Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Cited by 5
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: December 2014

4 - Processibility

from Part II - Corpora and pragmatic principles

References

Aijmer, K. 1997. I think: An English modal particle. In T. Swan and O. J. Westwik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, pp. 1–47. Berlin: Mouton.
Aijmer, K. 2007. The interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is that. In A. Celle and R. Huart (eds), Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, pp. 31–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Birner, B. J. and Ward, G. 2001. Discourse and information structure. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and E. H. Hamilton (eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 119–137. Oxford: Blackwell.
Boye, K. and Harder, P. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31: 569–606.
Boye, K. and Harder, P. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88 (1): 1–44.
Brenier, J. M. and Michaelis, L. A. 2005. Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax–prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1 (1): 45–88.
Brinton, L. J. 1998. The flowers are lovely; only, they have no scent: The evolution of a pragmatic marker. In R. Borgmeier, H. Grabes and A. H. Jucker (eds), Anglistentag 1997, pp. 9–33. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Brinton, L. J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, L. J. and Traugott, E. C. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, W. L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, pp. 22–55. New York: Academic Press.
Clark, H. H. and Haviland, S. E. 1977. Comprehension and the given–new contract. In R. O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension, pp. 1–40. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Curzan, A. 2012. Revisiting the reduplicative copula with corpus-based evidence. In T. Nevalainen and E. C. Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, pp. 211–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, M. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 425 million words, 1990–present. Online at: corpus.byu.edu/coca.
Davies, M. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Online at: corpus.byu.edu/coha.
Declerck, R. 1992. The inferential it is that-construction and its congeners. Lingua 87: 203–230.
Delahunty, G. P. 1995. The inferential construction. Pragmatics 5 (3): 341–364.
Delahunty, G. P. 1997. ‘Oh, it’s I’m not pretty enough’: Expletive structure and relevance. In A. Ahlqvist and V. Čapková (eds), Dán Do Oide: Essays in Memory of Conn R. Ó Cléirigh, pp. 113–122. Dublin: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.
Delahunty, G. P. 2001. Discourse functions of inferential sentences. Linguistics 39 (3): 517–545.
Delahunty, G. P. 2012. An analysis of the thing is that sentences. Pragmatics 22 (1): 41–78.
Diewald, G. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390.
Dik, S. C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar, part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
Firbas, Jan 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geluykens, R. 1991. Information flow in English conversation: A new approach to the given–new distinction. In E. Ventola (ed.), Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses, pp. 141–167. Berlin: Mouton.
Givón, T. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, pp. 151–173. New York: Academic Press.
Gómez-González, M. Á. 2001. The Theme–Topic Interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenbaum, S., Nelson, G. and Weitzman, M. 1996. Complement clauses in English. In J. Thomas and M. Short (eds), Using Corpora for Language Research, pp. 76–91. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (third edition, revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen). London: Edward Arnold.
Hannay, M. 1991. Pragmatic function assignment and word order variations in a functional grammar of English. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 131–155.
Hawkins, J. A. 1992. Syntactic weight versus information structure in word order variation. Linguistische Berichte 4: 196–219.
Hawkins, J. A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heller, B. and Howe, C. 2008. Raising parentheticals as discourse particles. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization, Leuven, 18 July 2008.
Hopper, P. J. 1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–157.
Hopper, P. J. 1988. Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, pp. 117–136. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hopper, P. J. 2001. Grammatical constructions and their discourse origins: Prototype or family resemblance? In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier and R. Dirven (eds), Applied Cognitive Linguistics, vol. I: Theory and Language Acquisition, pp. 109–129. Berlin: Mouton.
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. 2003. Grammaticalization (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jucker, A. H. and Ziv, Y. 1998. Discourse markers: Introduction. In A. H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Description and Theory, pp. 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaltenböck, G. 2005. It-extraposition in English: A functional view. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (2): 119–159.
Kaltenböck, G. 2006. ‘… That is the question’: Complementizer omission in extraposed that-clauses. English Language and Linguistics 10 (2): 371–396.
Kaltenböck, G. 2010. Pragmatic functions of parenthetical I think. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch and S. Schneider (eds), New Approaches to Hedging, pp. 243–272. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kaltenböck, G 2013. Development of comment clauses. In B. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech and S. Wallis (eds), The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kärkkäinen, E. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keizer, E. M. 2013. The X is (is) construction: and FDG account. In J. L. Mackenzie and H. Olbertz (eds), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, pp. 213–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krug, M. and Schützler, O. 2013. Recent change and grammaticalization. In B. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech and S. Wallis (eds), The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, pp. 155–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lehmann, H. M. 2008. Information structure and grammaticalization. In M. J. López-Couso and E. Seoane Posse (eds), Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, vol. 3, pp. 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
López-Couso, M. J. and Méndez-Naya, B. 2014. From clause to pragmatic marker: A study of the development of Like-parentheticals in American English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15 (1): 36–61.
Mahlberg, M. 2003. The textlinguistic dimension of corpus linguistics: The support function of English general nouns and its theoretical implications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (1): 97–108.
Massam, D. 1999. Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis?English Language and Linguistics 3 (2): 335–352.
McConvell, P. 1988. To be or double be? Current changes in the English copula. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 287–305.
OED: Oxford English Dictionary. www.oed.com
Prince, E. F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 223–255. New York: Academic Press.
Prince, E. F. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds), Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, pp. 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rühlemann, C. 2007. Conversation in Context: A Corpus-Driven Analysis. London: Continuum.
Schmid, H.-J. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton.
Seppänen, A. 1986. The syntax of seem and appear revisited. Studia Linguistica 40: 22–39.
Shapiro, M. and Haley, M. C. 2002. The reduplicative copula is is. American Speech 77 (3): 305–312.
Shibasaki, R. 2012. (The) thing is, …, my thing is, …, but not (yet) *your thing is, …?: Explorations of ongoing and oncoming phenomena in American English. Paper presented at SHEL Indiana.
Thompson, S. A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26: 125–164.
Thompson, S. A. and Mulac, A. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, pp. 313–339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. 1995a. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Online at: www.stanford.edu/~traugott/ect-papersonline.html.
Traugott, E. C. 1995b. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In D. Stein and S. Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tuggy, D. 1996. The thing is is that people talk that way: The question is why? In E. H. Casad (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, pp. 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vallduví, E. and Engdahl, E. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459–519.
Van Bogaert, J. 2010. I’m guessing it looks probably like a sea monkey right now: The recent emergence of comment clauses in the progressive. Paper given at ICAME 31, Giessen.
Wallis, S. 2009. Binominal distributions, probability and Wilson’s confidence interval. London: Survey of English Usage. Online at: www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/staff/sean/resources/binomialpoisson.pdf.
Wallis, S. 2010. z-squared: The origin and application of χ2. London: Survey of English Usage. Online at: www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/staff/sean/resources/z-squared.pdf.
Wallis, S. 2012. That vexed problem of choice: Reflections on experimental design and statistics with corpora. Online at: corplingstats.wordpress.com/2012/03/31/that-vexed-problem-of-choice/.
Wasow, T. 1997. End-weight from the speaker’s perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26 (3): 347–361.