Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bol, Damien 2019. Putting Politics in the Lab: A Review of Lab Experiments in Political Science. Government and Opposition, Vol. 54, Issue. 1, p. 167.

    Handke, Christian and Herzog, Christian 2018. Transparency and Funding of Public Service Media – Die deutsche Debatte im internationalen Kontext. p. 305.

    Muno, Wolfgang Niemann, Arne and Guasti, Petra 2018. Europa spielerisch erlernen. p. 3.

    Bakker, Femke E. 2017. Do liberal norms matter? A cross-regime experimental investigation of the normative explanation of the democratic peace thesis in China and The Netherlands. Acta Politica, Vol. 52, Issue. 4, p. 521.

    McCauley, John F. and Posner, Daniel N. 2015. African Borders as Sources of Natural Experiments Promise and Pitfalls. Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 3, Issue. 02, p. 409.

    guasti, petra muno, wolfgang and niemann, arne 2015. introduction – eu simulations as a multi-dimensional resource: from teaching and learning tool to research instrument. European Political Science, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 205.

    Bolsen, Toby 2013. A Light Bulb Goes On: Norms, Rhetoric, and Actions for the Public Good. Political Behavior, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

1 - Experimentation in Political Science

Summary

In his 1909 American Political Science Association presidential address, A. Lawrence Lowell (1910) advised the fledgling discipline against following the model of the natural sciences: “We are limited by the impossibility of experiment. Politics is an observational, not an experimental science…” (7). The lopsided ratio of observational to experimental studies in political science, over the one hundred years since Lowell's statement, arguably affirms his assessment. The next hundred years are likely to be different. The number and influence of experimental studies are growing rapidly as political scientists discover ways of using experimental techniques to illuminate political phenomena.

The growing interest in experimentation reflects the increasing value that the discipline places on causal inference and empirically guided theoretical refinement. Experiments facilitate causal inference through the transparency and content of their procedures, most notably the random assignment of observations (a.k.a. subjects or experimental participants) to treatment and control groups. Experiments also guide theoretical development by providing a means for pinpointing the effects of institutional rules, preference configurations, and other contextual factors that might be difficult to assess using other forms of inference. Most of all, experiments guide theory by providing stubborn facts – that is, reliable information about cause and effect that inspires and constrains theory.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science
  • Online ISBN: 9780511921452
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Bailenson, Jeremy N., Iyengar, Shanto, Yee, Nick, and Collins, Nathan A.. 2008. “Facial Similarity between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 935–61.
Brody, Richard A., and Brownstein, Charles N.. 1975. “Experimentation and Simulation.” In Handbook of Political Science 7, eds. Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 211–63.
Brown, Stephen R., and Melamed, Lawrence E.. 1990. Experimental Design and Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Campbell, Donald T. 1969. “Prospective: Artifact and Control.” In Artifact in Behavioral Research, eds. Rosenthal, Robert and Rosnow, Robert. New York: Academic Press, 264–86.
Cover, Albert D., and Brumberg, Bruce S.. 1982. “Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion.” American Political Science Review 76: 347–59.
Dipboye, Robert L., and Flanagan, Michael F.. 1979. “Research Settings in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Are Findings in the Field More Generalizable Than in the Laboratory?” American Psychologist 34: 141–50.
Druckman, Daniel. 1994. “Determinants of Compromising Behavior in Negotiation: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38: 507–56.
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100: 627–36.
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “Mind, Will, and Choice.” In The Oxford Handbook on Contextual Political Analysis, eds. Tilly, Charles and Goodin, Robert E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–113.
Druckman, James N., and McDermott, Rose. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.” Political Behavior 30: 297–321.
Eavey, Cheryl L., and Miller, Gary J.. 1984. “Bureaucratic Agenda Control: Imposition or Bargaining?” American Political Science Review 78: 719–33.
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1956. “Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 50: 154–65.
Esterling, Kevin Michael, Lazer, David, and Neblo, Michael. 2009. “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment Involving Members of Congress and Their Constituents.” Unpublished paper, University of California, Riverside.
Falk, Armin, and Heckman, James J.. 2009. “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326: 535–38.
Ferraz, Claudio, and Finan, Frederico. 2008. “Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil's Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 703–45.
Fowler, James H., and Schreiber, Darren. 2008. “Biology, Politics, and the Emerging Science of Human Nature.” Science 322: 912–14.
Fréchette, Guillaume, Kagel, John H., and Lehrer, Steven F.. 2003. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 97: 221–32.
Frohlich, Norman, and Oppenheimer, Joe A.. 1992. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis 15: 1–20.
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 94: 653–63.
Geva, Nehemia, and Mintz, Alex. 1997. Decision-Making on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Gilens, Martin. 1996. “‘Race Coding’ and White Opposition to Welfare.” American Political Science Review 90: 593–604.
Gosnell, Harold F. 1926. “An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting.” American Political Science Review 20: 869–74.
Green, Donald P. 1992. “The Price Elasticity of Mass Preferences.” American Political Science Review 86: 128–48.
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S.. 2002. “The Downstream Benefits of Experimentation.” Political Analysis 10: 394–402.
Greenberg, Jerald. 1987. “The College Sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the Record Straight.” Academy of Management Review 12: 157–59.
Guetzkow, Harold, and Valadez, Joseph J., eds. 1981. Simulated International Processes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel, and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2007. “Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?” American Political Science Review 101: 709–25.
Halpern, Sydney A. 2004. Lesser Harms: The Morality of Risk in Medical Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hauck, Robert J.-P. 2008. “Protecting Human Research Participants, IRBs, and Political Science Redux: Editor's Introduction.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41: 475–76.
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, and Gintis, Herbert, eds. 2004. Foundations of Human Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N., and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2002. “Ethnic Identity, Collective Action, and Conflict: An Experimental Approach.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, George. 2008. The Ten Most Beautiful Experiments. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Kardes, Frank R. 1996. “In Defense of Experimental Consumer Psychology.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 5: 279–96.
Keppel, Geoffrey, and Wickens, Thomas D.. 2004. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kühberger, Anton. 1998. “The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75: 23–55.
Levitt, Steven D., and List, John A.. 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Tell Us about the Real World?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 153–74.
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65: 682–93.
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83: 399–419.
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89: 309–26.
Lowell, A. Lawrence. 1910. “The Physiology of Politics.” American Political Science Review 4: 1–15.
Mahoney, Robert, and Druckman, Daniel. 1975. “Simulation, Experimentation, and Context.” Simulation & Games 6: 235–70.
Malesky, Edmund J., and Samphantharak, Krislert. 2008. “Predictable Corruption and Firm Investment: Evidence from a Natural Experiment and Survey of Cambodian Entrepreneurs.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3: 227–67.
Miller, Gary J., Hammond, Thomas H., and Kile, Charles. 1996. “Bicameralism and the Core: An Experimental Test.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21: 83–103.
Morton, Rebecca B. 1993. “Incomplete Information and Ideological Explanations of Platform Divergence.” American Political Science Review 87: 382–92.
Morton, Rebecca B., and Williams, Kenneth. 1999. “Information Asymmetries and Simultaneous versus Sequential Voting.” American Political Science Review 93: 51–67.
Morton, Rebecca B., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor, Walker, James, and Gardner, Roy. 1992. “Covenants with and without a Sword.” American Political Science Review 86: 404–17.
Richardson, Liz, and John, Peter. 2009. “Is Lobbying Really Effective? A Field Experiment of Local Interest Group Tactics to Influence Elected Representatives in the UK.” Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Lisbon, Portugal.
Riker, William H. 1967. “Bargaining in a Three-Person Game.” American Political Science Review 61: 642–56.
Roth, Alvin E. 1995. “Introduction to Experimental Economics.” In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds. Kagel, John H. and Roth, Alvin E.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1–110.
Simon, Adam, and Sulkin, Tracy. 2001. “Habermas in the Lab: An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Deliberation.” Political Psychology 22: 809–26.
Singer, Eleanor, and Levine, Felice J.. 2003. “Protection of Human Subjects of Research: Recent Developments and Future Prospects for the Social Sciences.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67: 148–64.
Smith, Vernon L. 1976. “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory.” American Economic Review 66: 274–79.
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagendoorn, Look, and Prior, Markus. 2004. “Predispositional Factors and Situational Triggers.” American Political Science Review 98: 35–50.
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior.” World Politics 55: 399–422.