Skip to main content
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bown, Alexander 2016. Epicurus on Truth and Falsehood. Phronesis, Vol. 61, Issue. 4, p. 463.


    ×
  • Print publication year: 1999
  • Online publication date: March 2008

8 - Epicurean epistemology

from PART III - EPISTEMOLOGY
Summary
Epicurus invented the term canonic to designate epistemology as a branch of philosophy. This chapter deals first with perceptions and feelings, then preconceptions. Turning first to sight and thought to explain sensory perception, Epicurus claims that very fine configurations of atoms, called images, are continually detached from the surface of external solids, having similar shape and colour to the solid. Epicurus does not explain feelings separately in the Letter to Herodotus. Their epistemological role can be inferred, however, from what he says about perceptions. The basic difference between these two measures of truth is that feelings are acts of awareness of inner states, whereas perceptions are directed at what is external to us. Preconceptions correspond to the utterances used to state a belief or problem. Beliefs are of two kinds: about what is waiting and about what is nonevident. The senses can display the things that we believe to exist.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy
  • Online ISBN: 9781139053617
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Asmis E. (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method, Cornell studies in classical philology 42 (Ithaca/London).
Bailey C. (1928) The Greek Atomists and Epicurus (Oxford, various repr.).
Barnes J. (1988c) ‘Epicurean signs’, OSAP suppl. vol.
Barnes J. (1996a) ‘Epicurus: meaning and thinking’, in Giannantoni & Gigante (1996), vol. I.
Bollack J., ed. (1975) La pensée du plaisir – Epicure: textes moraux, commentaires (Paris).
Everson S. (1990b) ‘Epicurus on the truth of the senses’, in Everson (1990a).
Furley D. J. (1971) ‘Knowledge of atoms and void in Epicureanism’, in Anton J. P. & Kustas G. L., edd., Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy I (Albany).
Glidden D. K. (1985) ‘Epicurean prolēpsis’, OSAP 3.
Long A. A. & Sedley D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).
Puglia E., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali e esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), La Scuola di Epicuro 8 (Naples).
Rist J. M. (1972) Epicurus: An introduction (Cambridge).
Sedley D. N. (1976b) ‘Epicurus and the mathematicians of Cyzicus’, CErc 6.
Sedley D. N. (1982c) ‘On Signs’, in Barnes et al. (1982a).
Sedley D. N. (1989a) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin & Barnes (1989).
Sedley D. N. (1989b) ‘Epicurus on the common sensibles’, in Huby & Neal (1989).
Striker G. (1974) Kριτ̮ριoν τἀς ἀαληθ∊ια, NGG, Philol.-hist. Klasse 2 ; repr. in Striker (1996).
Striker G. (1977) ‘Epicurus on the truth of sense impressions’, AGPh 59 ; repr. in Striker (1996).
Striker G. (1990) ‘The problem of the criterion’, in Everson (1990a) ; repr. in Striker (1996).
Tarrant H. (1985) Scepticism or Platonism? The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy (Cambridge).