Book contents
- Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
- Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Judging counter-terrorism judicial review
- 1 Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism
- 2 Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary
- 3 When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments
- 4 The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience
- Part II Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review
- Part III Counter-terrorism judicial review in the political constitution
- Part IV Internationalised counter-terrorism judicial review
- Index
1 - Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism
from Part I - Judging counter-terrorism judicial review
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2014
- Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
- Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Judging counter-terrorism judicial review
- 1 Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism
- 2 Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary
- 3 When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments
- 4 The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience
- Part II Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review
- Part III Counter-terrorism judicial review in the political constitution
- Part IV Internationalised counter-terrorism judicial review
- Index
Summary
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review , pp. 35 - 55Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014