Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T21:30:17.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Cognitive Science

from Part I - Intellectual Sources and Disciplinary Engagements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2023

By
Natalia Buitron  and
Harry Walker
Edited by
James Laidlaw
James Laidlaw
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Anthropologists and cognitive scientists interested in ethics and morality have much to gain from a two-way dialogue that does not shy away from constructive criticism. This chapter seeks to initiate such a conversation through an overview of three lines of recent research in cognitive science: the evolution of human morality from the standpoint of evolutionary psychology; theories that look to social institutions rather than only evolved psychological dispositions for insight into the variability of human moral dispositions; and studies of how responsibility and intentionality are ascribed in cases of wrongdoing. The final section offers some personal reflections on the methodological challenges of inter-disciplinary engagement, drawing on some of the authors’ recent research on morality and change in western Amazonia. It concludes that anthropologists can use experimental methods creatively, as a way of generating new ethnographic insights; although if genuine conversation on an equal footing is to take place, then ethnography must not only inform experimental design but also be employed to redefine concepts and generate theory.

Keywords

Amazoniacognitionequalityethicsfairnessintentionmoralityjusticeresponsibilitywrongdoing
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Ethics , pp. 177 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astuti, Rita. 2007. ‘Weaving Together Culture and Cognition: An Illustration from Madagascar’. Intellectica: revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive, 46/47: 173–89.Google Scholar
Astuti, Rita. 2016. ‘On Combining Natural and Social Histories into One and the Same Process. Comment on Keane, Webb. 2016. Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1): 449–54.Google Scholar
Astuti, Rita. forthcoming. Combining Methodologies. Talk given at Harvard University.Google Scholar
Astuti, Rita and Bloch., Maurice 2012. ‘Anthropologists as Cognitive Scientists’. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4: 453–61.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. Clark et al. 2016. ‘Small-Scale Societies Exhibit Fundamental Variation in the Role of Intentions in Moral Judgment’. PNAS, 113(17): 4688–93.Google Scholar
Baumard, Nicolas. 2016. The Origins of Fairness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumard, Nicolas and Sperber, Dan. 2010. ‘Weird People, Yes, but also Weird Experiments. [Letter]’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 33(80–1).Google Scholar
Baumard, Nicholas, André, Jean-Baptiste, and Sperber., Dan 2013. ‘A Mutualistic Approach to Morality: The Evolution of Fairness by Partner Choice’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 36(1): 59–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, Maurice. 2012. Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 2016. Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Boehm, Christopher. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert. 2018. A Different Kind of Animal: How Culture Transformed Our Species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, 2005. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buitron, Natalia. 2016. ‘The Attraction of Unity: Power, Knowledge and Community among the Shuar of Ecuadorian Amazonia’. Doctoral Thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Cassaniti, Julia and Hickman, Jacob. 2014. ‘New Directions in the Anthropology of Morality’. Anthropological Theory, 14(2): 251–62.Google Scholar
Chibnik, Michael. 2005. ‘Experimental Economics in Anthropology: A Critical Assessment’. American Ethnologist, 32(2): 198–209.Google Scholar
Chibnik, Michael. 2011. Anthropology, Economics, and Choice. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Jean and Rosaldo., Michele Z. 1981. ‘Politics and Gender in Simple Societies’, in Ortner, Sherry B. and Whitehead, Harriet (eds.), Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 275–329.Google Scholar
Cova, Florian. 2016. ‘The Folk Concept of Intentional Action: Empirical Approaches’, in Sytsma, Justin and Buckwalter, Wesley (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. London: Wiley-Blackwell: 121–41.Google Scholar
Crocker, William H. 1990. The Canela (Eastern Timbira), I: An Ethnographic Introduction. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
Curry, Oliver Scott. 2016. ‘Morality as Cooperation: A Problem-Centred Approach’, in Shackelford, Tod K. and Hansen, Ranald D. (eds.), The Evolution of Morality. New York: Springer International Publishing: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, Oliver Scott, Mullins, Daniel Austin, and Whitehouse., Harvey 2019. ‘Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies’. Current Anthropology, 60(1): 47–69.Google Scholar
Cushman, Fiery. 2008. ‘Crime and Punishment: Distinguishing the Roles of Causal and Intentional Analysis in Moral Judgment’. Cognition, 108(2): 353–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, Fiery, Young, Liane, and Hauser., Marc 2006. ‘The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: Testing Three Principles of Harm’. Psychological Science, 17(12): 1082–9.Google Scholar
Descola, Philippe. 2012. ‘Beyond Nature and Culture: Forms of Attachment’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2: 447–71.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2015. The Anthropology of Intentions: Language in a World of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. and Levinson., Steven C. 2006. Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Fassin, Didier. 2011. ‘A Contribution to the Critique of Moral Reason’. Anthropological Theory, 11(4): 481–91.Google Scholar
Faubion, James D. 2001. ‘Toward an Anthropology of Ethics: Foucault and the Pedagogies of Autopoiesis’. Representations, 74(1): 83–104.Google Scholar
Faubion, James D. 2011. An Anthropology of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, and Simon, Gächter. 2000. ‘Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments’. The American Economic Review, 90: 980–994.Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst and Gächter., Simon 2002. ‘Altruistic Punishment in Humans’. Nature, 415(6868): 137–40.Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst and Fischbacher, Urs. 2004. ‘Third Party Punishment and Social Norms’. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 25(2): 63–87.Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst Bernhard, Helen, and Rockenbach, Battina. 2008. ‘Egalitarianism in Young Children’. Nature, 454(28): 1079–84.Google Scholar
Gellner, David, Curry, Oliver Scott, Cook, Joanna, Alfano, Mark, and Venkatesan., Soumhya 2020. ‘Morality Is Fundamentally an Evolved Solution to Problems of Social Co‐operation’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 26(2): 415–27.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Esther N. (ed.). 1995. Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graeber, David 2011. Debt: The First 5000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.Google Scholar
Graeber, David and Wengrow., David 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Nosek, Brian, Haidt, Jonethan, Iyer, Ravi, Koleva, Spassena, and Ditto., Peter H. 2011. ‘Mapping the Moral Domain’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2): 366–85.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua. 2013. Moral Tribes. New York: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco 2012. ‘Reciprocity: Weak or Strong? What Punishment Experiments Do (and Do Not) Demonstrate’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 35(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Gurven, Michael and Geoffrey, Winking. 2008. ‘Collective Action in Action: Prosocial Behavior in and out of the Laboratory’. American Anthropologist, 110: 179–90.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan 2001. ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment’. Psychological Review, 108(4): 814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan and Bjorklund., Fredrik 2008. ‘Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions About Moral Psychology’, in Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed.), Moral Psychology: Vol. 2. The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 181–218.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan and Joseph., Craig 2008. ‘The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules’, in Carruthers, Peter, Laurence, Stephen, and Stich, Stephen (eds.), The Innate Mind, Vol. 3: Foundations and the Future. New York: Oxford University Press: 367–91.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glenn W. and List., John A. 2004. ‘Field Experiments’. Journal of Economics Literature, 42: 1009–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, Kristen. 2012. ‘Stag Hunts or Rearing Environments? Comment on Tomasello et al., Two Key Steps in the Evolution of Human Cooperation: The Interdependence Hypothesis’. Current Anthropology, 53(6): 687–8.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph 2004. ‘Cultural Group Selection, Coevolutionary Processes and Large-Scale Cooperation’. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53: 3–35.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph. 2017. The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph and Boyd., Richard 1997. ‘Market Incorporation, Agricultural Change and Sustainability among the Machiguenga Indians of the Peruvian Amazon’. Human Ecology, 25(2): 319–51.Google Scholar
Henrich, Natalie and Henrich, Joseph. 2007. Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven H., and Norenzayan., Ara 2010. ‘The Weirdest People in the World?’ Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, Joseph, Ensminger, Jean, McElreath, Richard, Barr, Abigail, Barrett, Clark, Bolyanatz, Alexander, Cardenas, Juan Camilo, Gurven, Michael, and Gwako, Edwins. 2000. ‘Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment’. Science, 327(5972): 1480–4.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, McElreath, Richard, Barr, Abigail, Ensminger, Jean, Barrett, Clark, Bolyanatz, Alexander, Cardaroas, Juan Camilo, Gurven, Michael, Gwako, Edwins, Henrich, Natalie, Lesoronol, Carolyn, Marlowe, Frank, Tracer, David, and Ziker, John. 2006. ‘Costly Punishment across Human Societies’. Science, 312 (5781): 1767–70.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Richard, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, Gintis, Herbert et al. 2005. ‘“Economic Man” in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioural Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 795–855.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Ensminger, Jean, McElreath, Richard, Barr, Abigail, Barrett, Clark, Bolyanatz, Alexander, Ziker, John et al. 2010. ‘Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment’. Science, 327: 1480–4.Google Scholar
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. 2009. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1999. ‘On the Social Relations of the Hunter-Gatherer Band’, in Lee, R. B. and Daly, R. H. (eds.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 399–410.Google Scholar
James, Scott M. 2011. An Introduction to Evolutionary Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Timothy 2014. ‘The Cognitive Science of Religion from an Anthropological Perspective’, in Watts, Fraser and Turner (eds.), Léon, Cognitive Approaches to the Evolution of Religion. Oxford: Press, Oxford University : 173–91.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2008. ‘Others, Other Minds, and Others’ Theories of Other Minds: An Afterword on the Psychology and Politics of Opacity Claims’. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2): 473–82.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb 2016. Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua. 2003. ‘Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language’. Analysis, 63: 190–3.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1981. Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 1: The Philosophy of Moral Development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James 2002. ‘For an Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom’. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8(2): 311–32.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James 2010. ‘Agency and Responsibility: Perhaps You Can Have Too Much of a Good Thing’, in Lambek, M. (ed.), Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press: 143–64.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James 2016a. ‘The Interactional Foundations of Ethics and the Formation and Limits of Morality Systems’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1): 455–61.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James 2016b. ‘A Well-Disposed Anthropologist’s Problems with the Cognitive Science of Religion’. Anthropology of This Century, 16. http://aotcpress.com/articles/welldisposed-social-anthropologists-problems-cognitive-science-religion.Google Scholar
Lamba, Shakti and Mace., Ruth 2013. ‘The Evolution of Fairness: Explaining Variation in Bargaining Behaviour’. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280.Google Scholar
Long, Nicholas and Moore., Henrietta L. 2012. Sociality: New Directions. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M. 2011. ‘Toward an Anthropological Theory of Mind’. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 36(4): 1–69.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M. 2020. ‘Mind and Spirit: A Comparative Theory about Representation of Mind and the Experience of Spirit’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 26(S1): 9–27.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel 1966. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. I. Cunnison. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
Mikhail, John 2007. ‘Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence, and the Future’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4): 143–52.Google Scholar
Parry, Jonathan 1986. ‘The Gift, the Indian Gift, and the “Indian Gift”’. Man (NS), 21(3): 453–73.Google Scholar
Price, Michael E. 2012. ‘Group Selection Theories Are Now More Sophisticated, but Are They More Predictive?’ Evolutionary Psychology, 10(1): 45–9.Google Scholar
Quinn, Naomi and Strauss, Claudia. 2006. ‘Introduction to Special Issue on the Missing Psychology in Cultural Anthropology’s Key Words’. Anthropological Theory, 6(3): 267–79.Google Scholar
Rapport, Nigel and Overing, Joanna (eds.). 2000. Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd., Robert 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2007. ‘Between Reproduction and Freedom: Morality, Value, and Radical Cultural Change’. Ethnos, 72(3): 293–314.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel 2012a. ‘On Becoming Ethical Subjects: Freedom, Constraint, and the Anthropology of Morality’. Anthropology of This Century, 5. http://aotcpress.com/articles/ethical-subjects-freedom-constraint-anthropology-morality.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel 2012b. ‘Cultural Values’, in Fassin, D (ed.), A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell: 117–32.Google Scholar
Robbins, Erin and Rochat, Philippe. 2017. ‘Sharing and Fairness in Development’, in Kiverstein, Julian (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind. London: Routledge: 222–44.Google Scholar
Robbins, Erin, Shepard, Jason ,and Rochat., Philippe 2017. ‘Variations in Judgments of Intentional Action and Moral Evaluation across Eight Cultures’. Cognition, 164: 22–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, Joel and Rumsey, Alun. 2008. ‘Introduction: Cultural and Linguistic Anthropology and the Opacity of Other Minds’. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2): 407–20.Google Scholar
Roberts, Simon. 1994. ‘Law and Dispute Processes’, in Tim Ingold (ed.), Companion Encyclopaedia of Anthropology: Humanity, Culture and Social Life. London: Routledge: 962–82.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 2011. ‘What Kinship Is (Part One)’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (NS), 17: 2–19.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Andrew et al. 2017. ‘“The Indian Gift”: A Critical Debate’. History and Anthropology, 28(5): 553–83.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard. 2012. ‘Anthropology’s Disenchantment with the Cognitive Revolution’. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4: 354–61.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard and Haidt, Jonathan. 1999. ‘Commentary to Feature Review. The Future of Moral Psychology: Truth, Intuition, and the Pluralist Way’. Psychological Science, 4(6): 360–5.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A., Much, Nancy C., Park, Lawrence, and Mahapatra, Manamohan. 1997. ‘The “Big Three” of Morality (Autonomy, Community, Divinity) and the “Big Three” Explanations of Suffering’, in Allan M. Brandt and Paul Rozin (eds.), Morality and Health. New York: Routledge: 119–69.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert 2008. ‘Knowing Minds Is a Matter of Authority: Political Dimensions of Opacity Statements in Korowai Moral Psychology’. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2): 443–53.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert 2009. Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2016. A Natural History of Human Morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2018. ‘Precis of a Natural History of Human Morality’. Philosophical Psychology, 31(5): 661–8.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael and Vaish, Amrisha. 2013. ‘Origins of Human Cooperation and Morality’. Annual Review of Psychology, 64: 231–55.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Melis, Alicia P., Tennie, Claudio, Wyman, Emily, and Herrmann., Esther 2012. ‘Two Key Steps in the Evolution of Human Cooperation’. Current Anthropology, 53(6): 673–92.Google Scholar
Walker, Harry. 2013. Under a Watchful Eye: Self, Power, and Intimacy in Amazonia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., and Gardner., A. 2007. ‘Social Semantics: Altruism, Cooperation, Mutualism, Strong Reciprocity and Group Selection’. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20: 415–32.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Harvey 1998. ‘From Mission to Movement: The Impact of Christianity on Patterns of Political Association in Papua New Guinea’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 4(1): 43–63.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, Dennis. 2019. Reply. In ‘Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies’, by Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., and Whitehouse, H., Current Anthropology, 62–3.Google Scholar
Young, Liane, Cushman, Fiery, Tranel, Ralph Adolphs, and Hauser., Marc 2006. ‘Does Emotion Mediate the Relationship between an Action’s Moral Status and Its Intentional Status? Neuropsychological Evidence’. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(1–2): 265–78.Google Scholar
Zigon, Jarrett. 2007. ‘Moral Breakdown and the Ethical Demand: A Theoretical Framework for an Anthropology of Moralities’. Anthropological Theory, 7(2): 131–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×