Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T01:50:20.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - CAT and Talk in Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

By
Cindy Gallois ,
Ann Weatherall  and
Howard Giles
Edited by
Howard Giles
Howard Giles
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Communication Accommodation Theory
Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts
 , pp. 105 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angus, D., Smith, A. E., & Wiles, J. (2012). Human communication as coupled time series: Quantifying multi-participant recurrence. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing: IEEE Transactions, 20 , 1795–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angus, D., Watson, B. M., Smith, A., Gallois, C., & Wiles, J. (2012). Visualizing conversation structure across time: Insights into effective doctor-patient consultations. PLoS ONE, 7, E3814.Google Scholar
Azuma, s. (1997). Speech accommodation and Japanese emperor Hirohito. Discourse and Society, 8 , 189–202.Google Scholar
Baker, R., Angus, D., Smith-Conway, E., Baker, K. S., Gallois, C., Smith, A., Wiles, J., & Chenery, H. J. (2015). Visualizing conversations between care home staff and residents with dementia. Ageing and Society, 35, 270–297.Google Scholar
Baker, S. C., Gallois, C., Driedger, M., & Santesso, N. (2011). Communication accommodation and managing musculoskeletal disorders: Doctors’ and patients’ perspectives (on behalf of the Effective Consumer Investigator Group: P.S. Tugwell, A. Wilson, P. M. Brooks, A. O’Connor, A. Qualman, J. Wale, & G. A. Wells). Health Communication, 26 , 379–388.Google Scholar
Bonnin, J. E. (2014). To speak with the other’s voice: Reducing asymmetry and social distance in professional-client communication. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 9 , 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrani, B. (2015). Arabic interdialectal encounters: Investigating the influence of attitudes on language accommodation. Language and Communication, 41, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, C. W., & Giles, H. (2012). Intergroup messages in policing the community. Giles, H. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 264–277). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (1984). Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46 , 49–70.Google Scholar
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language and Society, 17 , 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cretchley, J., Gallois, C., Chenery, H., & Smith, A. (2010). Conversations between carers and people with schizophrenia: A qualitative analysis using Leximancer. Qualitative Health Research, 20 , 1611–1628.Google Scholar
Duggan, A. P., Robinson, J. D., & Thompson, T. L. (2012). Understanding disability as an intergroup encounter. In Giles, H. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 250–263). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edwards, H., & Noller, P. (1993). Perceptions of overaccommodation used by nurses in communication with the elderly. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 207–223.Google Scholar
Gallois, C., & Giles, H. (2015). Communication accommodation theory. In Tracy, K., Ilie, C., & Sandel, T. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 159–176). Boston, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In Gudykunst, W. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gasiorek, J. (2013). “I was impolite to her because she was to me”: Perceptions of motive and young adults’ communicative responses to underaccommodation . Western Journal of Communication, 77, 604–624.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–109.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (Ed.) (1984). The dynamics of speech accommodation: Special issue of the International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46 .Google Scholar
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Giles, H. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.) (1991). Contexts of accommodation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2011). Intergenerational communication practices. In Schaie, K. W. & Willis, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th edn., pp. 231–245). New York, NY: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Linz, D., Bonilla, D., & Gomez, M. L. (2012). Police stops of and interactions with Latino and White (Non-Latino) drivers: Extensive policing and communication accommodation. Communication Monographs, 79 , 407–427.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Soliz, J. (2014). Communication accommodation theory: A situated framework for interpersonal, family, and intergroup dynamics. In Braithewaite, D. & Schrodt, P. (Eds.), Engaging interpersonal theories (2nd edn., pp. 157–169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hamilton, H. (1991). Accommodation and mental disability. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 157–186). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hewett, D. G., Watson, B. M., & Gallois, C. (2015). Communication between hospital doctors: Underaccommodation and interpretability. Language and Communication, 41 , 71–83.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 45 , 418–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles-telling” and a “service encounter”. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagace, M., Tanguay, A., Lavallée, M. L., Laplante, J., & Robichaud, S. (2012). The silent impact of ageist communication in long-term care facilities: Elders; perspectives on quality of life and coping strategies. Journal of Aging Studies, 28, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, J. (2015). Dialect accommodation in interaction: Explaining dialect change and stability. Language and Communication, 41 , 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1984). Speech convergence miscarried: An investigation into inappropriate accommodation strategies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 131–146.Google Scholar
Rajadurai, J. (2007). Outgroup phonological markers and the negotiation of identity. International Journal of Multilingualism, 4 , 282–299.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with older adults. Language and Communication, 6 , 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, T. L., Chao, W., & Liang, C. (2006). Language shift and language accommodation across family generations in Taiwan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27, 126–147.Google Scholar
Savundranayagam, M. Y., Ryan, E. B., & Hummert, M. L. (2007). Communication, health, and ageing: Promoting empowerment. In Weatherall, A., Watson, B. M., & Gallois, C. (Eds.), Language, discourse, and social psychology (pp. 81–107). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70 , 1075–1095.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockey, L. (1984). All in a flap: Long-term accommodation in phonology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 87–95.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2012). Handbook of conversation analysis. Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watson, B. M., Angus, D., Gore, L., & Farmer, J (2015). Communication in open disclosure conversations about adverse events in hospitals. Language and Communication, 41 , 57–70.Google Scholar
Weatherall, A. (2012). Identity categories as action in talk. In Giles, H. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 250–263), New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weatherall, A (2015). “But whose side are you on?” Doing being independent in telephone-mediated dispute resolution. In Moore, F. C. J. (Ed.), Producing and managing restricted activities: Avoidance and withholding in institutional interaction (pp. 151–179). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Weatherall, A., & Gallois, C. (2003). Gendered identity: Complexities/intersections. A social psychology perspective. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.), Handbook of gender and language (pp. 487–508). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Response tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69 , 150–182.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, M. (1988). The influence of changing group vitality on convergence toward a dominant linguistic norm: An Israeli example. Language and Communication, 8 , 285–305.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×