Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T18:26:48.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Is greener whiter? Resistance strategies by the US ski industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Jorge E. Rivera
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

In the late 1990s the US Forest Service (USFS) was developing revised land use plans for national forest lands, as required by the National Forest Management Act of 1976. Environmentalists' favored draft version of these land use plans proposed additional restrictions to recreational use, such as skiing and ski area development. The stringency of these restrictions was particularly high in western US national forest lands where major ski areas are located. For example, one of the proposed land use plans for Colorado's White River National Forest – home of renowned ski resorts such as Vail, Aspen, Breckenridge, Keystone, and Beaver Creek, among others – intended to forbid ski areas' expansion (Briggs, 2000). Not surprisingly, the adoption of more restrictive new land use plans was resisted not only by the ski industry but also by real-estate developing companies, recreation user groups, and local politicians, among others. This chapter examines in detail one of the resistance strategies adopted by the US ski industry: the creation and implementation of a voluntary environmental initiative named the Sustainable Slopes Program.

Since the early 1990s, more than 200 voluntary environmental programs have been created in the US with the stated intent of promoting proactive corporate environmental protection (Carmin et al., 2003). In the 1990s, the use of these programs as alternatives to command-and-control regulations became a core element of the federal government's environmental policy agenda (Dietz and Stern, 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Business and Public Policy
Responses to Environmental and Social Protection Processes
, pp. 86 - 110
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×