, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Smoking and Tobacco Use: Fact Sheet. www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/youth_data/tobacco_use/index.htm.Google Scholar
United States, Department of Health and Human Services (2014) The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
United States, Department of Transportation (2014a) Revised Departmental Guidance on the Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis. Office of Economic and Strategic Analysis. July 9.Google Scholar
United States, Department of Transportation (2014b) Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) in US Department of Transportation Analyses—2014 Adjustment. Acting Undersecretary for Policy and General Council. June 13.Google Scholar
United States, Environmental Protection Agency (2003) Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990–2020: Revised Analytical Plan For EPA’s Second Prospective Analysis. Office of Policy Analysis and Review. May 12.Google Scholar
United States, Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions for Environmental Policy: A White Paper. National Center for Environmental Economics. Review Draft. December 10.Google Scholar
United States, Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. National Center for Environmental Economics.Google Scholar
United States, Environmental Protection Agency (2015) Economy-Wide Modeling: Benefits of Air Quality Improvements White Paper. Prepared for the Science Advisory Board Panel on Economy-Wide Modeling of the Benefits and Costs of Environmental Regulation. September 22.Google Scholar
United States, Food and Drug Administration (2010) Required Warnings for Cigarette Packages and Advertisements. Federal Register 75(218), 6952369565.Google Scholar
United States, Government Accountability Office (2014) Dodd-Frank Regulations: Regulators’ Analytical and Coordination Efforts. December. GAO-15–8.Google Scholar
United States, National Institute on Drug Abuse (2012) Drug Facts: Understanding Drug Abuse and Addiction. www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/understanding-drug-abuse-addiction.Google Scholar
United States, Office of Management and Budget (2003) Circular A-4, Regulatory Analysis. September 17.Google Scholar
United States, Office of Management and Budget (2015) 2015Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations and Unfunded Mandates on State, Local, and Tribal Entities. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.Google Scholar
United States, Social and Behavioral Sciences Team (2016) Annual Report. National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President.Google Scholar
United States, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2014) Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Publication No. SMA 14–4863. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Varey, Carol and Kahneman, Daniel (1992) Experiences Extended Across Time: Evaluation of Moments and Episodes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5(3), 169185.Google Scholar
Vickrey, William (1961) Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance 16(1), 837.Google Scholar
Vining, Aidan R. and Weimer, David L. (1988) Information Asymmetry Favoring Sellers: A Policy Framework. Policy Sciences 21(4), 281303.Google Scholar
Vining, Aidan R. and Weimer, David L. (1992) Welfare Economics as the Foundation for Public Policy: Incomplete and Flawed but Nevertheless Desirable. Journal of Socio-Economics 21(1), 2537.Google Scholar
Vining, Aidan R. and Weimer, David L. (2010) An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Policy. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 1(1), 138.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (1989) Prospective Reference Theory: Toward and Explanation of the Paradoxes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2(3), 235264.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (1990) Do Smokers Underestimate Risks? Journal of Political Economy 98(6), 12531269.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (2002) Smoke-Filled Rooms: A Postmortem on the Tobacco Deal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (2013) Using Data from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries to Estimate the Value of a Statistical Life. Monthly Labor Review 136 (October): www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/using-data-from-the-census-of-fatal-occupational-injuries-to-estimate-the.htm.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (2015a) The Role of Publication Selection Bias in Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life. American Journal of Health Economics 1(1), 2752.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (2015b) Reference-Dependence Effects in Benefit Assessment: Beyond the WTA–WTP Dichotomy and WTA–WTP Ratios. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 6(1), 187206.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip and Aldy, Joseph E. (2003) The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1), 576.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip and Gayer, Ted (2015) Behavioral Public Choice: The Behavioral Paradox of Government Policy. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 38(3), 9731007.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip and Gayer, Ted (2016) Rational Benefit Assessment for an Irrational World: Toward a Behavioral Transfer Test. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 7(1), 6991.Google Scholar
Visschers, Vivianne H. M., Meertens, Ree M., Passchier, Wim W. F., and de Vries, Nanne N. K. (2009) Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature. Risk Analysis 29(2), 267287.Google Scholar
Volkow, Nora D. and Li, Ting-Kai. (2004) Drug Addiction: The Neurobiology of Behaviour Gone Awry. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5(12), 963970.Google Scholar
von Neumann, John and Morgenstern, Oskar (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vortherms, Sam A. (2014) Explaining the WTP/WTA Gap: The Issue of Budget Constraint and Unlimited Valuations. Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison: Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Vossler, Christian A., Doyon, Maurice, and Rondeau, Daniel (2012) Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(4), 145171.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, Rudy E. and Heather, Nick (2003) Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Warner, Mildred E. (2013) Private Finance for Public Goods: Social Impact Bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 16(4), 303319.Google Scholar
Weimer, David L. (1990) An Earmarked Fossil fuels Tax to Save the Rain Forests. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9(2), 254259.Google Scholar
Weimer, David L. (2015) The Thin Reed: Accommodating Weak Evidence for Critical Parameters in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Risk Analysis 35(6), 11011113.Google Scholar
Weimer, David L. and Vining, Aidan R. (2009) Investing in the Disadvantaged: Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Social Policies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Weimer, David L. and Vining, Aidan R. (2011) Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
Weimer, David L., Vining, Aidan R., and Thomas, Randall K. (2009) Cost-Benefit Analysis Involving Addictive Goods: Contingent Valuation to Estimate Willingness-to-Pay for Smoking Cessation. Health Economics 18(2), 181202.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. (1998) Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36(3), 201208.Google Scholar
White, Darcy and Van Landingham, Gary (2015) Benefit-Cost Analysis in the States: Status, Impact, and Challenges. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 6(2), 369399.Google Scholar
Whittington, Dale and MacRae, Duncan (1986) The Issue of Standing in Cost‐Benefit Analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5(4), 665682.Google Scholar
Willig, Robert D. (1976) Consumer’s Surplus without Apology. American Economic Review 66(4), 589597.Google Scholar
Wilson, Timothy D. and Gilbert, Daniel T. (2003) Affective Forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 35, 345411.Google Scholar
Winston, Gordon C. (1980) Addiction and Backsliding: A Theory of Compulsive Consumption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1(4), 295324.Google Scholar
Wunder, Sven, Engel, Stefanie, and Pagiola, Stefano (2008) Taking Stock: A Comparative Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services Programs in Developed and Developing Countries. Ecological Economics 65(4), 834852.Google Scholar
Yaari, Menahem E. (1987) The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk. Econometrica 55(1), 95115.Google Scholar
Zerbe, Richard O. Jr. (2001) Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Zerbe, Richard O., Jr. (2004) Should Moral Sentiments Be Incorporated into Benefit-Cost Analysis? An Example of Long-Term Discounting. Policy Sciences 37(3–4), 305318.Google Scholar
Zhang, Anming, Boardman, Anthony E., Gillen, David, and Waters, I. I. (2004) Towards Estimating the Social and Environmental Costs of Transportation in Canada. Report for Transport Canada. Vancouver: Centre for Transportation Studies, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • David L. Weimer, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Behavioral Economics for Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Online publication: 03 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108178389.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • David L. Weimer, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Behavioral Economics for Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Online publication: 03 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108178389.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • David L. Weimer, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Behavioral Economics for Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Online publication: 03 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108178389.010
Available formats
×