Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Stucki, Iris Pleger, Lyn E. and Sager, Fritz 2018. The Making of the Informed Voter: A Split-Ballot Survey on the Use of Scientific Evidence in Direct-Democratic Campaigns. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 115.

    Ferrin, Monica Fraile, Marta and García-Albacete, Gema 2018. Is It Simply Gender? Content, Format, and Time in Political Knowledge Measures. Politics & Gender, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 162.

    Vezzoni, Cristiano and Ladini, Riccardo 2017. Thou shalt not cheat: how to reduce internet use in web surveys on political knowledge. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, Vol. 47, Issue. 03, p. 251.

    Braman, Eileen 2016. Exploring Citizen Assessments of Unilateral Executive Authority. Law & Society Review, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 189.

    Lee, Francis L.F. 2015. Social movement as civic education: communication activities and understanding of civil disobedience in the Umbrella Movement. Chinese Journal of Communication, Vol. 8, Issue. 4, p. 393.

    Pereira, Mónica Ferrín Fraile, Marta and Rubal, Martiño 2015. Young and Gapped? Political Knowledge of Girls and Boys in Europe. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 68, Issue. 1, p. 63.

    Ferrín, Monica Fraile, Marta and García-Albacete, Gema 2015. The Gender Gap in Political Knowledge: Is It All About Guessing? An Experimental Approach. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, p. edv042.

    Boudreau, Cheryl 2013. Gresham's Law of Political Communication: How Citizens Respond to Conflicting Information. Political Communication, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 193.

    Goldman, Seth K. Mutz, Diana C. and Dilliplane, Susanna 2013. All Virtue Is Relative: A Response to Prior. Political Communication, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 635.

    Prior, Markus 2013. The Challenge of Measuring Media Exposure: Reply to Dilliplane, Goldman, and Mutz. Political Communication, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 620.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

12 - Political Knowledge

Summary

In political surveys, many citizens fail to answer, or provide incorrect answers to, fact-based questions about political figures and institutions. A common inference drawn from such failures is that citizens' poor performance on surveys reflects their incompetence in democratically meaningful contexts such as voting booths.

The scholarly home for such findings is the academic literature on political knowledge. A common analytic definition of political knowledge is that it is a measure of a citizen's ability to provide correct answers to a specific set of fact-based questions. Typical political knowledge questions include “What is the political office held by [name of current vice president, British prime minister, or chief justice of the United States]?” and “Which political party has the most seats in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Many people have used responses to survey-based political knowledge questions to criticize the public for its general incompetence.

In recent years, these criticisms have come under increasing scrutiny (e.g., Graber 1984; Popkin 1994). Some scholars raised questions about the practice of basing broad generalizations of citizen competence or knowledge on a relatively small set of idiosyncratic, fact-based survey questions (e.g., Lupia 2006). Others uncovered logical and factual errors in claims about the kinds of political knowledge that are needed to make important political choices competently (e.g., Lupia and McCubbins 1998; Gibson and Caldeira 2009).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science
  • Online ISBN: 9780511921452
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Boudreau, Cheryl. 2009. “Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?” Journal of Politics 71: 964–76.
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009. “Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court.” Journal of Politics 71: 429–41.
Gilens, Martin. 2001. “Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95: 379–96.
Gould, Stephen J. 1996. The Mismeasure of Man. rev. ed. New York: W.W. Norton.
Graber, Doris. 1984. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman.
Krosnick, Jon A., Lupia, Arthur, DeBell, Matthew, and Donakowski, Darrell. 2008. “Problems with ANES Questions Measuring Political Knowledge.” Retrieved from www.electionstudies.org/announce/newsltr/20080324PoliticalKnowledgeMemo.pdf (November 5, 2010).
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, and Rich, Robert F.. 2001. “The Political Environment and Citizen Competence.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 410–24.
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, Schwieder, David, and Rich, Robert F.. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62: 790–816.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91: 585–98.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 951–71.
Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence.” Critical Review 18: 217–32.
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
McClone, Matthew S., Aronson, Joshua, and Kobrynowicz, Diane. 2006. “Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30: 392–98.
Miller, Melissa, and Orr, Shannon K.. 2008. “Experimenting with a ‘Third Way' in Political Knowledge Estimation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 768–80.
Mondak, Jeffery J. 2001. “Developing Valid Knowledge Scales.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 224–38.
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66: 492–513.
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Davis, Belinda Creel. 2001. “Asked and Answered: Knowledge Levels When We Will Not Take ‘Don't Know’ for an Answer.” Political Behavior 23: 199–224.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Prior, Markus, and Lupia, Arthur. 2008. “Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall from Political Learning Skills.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 168–82.
Steele, Claude M., and Aronson, Joshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African-Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 787–811.
Sturgis, Patrick, Allum, Nick, and Smith, Patten. 2008. “An Experiment on the Measurement of Political Knowledge in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 90–102.