Skip to main content
×
×
Home
Copyright Exhaustion
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Copyright Exhaustion
    • Online ISBN: 9781108135290
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108135290
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

In this timely book, copyright scholar Péter Mezei offers a comprehensive examination of copyright exhaustion, including its historical development, theoretical framework, practical application, and policy considerations. He compares the substantive norms and case law for the first-sale doctrine in the United States and in the European Union, covering both analogue and digital applications in detail, and in doing so questions the common rejection of exhaustion in the resale of digital subject matter such as computer programs, sound recordings, audiovisual works, and e-books. Instead, he proposes a digital first-sale doctrine that would offer legal consistency to copyright law and a technologically feasible framework for content producers and consumers. This book should be read by anyone interested in how copyright law continues to evolve in conjunction with the digital world.

Reviews

Advance praise:‘In this era of digital streaming, cloud computing and global content distribution, the exhaustion doctrine in copyright law deserves serious scholarly and policy attention. This timely and important book provides an in-depth comparative analysis of the doctrine's justifications, evolution and future development on both sides of the Atlantic and at the international level. Highly recommended!'

Peter K. Yu - Director, Center for Law and Intellectual Property, Texas A & M University School of Law

Advance praise:‘Users have grown comfortable with the freedom to resell books, sound recordings, and the like. In a world in which these media are distributed in digital form, users may not have that same luxury. Professor Mezei's book does an excellent job discussing the legal and policy issues underlying exhaustion, and how those same considerations ought to apply to digital works.'

John T. Cross - Grosscurth Professor of Law, University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law

Advance praise:‘Professor Mezei's new book is the much-needed update of the copyright exhaustion doctrine to the digital age of today. It discusses the international and EU law dimensions of copyright exhaustion in detail and compares the European legal developments to US law. A highly recommended book for practitioners, students and academic alike.'

Tuomas Mylly - University of Turku

Advance praise:‘Professor Mezei's book provides a detailed, nuanced, yet accessible treatment of the copyright exhaustion doctrine - a critical but underdeveloped area of intellectual property law that courts around the world are struggling to get right, especially as it applies to copyright-protected digital works.'

William T. Gallagher - Director of the Intellectual Property Law Center, Golden Gate University School of Law, and Founding Editor, The IP Law Book Review

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Abbott Frederick M.: Second Report (Final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the Subject of the Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Parallel Importation, FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 2000 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1921856).
Abbott Frederick M.: Parallel Importation: Economic and Social Welfare Dimensions, 2007 (www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/parallel_importation.pdf).
Abelson Sarah: An Emerging Secondary Market for Digital Music – The Legality of ReDigi and the Extent of the First Sale Doctrine, Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, Winter 2012: pp. 811.
Akkermans Bram, and Ramaekers Eveline: Article 345 TFEU (ex. 295 EC), Its Meanings and Interpretations, European Law Journal, Vol. 3/2010, pp. 292314.
Alderman Elliott C.: Resale Royalties in the United States for Fine Visual Artists: An Alien Concept, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 40/1983, pp. 265283.
Aldridge Lindsay R.: Costco v. Omega and the First Sale Doctrine, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 12/2011, pp. 325344.
Allfeld Philipp: Das Urheberrecht an Werken der Literatur und der Tonkunst, Zweite, vielfach veränderte Auflage, Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 1928.
Alter Alexandra: Amazon Unveils E-Book Subscription Service, With Some Notable Absenses, The New York Times, July 18, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/07/19/business/media/amazon-introduces-kindle-subscription-service.html).
Alvarado Daniela: Seamaster-ing the First Sale Doctrine: A Tripartite Framework for Navigating the Applicability of Section 109(a) to Gray Market Goods, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2012: pp. 885925.
Amundsen Kaitlyn E.: From Your Land to Mine: The Benefits of Applying the First Sale Doctrine to Goods Manufactured Abroad, George Mason Journal of International Commercial Law, Spring 2012, pp. 339364.
Aplin Tanya: The ECJ Elucidates the Database Right, Intellectual Property Quarterly, Issue 2/2005, pp. 204221.
Appl Clemens, and Schmidt Marlene: Zweitverwertung gebrauchter Digitalgüter – Die Folgen des UsedSoft-Urteils für Schöpfungen anderer Werkarten, Medien und Recht, Issue 4/2014, pp. 189200.
Arnerstål Stojan: Licensing Digital Content in a Sale of Goods Context, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 10/2015, pp. 750758.
Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI): Report and Opinion on the Making Available and Communication to the Public in the Internet Environment – Focus on Linking Techniques on the Internet, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 149154.
Atkinson Benedict, and Fitzgerald Brian: A Short History of Copyright – The Genie Information, Springer, Cham, 2014.
Axberg Robyn: File-Sharing Tools and Copyright Law: A Study of In Re Aimster Copyright Litigation and MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Loyola University Chicago Law Review, Fall 2003, pp. 389456.
Bacon Thomas J.: Caveat Bibliotheca: The First Sale Doctrine and the Future of Libraries after Omega v. Costco, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 11/2011: pp. 414438.
Bainbridge David: Software Copyright Law, 4th ed. Butterworths, London, 1999.
Barbour Adrienne Clare: Used iTunes: The Legality of ReDigi's Model for a Second-Hand Digital Music Store, Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Fall 2012, pp. 165198.
Barfield Claude E., and Groombridge Mark A.: The Economic Case for Copyright Owner Control over Parallel Imports, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Issue 6/1998, pp. 904939.
Barker Emily: The California Resale Royalty Act: Droit De [Not So] Suite, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Issue 2/2011, pp. 387406.
Batchelor Bill, and Montani Luca: Exhaustion, Essential Subject Matter and Other CJEU Judicial Tools to Update Copyright for an Online Economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 8/2015, pp. 591600.
Berger Christian: Urheberrechtliche Erschöpfungslehre und digitale Informationstechnologie, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 3/2002, pp. 198203.
Berger Christian: Verkehrsfähigkeit “Digitaler Güter”: Zur Dogmatik der Verkehrsfähigkeit von Rechten, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 170194.
Bice Scott H.: The Limited Grant of Certiorari and the Justification of Judicial Review, Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 1975/1975: pp. 343413.
Bjelke Harald: The Development of Nordic Copyright in the Light of Court Usage, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 1/1991, pp. 3355.
Blomqvist Jørgen: Primer on International Copyright and Related Rights, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014.
Bodewig Theo: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Takenaka Toshiko (Ed.): Intellectual Property in Civil Law and Common Law, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013: pp. 401415.
Bodewits Joke: The Reselling of Second Hand E-Books Allowed in the Netherlands, E-Commerce Law Reports, Issue 4/2014, pp. 1011.
Bonadio Enrico: Parallel Imports in a Global Market: Should a Generalised International Exhaustion be the Next Step?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/2011, pp. 153161.
Borghi Naurizio, Maggiolino Mariateresa, Montagnani Maria Lillá, and Nuccio Massimiliano: Determinants in the Online Distribution of Digital Content: An Exploratory Analysis, European Journal for Law and Technology, Issue 2/2012, pp. 129.
Bracha Oren: United States Copyright, 1672–1909. In: Alexander Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 335371.
Braun Thorsten: Schutz geistigen Eigentums contra Berufsausübungsfreiheit am Beispiel der Tonträgervermietung, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 89/1998, pp. 627630.
Bräutigam Peter: Second-Hand Software in Europe – Thoughts on the Three Questions of the German Federal Court of Justice Referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union, Computer Law Review International, Issue 1/2012, pp. 19.
Breagelmann Tom: Copyright Law in and under the Constitution: The Constitutional Scope and Limits to Copyright Law in the United States in Comparison with the Scope and Limits Imposed by Constitutional and European Law on Copyright Law in Germany, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 27/2009: pp. 99144.
Brooks Samuel: Battling Gray Markets through Copyright Law: Omega, S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 20/2010: pp. 1933.
Brustein Joshua: Spotify Hits 10 Million Paid Users. Now Can It Make Money?, Bloomberg Businessweek, May 21, 2014 (www.businessweek.com/articles/2014–05–21/why-spotify-and-the-streaming-music-industry-cant-make-money).
Business Insider: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, March 1, 2011 (www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankrupted-and-destroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3).
Bussey Alexander: The Incompatibility of Droit de Suite with Common Law Theories of Copyright, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, Issue 3/2013, pp. 10631104.
Büscher Mareile, and Müller Judith: Urheberrechtliche Fragestellungen des Audio-Video-Streamings, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 6/2009, pp. 558560.
Calaba Victor F.: Quibbles ’n Bits: Making a Digital First Sale Doctrine Feasible, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 9/2002: pp. 134.
Calboli Irene: Trademark Exhaustion in the European Union: Community-Wide or International? The Saga Continues, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 6/2002: pp. 4786.
Calboli Irene: The United States Supreme Court's Decision in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons: An “Inevitable” Step in Which Direction?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 1/2014, pp. 7591.
Cameron Alec: Copyright Exceptions for the Digital Age: New Rights of Private Copying, Parody and Quotation, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 12/2014, pp. 10021007.
Capobianco Gregory: Rethinking ReDigi: How a Characteristics-Based Test Advances the “Digital First Sale” Doctrine Debate, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 35/2013, pp. 391424.
Carrington Victoria: .ca Domain Names are Personal Property, World Intellectual Property Review, May/June 2014, p. 81.
Challis Ben: Warner Music Moves to Settle Digital Royalties Class Action, The 1709 Blog, January 9, 2014 (http://the1709blog.blogspot.hu/2014/01/warner-music-moves-to-settle-digital.html).
Chatterjee I. Neel: Imperishable Intellectual Creations: The Limits of the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 5/1995: pp. 383425.
Chiappetta Vincent: The Desirability of Agreeing to Disagree: The WTO, TRIPS, International IPR Exhaustion and a Few Other Things, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 21/2000: pp. 333392.
Chiappetta Vincent: Patent Exhaustion: What's It Good For?, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 51/2011: pp. 101161.
Chiappetta Vincent: Working toward International Harmony on Intellectual Property Exhaustion (and Substantive Law). In: Calboli Irene and Lee Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 125144.
Chiarizio Matthew: An American Tragedy: E-Books, Licences, and the End of Public Lending Libraries, Vanderbilt Law Review, Issue 2/2013, pp. 615644.
Choderker Ivy: The First Sale Doctrine Defense as a Limit on the Right of Publicity: Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 19/1998–1999, pp. 413444.
Cistaro Mario: The Interface between the EU Copyright Law and the Fundamental Economic Freedoms of Trade and Competition in the Digital Single Market: From the FAPL Case to the Decision, UsedSoft, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Issue 2/2016, pp. 133153.
Clark Charles R.: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corporation of America: Application of the Fair Use Doctrine under the United States Copyright Acts of 1909 and 1976, New England Law Review, Vol. 15/1979–1980: pp. 661681.
Coats William S., Rafter Heather D., Feeman Vickie L., and Given John G.: Blows against the Empire: Napster, Aimster, Grokster and the War against P2P File Sharing, Practising Law Institute, Vol. 765/2003: pp. 445488.
Cohen Patricia: Lobbyists Set to Fight Royalty Bill for Artists, New York Times, March 23, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/arts/design/auction-houses-taking-no-chances-on-american-royalties-too-act.html).
Cohen Jehoram Herman: Cabletelevision, Satellites and Copyright, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 23/1985, pp. 188195.
Cohen Jehoram Herman: The EC Copyright Directives, Economics and Authors’ Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 6/1994, pp. 821839.
Cohen Jehoram Herman: European Copyright Law – Ever More Horizontal, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/2001, pp. 532545.
Cohen Jehoram Herman: Harmonising Intellectual Property Law within the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1992, pp. 622629.
Cohen Jehoram Herman: Prohibition of Parallel Imports through Intellectual Property Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1999, pp. 495511.
Collins Maureen B.: Crossing Parallel Lines: The State of the First Sale Doctrine after Costco v. Omega, Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 8/2012: pp. 2649.
Congdon Julie S.: Copyright Law – Gray Marketing – The First Sale Doctrine of Copyright Law Closes Another Avenue of Redress, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 34/1989: pp. 597609.
Cook Trevor: EU Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.
Corbet Jan: The Law of the EEC and Intellectual Property, Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol. 13/1994: pp. 327369.
Correa Carlos M.: Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Oxford Commentaries on the GATT/WTO Agreements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.
Correa Carlos M., and Correa Juan I.: Parallel Imports and the Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in Latin America. In: Calboli Irene and Lee Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 198225.
Corsello Kenneth R.: The Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990: Another Bend in the First Sale Doctrine, Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 41/1991: pp. 177209.
Costanza Nicholas: Digital Music Garage Sale: An Analysis of Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. and a Proposal for Legislative Reform in Copyright Enabling a Secondary Market for Digital Music, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Winter 2015, pp. 135161.
Cozine John C.: Fade to Black? The Fate of the Gray Market after L'anza Research International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 66/1998: pp. 775800.
Crowne Emir: Anything but Tired: The Doctrine of Exhaustion in Canada, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 11/2015, pp. 801802.
Cuevas Michel Olmedo: Copyright: Dutch Copyright Succumbs to Aging as Exhaustion Extends to E-Books, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 1/2015a, pp. 810.
Cuevas Michel Olmedo: Hot News: Amsterdam Court of Appeal Gives Tom Kabinet Three Days to Shut Down, The 1709 Blog, January 20, 2015b (http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/hot-news-amsterdam-court-of-appeal.html).
Dannreuther Anna: Freedom to Contract Prevails: Anyone Can Bear the Cost of the Artist's Resale Royalty, European Law Reporter, Issue 1/2015, pp. 27.
Davis Nakimuli: Reselling Digital Music: Is There a Digital First Sale Doctrine?, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 29/2009: pp. 363373.
de Beer Jeremy, and Burri Mira: Transatlantic Copyright Comparisons: Making Available via Hyperlinks in the European Union and Canada, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 2/2014, pp. 95105.
Degner Andrew: Wise-ing Up about the First Sale Doctrine: A Look at the Ninth Circuit's Approach to Vernor v. Autodesk, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 35/2012: pp. 581606.
de la Durantaye Katharina, and Kuschel Linda: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz – Josef Kohler, UsedSoft, and Beyond, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 195217.
de la Merced Michael J.: Pandora, Faded Star of Online Music, Gets Cash Infusion from Sirius XM, The New York Times, June 9, 2017 (www.nytimes.com/2017/06/09/business/dealbook/pandora.html).
Derclaye Estelle: The Legal Protection of Databases – A Comparative Analysis, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008.
Desurmont Thierry: The Author's Right to Control the Destination of Copies Reproducing His Work, Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur, Issue 4/1984, pp. 269.
Determann Lothar, and Fellmeth Aaron Xavier: Don't Judge a Sale by Its License: Software Transfers under the First Sale Doctrine in the United States and the European Community, University of San Francisco Law Review, Fall 2001, pp. 1107.
Determann Lothar, and Nimmer David: Software Copyright's Oracle from the Cloud, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Spring 2015, pp. 161211.
Deutsch Askan, and Zimmerman Robert: Customs Seizure Proceedings in the European Union and the United States, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 4/2014, pp. 276286.
Dietz Adolf: The Possible Harmonization of Copyright Law within the European Community, ICC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 10/1979, pp. 395411.
Dietz Adolf: The Harmonization of Copyright in the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 4/1985, pp. 379411.
Dobson Monica L.: Comment: ReDigi and the Resale of Digital Media: The Courts Reject a Digital First Sale Doctrine and Sustain the Imbalance between Copyright Owners and Consumers, Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 7/2015: pp. 179211.
Doi Teruo: Japan: Copyright – Whether Computer Games Are Cinematographic Works – Exhaustion of Distribution Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 9/2002, pp. N147148.
Donatello Gary: Killing the Secondary Market: How the Ninth Circuit Interpreted Vernor and Aftermath to Destroy the First Sale Doctrine, Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, Vol. 22/2012: pp. 5992.
Donnelly Darren E.: Parallel Trade and International Harmonization of the Exhaustion of Rights Doctrine, Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, Issue 2/1997, pp. 445515.
Donohue James P.: The Use of Copyright Laws to Prevent the Importation of “Genuine Goods,” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Spring 1986, pp. 183204.
Dredge Stuart: Spotify Financial Results Show Struggle to Make Streaming Music Profitable, The Guardian, May 11, 2015 (www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/11/spotify-financial-results-streaming-music-profitable).
Dreier Thomas: Online and Its Effect on the “Goods” versus “Services” Distinction, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 2/2013, pp. 137139.
Dreier Thomas, and Leistner Matthias: Urheberrecht im Internet: die Forschungsherausforderungen, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 9/2013, pp. 887888.
Dreier Thomas, and Schulze Gernot: Urheberrechtsgesetz, Vol. 4. Auflage/C. H. Beck, München, 2013.
DuBoff Leonard D., King Christy A., and Murray Michael D.: Art Law in a Nutshell, 5th ed., West Academic, St. Paul, 2017.
Dubuisson Thomas: IP Protection for Graphical User Interfaces in the EU, US and China, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 10/2015, pp. 767774.
Dyekjaer Karen: Internet Sales into the EU of Fake “Replicas,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 7/2014, pp. 550551.
Eichelberger Jan: Das urheberrechtliche Verbreitungsrecht (§ 17 Abs. 1 UrhG) nach den Entscheidungen EuGH Peek & Cloppenburg/Cassina und BGH – Le Corbusier-Möbel II, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2011, pp. 403434.
Eichelberger Jan: (Wieder-) Ausdehnung des urheberrechtlichen Verbreitungsrechts durch den EuGH?, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 12/2012, pp. 954959.
Eisnach Michael: Omega v. Costco: An Unprecedented Decision without Precedent, ABA Section of International Law, International Intellectual Property Newsletter, Spring 2011: p. 4.
Elio Anthony: The Rise and Fall of Pokémon Go, Innovation & Technology Today, December 5, 2016 (https://innotechtoday.com/rise-fall-pokemon-go/).
Espantaleon Jaime: Exhaustion Light in European Television, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2010, pp. 2942.
Etherington Darrell: Apple Patents a System for the Resale and Transfer of “Used” Digital Goods, Techcrunch, March 7, 2013 (http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/07/apple-patents-a-system-for-the-resale-and-transfer-of-used-digital-goods/).
Evans Whitney: 4 Hollywood Studios Sue Utah Movie Editing Service VidAngel, Desert News, June 10, 2016 (www.deseretnews.com/article/865656008/Major-Hollywood-studios-sue-movie-editing-service-VidAngel.html).
Evans Mark, and Prévost Geneviève: Copyright Licensing Not the Answer to Grey Imports, Managing Intellectual Property, September 2007, pp. 5859.
Fagundes David: Property Rhetoric and the Public Domain, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94/2010: pp. 652705.
Feiler Lukas: Birth of the First-Download Doctrine: The Application of the First-Sale Doctrine to Internet Downloads under EU and U.S. Copyright Law, Journal of Internet Law, October 2012, pp. 1617.
Fennelly Nial: Rules and Exceptions: Freedom of Movement and Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Hansen Hugh C. (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 5, Juris, Huntington, 2003: pp. 33-1–33-19.
Ficsor Dr. Mihály: Current Issues of Exhaustion of Rights (Kirtsaeng & Quality King, ReDigi v. UsedSoft), Copyright See-Saw, January 28, 2014a (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=55).
Ficsor Dr. Mihály: Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and Glossary of Copyright and Related Rights Terms, Publication 891(E), World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, 2003.
Ficsor Dr. Mihály: The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO Treaties, Their Interpretation and Implementation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
Ficsor Dr. Mihály: The Spring 1997 Horace S. Manges Lecture – Copyright for the Digital Era: The WIPO “Internet” Treaties, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Spring–Summer 1997, pp. 197223.
Ficsor Dr. Mihály: Svensson: Honest Attempt at Establishing Due Balance Concerning the Use of Hyperlinks – Spoiled by the Erroneous “New Public” Theory, Copyright See-Saw Blog, May 4, 2014b (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=63).
Fiegerman Seth: Netflix Nears 100 Million Subscribers, CNN Tech, April 17, 2017 (http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/17/technology/netflix-subscribers/).
Figliomeni Marco: The Song Remains the Same: Preserving the First Sale Doctrine for a Secondary Market of Digital Music, Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, November 2014, pp. 219244.
Frankel Susy: Tangible Meets the Intangible: International Trade in Intellectual Property. In: Lai Jessica C. and Dominicé Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 204224.
Frankel Susy, and Gervais Daniel: International Intellectual Property Rules and Parallel Imports. In: Calboli Irene and Lee Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 85105.
Friedman Milton: Price Theory, 4th printing, Transaction, New Brunswick, 2008.
Gadd Ian: The Stationers’ Company in England before 1710. In: Alexander Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 8195.
Gardner Eriq: “Weird Al” Yankovic Settles $5 Million Lawsuit against Sony Music, The Hollywood Reporter, December 18, 2013 (www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/weird-al-yankovic-settles-5–666550).
Gaster Jens: “Obtinere” of Data in the Eyes of the ECJ – How to Interpret the Database Directive after British Horseracing Board Ltd et al. v. William Hill Organisation Ltd, Computer und Recht: International, Issue 3/2005, pp. 129135.
Gaubiac Yves: The Exhaustion of Rights in the Analogue and Digital Environment, Copyright Bulletin, Issue 4/2002, pp. 215.
Gautam S. Zubin: The Murky Waters of First Sale: Price Discrimination and Downstream Control in the Wake of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 29/2014: pp. 717758.
Geiger Christophe: Der urheberrechtliche Interessenausgleich in der Informationsgesellschaft – Zur Rechtsnatur der Beschränkungen des Urheberrechts, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht International, Issue 10/2004, pp. 815821.
Geist Rachel Ann: A “Licence to Read”: The Effect of E-books on Publishers, Libraries and the First Sale Doctrine, IDEA, Vol. 52/2012: pp. 63100.
Gervais Daniel J.: Copyright, Culture and the Cloud. In: Pager Sean A. and Candeub Adam (Eds.): Transnational Culture in the Internet Age, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2012: pp. 3154.
Ghosh Shubha: The Implementation of Exhaustion Policies – Lessons from National Experiences, Issue Paper 40, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, 2013.
Ginsburg Jane C.: Four Reasons and a Paradox: The Manifest Superiority of Copyright over Sui Generic Protection of Computer Software, Columbia Law Review, December 1994: pp. 25592572.
Ginsburg Jane C.: Hyperlinking and “Making Available,” European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/2014, pp. 147148.
Ginsburg Jane C., and Treppoz Edouard: International CopyrightLaw – U.S. and E.U. Perspectives, Text and Cases, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.
Gladwell David: The Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 12/1986, pp. 366370.
Göbel Alexander: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Downloaded Software – The UsedSoft v. Oracle Case [UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corporation, ECJ (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 3 July 2012, C-128/11], European Law Reporter, Issue 9/2012, pp. 226234.
Goetzel Dwayne K.: Recent Developments in Copyright Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Spring 1999, pp. 445461.
Goldberg Melissa: A Textbook Dilemma: Should the First Sale Doctrine Provide a Valid Defense for Foreign-Made Goods?, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 80/2012: pp. 30573092.
Goldmann Michael, and Möller Ralf: Anbieten und Verbreiten von Werken der angewandten Kunst nach der “Le-Corbusier-Möbel”-Entscheidung des EuGH, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 6/2009, pp. 551558.
Goldstein Paul, and Hugenholtz P. Bernt: International Copyright – Principles, Law and Practice, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.
Gomber Amit Jyoti S.: First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era. In: Sinha Manoj Kumar and Mahalwar Vandana (Eds.): Copyright Law in the Digital World, Springer, Singapore, 2017: pp. 251277.
Gonzalez Alexis: Why the Supreme Court Said Yes to the First Sale Doctrine in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'anza Research International, Inc., University of Miami Business Law Review, Vol. 8/1999: pp. 2946.
Gotzen Frank: Distribution and Exhaustion in the EC, EuropeanIntellectual Property Review, Issue 8/1990, pp. 299303.
Graber Christoph B.: Tethered Technologies, Cloud Strategies and the Future of the First Sale/Exhaustion Defence in Copyright Law, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Issue 4/2015, pp. 389408.
Granmar Claes: Intellectual Property Rights and the Single Market, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 4/2011, pp. 321351.
Gratz Joseph: Digital Book Distribution – The End of the First-Sale Doctrine?, Landslide, May/June 2011, pp. 811.
Griffiths Jonathan: Exhaustion and the Alteration of Copyright Works in EU Copyright Law – (C-419/13) Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, ERA Forum, Vol. 17/2016: pp. 7384.
Grigoriadis Lazaros G.: The Distribution of Software in the European Union after the Decision of the CJEU “UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp.” (“UsedSoft”), Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, Issue 3/2013, pp. 198205.
Grisse Karina, and Koroch Stefan: The British Private Copying Exception and Its Compatibility with the Information Society Directive, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 7/2015, pp. 562569.
Grützmacher Malte: Endlich angekommen im digitalen Zeitalter!? Die Erschöpfungslehre im europäischen Urheberrecht: der gemeinsame Binnenmarkt und der Handel mit gebrauchter Software, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 1/2013, pp. 4683.
Grützmacher Malte: “Gebrauchtssoftware” und Erschöpfungsgrundlehre: zu den Rahmenbedingungen eines Second-Hand-Marktes für Software, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 4/2006, pp. 302306.
Guibault Lucie, and van ’t Klooster Kevin: Netherlands. In: Hilty Reto M. and Nérisson Sylvie (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012: pp. 677718.
Günther Petteri: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Digital Music in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. and Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi, Inc. Cases, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 3/2014, pp. 205229.
Haberstumpf Helmut: Der Handel mit gebrauchter Software im harmonisierten Urheberrecht – Warum der Ansatz des EuGH einen falschen Weg zeigt, Computer und Recht, Issue 9/2012, pp. 561572.
Haberstumpf Helmut: Josef Kohler und die Erschöpfungslehre, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2014, pp. 470496.
Halpern Marcelo, Kapgan Yury, and Yu Kathy: Vernor v. Autodesk: Software and the First Sale Doctrine under Copyright Law, Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, Vol. 23/2011: pp. 710.
Hamborg Benjamin: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng: the Uncertain Future of the First-Sale Doctrine, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, Vol. 13/2012: pp. 899924.
Hansen William R., and Morales Suzanne M. M.: John Wiles & Sons Case: Limits on the First Sale Doctrine on U.S. Copyright Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 8/2012, pp. 558563.
Harmon Steph, and Clark Lucy: Magda Szubanski May Leave Australia If Changes to Book Industry Go Ahead, The Guardian, May 20, 2016 (www.theguardian.com/books/2016/may/20/authors-condemn-book-copyright-and-import-proposal-as-massive-own-goal).
Harris Keith: For Promotional Use Only: Is the Resale of a Promotional CD Protected by the First Sale Doctrine?, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 30/2009: pp. 17451772.
Hartmann Thomas: Weiterverkauf und “Verleih” online vertriebener Inhalte – Zugleich Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 3. Juli 2012, Rs. C-128/11 – UsedSoft./. Oracle, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 11/2012, pp. 980989.
Hauck Ronny: Digitale Inhalte – Verkehrsfähigkeit oder Lizenzketten?, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 1/2017, pp. 4771.
Hauck Ronny, Hofmann Franz, and Zech Herbert: Verkehrsfähigkeit digitaler Güter, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 141148.
Heath Christopher: Parallel Imports and International Trade, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1997, pp. 623632.
Helberger Natali, Huygen Annelies, and van Eijk Nico: Ups and Downs – Economic and Cultural Effects of File Sharing on Music, Film and Games, Culture and Science, Economic Affairs and Justice, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper 2012-33, Institute for Information Law Research Paper 2012-27, February 2009.
Helft Miguel: Netflix to Deliver Movies to the PC, New York Times, January 16, 2007 (www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/technology/16netflix.html).
Hess Evan: Code-ifying Copyright: An Architectural Solution to Digitally Expanding the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review, March 2013: pp. 19652011.
Heun-Rehn Stefan Lars-Thoren, and Wagner Eva: Das Folgerecht nach dem Tod des Künstlers – Erste Vorabentscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, European Law Reporter, Issue 7/2010, pp. 212218.
Hieger Barbara: Verletzung von Marken- und Urheberrechten durch Versand rechtsverletzender Ware aus Drittstaat in die EU, Ecolex, Vol. 25/2014: p. 548.
Hill Brad: Pandora Earnings: Revenue Growth, Gross Profit, Net Loss, and Savaged Stock, Radio and Internet News, October 23, 2015 (http://rainnews.com/pandora-earnings-revenue-growth-gross-profit-net-loss-and-savaged-stock/).
Hilty Reto M.: “Exhaustion” in the digital age. In: Calboli Irene and Lee Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 6482.
Hilty Reto M., and Sylvie Nérisson (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012.
Hoeren Thomas: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz bei Software – Körperliche Übertragung und Folgeprobleme, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 8/2010a, pp. 665673.
Hoeren Thomas: Die Online-Erschöpfung im Softwarebereich – Fallgruppen und Beweislast, Multimedia und Recht, Issue 7/2010b, pp. 447450.
Hoeren Thomas, and Försterling Matthias: Onlinevertrieb “gebrauchter“ Software – Hintergründe und Konsequenzen der EuGH-Entscheidung “UsedSoft,” Multimedia und Recht, Issue 10/2012, pp. 642647.
Hoffelder Nate: Publishers Lose First Round of Lawsuit against Used eBook Marketplace, The Digital Reader, July 21, 2014a (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/07/21/publishers-lose-first-round-lawsuit-used-ebook-marketplace/).
Hoffelder Nate: Used eBook Website Launches in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 19, 2014b (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/19/used-ebook-website-launches-europe/).
Hoffelder Nate: Used eBook Website Faces Lawsuit in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 27, 2014c (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/27/used-ebook-website-faces-lawsuit-europe/).
Hofmann Franz: Grundsatz der Technikneutralität im Urheberrecht? Zugleich Gedanken zu einem more technological approach, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2016: pp. 482512.
Hojnik Janja: Technology Neutral EU Law: Digital Goods within the Traditional Goods/Services Distinction, International Journal of Law and IT, Vol. 25/2017: pp. 6384.
Horowitz David H.: The Record Rental Amendment of 1984: A Case Study in the Effort to Adapt Copyright Law to New Technology, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & Arts, March 1988: pp. 3172.
Hovenkamp Herbert: Post-Sale Restraings and Competitive Harm: The First Sale Doctrine in Perspective, New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 66/2011: pp. 487547.
Hugenholtz Bernt: Harmonization or Unification of EU Copyright Law. In: Axhamn Johan (Ed.): Copyright in a Borderless Online Environment, The Institute for Legal Research, 2012: pp. 189204.
P. Bernt Hugenholtz, Antoon Quaedvlieg, and Dirk Visser (Eds.): A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912–2012, deLex, Amsterdam, 2012.
Hunnings N. March (Ed.): Industrial Property Cases from Common Market Law Reports, Common Law Reports Ltd., London, 1973.
Hyland Mark: The Football Association Premier League Ruling – the Bosman of Exclusive Broadcasting Rights?, Communications Law, Issue 1/2012, pp. 713.
IFPI: Global Music ReportAnnual State of the Industry, 2017 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2017.pdf).
IFPI: Global Music ReportMusic Consumption Exploding Worldwide, State of the Industry Overview, 2016 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2016.pdf).
Ikeler Kim: Sony v. Universal City Studios: Can the Marketplace Relationship between Creator and Consumer Be Preserved?, Denver University Law Review, Vol. 62/1985: pp. 873897.
Ingham Tim: iTunes: Music, Movie, TV and e-Book Sales Drop 7%, Music Business Worldwide, January 30, 2015 (www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/itunes-music-movie-tv-e-book-sales-drop-7/).
International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law: Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, Issue 4/1982, pp. 415430.
Jankowski Donald Frank: The End of Ownership?, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 14/2013: pp. 103121.
Joliet René: Patented Articles and the Free Movement of Goods within the EEC, Current Legal Problems, Issue 1/1975, pp. 1538.
Jolly Ieuan, and Westmoreland Jill: Case Comment: Can You Sell “Used” Music Purchased on iTunes – the ReDigi Decision, Entertainment Law Review, Issue 5/2013, pp. 180182.
Joyce Craig P., and Patterson L. Ray: Copyright in 1791: An Essay Concerning the Founders’ View of the Copyright Power Granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 52/2003: pp. 909952.
Kaczanowska Agata: IBISWorld Industry Report 53223: DVD, Game & Video Rental in the US, May 2011 (www.ibisworld.com/industry/default.aspx?indid=1370).
Kaltner Jonathan: Zum EuGH-Urteil “Phil Collins,” Ecolex, Vol. 5/1994: pp. 3334.
Karjala Dennis S.: “Copying” and “Piracy” in the Digital Age, Washburn Law Journal, Spring 2013, pp. 245266.
Karmel Dan: Off the Wall: Abandonment and the First Sale Doctrine, Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, Spring 2012, pp. 353378.
Karnell Gunnar W. G.: Exhaustion of Copyright – Swedish Law in a European Setting, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 6/1999, pp. 654660.
Kass Sean M.: Misinterpreting the Record Rental Amendment: Brilliance Audio v. Haights Cross Communications, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 21/2007: pp. 297319.
Katz Ariel, Perzanowski Aaron, and Rub Guy A.: The Interaction of Exhaustion and the General Law: A Reply to Duffy and Hynes, Virginia Law Review Online, Vol. 102/2016, pp. 824.
Katzenberger Paul: The Droit de Suite in Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 34/1973, pp. 361375.
Kaufman Anthony: The Vanishing: The Demise of VHS, and the Movies Disappearing Along with It, Museum Moving Image, February 26, 2009 (www.movingimagesource.us/articles/the-vanishing-20090226).
Kawabata B. Makoa: Unresolved Textual Tension: Capitol Records v. ReDigi and a Digital First Sale Doctrine, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Winter 2014, pp. 3378.
Keeling David T.: Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law, Vol. 1, Free Movement and Competition Law, Oxford EC Law Library, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.
Kerber Wolfgang: Exhaustion of Digital Goods: An Economic Perspective, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016: pp. 149169.
Khoury May: Exhausted Yet? The First-Sale Doctrine and the Second-Hand Market for Software Licenses in the European Union, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Issue 3/2014, pp. 4557.
Knopf Howard P.: Parallel Imports & the Internet: Bits, Borders, Barriers & Exhaustion. In: Hansen Hugh C. (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001: pp. 113-1–113-66.
Koehler Philipp: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz des Urheberrechts im Online-Bereich, C. H. Beck, München, 2000.
Kohler Joseph: Das Authorrecht – Eine zivilistische Abhandlung, Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1880.
Koktvedgaard Mogens: The Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in the Law of Intellectual Property, Especially Copyright Law, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 3/1982, pp. 355362.
Kon Stephen, and Heide Thomas: BHB/William Hill: Europe's Feist. Court of Appeal Confirmation Establishes Bright Lines, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2006, pp. 6066.
Kremen Hillary A.: Caveat Venditor: International Application of the First Sale Doctrine, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Vol. 23/1997: pp. 161185.
Kretsinger Marilyn J.: Droit de Suite: The Artist's Right to a Resale Royalty, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Summer 1993: pp. 967978.
Kur Annette: Händlerwerbung für Markenartikel aus urheberrechtlicher Sicht – Präsentationsrecht als neue Schutzschranke?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 1/1999, pp. 2430.
Laddie Hugh, Prescott Peter, Vitoria Mary, Speck Adrian, and Lane Lindsay: The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs, Vol. 2, Butterworths, London, 2000.
LaFrance Mary: Global Issues in Copyright Law, West Academic, St. Paul, 2009.
LaFrance Mary: Using Trademark Law to Override Copyright's First Sale Rule for Imported Copies in the United States. In: Calboli Irene and Lee Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 390407.
Lauterbach Thorsten: Copyright Law Trumps Free Movement of Unlawfully Distributed Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 1/2013, pp. 1315.
Leahy Brandon: Supreme Indecision: Copyright's First Sale Doctrine in the Gray Aftermath of Costco v. Omega, Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, Fall 2011: pp. 4567.
Lee Yin Harn: UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. (Case C-128/11) – Sales of “Used” Software and the Principle of Exhaustion, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 7/2012, pp. 846853.
Lehmann Michael: Digitisation and Copyright Agreements. In: Stamatoudi Irini A. and Torremans Paul L. C. (Eds.): Copyright in the New Digital Environment: The Need to Redesign Copyright, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2000: pp. 193204.
Leiss Ludwig: Verlagsgesetz – Kommentar mit Vertragmustern, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1973.
Leistner Matthias: Gebrauchtsoftware auf dem Weg nach Luxemburg – Der Vorlagebeschluss des BGH in Sachen Oracle v. UsedSoft, Computer und Recht, Issue 4/2011a, pp. 209215.
Leistner Matthias: “Used” Software before Europe's Top Court – the German Federal Supreme Court Refers the Oracle v. UsedSoft Case to the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/2011b, pp. 503506.
Lejeune Mathias: Remarks to USA: No Second Hand Digital Music (Yet), Computer Law Review International, Issue 3/2013, pp. 8890.
Leong Terence: When the Software We Buy Is Not Actually Ours: An Analysis of Vernor v. Autodesk on the First Sale Doctrine and Essential Step Defense, Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, January 2012, pp. 146.
Lindey Alexander, and Landau Michael: Lindey on Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts, 3rd ed., Thomson Reuters, 2016.
Linklater Emma: UsedSoft and the Big Bang Theory: Is the e-Exhaustion Meteor about to Strike?, JIPITEC, Issue 1/2014, pp. 1222.
Lipton Jacqueline: Rethinking Cyberlaw – A New Vision for Internet Law, Eward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.
Litman Jessica: Digital Copyright, Prometheus Books, Amherst, 2006.
Liu Joseph P.: Owning Digital Copies: Copyright Law and the Incidents of Copy Ownership, William and Mary Law Review, April 2001: pp. 12451366.
Loewenheim Ulrich (Ed.): Handbuch des Urheberrechts, Vol. 2. Auflage/C. H. Beck, München, 2010.
Long Doris Estelle: Deviant Globalization: The Next Step in the Multilateral Protection of Intellectual Property. In: Weckström Katja (Ed.): Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, Private Law Series A:132, University of Turku Faculty of Law, Turku, 2013: pp. 4984.
Long Doris Estelle: Globalization: A Future Trend or a Satisfying Mirage, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 49/2001: pp. 313343.
Long Henry Sprott: Reconsidering the “Balance” of the “Digital First Sale” Debate: Re-examining the Case for a Statutory Digital First Sale Doctrine to Facilitate Second-Hand Digital Media Markets, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 59/2008: pp. 11831201.
Longdin Louise: Making the Most of Article 6: Parallel Importing in Australia and New Zealand. In: Hansen Hugh C. (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001: pp. 112-1–112-38.
Longdin Louise, and Lim Pheh Hoon: Inexhaustible Distribution Rights for Copyright Owners and the Foreclosure of Secondary Markets for Used Software, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Issue 5/2013, pp. 541567.
Longdin Louise, and Lim Pheh Hoon: Sale versus Licence Offline and Online: Can Competition Law Bridge the Doctrinal Gap? Sale versus Licence Offline and Online, International Journal of Law and IT, Issue 4/2014, pp. 311333.
Loughlan Patricia: “You Wouldn't Steal a Car”: Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 29/2007: pp. 401405.
Lucas André: Copyright in the European Community: The Green Paper and the Proposal for a Directive Concerning Legal Protection of Computer Programs, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 29/1991: pp. 145167.
Maclean Fiona: European Union (CJEU) has delivered its long-awaited decision in UsedSoft v. Oracle International Corp., Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Issue 1/2013, pp. 12.
Maggioni Ilaria: Kirtsaeng v. Wiley Incentivizes Digital Distribution, les Nouvelles, December 2013, pp. 260262.
Maher Imelda: Trade Marks & International Exhaustion, The Bar Review, Vol. 5/2000: pp. 243246.
Malovic Nedim: Copyright: Distribution Right Encompasses Advertisement for Sale of Copyright Works, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 12/2015, pp. 895896.
Matthews Brander: The Evolution of Copyright, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 5/1890: pp. 583602.
McDaniel Jeff A.: Recent Copyright Case Law Development, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 5/1997: pp. 293317.
McIntyre Hugh: Spotify Officially Hits 50 Million Paid Subscribers, Forbes, March 3, 2017 (www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/03/03/spotify-officially-hits-50-million-paying-subscribers/).
McKenzie Elizabeth: A Book by Any Other Name: E-Books and the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 12/2013: pp. 5773.
Menell Peter S.: In Search of Copyright's Lost Ark: Interpreting the Right to Distribute in the Internet Age, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, Vol. 59/2012: pp. 201267.
Merryman John Henry: The Wrath of Robert Rauschenberg, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Winter 1993, pp. 103127.
Meurer Michael J.: Coypright Law and Price Discrimination, Cardozo Law Review, November 2001: pp. 55148.
Mezei Péter: The Painter, the One Horn Cow and Ole Hank Wilson's Back Lot – The Future of Library Digitization in the European Union and Hungary, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 5/2015, pp. 535562.
Miller Esti: NAFTA: Protector of National Intellectual Property Rights or Blueprint for Globalization? The Effect of NAFTA on the First Sale Doctrine in Copyright Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 16/1995: pp. 475511.
Mohn Ludwig: Juristische Hilfsbücher für Studium und Praxis, Springer, Berlin, 1919.
Mok M. Robert: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights: EC-wide or Worldwide? In: Schulze Reiner (Ed.): Auslegung europäischen Privatrechts und angeglichenen Rechts, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 1999: pp. 8995.
Morris P. Sean: Beyond Trade: Global Digital Exhaustion in International Economic Regulation, Campbell Law Review, Fall 2013, pp. 118124.
Mosley C. Todd: Mourning the Loss of Copyright's Unsung Hero: Destruction of the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 14/2015: pp. 235262.
Mount Dan: A Review of Public Library E-Lending Models, Civic Agenda European Unit, December 2014 (www.bibliotheksportal.de/fileadmin/user_upload/content/bibliotheken/international/Study_Public_Library_E-Lending_Models_2014.pdf).
Moyse Pierre-Emmanuel: From Importation to Digital Exhaustion: A Canadian Copyright Perspective. In: Calboli Irene and Lee Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 478497.
Mtima Lateef: So Dark the CON(TU) of Man: The Quet for a Software Derivative Work Right in Section 117, University of Pittsburg Law Review, Vol. 70/2008, pp. 1100.
Mueller-Langer Frank: Copyright and parallel trade. In: Watt Richard (Ed.): Handbook on the Economics of Copyright – A Guide for Students and Teachers, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014: pp. 287310.
Mulligan Deirdre K., and Schultz Jason M.: Neglecting the National Memory: How Copyright Term Extensions Compromise the Development of Digital Archives, Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 4/2002: pp. 451473.
Muñoz Rodolphe, Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited. Judgment of 19 March 1998, [1998]ECR I-1251, Common Market Law Review, Issue 4/1999, pp. 831839.
Mutimear Jane: Merck v Primecrown: The Challenge to Merck v Stephar, European Competition Law Review, Issue 2/1996, pp. 185188.
Mylly Tuomas: A Silhouette of Fortress Europe? International Exhaustion of Trade Mark Rights in the EU, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 7/2000: pp. 133.
Mylly Ulla-Maija: Harmonizing Copyright Rules for Computer Program Interface Protection, University of Louisville Law Review, Vol. 48/2010: pp. 877908.
Navarro Arthur I.: Selected Recent Developments in Copyright, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 3/1995: pp. 107114.
Naylor David, and Parris Emily: After ReDigi: Contrasting the EU and US Approaches to the Re-sale of Second-Hand Digital Assets, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 8/2013, pp. 487490.
Nimmer Melville B., and Nimmer David: Nimmer on Copyright, Matthew Bender, 2013.
Norman Helen: Parallel Imports from Non-EEA Member States: The Vision Remains Unclear, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 4/2000, pp. 159170.
Norman Helen: Perfume, Whisky and Leaping Cats of Prey: A UK Perspective on Three Recent Trade Mark Cases before the European Court of Justice, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 8/1998, pp. 306312.
Nowak Peter: Netflix Launches Canadian Movie Service, CBCNews, September 22, 2010 (www.cbc.ca/news/technology/netflix-launches-canadian-movie-service-1.872505).
O'Connor Sean M.: The Overlooked French Influence on the Intellectual Property Clause, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 82/2015: pp. 733830.
Oliar Dotan: Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress as a Limitation on Congress's Intellectual Property Power, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94/2006: pp. 17711845.
O'Neill Megan: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, Social Times, March 1, 2011, www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankrupted-and-destroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3.
Opri Debra A.: Video Rentals and the First Sale Doctrine: The Deficiency of Proposed Legislation, Whittier Law Review, Vol. 8/1986: pp. 331352.
Overdijk Tjerd, van der Putt Polo, de Vries Eva, and Schafft Thomas: Exhaustion and Software Resale Rights – A Comparison between the European Exhaustion Doctrine and the U.S. First Sale Doctrine in the Light of Recent Case Law, Computer Law Review International, Issue 2/2011, pp. 3339.
Owen Laura: Like Amazon, Apple Wants to Create a Marketplace for Used Digital Goods, Gigaom, March 8, 2013 (https://gigaom.com/2013/03/08/like-amazon-apple-wants-to-create-a-marketplace-for-used-digital-goods/).
Pagenberg Jochen: The Exhaustion Principle and “Silhouette” Case, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Issue 1/1999, pp. 1928.
Pahlow Louis: Lizenzen als handelbare Güter? Nutzungrecht und Nutzunggegenstand im Softwareverkehr, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 218238.
Pallante Maria A.: The Next Great Copyright Act, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 36/2013: pp. 315344.
Parker James: Comparing Strategies of the 2d Punic War: Rome's Strategic Victory over the Tactical/Operational Genius, Hannibal Barca, USAWC Strategy Research Project, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, 2001 (www.iwar.org.uk/military/resources/hannibal/Parker_J_P_01.pdf).
Patry William: Copyright Law and Practice, Vol. 2, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC, 1994.
Patry William: In Praise of the Betamax Decision: An Examination of Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of America, South Texas Law Journal, Vol. 22/1982: pp. 211248.
Patry William: Patry on Copyright, Thomson Reuters, 2016.
Patterson L. Ray, Birch Stanley F., and Joyce Craig: A Unified Theory of Copyright – Chapter 2: The Copyright Clause and Copyright History, Houston Law Review, Vol. 46/2009: pp. 215397.
Perlmutter Shira: Resale Royalties for Artists: An Alanysis of the Register of Copyrights’ Report, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 40/1983: pp. 284314.
Perzanowski Aaron, and Hoofnagle Chris Jay: What We Buy When We Buy Now, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, January 2017, pp. 315378.
Perzanowski Aaron, and Schultz Jason: Digital Exhaustion, UCLA Law Review, April 2011, pp. 889946.
Perzanowski Aaron, and Schultz Jason: The End of Ownership – Personal Property in the Digital Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016.
Perzanowski Aaron, and Schultz Jason: Legislating Digital Exhaustion, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Symposium 2014, pp. 15351557.
Petty M. Elizabeth: Rauschenberg, Royalties, and Artists’ Rights: Potential Droit de Suite Legislation in the United States, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Issue 3/2014, pp. 9771009.
Pickton Miggie: Ebook Price Increases from Three Publishers, Research Support Hub, July 5, 2013 (https://researchsupporthub.northampton.ac.uk/2013/07/05/ebook-price-increases-from-three-publishers/).
Pitell Lisa R.: Non-transferability of Software Licences in the European Union, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 9/2004, pp. 390401.
Puig Antoni Rubí: Copyright Exhaustion Rationales and Used Software – A Law and Economics Approach to Oracle v. UsedSoft, JIPITEC, Issue 3/2013, pp. 159178.
Rahmatian Andreas: A Comparison of German Moveable Property Law and English Personal Property Law, Journal of Comparative Law, Issue 1/2010, pp. 197248.
Ramalho Ana: Copyright Law-Making in the EU: What Lies under the “International Market” Mask?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 3/2014, pp. 208224.
Rauer Nils, and Ettig Diana: Can e-Books and Other Digital Works Be Resold?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 9/2015, pp. 713716.
Reddy Michael B.: The Droit de Suite: Why American Fine Artists Should Have the Right to a Resale Royalty, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 15/1995: pp. 509546.
Reese R. Anthony: The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks, Boston College Law Review, March 2003: pp. 577652.
Rehbinder Manfred: Urheberrecht, 15., neubearbeitete Auflage, C. H. Beck, München, 2008.
Reimer Dietrich: Copyright Law and the Free Movement of Goods, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 4/1981, pp. 493511.
Reimer Dietrich: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz im Urheberrecht und gewerblichen Rechtsschutz unter Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 6/1972: pp. 221234.
Reimer Dietrich: Principle of Exhaustion of Rights, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 3/1982, pp. 362367.
Reinbothe Jörg: The EC Directive on Rental and Lending Rights and Rights Related to Copyright. In: Cohen Jehoram Herman, Keuchenius Petra, and Seignette Jacqueline (Eds.): Audiovisual Media and Copyright in Europe, Kluwer, Deventer, 1999: pp. 4151.
Reinbothe Jörg, and von Lewinski Silke: The WIPO Treaties 1996 – The WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, Commentary and Legal Analysis, Butterworths Lexis Nexis, London, 2002.
Reiner Richard F.: Home Videorecording: Fair Use or Infringement?, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 52/1978–1979: pp. 573634.
Reis Sarah: Toward a “Digital Transfer Doctrine”? The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 109/2015: pp. 173208.
Reischl Gerhard: Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 13/1982, pp. 415430.
Richelieu William: Gray Days Ahead? The Impact of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'anza Research International, Inc., Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 27/2000: pp. 827859.
Ricketson Sam: Proposed International Treaty on Droit de Suite/Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists, Revue Internationale de Droit d'Auteur, Issue 3/2015, pp. 3263.
Ricketson Sam: WIPO Study in Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment, Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Ninth Session, Geneva, June 23–27, 2003 (www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_9/sccr_9_7.pdf).
Ricketson Sam, and Ginsburg Jane C.: International Copyrights and Neighboring Rights – Berne Convention and Beyond, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.
Riehl Damien, and Kassim Jumi: Is “Buying” Digital Content Just “Renting” for Life? Contemplating a Digital First-Sale Doctrine, William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 40/2014: pp. 783812.
Rigamonti Cyrill P.: Der Handel mit Gebrauchtsoftware nach schweizerischem Urheberrecht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 43/2009: pp. 1427.
Roa John C.: Gray Market Goods and the First Sale Doctrine: The Last Nail in the Coffin?, Mississippi College Law Review, Vol. 20/1999: pp. 211234.
Rognstad Ole-Andreas: Legally Flawed but Politically Sound? Digital Exhaustion of Copyright in Europe after UsedSoft, Oslo Law Review, Issue 1/2014, pp. 119.
Rosati Eleonora: Online Copyright Exhaustion in a Post-Allposters World, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 9/2015, pp. 673681.
Rosén Jan: Free Trade, Competition and Copyright: Viewpoints from the Nordic EFTA Countries, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 2/1987, pp. 120131.
Rothnie Warwick A.: Parallel Imports, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1993.
Rothstein Robert H., Evitt Emily F., and Williams Matthew: The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, March 2010, pp. 2327.
Röttinger Moritz: Copyright and the Rules on the Free Movement of Goods, Revue Internationale de Droit d'Auteur, Issue 3/1993, pp. 50127.
Rub Guy A.: The Economics of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: The Efficiency of a Balanced Approach to the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review Res Gestae, Vol. 81/2013: pp. 4154.
Rub Guy A.: Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 64/2015: pp. 741817.
Rub Guy A.: The Unconvincing Case for Resale Royalties, The Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 124/2014: pp. 110.
Ruffler Friedrich: Is Trading in Used Software an Infringement of Copyright? The Perspective of European Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 6/2011, pp. 375383.
Runge Philipp: Prinzip der gemeinschaftsweiten Erschöpfung im Urheberrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Issue 21/2006, pp. 666667.
Rutz Christian: Germany: Copyright – Exhaustion of Rights and Re-sale of Pre-installed Software, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 6/2009, pp. N4850.
Samuelson Pamela: Why Copyright Law Excludes Systems and Processes from the Scope of Its Protection, Texas Law Review, Vol. 85/2006: pp. 19211977.
Samuelson Pamela, Vinje Thomas, and Cornish William: Does Copyright Protection under the EU Software Directive Extend to Computer Program Behaviour, Languages and Interfaces?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 2/2012, pp. 158166.
Savič Maša: The CJEU Allposters Case: Beginning of the End of Digital Exhaustion?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 6/2015a, pp. 389394.
Savič Maša: The Legality of Resale of Digital Content after UsedSoft in Subsequent German and CJEU Case Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 7/2015b, pp. 414429.
Schack Haimo: Urheber- und Urhebervertragsrecht, Vol. 3, neubearbeitete Auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2005.
Schlesinger Michael: Legal Issues in Peer-to-Peer File Sharing, Focusing on the Making Available Right. In: Strowel Alain (Ed.): Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009: pp. 4370.
Schneider Jochen, and Spindler Gerald: Der Kampf um die gebrauchte Software – Revolution im Urheberrecht? – Das Urteil des EuGH vom 3.7.2012 – Rs. C-128/11 – “UsedSoft” Gebrauchtsoftware, Computer und Recht, Issue 8/2012, pp. 492493.
Schneider Marius, and Maillefer Christophe: How Europe Deals with Private Imports of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 4/2015, pp. 262268.
Scholz Jochen: Mögliche vertragliche Gestaltungen zur Weitergabe von Software nach “UsedSoft II,” Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 2/2015, pp. 142150.
Schonhofen Sven: UsedSoft and Its Aftermath: The Resale of Digital Content in the European Union, Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 16/2015, pp. 262297.
Schovsbo Jens: Constitutional Foundations and Constitutionalization of IP Law – A Tale of Different Stories?, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2015: pp. 383394.
Schovsbo Jens: The Exhaustion of Rights and Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law. In: Ohly Ansgar (Ed.): Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2010: pp. 169187.
Schricker Gerhard: Harmonization of Copyright in the European Economic Community, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 4/1988, pp. 489505.
Schricker Gerhard: Harmonization of Copyright in the European Economic Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 4/1989, pp. 466484.
Schricker Gerhard: Urheberrecht – Kommentar, Vol. 3, Neubearbeitete Auflage, C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 2006.
Schulder Diane B.: Art Proceeds Act: A Study of the Droit de Suite and a Proposed Enactment for the United States, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 61/1966: pp. 1943.
Schulze Ellen Franziska: Resale of Digital Content Such as Music, Films or eBooks under European Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2014, pp. 913.
Schulze Gernot: Anspruch auf Folgerechtsvergütungen bei Tod des Urhebers, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 6/2010, pp. 529530.
Scott Mark: In Global Expansion, Netflix Makes Friends with Carriers, New York Times, February 26, 2017 (www.nytimes.com/2017/02/26/technology/netflix-streaming-expansion-mwc.html).
Senftleben Martin: Die Fortschreibung des urheberrechtlichen Erschöpfungsgrundsatzes im digitalen Umfeld, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, Issue 40/2012, pp. 29242927.
Serra Theodore: Rebalancing at Resale: ReDigi, Royalties, and the Digital Secondary Market, Boston University Law Review, October 2013, pp. 17531801.
Seville Catherine: Developments in United Kingdom Copyright Law, Revue Internationale de Droit d'Auteur, Issue 2/2015, pp. 50151.
Sheridan Jenny Lynn: Does the Rise of Property Rights Theory Defeat Copyright's First Sale Doctrine?, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 52/2012: pp. 297372.
Shinall Michael A.: Software & Copyright Exhaustion: A Proposal to Amend §117 & Restore Balance to the Copyright System, Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 24/2014: pp. 365405.
Sikich Adam W.: Buyer Beware: The Threat to the First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age, Journal of Internet Law, January 2011, pp. 123.
Sisario Ben: Site to Resell Music Files Has Critics, New York Times, November 14, 2011 (www.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/business/media/reselling-of-music-files-is-contested.html).
Sisario Ben, and Russell Karl: In Shift to Streaming, Music Business Has Lost Billions, New York Times, March 24, 2016 (www.nytimes.com/2016/03/25/business/media/music-sales-remain-steady-but-lucrative-cd-sales-decline.html).
Sluiter Saba: The Dutch Courts Apply UsedSoft to the Resale of eBooks, Kluwer Copyright Blog, January 28, 2015 (http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2015/01/28/the-dutch-courts-apply-usedsoft-to-the-resale-of-ebooks/).
Smith B. Chase: International or National Exhaustion: The Need for Legislative Intervention Regarding the First Sale Doctrine, Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 14/2014: pp. 578598.
Smith Judith Klerman: The Computer Software Rental Act: Amending the “First Sale Doctrine” to Protect Computer Software Copyright, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 20/1987: pp. 16131639.
Soma John T., and Kugler Michael K.: Why Rent When You Can Own? How ReDigi, Apple, and Amazon Will Use the Cloud and the Digital First Sale Doctrine to Resell Music, E-Books, Games, and Movies, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, March 2014, pp. 425461.
Sosnitza Olaf: Gemeinschaftsrechtliche Vorgaben und urheberrechtlicher Gestaltungsspielraum für den Handel mit gebrauchter Software, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 7/2009, pp. 521526.
Spedicato Giorgio: Online Exhaustion and the Boundaries of Interpretation. In: Caso Roberto and Giovanella Federica (Eds.): Balancing Copyright Law in the Digital Age – Comparative Perspectives, Springer, Berlin, 2015: pp. 2764.
Spoor J. H., Verkade D. W. F., and Visser D. J. G.: Auteursrecht, Kluwer, Deventer, 2005.
Stazi Andrea: Digital Copyright and Consumer/User Protection: Moving toward a New Framework?, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 2/2012: pp. 158174.
Steimer Maureen: Restoring the Balance: Bringing Back Consumers Rights in UMG Recordings v. Augusto by Reaffirming the First Sale Doctrine in Copyright Law, Villanova Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 16/2009: pp. 313342.
Sterling J. A. L.: World Copyright Law, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1998.
Stern Richard H.: Some Reflections on Parallel Importation of Copyrighted Products into the United States and the Relation of the Exhaustion Doctrine to the Doctrine of Implied Licence, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 4/1989, pp. 119127.
Stern Richard H.: USA: Copyright – Transnational Exhaustion of Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/2009, pp. N3132.
Stokes Simon: Copyright and Artistic Practice: Allposters Revisited, Entertainment Law Review, Issue 5/2016, pp. 172174.
Stothers Christopher: When Is Copyright Exhausted by a Software Licence? UsedSoft v. Oracle, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 11/2012, pp. 787791.
Streitfeld David: Amazon Offers All-You-Can-Eat Books; Authors Turn Up Noses, New York Times, December 27, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/12/28/technology/amazon-offers-all-you-can-eat-books-authors-turn-up-noses.html).
Strowel Alain (Ed.): Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009.
Tai Eric Tjong Tjin: Exhaustion and Online Delivery of Digital Works, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 5/2003, pp. 207211.
Targosz Tomasz: Exhaustion in Digital Products and the “Accidental” Impact on the Balance of Interests in Copyright Law. In: Bently Lionel, Suthersanen Uma, and Torremans Paul (Eds.): Global Copyright – Three Hundred Years since the Statute of Anne, from 1709 to Cyberspace, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2010: pp. 337353.
Tobin Jonathan C.: Licensing as a Means of Providing Affordability and Accessability in Digital Markets: Alternatives to a Digital First Sale Doctrine, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, Vol. 93/2011: pp. 167187.
Trampuž Miha: An Oracle on European Copyright Exhaustion, Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur, July 2016: pp. 155255.
Travers Noel: Rental Rights and the Specific Subject-Matter of Copyright in Community Law, European Law Review, Issue 2/1999, pp. 171177.
Tritton Guy: Intellectual Property in Europe, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2002.
Tseng David: Bypassed: The Kirtsaeng Decision's Underwhelming Impact on Exhaustion, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 43/2015: pp. 559593.
Tucker Annette V.: The Validity of the Manufacturing Clause of the United States Copyright Code as Challenged by Trade Partners and Copyright Owners, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Summer 1985, pp. 577624.
Turner Stephanie B.: The Artist's Resale Royalty Right: Overcoming the Information Problem, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Issue 2/2012, pp. 329370.
Turner Stephanie B.: The Artist's Resale Royalty Right: Overcoming the Information Problem, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 19/2014, pp. 329370.
Ubertazzi Luigi Carlo: Copyright and the Free Movement of Goods, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 1/1985, pp. 4675.
Ulmer Eugen: Die Entscheidungen zur Kabelübertragung von Rundfunksendungen im Lichte urheberrechtlicher Grundsätze, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 6/1981, pp. 372378.
Ulmer Eugen: The “Droit de Suite” in International Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 1/1975, pp. 1228.
UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development: Resource Book on TRIPS and Development, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
Vacca Ryan: Expanding Preferential Treatment under the Record Rental Amendment beyond the Music Industry, Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 11/2007: pp. 605632.
Vale Shannon T., and Brennan Daniel J.: Recent Developments in Copyright Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 4/1996: pp. 321334.
Vanden Heuvel Sage: Fighting the First Sale Doctrine: Strategies for a Struggling Film Industry, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 18/2012: pp. 661689.
Van Calster Geert: Case Law: Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited [1998]ECR 1–1251, The Columbia Journal of European Law, Issue 1/2000, pp. 115123.
Van Oostveen Dirk: Netherlands: Copyright, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/1997, pp. D7475.
Verbraeken Erik: The Exhaustion Theory Is Not Yet Exhausted, les Nouvelles, March 2013, pp. 712.
Verkade Feer: “First-Sale” or Exhaustion Doctrine in the Netherlands. In: Hugenholtz P. Bernt, Quaedvlieg Antoon, and Visser Dirk (Eds.): A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912–2012, deLex, Amsterdam, 2012: pp. 291305.
Verma S. K.: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Free Trade – Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1998, pp. 534567.
Vezzoso Simonetta: Copyright, Interfaces, and a Possible Atlantic Divide, JIPITEC, Issue 2/2012, pp. 153161.
Vinje Thomas, Marsland Vanessa, and Gärtner Anette: Software Licensing after Oracle v. UsedSoft – Implications of Oracle v. UsedSoft (C-128/11) for European Copyright Law, Computer Law Review International, Issue 4/2012, pp. 97102.
von Lewinski Silke: International Copyright Law and Policy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2008.
von Lewinski Silke: International Exhaustion of the Distribution Right under EC Copyright Law?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 7/2005, pp. 233236.
von Lewinski Silke: Proposed EC Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society as It Progresses, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 7/2014, pp. 767782.
von Ungern-Sternberg Joachim: Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts und Vermietung von Videokassetten, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 4/1984, pp. 262267.
Walter Michel M.: Zum Vermieten von Werken der angewandten Kunst, Medien und Recht, Issue 5/2008, pp. 246248.
Walter Michel M., and von Lewinski Silke: European Copyright Law – A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.
Wandtke Artur-Axel, and von Gerlach Felix-Tessen: Die urheberrechtliche Rechtmäßigkeit der Nutzung von Audio-Video Streaminginhalten im Internet, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 7/2013, pp. 676683.
Weicher Michael B.: K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.: A Black Decision for the Gray Market, American University Law Review, Vol. 38/1989: pp. 463489.
Wenzel Karl Egbert, and Burkhardt Emanuel H.: Urheberrecht für die Praxis, Vol. 5, Vollständig überarbeitete Auflage, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, Köln, 2009.
Westkamp Guido: Exhaustion and the Internet as a Distribution Channel: The Relationship between Intellectual Property and European Law in Search of Clarification. In: Calboli Irene and Lee Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 498517.
Wiebe Andreas: Europäischer Datenbankschutz nach “William Hill” – Kehrtwende zur Informationsfreiheit?, Computer und Recht, Issue 3/2005, pp. 169174.
Wiebe Andreas: The Principle of Exhaustion in European Copyright Law and the Distinction between Digital Goods and Digital Services, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 2/2009, pp. 114118.
Winghardt Stefan: Gemeinschaftsrechtliches Diskriminierungsverbot und Inländerbehandlungsgrundsatz unter dem Blickwinkel der kollektiven Wahrnehmung urheberrechtlicher Ansprüche, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 12/2001, pp. 9931011.
WIPO Magazine: 50 Years of the Video Cassette Recorder, November 2006: pp. 811.
Witzel Michaela: Remarks to EU: Exhaustion of Distribution Right for Software Copy, Computer Law Review International, Issue 4/2012, pp. 121123.
Woods Tanya: Copyright Enforcement at All Costs? Finding a Place for Balance in the International Enforcement Agenda, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Summer 2009: pp. 347393.
Wright Aaron, and De Filippi Primavera: Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia, March 10, 2015 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=2580664).
Yen Alfred C., and Liu Joseph P.: Copyright Law – Essential Cases and Materials, 2nd ed., American Casebook Series, West, St. Paul, 2011.
Yu Peter K.: The Alphabet Soup of Transborder Intellectual Property Enforcement. In: Weckström Katja (Ed.): Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, Private Law Series A:132, University of Turku Faculty of Law, Turku, 2013: pp. 239257.
Yu Peter K.: Anticircumvention and Anti-Anticircumvention, Denver University Law Review, Issue 1/2006, pp. 1377.
Yu Peter K.: The Copy in Copyright. In: Lai Jessica C. and Dominicé Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 6593.
Yu Peter K.: The Global Intellectual Property Order and Its Undetermined Future, The WIPO Journal, Vol. 1/2009: pp. 115.
Yu Peter K.: How Copyright Law May Affect Pop Music without Our Knowing It, UMKC Law Review, Vol. 38/2014a: pp. 363401.
Yu Peter K.: Region Codes and the Territorial Mess, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 20/2012: pp. 187264.
Yu Peter K.: TPP and Trans-Pacific Perplexities, Fordham International Law Journal, May 2014b, pp. 11291181.
Yu Peter K.: What Apple's New Music Streaming Service Will Mean for Underpaid Songwriters, The Conversation, June 17, 2015 (http://theconversation.com/what-apples-new-music-streaming-service-will-mean-for-underpaid-songwriters-42230).
Zech Herbert: Vom Buch zur Cloud – Die Verkehrsfähigkeit digitaler Güter, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 3/2013: pp. 369396.
Zweigert Konrad, and Kötz Hein: Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, Vol. 3, Auflage, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, 1996.
COM(85) 310 = White Paper from the Commission to the European Council: Completing the Internal Market, COM(85) 310 final, Brussels, June 14, 1985.
COM(96) 568 = Follow-up to the Green Paper on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, 1996, COM (96) 568 final, Brussels, November 20, 1996.
COM(2000) 199 = Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on the implementation and effects of Directive 91/250/EEC on the legal protection of computer programs, COM(2000) 199 final, Brussels, April 10, 2000.
COM(2011) 635 = Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law, COM(2011) 635 final, Brussels, November 10, 2011.
COM(2015) 626 = Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Towards a modern, more European copyright framework, COM(2015) 626 final, Brussels, December 9, 2015.
DMCA Section 104 Report (2001) = DMCA Section 104 Report – A Report of the Register of Copyrights Pursuant to §104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, August 2001 (www.copyright.gov/reports/studies/dmca/sec-104-report-vol-1.pdf).
Entwurf (2012) = Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Ermöglichung der privaten Weiterveräußerung unkörperlicher Werkexemplare, Drucksache 17/8377, January 18, 2012 (www.cr-online.de/20120207_1708377.pdf).
EU Position Paper (2015) = The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) – Towards an EU-US trade deal, Intellectual property, EU Position Paper, March 20, 2015 (http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/153331.htm).
Green Paper (1988) = Commission of the European Communities: Green Paper on Copyright and the Challenge of Technology – Copyright Issues Requiring Immediate Action, COM (88) 172 final, Brussels, June 7, 1988.
Green Paper (1995) = Green Paper – Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, Brussels, COM(95) 382 final, Brussels, June 19, 1995.
H.R. Rep (1909) = The House Report 1 on the Copyright Act of 1909, February 1909 (http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/lipa/copyrights/The%20House%20Report%201%20on%20the%20Copyright%20Act%20of%201909.pdf).
H.R. Rep. (1976) = H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476 (1976).
H.R. Rep. (1984) = H.R. Rep. No. 98–987 (1984).
Public Consultation (2014) = Public Consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules, 2014 (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/copyright-rules/docs/consultation-document_en.pdf).
Report to Congress (2001) = Report to Congress: Study Examining 17 U.S.C. Sections 109 and 117 Pursuant to Section 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, March 21, 2001 (www.ntia.doc.gov/report/2001/report-congress-study-examining-17-usc-sections-109-and-117-pursuant-section-104-digital).
SEC(2012) 680 = Orientation Debate on Content in the Digital Economy, SEC(2012) 680, Brussels, November 28, 2012.
S.Rep. (1983) = S. Rep. No. 98–162 (1983).
Pallante Statement (2015) = Statement of Maria A. Pallante, United States Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office, Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, “The Register's Perspective on Copyright Review,” April 29, 2015 (http://judiciary.house.gov/_cache/files/1c82a3a6–3b1b-4a51-b212–281454d1e56e/written-testimony-of-register-maria-a-pallante.pdf).
USCO (1992) = U.S. Copyright Office: Droit de Suite: The Artist's Resale Royalty, December 1992 (www.copyright.gov/history/droit_de_suite.pdf).
USCO (2013) = U.S. Copyright Office: Resale Royalties: an Updated Analysis, December 2013 (www.copyright.gov/docs/resaleroyalty/usco-resaleroyalty.pdf).
USCO (2016) = U.S. Copyright Office: The Making Available Right in the United States, February 2016 (www.copyright.gov/docs/making_available/making-available-right.pdf).
U.S. Green Paper (1994) = Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: A Preliminary Draft of the Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, July 1994.
U.S. White Paper (1995) = Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, September 1995.
U.S. White Paper (2016) = The Department of Commerce – Internet Policy Task Force: White Paper on Remixes, First Sale and Statutory Damages – Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy, January 2016 (www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/copyrightwhitepaper.pdf).
A&M Records, Inc., et al., v. Napster, Inc., et al., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001).
Aftermath Records, et al. v. F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al., 131 S.Ct. 1677 (2011).
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., et al. v. Aereo, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 2498 (2014).
Andrew Paul Leonard v. Stemtech Health Sciences, Inc., et al., 2013 WL 5288266.
Apple Computer, Inc. vs. Microsoft Corporation, 35 F.3d 1435 (1994).
Art & Allposters International BV kontra Stichting Pictoright, Case C-419/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:27.
Atlantic Recording Corporation, et al., Pamela v. and Howell Jeffrey, 554 F.Supp.2d 976 (2008).
BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015]EWHC 1723 (Admin).
BestWater International GmbH kontra Michael Mebes és Stefan Potsch, Case C-348/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2315.
Bezpečnostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany kontra Ministerstvo kultury, Case C-393/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:816.
BGH 21.11.1958 (I ZR 98/57) – Der Heiligenhof, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 4/1959, pp. 200204.
BGH 07.11.1980 (I ZR 24/79) – Kabelfernsehen in Abschattungsgebieten, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 4/1981, pp. 413419.
BGH 06.05.1981 (I ZR 92/78) – Schallplattenexport, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 2/1982, pp. 100102.
BGH 21.03.1985 (I ZR 166/82) – Schallplattenimport II, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 10/1985, pp. 924926.
BGH 15.05.1986 (I ZR 22/84) – Videofilmvorführung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 10/1986, pp. 742743.
BGH 22.12.1999 (VIII ZR 299/98) – Ablieferung von Standard-Software, JurPC Web-Dok. 70/2000, Abs. 126. (www.jurpc.de/jurpc/show?id=20000070).
BGH 7.6.2001 (I ZR 21/99) – Keine Erschöpfungswirkung bei Vertrieb im Wege des Kaufs auf Probe, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 10–11/2001, pp. 10361038.
BGH 15.11.2006 (XII ZR 120/04) – Zur Rechtsnatur der Softwareüberlassung im Rahmen eines ASP-Vertrages, Medien Internet und Recht, Issue 1/2007, p. 3. (http://medien-internet-und-recht.de/pdf/vt_MIR_Dok._009–2006.pdf).
BGH 11.02.2010 (I ZR 178/08) – Half-Life 2, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 9/2010, pp. 822824.
BGH 17.07.2013 (I ZR 129/08) – Zulässigkeit des Vertriebs gebrauchter Softwarelizenzen – UsedSoft II., Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 3/2014, pp. 264272. (Anm. Stieper).
BGH 11.12.2014 (I ZR 8/13) – Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts an Kopien eines Computerprogramms – UsedSoft III, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 8/2015, pp. 772780. (Anm. Sattler).
BGH 19.3.2015 (I ZR 4/14) – Voraussetzungen zur Zulässigkeit der Weiterveräußerung gebrauchter Software – Green-IT, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 11/2015, pp. 11081114.
BGH 9.7.2015 (I ZR 46/12) – Keine öffentliche Wiedergabe durch “Framing” – Die Realität II, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 2/2016, pp. 171176.
BMG Music, et al., v. Edmundo Perez, et al., 952 F.2d 318 (1991).
Bobbs-Merrill Company v. Isidor Straus and Nathan Straus, 210 U.S. 339 (1908).
Brilliance Audio, Inc. v. Haights Cross Communications, Inc., 474 F.3d 365 (2007).
Burke & Van Heusen Inc. v. Arrow Drug Inc., et al., 233 F.Supp. 881 (1964).
Capitol Records, LLC, v. ReDigi Inc., 934 F.Supp.2d 640 (2013).
Cartoon Network LP, LLLP, et al. v. CSC Holdings, Inc., et al., 536 F.3d 121 (2008).
Christie's France SNC kontra Syndicat national des antiquaires, Case C-41/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:119.
Cinéthèque SA és társai kontra Fédération nationale des cinémas français, Joined Cases 60 and 61/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:329.
Clemens v. Estes, 22 Fed. Rep. 899 (1885).
Coditel SA, Compagnie générale pour la diffusion de la télévision, és társai kontra Ciné-Vog Films SA és társai, Case 262/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:334.
Columbia Broadcasting System Inc. v. Scorpio Music Distributors Inc., 569 F.Supp. 47 (1983).
Columbia Broadcasting System Inc. v. Scorpio Music Distributors Inc., 738 F.2d 424 (1984).
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Aveco, Inc., et al., 800 F.2d 59 (1986).
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Redd Horne, Inc., et al., 749 F.2d 154 (1984).
Computer Associates International, Inc., v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693 (1992).
Cosmair Inc., et al. v. Dynamite Enterprises Inc., et al., 226 U.S.P.Q. 344 (1985).
Costco Wholesale Corp., v. Omega S.A.,559 U.S. 1066 (2010).
Costco Wholesale Corp., v. Omega S.A., 131 S.Ct. 565 (2010).
Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v. Tom Kabinet, 200 154 572/01 SKG NL:GHAMS:2015:66, January 20, 2015, Computer Law Review International, Issue 2/2015, pp. 4750.
Criminal proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner, Case C-5/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:370.
Denbicare U.S.A., Inc., et al., v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., 84 F.3d 1143 (1996).
Denbicare U.S.A., Inc. v. Toys “R” Us, Inc. 519 U.S. 873 (1996).
Design Options, Inc., v. Bellepointe, Inc., 940 F.Supp 86 (1996).
Deutsche Grammophon Gesellschaft mbH kontra Metro-SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG, Case 78/70, ECLI:EU:C:1971:59.
Deutsche Grammophon Geselschaft mbH v. Metro-SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG (3 U 108/1970), Hanseatische OLG, October 28, 1971.
District Court of Amsterdam, Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet, C/13/567567/KG ZA 14795 SP/MV, July 21, 2014.
District Court Mid-Nederlands, CWS v. Vendorlink, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2015:1096, 25.03.2015, Computer Law Review International, Issue 2/2016, pp. 6062.
Dowling v. United States, 472 U.S. 207 (1985).
Dutch Supreme Court, Beeldbrigade, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BV1301, 27.04.2012, Computerrecht, Issue 2/2012, pp. 339353.
Edmundo Perez v. BMG Music, et al., 505 U.S. 1206 (1992).
Elisa Allison, et al., v. Vintage Sports Plaques, et al., 136 F.3d 1443 (1998).
EMI Electrola GmbH kontra Patricia Im- und Export és társai, Case 341/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:30.
Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 34, [2012]2 R.C.S. 231.
Estate of Robert Graham, et al., v. Sotheby's, Inc., 860 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2012).
Estate of Robert Graham, et al., v. Sotheby's, Inc., 178 F.Supp.3d 974 (2016).
Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. és Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH kontra az Európai Gazdasági Közösség Bizottsága, Joined Cases 56/64 and 58/64, ECLI:EU:C:1966:41.
Euro-Excellence Inc. v. Kraft Canada Inc., [2007]3 S.C.R. 20, 2007 SCC 37.
European Commission v France, Case C-479/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:141.
F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al. v. Aftermath Records, et al., No. CV 07–3314 PSG (MANx), 2009 WL 137021.
F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al. v. Aftermath Records, et al., 621 F.3d 958 (2010).
Flava Works, Inc., v. Marques Rondale Gunter, et al., 689 F.3d 754 (2012).
Football Association Premier League Ltd és társai kontra QC Leisure és társai, Joined Cases C-403/08. és C-429/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:631.
Fundación Gala-Salvador Dalí és Visual Entidad de Gestión de Artistas Plásticos (VEGAP) kontra Société des auteurs dans les arts graphiques et plastiques (ADAGP) és társai, Case C-518/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:191.
Ganghua Liu v. Pearson Education, Inc., et al., 133 S.Ct. 1630 (2013).
G. Basset kontra Société des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs de musique (SACEM), Case 402/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:197.
Geophysical Service, Inc., v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company, 850 F.3d 785 (2017).
Google, Inc., v. Oracle America, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 2887.
Harrison v. Maynard, Merrill & Co., 61 Fed. Rep. 689 (1894).
Hearst Corporation, et al., v. J. Ben Stark, et al., 639 F.Supp. 970 (1986).
Henry Bill Publishing Co. v. Smythe, 27 Fed. Rep. 914 (1886).
Independent News Co., Inc., et al., v. Harry Williams, 293 F.2d 510 (1951).
Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening, Case C-5/08, ECLI:EU:C:2009:465.
ITV Broadcasting Ltd and Others v TV Catch Up Ltd., Case C-607/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:147.
Johan Deckmyn and Others v Helena Vandersteen and Others, Case C-201/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2132.
John Hampton, et al. v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, et al., 279 F.2d 100 (1960) cert. denied 364 U.S. 882 (1960).
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, et al., 2009 WL 3364037 (S.D.N.Y., 2009).
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210 (2011).
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, 713 F.3d 1142 (2013).
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, 2013 WL 6722887 (S.D.N.Y., 2013).
KG 26.1.2001 (5 U 4102/99) – Erschöpfung des Urheberrechts an Dias – Gruß aus Potsdam, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Rechtssprechungs-Report, Issue 4/2002, pp. 125126.
K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 108 S.Ct. 1811 (1988).
Lantern Press Inc. v. American Publishers Co., 419 F.Supp. 1267 (1976).
L'anza Research International v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., 1995 WL 908331 (C.D. Cal.).
L'anza Research International v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., 98 F.3d 1109 (1996).
Laserdisken ApS kontra Kulturministeriet, Case C-479/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:549.
LG Bielefeld 05.03.2013 (4 O 191/11) – Einschränkung der Rechte beim Erwerb urheberrechtlich geschützter Werke über das Internet, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 8/2013, pp. 688694.
LG München I. 19.01.2006 (7 O 23237/05) – Online-Erwerb von Software/Erschöpfungsgrundsatz Urheberrecht (Deutschland), Medien und Recht International, Issue 4/2006, pp. 201204.
LG München I. 15.03.2007 (7 O 7061/06) – Handel mit “gebrauchten” Softwarelizenzen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 5/2007, pp. 409417.
London-Sire Records, Inc. v. John Doe 1,542 F.Supp.2d 153 (2008).
Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996).
MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511 (1993).
Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA and Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA, Case C-98/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:55.
Mazer, et al. v. Stein, et al., 347 U.S. 201 (1954).
Microsoft Corp. v. Software Wholesale Club, Inc., 129 F.Supp.2d 995 (2000).
Mirage Editions, Inc., et al., v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co., 856 F.2d 1341 (1988).
Morseburg v. Balyon, 621 F.3d 972 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 983 (1980).
Motown Record Co., LP, et al., v. Theresa DePietro, 2007 WL 576284 (E.D.Pa.).
Musik-Vertrieb membran GmbH and K-tel International v GEMA – Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte, Joined Cases 55 and 57/80, ECLI:EU:C:1981:10.
Navitaire Inc. v. easyJet Airline Company and Others, [2004]EWHC 1725 (Ch).
Neutrogena Corporation v. U.S., Secretary of the Treasury, 7 U.S.P.Q.2d 1900 (1988).
Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB, Case C-466/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:76.
Nintendo of America, Inc., v. Elcon Industries, Inc., et al., 564 F.Supp. 937 (1992).
Nintendo Co. Ltd and Others v PC Box and Others, Case C-355/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:25.
OGH 23.05.2000 4 Ob 30/00s, Medien und Recht, Issue 4/2000, pp. 249253. (Anm. Walter).
OLG Düsseldorf 29.06.2009 (20 U 247/08) – Zweck des Erschöpfungsgrundsatzes, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Rechtssprechungs-Report, Issue 1/2009, pp. 45.
OLG Frankfurt am Main 12.05.2009 (11 W 15/09) – Handel mit Software-Echtheitszertifikaten und Product-Keys, Medien Internet und Recht, Issue 6/2009, pp. 14 (http://medien-internet-und-recht.de/pdf/VT_MIR_2009_131.pdf).
OLG Frankfurt am Main 18.12.2012 (11 U 68/11) – Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts on online übermittelter Software – Adobe/UsedSoft, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 3/2013, pp. 279285.
OLG Frankfurt am Main 22.12.2016 (11 U 108/13) – Keine Erschöpfung durch Herunterladen einer Testversion, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 6/2017, pp. 512517.
OLG Hamburg 04.12.2014 (10 U 5/11) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Online-Diensten – eBook-AGB, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht – Rechtssprechungs-Report, Issue 9/2015, pp. 361365.
OLG Hamm 15.05.2014 (22 U 60/13) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Audiodateien – Hörbuch-AGB, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 9/2014, pp. 853863.
OLG München 03.07.2008 (6 U 2759/07) – Handel mit “gebrauchten” Softwarelizenzen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 1/2009, pp. 7074 (Anm. Herzog).
OLG Stuttgart 03.11.2011 (2 U 49/11) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Online-Vertrieb von Hörbüchern, Computer und Recht, Issue 5/2012, pp. 301302 (Anm. Schmidt).
Omega S.A., et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 2007 WL 7029734 (C.D.Cal., 2007).
Omega S.A., et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (2008).
Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 2011 WL 8492716 (C.D.Cal., 2011).
Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 776 F.3d 692 (2015).
Opinion, Axel W. Bierbach, administrator of UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp., Case C-128/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:234.
Opinion, Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others, Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:43.
Opinion, Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, Case C-174/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:459.
Oracle America Inc. v. Google Inc., 750 F.3d 1339 (2014).
Paramount Home Entertainment v. British Sky Broadcasting [2014]EWHC 937 (Ch).
Parfums Christian Dior SA és Parfums Christian Dior BV kontra Evora BV, Case C-337/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:517.
Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. Drug Emporium, Inc., 38 F.3d 477 (1994).
Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. Drug Emporium, Inc., 514 U.S. 1004 (1995).
Paul Edmond Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985).
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Ganghua Liu, et al., 656 F.Supp.2d 407 (2009).
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Ganghua Liu, et al., 10894-mv (Second Circuit, 2011; nem publikált).
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Mohit Arora, et al., 717 F.Supp.2d 374 (2010).
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Mohit Arora, et al., 438 Fed.Appx. 34 (2011).
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Vinod Kumar, et al., 721 F.Supp.2d 166 (2010).
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Vinod Kumar, et al., 452 Fed.Appx. 11 (2011).
Peek & Cloppenburg KG kontra Cassina SpA, Case C-456/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:232.
Phil Collins kontra Imtrat Handelsgesellschaft mbH és Patricia Im- und Export Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH és Leif Emanuel Kraul kontra EMI Electrola GmbH, Joined Cases 92/92 and 326/92, ECLI:EU:C:1993:847.
Platt & Munck Co., Inc. v. Republic Graphics Inc., et al., 315 F.2d 847 (1963).
Polydor Limited és RSO Records Inc. kontra Harlequin Records Shops Limited és Simons Records Limited, Case C-270/80, ECLI:EU:C:1982:43.
ProCD, Inc., v. Matthew Zeidenberg, et al., 86 F.3d 1447 (1996).
Procureur du Roi kontra Benoît és Gustave Dassonville, Case C-8/74, ECLI:EU:C:1974:82.
Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'anza Research International, Inc., 523 U.S. 135 (1998).
Recording Industry Association of America v. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc., 180 F.3d 1072 (1999).
Red Baron-Franklin Park Inc., et al., v. Taito Corp., et al., 883 F.2d 275 (1989).
Red Baron-Franklin Park, Inc. v. Taito Corp. 493 U.S. 1058 (1990).
RG 26.03.1902 (Rep. I. 303/01) – Guajakol-Karbonat, 51 RGZ 139.
RG 10.06.1906. (Rep. I. 5/06) – Königs Kursbuch, 63 RGZ 394.
RG 10.06.1906, 39 RGSt 108.
Rogers Communications Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35, [2012]2 R.C.S. 283.
SA Compagnie générale pour la diffusion de la télévision, Coditel, és társai kontra Ciné Vog Films és társai, Case 62/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:84.
Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. Christie's, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (2015).
Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. Christie's, Inc., 2015 WL 4429309.
Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. Christie's, Inc., 136 S.Ct. 795 (2016).
SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Ltd, Case C-406/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:259.
Scarves by Vera Inc. v. American Handbags Inc., 188 F.Supp. 255 (1960).
Schweizerisches Bundesgericht 1.3.2007 (4C.384/2006) – Enter the Matrix, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 1/2008, pp. 7072.
Sebastian International Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY) Ltd., et al., 664 F.Supp. 909 (1987).
Sebastian International Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY) Ltd., et al., 847 F.2d 1093 (1987).
Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510 (1992).
SoftMan Products Co. v. Adobe Sys. Inc., 171 F.Supp.2d 1075 (2001).
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al., v. Joel Tenenbaum, 660 F.3d 487 (2011).
Sony Corporation of America, et al. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., et al., 464 U.S. 417 (1984).
Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (AKM) v Zürs.net Betriebs GmbH, Case C-138/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:218.
Stowe v. Thomas, 23 F.Cas. 201 (1853).
Supap Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S.Ct. 1351 (2013).
T.B. Harms Company v. Jem Records, Inc., 655 F.Supp. 1575 (1987).
The British Horseracing Board Ltd és társai kontra William Hill Organization Ltd., Case C-203/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:695.
The C. M. Paula Company v. L. Gene Logan, 355 F.Supp. 189 (1973).
The Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. eBay Inc., 2012 WL 12294395.
The Queen kontra Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Ltd., Case C-1/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:113.
Théberge v. Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain Inc., et al., [2002]2. S.C.R. 336, 2002 SCC 34.
Timothy S. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 555 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2008).
Timothy S. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 621 F.3d 1102 (2010).
Timothy S. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 132 S.Ct. 105 (2011).
Triad Systems Corp. v. Souteastern Express Company, 64 F.3d 1330 (1995).
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Troy Augusto, 628 F.3d 1175 (2011).
United States v. Belmont et al., 715 F.2d 459 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1022 (1984).
United States v. Raymond Joseph Atherton, 561 F.2d 747 (1977).
United States v. Wise, 550 F.2d 1180 (1977).
Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, et al., v. Clint Bigwood, 441 F.Supp.2d 185 (2006).
UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Others, Case C-314/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:192.
UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp., Case C-128/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:407.
Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, Case C-174/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:856.
Vinod Kumar, et al., v. Pearson Education, Inc., et al., 133 S.Ct. 1631 (2013).
Wall Data, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, 447 F.3d 769 (2006).
Walt Disney Productions v. John Basmajian and Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc., 600 F. Supp. 439 (1984).
Warner Brothers Inc. and Metronome Video ApS v Erik Viuff Christiansen, Case 158/86, ECLI:EU:C:1988:242.