Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 A Venetian Operatic Contract of 1714
- 2 What Choirs Also Sang: Aspects of Provincial Music Publishing in Late-nineteenth-century England
- 3 The Modernisation of London Concert Life around 1900
- 4 Debussy, Durand et Cie: A French Composer and His Publisher (1884–1917)
- 5 Nadia Boulanger (1887–1979): The Teacher in the Marketplace
- 6 Copyright as a Component of the Music Industry
- 7 Illegality and the Music Industry
- 8 The Tarnished Image? Folk ‘Industry’ and the Media
- 9 Collective Responsibilities: The Arts Council, Community Arts and the Music Industry in Ireland
- 10 Paying One's Dues: The Music Business, the City and Urban Regeneration
- 11 Learning to Crawl: The Rapid Rise of Music Industry Education
- Index of Personal Names
Introduction
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 A Venetian Operatic Contract of 1714
- 2 What Choirs Also Sang: Aspects of Provincial Music Publishing in Late-nineteenth-century England
- 3 The Modernisation of London Concert Life around 1900
- 4 Debussy, Durand et Cie: A French Composer and His Publisher (1884–1917)
- 5 Nadia Boulanger (1887–1979): The Teacher in the Marketplace
- 6 Copyright as a Component of the Music Industry
- 7 Illegality and the Music Industry
- 8 The Tarnished Image? Folk ‘Industry’ and the Media
- 9 Collective Responsibilities: The Arts Council, Community Arts and the Music Industry in Ireland
- 10 Paying One's Dues: The Music Business, the City and Urban Regeneration
- 11 Learning to Crawl: The Rapid Rise of Music Industry Education
- Index of Personal Names
Summary
The double meaning of the title for this volume, and for the symposium that preceded it, is of course intended. The first meaning, which one could paraphrase as ‘What music is (or ought to be) about’, contrasts with the second, which is: ‘How music is produced and consumed, bought and sold’. But even if the two meanings are quite different, they are intertwined. No one is so naive as to imagine that the material circumstances of music's existence leave no mark whatever on its character. The important questions are, rather, whether such influences are (or should be) central or marginal and whether, on balance, they are good or bad.
No musical tradition is wholly unanimous about the answers. Where music produced in our own age is concerned, a kind of litmus test is provided by reactions to the description ‘commercial’ and its subtly different pair of antonyms, ‘non-commercial’ and ‘uncommercial’. Within the Western art music tradition, commonly known as classical music, it would usually seem inadvisable, even improper, to apply the term ‘commercial’ to the music itself. Of course, everyone wishes for success (the composer and his or her performers must eat!) and for wide dissemination, even if, unexpectedly, to the vulgus. But in the view of the musicians most intimately involved, this success must appear almost accidental rather than engineered. If the community of practitioners and professional commentators describes a composition as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ according to its consensual aesthetic and technical standards, this quality remains unaffected by public success or failure and sticks to the work for as long as the experts remain in agreement.
The insulation of the concept of artistic value from survival in the marketplace is perhaps logical for a tradition that prizes durability and, almost uniquely among musical practices, likes to take the long-term view. Viewed in this light, the subsidy of classical music from the public or private purse is a great benefit, since it validates a distinction between artistic and commercial value: a deus ex machina plugs the gap between what concertgoers are willing to pay and how much composers, performers and venues need to earn in order to keep going. But such patronage is simply a different kind of commerce from the more familiar brand rather than a negation of commerce as such.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Business of Music , pp. 1 - 9Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2002