Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T09:02:28.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

David Altman
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christofer H. 2000. “Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, July 20–22, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. and Fishkin, James S.. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Aguiar-Conraria, Luís and Magalhães, Pedro C.. 2009. “Referendum Design, Quorum Rules and Turnout.” Public Choice doi:10.1007/s11127–009–9504–1.CrossRef
Aguiar-Conraria, Luís and Magalhães, Pedro C.. 2010. “How Quorum Rules Distort Referendum Outcomes: Evidence from a Pivotal Voter Model.” European Journal of Political Economy doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.03.004.CrossRef
Aguiar, César A. 1985. “Uruguay: Escenas Políticas y Subsistemas Electorales.” Desarrollo Económico 24 (96): 517–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties?Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfaro Redondo, Ronald. 2006. “Elecciones Nacionales 2006 en Costa Rica y la Recomposición del Sistema de Partidos Políticos.” Revista de Ciencia Política 26 (1): 125–137.Google Scholar
Allamand, Andrés. 1999. La Travesía del Desierto. Santiago: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David. 2002a. “Increasing Horizontal and Social Accountability in Latin America: Satisfaction with Democracy, Social Accountability, and Direct Democracy.” International Review of Public Administration 7 (2): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David. 2002b. “Popular Initiatives in Uruguay: Confidence Votes on Government or Political Loyalties?Electoral Studies 21 (4): 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David. 2005. “Democracia Directa en el Continente Americano: ¿Auto-Legitimación Gubernamental o Censura Ciudadana?Política y Gobierno XII (2): 203–232.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2008. “Collegiate Executives and Direct Democracy in Switzerland and Uruguay: Similar Institutions, Opposite Political Goals, Distinct Results.” Swiss Political Science Review 14 (3): 483–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, David, Buquet, Daniel, and Luna, Juan Pablo. 2006. “Constitutional Reforms and Political Turnover in Uruguay: Winning a Battle, Losing the War.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31 – September 3, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Altman, David, Castiglioni, Rossana, and Luna, Juan Pablo. 2008. “Uruguay: A Role Model for the Left?” In Leftovers: Tales of the Latin American Left, edited by Castañeda, J. G. and Morales, M. A.. London-New York: Routledge, 151–173.Google Scholar
Altman, David and Lalander, Rickard. 2003. “Bolivia's Popular Participation Law: An Undemocratic Democratisation Process?” In Decentralisation and Democratic Governance: Experiences from India, Bolivia and South Africa, edited by Hadenius, A.. Stockholm: Expert Group on Development Issues – Almqvist & Wiksell International, 63–104.Google Scholar
Altman, David and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2002. “Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness, and Participation in 18 Latin American Countries.” Democratization 9 (2): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Angel. 2007. “Venezuela 2007: Los Motores del Socialismo se Alimentan con Petróleo.” Revista de Ciencia Política 27 (EE): 264–286.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Angel. 2008. “Venezuela: ¿La Revolución Pierde su Encanto?Revista de Ciencia Política 28 (1): 405–432.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Angel and Acosta, Yorelis. 2006. “The 2006 Presidential Elections in Venezuela: Electoral Competition and Regime Change.” Harvard Review of Latin America V (1): 35–37.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Goodrich, Melanie, Hall, Thad E., Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Sled, Sarah M.. 2004. “The Complexity of the California Recall Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (1): 23–26.Google Scholar
Amacher, Ryan C. and Boyes, William J.. 1978. “Cycles in Senatorial Voting Behavior: Implications for the Optimal Frequency of Elections.” Public Choice 33 (3): 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006. Presidencialismo e Governabilidade nas Américas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Anckar, Dag. 2004. “Direct Democracy in Microstates and Small Island States.” World Development 32 (2): 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araos, María Raquel and Engel, Eduardo. 1989. “Desempleo, Votación Histórica y el Plebiscito de 1988.” Estudios CIEPLAN 27 (Diciembre): 5–17.Google Scholar
Arrarás, Astrid and Deheza, Grace. 2005. “Referéndum del Gas en Bolivia: Mucho Más que un Referéndum.” Revista de Ciencia Política 25 (2): 161–172.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1950. “A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare.” The Journal of Political Economy 58 (4): 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963 (1st ed., 1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, Andreas. 2005. “European Citizens' Initiative.” European Constitutional Law Review 1 (1): 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Andreas. 2007. “National Referendums in the Process of European Integration: Time for Change.” In The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond, edited by Albi, A. and Ziller, J.. Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International, 261–271.Google Scholar
Barczak, Monica. 2001. “Representation by Consultation? The Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America.” Latin American Politics & Society 43 (3): 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, Robert. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejarano, Ana María and Pizarro, Eduardo. 2005. “From “Restricted” to “Besieged”: The Changing Nature of the Limits to Democracy in Colombia.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, edited by Hagopian, F. and Mainwaring, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. Derrick. 1978. “The Referendum: Democracy's Barrier to Racial Equality.” Washington Law Review 54 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, S.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 67–94.Google Scholar
Benz, Matthias and Stutzer, Alois. 2004. “Are Voters Better Informed When They Have a Larger Say in Politics? Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland.” Public Choice 119 (1–2): 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2003. BTI 2003 Iraq Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
,Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2007a. BTI 2008 Kazakhstan Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
,Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2007b. BTI 2008 Turkmenistan Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
,Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2007c. BTI 2008 Zimbabwe Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1948. “On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making.” The Journal of Political Economy 56 (1): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 1987. The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1979. “Political Democracy and the Timing of Development.” American Sociological Review 44 (4): 572–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1993. “Liberal Democracy: Validity and Sources Biases in Cross-National Measures.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1207–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. and Jackman, Robert W.. 1985. “Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income.” American Sociological Review 50 (4): 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. and Jackman, Robert W.. 1995. “Income Inequality and Democratization Revisited: Comment on Muller.” American Sociological Review 60 (6): 983–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. and Paxton, Pamela. 2000. “Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottinelli, Oscar, Buquet, Daniel, Caetano, Gerardo, Canzani, Agustín, Cardarello, Antonio, Chasquetti, Daniel, Armas, Gustavo, Garcé, Adolfo, González, Luis E., Guerrini, Aldo, Lanzaro, Jorge, Magri, Altair, Moreira, Constanza, Antón, Romeo Pérez, Queirolo, Rosario, and Yaffé, Jaime (Ed.). 2000. Elecciones 1999/2000. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental – Instituto de Ciencia Politica.
Bowler, Shaun and Cain, Bruce. 2004. “Introduction – Recalling the Recall: Reflections on California's Recent Political Adventure.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (1): 7–10.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun and Donovan, Todd. 1998. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasil De Lima, Olavo. 1983. “Electoral Participation in Brazil (1945–1978): The Legislation, the Party Systems and Electoral Turnouts.” Luso-Brazilian Review 20 (1): 65–87.Google Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2007. “Institutions of Direct Democracy and Accountability in Latin America's Presidential Democracies.” Democratization 14 (4): 554–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2008a. “Policymaking by Referendum in Presidential Systems: Evidence from the Bolivian and Colombian Cases.” Latin American Politics & Society 50 (4): 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2008b. “The Problematic Relation between Direct Democracy and Accountability in Latin America: Evidence from the Bolivian Case.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 27 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2009a. “Costa Rica's 2007 Referendum on the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR): Citizen Participation or Citizen Manipulation?” Representation 45 (4): 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Anita. 2009b. “The Use of Government-Initiated Referendums in Latin America: Towards a Theory of Referendum Causes.” Revista de Ciencia Política 29 (1): 23–55.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel and Coppedge, Michael. 2006. “Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (4): 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broder, David S. 2000. Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money. Orlando: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo. 1997. “Der Status Quo Bias und die bremsende Wirkung des fakultativen Referendums.” In Wieviel direkte Demokratie verträgt die Schweitz?, edited by Borner, S. and Rentsch, H.. Zürich: Verlag Rüegger, 167–182.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, Marc and Freitag, Markus. 2006. “Individual and Contextual Determinants of Electoral Participation.” Swiss Political Science Review 12 (4): 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühlmann, Marc, Nicolet, Sarah, and Selb, Peter. 2006. “National Elections in Switzerland: An Introduction.” Swiss Political Science Review 12 (4): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buquet, Daniel and Castellano, Ernesto. 1995. “Representación Proporcional y Democracia en Uruguay.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 8: 107–123.Google Scholar
Buquet, Daniel, Chasquetti, Daniel, and Moraes, Juan Andrés. 1998. Fragmentación Política y Gobierno en Uruguay: ¿Un Enfermo Imaginario?Montevideo: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry and Kimball, David. 1998. “A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.” American Political Science Review 92 (3): 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David and Ranney, Austin (Eds.). 1978. Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David and Ranney, Austin (Eds.). 1994. Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: AEI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caetano, Gerardo and Rilla, José. 1994. Historia Contemporánea del Uruguay: De la Colonia al MERCOSUR. Montevideo: Colección CLAEH/Editorial Fin de Siglo.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., Russell, J. Dalton, and Scarrow, Susan E.. 2003. “New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions.” In Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Cain, B. E., Dalton, R. J., and Scarrow, S. E.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A. and Faletti, Tulia G.. 2005. “Federalism and the Subnational Separation of Powers.” Publius. The Journal of Federalism 35 (2): 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, Rossana. 2001. “The Politics of Retrenchment: The Quandaries of Social Protection Under Military Rule in Chile 1973–1990.” Latin American Politics & Society 43 (4): 37–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Castiglioni, Rossana. 2005. The Politics of Social Policy Change in Chile and Uruguay: Retrenchment versus Maintenance 1973–1998. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cebula, Richard J. 2008. “Does Direct Democracy Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence from the 2004 General Election.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 67 (4): 629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Steve. 2003. “Explaining War Termination: A Boolean Analysis of Causes.” Journal of Peace Research 40 (1): 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasquetti, Daniel. 2001. “Democracia, Multipartidismo y Coaliciones en América Latina: Evaluando la Difícil Combinación.” In Tipos de Presidencialismo y Coaliciones Políticas en América Latina, edited by Lanzaro, J.. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 319–359.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio and Gandhi, Jennifer. 2004. “Classifying Political Regimes: A Six-Fold Measure of Democracies and Dictatorships.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio and Gandhi, Jennifer. 2005. “Classifying Political Regimes: A Six Fold Classification of Democracies and Dictatorships (Database v.1–2006).” New Haven: Yale University.
Christin, Tomas, Hug, Simon, and Sciarini, Pascal. 2002. “Interests and Information in Referendum Voting: An Analysis of Swiss Voters.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 759–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Kornberg, Allan, and Stewart, Marianne C.. 2004. “Referendum Voting as Political Choice: The Case of Quebec.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, William S. 1979. “Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (368): 829–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David. 1991. “The Comparative Method: Two Decades of Change.” In Comparative Political Dynamics: Global Research Perspectives, edited by Rustow, D. A. and Paul, K.. New York: HarperCollins, 7–31.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Finding Conceptual Order in Recent Comparative Research.” World Politics 49 (3): 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compagnon, Daniel. 2000. “Briefing: Zimbabwe: Life After ZANU-PF.” African Affairs 99 (396): 449–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. “The Evolution of Latin American Party Systems.” In Politics, Society, and Democracy: Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, S. and Valenzuela, A.. Boulder: Westview Press, 171–206.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2004. “Quality of Democracy and Its Measurement.” In The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications, edited by O'Donnell, G., Cullell, J. V., and Iazzetta, O. M.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 239–248.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2005. “Explaining Democratic Deterioration in Venezuela through Nested Inference.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, edited by Hagopian, F. and Mainwaring, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 289–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. (n.d.) Approaching Democracy: Research Methods in Comparative Politics. Mimeographed.
Cortés, Cecilia (Ed.). 1989. El Referendum Uruguayo del 16 de Abril de 1989. San José: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, Centro de Asesoría y Promoción Electoral.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1998. “Closeness and Turnout: A Methodological Note.” Journal of Politics 50 (3): 768–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Munger, Michael C.. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures and Turnout in the 1982 House Elections.” American Political Science Review 83 (1): 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Thomas. 1999. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Frank. 2002. Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutright, Phillip. 1963. “National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis.” American Sociological Review 28 (2): 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell, Bürklin, Wilhelm, and Drummond, Andrew. 2001. “Public Opinion and Direct Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 12 (4): 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, James N. 1998. Understanding the Political World: A Comparative Introduction to Political Science. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Daroca Oller, Santiago. n.d. “La Guerra del Agua: Protesta y Acción Social en Cochabamba.” Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (Bolivia).
Vreese, Claes H. 2006. “Political Parties in Dire Straits? Consequences of National Referendums for Political Parties.” Party Politics 12 (5): 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2003. “Advancing Democratic Governance: A Global Perspective on the Status of Democracy and Directions for International Assistance.” Mimeographed.
Donovan, Todd and Bowler, Shaun. 1998. “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An Extension.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 1020–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Todd and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2006. “Popular Support for Direct Democracy.” Party Politics 12 (5): 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorenspleet, Renske. 2004. “The Structural Context of Recent Transitions to Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 43 (3): 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Steve. 2005. “Referendum: Hitler's ‘Democratic’ Weapon to Forge Dictatorship.” Executive Intelligence Review 4 (14): 40–43.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1979. Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd A. 2004. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary. 2000. “Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary and Sides, John. 2007. “Can Institutions Build Unity in Multiethnic States?” American Political Science Review 101 (4): 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 2003. “The Contrasting Variants of the Populism of Hugo Chávez and Alberto Fujimori.” Journal of Latin American Studies 35 (1): 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, John. 1998. “Emotions and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 47–74.Google Scholar
Epstein, David L., Bates, Robert, Goldstone, Jack, Kristensen, Ida, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2006. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eulau, Heinz and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 1985. Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: The United States and Western Europe. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. and Laitin, David D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Febres Cordero, María M. and Márquez, Bernardo. 2006. “A Statistical Approach to Assess Referendum Results: The Venezuelan Recall Referendum 2004.” International Statistical Review 74 (3): 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Lars P. and Kirchgässner, Gebhard. 2001. “The Political Economy of Direct Legislation: Direct Democracy and Local Decision-Making.” Economic Policy 16 (33): 329–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Lars P. and Savioz, Marcel R.. 1997. “Direct Democracy Matters for Economic Performance: An Empirical Investigation.” Kyklos 50 (4): 507–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feoli, Ludovico. 2009. “Costa Rica después del TLC: ¿La Calma que Sigue a la Tempestad?Revista de Ciencia Política 29 (2): 355–379.Google Scholar
Fiorino, Nadia and Ricciuti, Roberto. 2006. “Determinants of Direct Democracy across Europe.” Department of Public Policy and Public Choice – Universita del Piemonte Amedeo Avogadro Working Paper 72.
Fiorino, Nadia and Ricciuti, Roberto. 2007. “Determinants of Direct Democracy.” CESifo Working Paper No. 2035.
Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fossedal, Gregory A. 2002. Direct Democracy in Switzerland. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark, DerEijk, Cees, and Marsh, Michael. 1995. “Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht.” West European Politics 18 (3): 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 2002. “Learning from the Danish Case: A Comment on Palle Svensson's Critique of the Franklin Thesis.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 751–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidenberg, Flabia. 2006. “Izquierda vs. Derecha: Polarización Ideológica y Competencia en el Sistema de Partidos Ecuatoriano.” Política y Gobierno XIII (2): 237–278.Google Scholar
Freidenberg, Flavia. 2003. “Selección de Candidatos y Democracia Interna en los Partidos de América Latina.” Instituto Interuniversitario de Estudios de Iberoamérica y Portugal, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca.
Freire, André and Baum, Michael A.. 2003. “Referenda Voting in Portugal, 1998: The Effects of Party Sympathies, Social Structure and Pressure Groups.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (1): 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitag, Markus and Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2008. “Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? The Influence of Direct Democracy on Individual Participation in Parliamentary Elections.” Mimeographed.
Freitag, Markus and Vatter, Adrian. 2006. “Initiatives, Referendums, and the Tax State.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1): 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., Kucher, Marcel, and Stutzer, Alois. 2001. “Outcome, Process and Power in Direct Democracy – New Econometric Results.” Public Choice 107 (3–4): 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Goette, Lorenz. 1998. “Does the Popular Vote Destroy Civil Rights?” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1343–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., Werner Pommerehne, and Friedrich Schneider. 1981. “Politico-Economic Interdependence in a Direct Democracy: The Case of Switzerland.” In Contemporary Political Economy, edited by Hibbs, D. A. and Fassbender, H.. Amsterdam: North Holland, 231–248.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Stutzer, Alois. 2000. “Happiness Prospers in Democracy.” Journal of Happiness Studies 1 (1): 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friemel, Thomas N. (Ed.). 2008. Why Context Matters: Applications of Social Network Analysis. Wiesbaden: VS Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael and Vincenzo Uleri, Pier (Eds.). 1996. The Referendum Experience in Europe. London: Palgrave–Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamarra, Eduardo A. 1997. “Hybrid Presidentialism and Democratization: The Case of Bolivia.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 363–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Barbara S. 1997. “Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcé, Adolfo. 2006. Donde Hubo Fuego. El Proceso de Adaptación del MLN-Tupamaros a la Legalidad y a la Competencia Electoral (1985–2004). Montevideo: Fin de Siglo.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. and Lupia, Arthur. 1995. “Campaign Competition and Policy Responsiveness in Direct Legislation Elections.” Political Behaviour 17 (3): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2004. “When Does Government Limit the Impact of Voter Initiatives? The Politics of Implementation and Enforcement.” The Journal of Politics 66 (1): 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilland, Karin. 2002a. “Ireland's (First) Referendum on the Treaty of Nice.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (3): 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilland, Karin. 2002b. “Ireland's Second Referendum on the Treaty of Nice, October 2002.” Opposing Europe Research Network Referendum Briefing No 1. www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/documents/irelandno1.pdf.
Gillespie, Charles G. 1991. Negotiating Democracy: Politicians and Generals in Uruguay. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloger, Andrew M. 2006. “Paid Petitioners after Prete.” Initiative & Referendum Institute – Report2006–1 (May).
Goertz, Gary. 2005. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2002. “The Fragile Flower of Local Democracy: A Case Study of Decentralization/Participation in Montevideo.” Politics & Society 30 (1): 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2006. “Los Procesos de “Presupuesto Participativo” en América Latina: Exito, Fracaso y Cambio.” Revista de Ciencia Política XXVI (2): 3–28.Google Scholar
González-Rissoto, Rodolfo. 2007. “Democracia Directa: El Caso de Uruguay.” Presented at the Direct Democracy in Latin America, March 14–15, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
González, Luis E. 1983. “Uruguay, 1980–1981: An Unexpected Opening.” Latin American Research Review 18 (3): 63–76.Google Scholar
Gosnell, Harold F. 1927. “The German Referendum on the Princes' Property.” American Political Science Review 21 (1): 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gros Espiell, Héctor. 2002. “Uruguay: ¿Presidencialismo o Parlamentarismo?” Cuestiones Constitucionales 7 (Julio-Diciembre): 87–108.Google Scholar
Gross, Andreas and Kaufmann, Bruno. 2002. IRI Europe Country Index on Citizenlawmaking 2002: A Report on Design and Rating of the I&R Requirements and Practices of 32 European States. Amsterdam: IRI Europe.Google Scholar
Grummel, John A. 2008. “Morality Politics, Direct Democracy, and Turnout.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 8 (3): 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadenius, Axel. 1992. Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadenius, Axel and Teorell, Jan. 2005. “Assessing Alternative Indices of Democracy.” Political Concepts, Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper Series #6.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan and Lewis, Paul G.. 2003. “Municipal Institutions and Voter Turnout in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (5): 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, C.. New York: Mentor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handelman, Howard. 1981. “Politics and Plebiscites: The Case of Uruguay.” Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Working Paper #89.Google Scholar
Hardmeier, Sibylle. 2002. “Switzerland.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (7–8): 1095–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, John. 2000. Direct Democracy or Representative Government? Dispelling the Populist Myth. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hautala, Heidi, Kaufmann, Bruno, and Wallis, Diana (Eds.). 2002. Voices of Europe: IRI Europe Report on the Growing Importance of Initiatives and Referendums in the European Integration Process. Amsterdam: Initiative & Referendum Institute Europe.Google Scholar
Heiss, Claudia and Navia, Patricio. 2007. “You Win Some, You Lose Some: Constitutional Reforms in Chile's Transition to Democracy.” Latin American Politics and Society 49 (3): 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David (Ed.). 1993. Prospects for Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2001. “Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 145–153.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A.. 1979. “The Mass Public and the Macroeconomic Performance: The Dynamics of Public Opinion towards Unemployment and Inflation.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 705–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higley, John and McAllister, Ian. 2002. “Elite Division and Voter Confusion: Australia's Republic Referendum in 1999.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile. 1994. Democracy in the Fifty States. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile and Leighley, Jan E.. 1993. “Party Ideology, Organization, and Competitiveness as Mobilizing Forces in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1158–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Lisa. 2003. “Democratic Deficit in the ACT: Is the Citizen Initiated Referendum a Solution?Australian Journal of Social Issues 38 (4): 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkelammert, Franz. 1994. “Our Project for the New Society in Latin America.” In Latin America Faces the Twenty-First Century, edited by Jonas, S. and McCaughan, E. J.. Boulder: Westview Press, 12–27.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2006a. “Direct Democracy and European Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1): 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2006b. “How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums.” Party Politics 12 (5): 623–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2008. “How Voters Decide in EU Referendums.” Presented at the Direct Democracy in and around Europe – Integration, Innovation, Illusion and Ideology, 3–4 October, Congress and Culture Center, Aarau, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2009. Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, Harold. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal 39 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2002. Voices of Europe. Citizens, Referendums and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2004. “Occurrence and Policy Consequences of Referendums: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 16 (3): 321–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon and Schulz, Tobias. 2007. “Referendums and Ratification of the EU Constitution.” In Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects, edited by Pállinger, Z. T., Kaufmann, B., Marxer, W., and Schiller, T.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon and Tsebelis, George. 2002. “Veto Players and Referendums around the World.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14 (4): 465–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneeus, Carlos. 2000. El Régimen de Pinochet. Santiago: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ibarra, Luis. 2005. “La Reforma del Agua: Nuevas Alianzas, Nuevas Instituciones y Nuevos Desafíos.” In Las Claves del Cambio: Ciclo Electoral y Nuevo Gobierno 2004/5002, edited by Buquet, D.. Montevideo: Banda Oriental – Instituto de Ciencia Política, 275–293.Google Scholar
Ingberman, Daniel E. 1985. “Running Against the Status Quo: Institutions for Direct Democracy Referenda and Allocations over Time.” Public Choice 46 (1): 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Initiative & Referendum Institute. 2007. “Election Results 2007.” Ballotwatch (2).
,Initiative & Referendum Institute. 2008. “Same-Sex Marriage: Breaking the Firewall in California.” Ballotwatch (2).
Jackman, Robert W. and Miller, Ross. 1995. “Voter Turnout in the Industrialized Democracies during the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies 27 (4): 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1985. “Petroleum and Political Pacts: The Transition to Democracy in Venezuela.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America, edited by O'Donnell, G., Schmitter, P., and Whitehead, L.. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 196–219.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1995. “The Hybrid Regimes in Central America.” Journal of Democracy 6 (3): 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Edy. 1979. Uruguay in Transition: From Civilian to Military Rule. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno (Ed.). 2004. Initiative and Referendum Monitor 2004/2005. Amsterdam: IRI Europe.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, Büchi, Rolf, and Braun, Nadja. 2007. Guidebook to Direct Democracy in Switzerland and Beyond. 2007 Edition. Bern: Benteli Hallwag Druck AG.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, Büchi, Rolf, and Braun, Nadja. 2008. Guidebook to Direct Democracy in Switzerland and Beyond. 2008 Edition. Bern: Benteli Hallwag Druck AG.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, Wallis, Diana, Leinen, Jo, Berg, Carsten, and Carline, Paul (Eds.). 2006. Initiative for Europe: A Roadmap for Transnational Democracy. Brussels: The Initiative & Referendum Institute Europe.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno and Waters, Dane (Eds.). 2004. Direct Democracy in Europe: A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
,Keesing's Worldwide. (n.d.). “Keesing's Record of World Events Online.” http://www.keesings.com.
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Rosen, Ori, and Tanner, Martin A.. 1999. “Binomial-Beta Hierarchical Models for Ecological Inference.” Sociological Methods and Research 28 (1) 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchgässner, Gebhard. 2008. “Direct Democracy: Obstacle to Reform?” Constitutional Political Economy 19 (2): 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk, Luna, Juan Pablo, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth-Jean. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klöti, Ulrigh. 2001. “Consensual Government in a Heterogeneous Polity.” West European Politics 24 (2): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobach, Kris. 1993. The Referendum: Direct Democracy in Switzerland. Vermont: Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited.Google Scholar
Kobach, Kris. 1994. “Switzerland.” In Referendums Around the World, edited by Butler, D. and Ranney, A.. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 98–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, Benjamin. 2002. “Stabilizing Neoliberalism in Bolivia: Popular Participation and Privatization.” Political Geography 21 (4): 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koole, Ruud. 1996. “Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel? A Comment on the Notion of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 2 (4): 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, Miriam. 2005. “Elections Versus Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 16 (1): 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior: 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65 (1): 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2001. “The Federal Parliament: The Limits of Institutional Reform.” West European Politics 24 (2): 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2002. “Individual Opinion Formation in a Direct Democratic Campaign.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2006. “Role of the Political Elite in Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes.” Party Politics 12 (5): 599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter and Trechsel, Alexander H.. 2008. The Politics of Switzerland: Continuity and Change in a Consensus Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladner, Andreas and Brändle, Michael. 1999. “Does Direct Democracy Matter for Political Parties? An Empirical Test in the Swiss Cantons.” Party Politics 5 (3): 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerspetz, Eerik. 2006. “Referenda with Multiple Alternatives.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, April 20–23, Turku, Finland.Google Scholar
Lalander, Rickard. 2004. Suicide of the Elephants? Venezuelan Decentralization between Partyarchy and Chavismo. Stockholm: Instituto of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. 2004. “Turning Votes into Territories: Boundary Referendums in Theory and Practice.” Political Geography 23 (2): 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassen, David Dreyer. 2005. “The Effect of Information on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Steve. 2008. “Wealthy Interests Alter Calif's Initiative Process.” Washington Times, October 29.
LeDuc, Lawrence. 1993. “Canada's Next Term Constitutional Referendum of 1992: A ‘Great Big No’.” Electoral Studies 12 (3): 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. 2002. “Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 711–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Lee Van Cott, Donna. 2000. “Party System Development and Indigenous Populations in Latin America: The Bolivian Case.” Party Politics 6 (2): 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessa, Alfonso. 2002. La Revolución Imposible: Los Tupamaros y el Fracaso de la Vía Armada en el Uruguay del Siglo XX. Montevideo: Editorial Fin de Siglo.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Quan, Li and Reuveny, Rafael. 2003. “Economic Globalization and Democracy: An Empirical Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 29–54.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patter of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2006. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf. 1994. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Linton, Martin. 2001. “Options for the Referendum on the Voting System.” The Political Quarterly 72 (1): 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.” In Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3, Macropolitical Theory, edited by Polsby, N. and Greenstein, F.. Reading: Addison-Wesley Press, 175–411.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Seong, Kyoung-Ryung, and Torres, John Charles. 1993. “A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy.” International Social Science Journal XLV (2): 155–175.Google Scholar
Lissidini, Alicia. 1998. “Una Mirada Crítica a la Democracia Directa: El Origen y las Prácticas de los Plebiscitos en Uruguay.” Perfiles Latinoamericanos 7 (12): 169–200.Google Scholar
Lissidini, Alicia. 2007. “La Democracia Directa en Venezuela: ¿Democracia Participativa o Democracia Plebiscitaria?” C2D – 25/2008.
Londregan, John and Vindigni, Andrea. 2008. “Authoritarian Plebiscites.” Presented at the Seminarios de Macroeconomía y Finanzas del Banco Central de Chile, June 6, Santiago.Google Scholar
López Maya, Margarita. 2003. “The Venezuelan Caracazo of 1989: Popular Protest and Institutional Weakness.” Journal of Latin American Studies 35 (1): 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2002. “¿Pesimismo Estructural o Voto Económico? Macropolitics en Uruguay.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 13: 123–151.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2007. “Representación Política en América Latina: El Estado de la Cuestión y una Propuesta de Agenda.” Política y Gobierno XIV (2): 391–435.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “The Effect of Information on Voting Behavior and Electoral Outcomes: An Experimental Study of Direct Legislation.” Public Choice 78 (1): 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and Matsusaka, John G.. 2004. “Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lüthi, Ruth. 2007. “The Parliament.” In Handbook of Swiss Politics, edited by Klöti, U., Knoepfel, P., Kriesi, H., Linder, W., Papadopoulos, Y., and Sciarini, P.. Zurich: Neue Zurcher Zeitung Publishing, 121–144.Google Scholar
Lutz, Georg. 2006. “The Interaction between Representative and Direct Democracy in Switzerland.” Representation 42 (1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Karin Gilland and Hug, Simon. 2006. “A Cross-National Comparative Study of the Policy Effects of Referendums.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31–September 3, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Machado, Juan Carlos. 2007. “Ecuador: El Derrumbe de los Partidos Tradicionales.” Revista de Ciencia Política 27 (EE): 129–148.Google Scholar
Machado, Juan Carlos. 2008. “Ecuador:…Hasta que se Fueron Todos.” Revista de Ciencia Política 28 (1): 189–215.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magleby, David B. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination.” Comparative Political Studies 26 (4): 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Brinks, Daniel, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2001. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America 1945–1999.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Brinks, Daniel, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America 1945–2004.” In Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods, edited by Munck, G. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–160.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Tim (Eds.). 1995a. Building Democratic Institutions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Tim. 1995b. “Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions, edited by Mainwaring, S. and Scully, T.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1–36.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1997. “Conclusion: Presidentialism and the Party System.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, S. and Shugart, M. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 394–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maor, Moshe. 1998. Parties, Conflicts and Coalitions in Western Europe: Organisational Determinants of Coalition Bargaining. London: Routledge and LSE.Google Scholar
Maravall, José María. 1999. “Accountability and Manipulation.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, edited by Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 131–153.Google Scholar
Marcus, Richard R., Mease, Kenneth, and Ottemoeller, Dan. 2004. “Popular Definitions of Democracy from Uganda, Madagascar, and Florida, U.S.A.” Journal of African and Asian Studies 36 (1): 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenco, André. 2006. “Path-Dependency, Instituciones Políticas y Reformas Electorales en Perspectiva Comparada.” Revista de Ciencia Política 26 (2): 53–75.Google Scholar
Margalit, Avishai and Raz, Joseph. 1990. “National Self-Determination.” The Journal of Philosophy 87 (9): 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marius, Jorge L. and Bacigalupe, Juan F.. 1998. Sistema Electoral y Elecciones Uruguayas 1925–1998. Montevideo: Fundacion Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Markarian, Vania. 2004. “De la Lógica Revolucionaria a las Razones Humanitarias: La Izquierda Uruguaya en el Exilio y las Redes Transnacionales de Derechos Humanos (1972–1976).” Cuadernos del CLAEH 89 (2): 85–108.Google Scholar
Markoff, John. 1999. “Where and When Was Democracy Invented?” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41 (4): 660–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marques, Alvaro and Smith, Thomas B.. 1984. “Referendums in the Third World.” Electoral Studies 3 (1): 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith. 2001. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–1999.” http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/polity/.
Marshall, Thomas Humphrey. 1992. “Citizenship and Social Class.” In Citizenship and Social Class, edited by Marshall, T. H. and Bottomore, T.. London: Pluto Press, 3–51.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayorga, René Antonio. 1997. “Bolivia's Silent Revolution.” Journal of Democracy 8 (1): 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer L. 2006. “The 2004 Venezuelan Recall Referendum.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 2 (1): 61–80.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer L. 2005. “One Act in an Unfinished Drama.” Journal of Democracy 16 (1): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew and Rosenbluth, Frances. 1995. “Party Provision for Personal Votes: Dividing the Vote in Japan.” In Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States, edited by Cowhey, P. and McCubbins, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–55.Google Scholar
McDonald, Ronald H. 1982. “The Struggle for Normalcy in Uruguay.” Current History 81 (472): 69–85.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. and Schofield, Norman. 1986. “Structural Instability of the Core.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 15 (3): 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew and Cutler, Fred. 2000. “The Effect of Referenda on Democratic Citizens: Information, Politicization, Efficacy and Tolerance.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 669–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, Fernando and Triga, Vasiliki. 2009. “Constitution-Making, Constitutional Conventions and Conflict Resolution: Lesson Drawing for Cyprus.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 11 (4): 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez, Juan E. 2004. “Fundamental Rights as a Limitation to the Democratic Principle of Majority Will.” In The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications, edited by O'Donnell, G., Cullell, J. V., and Iazzetta, O. M.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 196–202.Google Scholar
Mershon, Carol. 1996. “The Cost of Coalition: Coalition Theories and Italian Governments.” American Political Science Review 90 (3): 534–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1999 (1911). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Miller, Kenneth P. 2003. “The Courts and the Initiative Process.” In Initiative and Referendum Almanac, edited by Waters, D. M.. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 459–467.Google Scholar
Miller, William L. 1988. Irrelevant Elections? The Quality of Local Democracy in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 2006. “The Digital Divide: The Role of Political Institutions in Technology Diffusion.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittendorf, Volker. 2007. “Databases for (Empirical) Research on ‘Direct Democracy.’” In Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects, edited by Pállinger, Z. T., Kaufmann, B., Marxer, W., and Schiller, T.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalvo, Jose G. and Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2005. “Ethnic Diversity and Economic Development.” Journal of Development Economics 76 (2): 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Bruce E., Harvey, Jennifer, Ceisluk, Sylvia, Garlett, Lauren M., Hermias, Joshua J., Mendenhall, Elizabeth, Schmid, Patrick D., and Wong, Wai Hong. 2006. “Voting Counts: Participation in the Measurement of Democracy.” Studies in Comparative International Development 41 (2): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales Viteri, Juan Pablo. 2008. “Ecuador: Mecanismos de Democracia Directa.” C2D Working Paper Series 20.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll-Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 2004. “What Is a ‘Good’ Democracy?” Democratization 11 (5): 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward N. 1988. “Democracy, Economic Development, and Income Inequality.” American Sociological Review 53 (2): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward N. 1989. “Democracy and Inequality: Reply to Weede.” American Sociological Review 54 (5): 868–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward N. 1995. “Economic Determinants of Democracy.” American Sociological Review 60 (6): 966–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 1999. “Plebiscitary Agenda-Setting and Party Strategies: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Austria.” Party Politics 5 (3): 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo. 2003. “Teaching Qualitative Methodology: Rationale, State of the Art, and an Agenda.” Qualitative Methods-Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 1 (1): 12–15.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2007. “The Study of Politics and Democracy: Touchstones of a Research Agenda.” In Regimes and Democracy in Latin America. Theories and Methods, edited by Munck, G. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–38.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2009. Measuring Democracy. A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Martin, Pierre, and Blais, André. 1999. “Attitude Towards Risk-Taking and Individual Choice in the Quebec Referendum on Sovereignty.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nannestad, Peter and Paldman, Martin. 1994. “The VP-Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years.” Public Choice 79 (3–4): 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedelmann, Birgitta. 1987. “Individuals and Parties – Changes in Processes of Political Mobilization.” European Sociological Review 3 (3): 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. 2004. “Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 37 (5): 531–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. “On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.” World Development 21 (8): 1355–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2001. “Reflections on Contemporary South American Democracies.” Journal of Latin American Studies 33 (3): 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2002. “Acerca de varias Accountabilities y sus Interrelaciones.” In Controlando la Política: Ciudadanos y Medios en las Nuevas Democracias Latinoamericanas, edited by Peruzzotti, E. and Smulovitz, C.. Buenos Aires: Temas, 87–102.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2004a. “Exploración sobre el Desarrollo de la Democracia.” In La Democracia en América Latina: Hacia un Democracia de Ciudadanas y Ciudadanos, edited by PNUD. New York: PNUD, 47–70.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2004b. “Human Development, Human Rights, and Democracy.” In The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications, edited by O'Donnell, G., Cullell, J. V., and Iazzetta, O. M.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 9–92.Google Scholar
Olken, Benjamin A. 2008. “Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Series No. 14123.
Pachano, Simón. 1997. “Bucaram, ¡Fuera! Bucaram, ¿Fuera?” In ¿Y Ahora Qué? Una Contribución al Análisis Político-Histórico Actual. Quito: Eskeletra Editorial, 229–264.Google Scholar
Panizza, Francisco E. 1990. Uruguay: Batllismo y Después. Pacheco, Militares y Tupamaros en la Crisis del Uruguay Batllista. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Panzer, John and Paredes, Ricardo. 1991. “The Role of Economic Issues in Elections: The Case of the 1988 Chilean Presidential Referendum.” Public Choice 71 (1–2): 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Yannis. 1995. “Analysis of Functions and Dysfunctions of Direct Democracy: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives.” Politics and Society 23 (4): 421–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2001. “How Does Direct Democracy Matter? The Impact of Referendum Votes upon Politics and Policy-Making.” West European Politics 24 (2): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, John. 2003. “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51 (1): 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel and Caldeira, Gregory. 1983. “Getting Out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 77 (3): 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2000. “The Institutional Determinants of Impeachment.” Presented at the Latin American Science Association, March 16–18, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2006. “Evaluating Presidential Runoff Elections.” Electoral Studies 25 (1): 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2003. “Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma and Republican Theory.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, edited by Fishkin, J. and Laslett, P.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 138–162.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1991. Engendering Democracy. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
,PNUD. 2004. La Democracia en América Latina: Hacia una Democracia de Ciudadanas y Ciudadanos. New York: Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Pommerehne, Werner W. and Weck-Hannemann, Hannelore. 1996. “Tax Rates, Tax Administration and Income Tax Evasion in Switzerland.” Public Choice 88 (1/2): 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porzecanski, Arturo C. 1973. Uruguay's Tupamaros: The Urban Guerrilla. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pottie, David. 2003. “The Presidential Elections in Zimbabwe, March 2002.” Electoral Studies 22 (3): 516–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottie, David. 2002. “Parliamentary Elections in Zimbabwe, 2000.” Electoral Studies 21 (3): 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 80 (1): 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Matthew. 2004. Ending Civil War: Rhodesia and Lebanon in Perspective. New York: Tauris Academic Studies.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2008. “Protecting the Poor: Welfare Politics in Latin America's Neoliberal Era.” Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Ph.D. Thesis.
Przeworski, Adam. 1986. “Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, vol. III, edited by O'Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., and Whitehead, L.. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 47–63.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1988. “Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, J. and Slagstad, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 1996. “What Makes Democracies Endure?” Journal of Democracy 7 (1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” World Politics 49 (2): 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 1999. “A.V. Dicey: The Referendum as the People's Veto.” History of Political Thought XX (3): 531–546.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2005. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles. 2000. Fuzzy-Set, Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles and Sonnett, John. 2004. “Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis.” In Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, edited by Kropp, S. and Minkenberg, M.. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 180–197.Google Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1965. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, edited by Jacob, H. and Vines, K. N.. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 51–92.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review 61 (1): 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz. 1984. “National Electoral Cycles and European Elections.” Electoral Studies 3 (3): 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz and Schmitt, Hermann. 1980. “Nine Second Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1989. Military Rule in Latin America. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Réti, Pál. 2009. “Hungary: Direct Democracy in an Antagonistic Society.” In Global Citizens in Charge: How Modern Direct Democracy Can Make Our Representative Democracies Truly Representative, edited by Lee, J.-O. and Kaufmann, B.. Seoul: Korea Democracy Foundation, 211–220.Google Scholar
Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2002. “Ethnicity, Political Systems, and Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rial, Juan. 2000. “Instituciones de Democracia Directa en América Latina.” National Democratic Institute (October). www.ndipartidos.org/pdf/gobernando/democraciadirecta.pdf.
Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Rilla, José. 1997. “Uruguay 1980: Transición y Democracia Plebiscitaria.” Nueva Sociedad 150 (Julio-Agosto): 77–83.Google Scholar
Rius, Andrés. 1992. “El Gobierno, la Economía y el Hombre de la Calle.” SUMA 7 (13): 7–35.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Raga, Juan Carlos and Botero, Felipe. 2006. “Ordenando el caos. Elecciones legislativas y reforma electoral en Colombia.” Revista de Ciencia Política 26 (1): 138–151.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. and Mark Hansen, John. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I. 2000. “Africa's Mess, Mugabe's Mayhem.” Foreign Affairs 79 (5): 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I. 2007. “The Challenge of Weak, Failing, and Collapsed States.” In Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 83–94.Google Scholar
Rourke, John T., Hiskes, Richard P., and Zirakzadeh, Cyrus Ernesto. 1992. Direct Democracy and International Politics: Deciding International Issues Through Referendums. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1988. The Social Contract. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Royston, Patrick and Altman, Douglas G.. 1997. “Approximating Statistical Functions by Using Fractional Polynomial Regression.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 46 (3): 411–422.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1997. “Is Collective Violence Correlated with Social Pluralism?” Journal of Peace Research 34 (2): 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy.” Comparative Politics 2 (3): 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydgren, Jens. 2005. “Is Extreme Right-Wing Populism Contagious? Explaining the Emergence of a New Party Family.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (3): 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan. 1999. “Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy: Who Benefits?” Party Politics 5 (3): 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 2001. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (6): 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Daniel and Yohai, Ian. 2008. “How Initiatives Don't Always Make Citizens: Ballot Initiatives in the American States, 1978–2004.” Political Behavior 30 (4): 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. 2002. “Political Performance and Types of Democracy: Findings from Comparative Studies.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (1): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Friedrich and Naumann, Jorg. 1982. “Interest Groups in Democracies – How Influential Are They? An Empirical Examination for Switzerland.” Public Choice 38 (3): 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofer, Evan and Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion. 2001. “The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement. Voluntary Association Membership, Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review 66 (6): 806–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, Andreas R. T. and Vreese, Claes H.. 2008. “The Dutch No to the EU Constitution: Assessing the Role of EU Skepticism and the Campaign.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18 (1): 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brother Publishers.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1997. “Maximization and the Act of Choice.” Econometrica 65 (4): 745–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Serdült, Uwe. 2007. “Direct Democracy in Switzerland and its Discontents.” Presented at the Direct Democracy in Latin America, March 14–15, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 1999a. Referendums and Democratic Government: Normative Theory and the Analysis of Institutions. London: Palgrave – MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 1999b. “Referendums in Western Europe – A Wave of Direct Democracy?” Scandinavian Political Studies 22 (4): 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 2006a. “National Referendums in European Democracies: Recent Developments.” Representation 42 (1): 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 2006b. “On the Problems of Responsibility and Accountability in Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (4): 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Fred. 2003. “The Indirect Initiative Process.” In Initiative and Referendum Almanac, edited by Waters, D. M.. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 13–29.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E. and Smith, Peter H.. 2001. Modern Latin America. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Barbara and Nolan, Stuart. 2000. “Zimbabwe: Referendum Defeat for Mugabe Shakes Zanu-PF Government.” World Socialist Web Site. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/feb2000/zimb-f22.shtml.
Smith, Daniel A. and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2004. Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2002. “Ballot Initiatives and the Democratic Citizen.” The Journal of Politics 64 (3): 892–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 2004. “Los Ciclos de Democracia Electoral en América Latina 1900–2000.” Política y Gobierno XI (2): 189–228.Google Scholar
Sondrol, Paul C. 1991. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner.” Journal of Latin American Studies 23 (3): 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotelo Rico, Mariana. 1999. “La Longevided de los Partidos Tradicionales Uruguayos desde una Perspectiva Comparada.” In Los Partidos Políticos Uruguayos en Tiempos de Cambio, edited by González, L. E.. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 131–158.Google Scholar
Stallings, Barbara and Brock, Phillip. 1993. “The Political Economy of Adjustment: Chile, 1973–1990.” In Political and Economic Interactions in Economic Policy Reform: Evidence of Eight Countries, edited by Bates, R. and Krueger, A.. Cambridge: Blackwell, 78–121.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 1991. “Democratic Dominoes: Diffusion Approaches to the Spread of Democracy in the International System.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2): 356–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred C. 1978. The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 914–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1996. “Economic Reform and Public Opinion in Peru, 1990–1995.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (5): 544–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1999. “What Do Policy Switches Tell Us about Democracy?” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, edited by Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., and Manin, B.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 98–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Walter J. and Narayan Datta, Monti. 2004. “Rationalizing the California Recall.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (1): 19–21.Google Scholar
Suksi, Markku. 1993. Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendums. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Svensson, Palle. 2002. “Five Danish Referendums on the European Community and European Union: A Critical Assessment of the Franklin Thesis.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 733–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, Palle. 2007. “Direct and Representative Democracy – Supplementing, Not Excluding Each Other.” Presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, 7–12 May, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks and Taggart, Paul. 2004. “The Politics of European Referendum Outcomes and Turnout: Two Models.” West European Politics 27 (4): 557–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy. 1987. Why Americans Don't Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States, 1960–1984. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
,The National Conference of State Legislatures. 2008. Available at http://www.ncsl.org/ncsldb/elect98/irsrch.cfm.
Thomas Acuña, Evaristo. 2007. “Colombia: Entre la crisis de la representatividad y la democracia directa.” C2D16/2008.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J. and Bowen, Daniel. 2008. “Direct Democracy, Engagement and Turnout.” In Democracy in the States: Experiments in Election Reform, edited by Cain, B. E., Donovan, T., and Tolbert, C.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 99–113.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J. and Smith, Daniel A.. 2005. “The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout.” American Politics Research 33 (2): 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J. and Smith, Daniel A.. 2006. “Representation and Direct Democracy in the United States.” Representation 42 (1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres Rivas, Edelberto. 1997. “La Gobernabilidad Centroamericano en las Noventa: Consideraciones sobre las Posibilidades Democráticas en la Postguerra.” América Latina Hoy 8 (June): 27–34.Google Scholar
Tranter, Bruce. 2003. “The Australian Constitutional Referendum of 1999: Evaluating Explanations of Republican Voting.” Electoral Studies 22 (4): 677–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trechsel, Alexander H. and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1996. “Switzerland: The Referendum and Initiative as a Centerpiece of the Political System.” In The Referendum Experience in Europe, edited by Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P. V.. London: Macmillan, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trechsel, Alexander H. and Sciarini, Pascal. 1998. “Direct Democracy in Switzerland: Do Elites Matter?” European Journal of Political Research 33 (1): 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1997. “Procedural Fairness and Compliance with the Law.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 133 (2/2): 219–240.Google Scholar
Uggla, Fredrik. 2008. “Bolivia: Referéndums como Armas Políticas.” Presented at the ¿Hacia dónde va la democracia en América Latina? October 20–21, Montevideo.Google Scholar
Uleri, PierVincenzo. 1996. “Italy: Referendums and Initiatives from the Origins to the Crisis of a Democratic Regime.” In The Referendum Experience in Europe, edited by Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P. V.. London: Macmillan, 106–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uleri, PierVincenzo. 2002. “On Referendum Voting in Italy: YES, NO or Non–Vote? How Italian Parties Learned to Control Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 863–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, Jodie B. 1996. “Structural Equation Model.” In Using Multivariate Statistics, edited by Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L.. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 653–771.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1991. “The Military in Power: The Consolidation of One-Man Rule.” In The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, 1982–1990, edited by Drake, P. and Jaksic, I.. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 21–72.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Samuel J. 1992. “Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings: Notion, Process and Facilitating Conditions.” In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, edited by Mainwaring, S., O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Valenzuela, S.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 57–73.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 1999. “Domestic Ethnic Conflict and Ethnic Nepotism: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Peace Research 36 (1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. “A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810–1998.” Journal of Peace Research 37 (2): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas Cullell, Jorge. 2007. “Costa Rica: Fin de una Era Política.” Revista de Ciencia Política 27 (EE): 113–128.Google Scholar
Vargas Cullell, Jorge. 2008. “Costa Rica: Una Decisión Estratégica en Tiempos Inciertos.” Revista de Ciencia Política 28 (1): 147–169.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian. 2000. “Consensus and Direct Democracy: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages.” European Journal of Political Research 38 (2): 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatter, Adrian. 2007. “Three Dimensions of Democracy? Lijphart's Typology and Direct Democracy. A Cross-National Analysis of Forms of Government in 23 Advanced Democracies between 1997 and 2006.” Presented at the 35th Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, May 7–12, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian. 2008. “Swiss Consensus Democracy in Transition: A Re-analysis of Lijphart's Concept of Democracy for Switzerland from 1997 to 2007.” World Political Science Review 4 (2): Article 1.Google Scholar
Vatter, Adrian. 2009. “Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries?” European Political Science Review 1 (1): 125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venter, Denis. 2005. “Zimbabwe Before and After the June 2000 Elections: An Assessment.” EISA. Available at http://www.eisa.org.za/WEP/zim2000election1.htm.
Venturini, Angel R. 1989. Estadísticas Electorales 1917–1989. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Vergara, Pilar. 1985. Auge y Caída del Neoliberalismo en Chile. Santiago: FLACSO-Salesianos.Google Scholar
Vergara, Pilar. 1986. “Changes in the Economic Functions of the Chilean State under the Military Regime.” In Military Rule in Chile: Dictatorship and Oppositions, edited by Valenzuela, A. and Valenzuela, S.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Verhulst, Jos and Nijeboer, Arejen. 2007. Direct Democracy: Facts and Arguments about the Introduction of Initiative and Referendum. Brussels: Democracy International.Google Scholar
Voss, Stephen and Lublin, David. 1998. “Ecological Inference and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Association – Comparative Politics Newsletter. Winter 25–31.
Wald, Kenneth D., Button, James W., and Rienzo, Barbara A.. 1996. “The Politics of Gay Rights in American Communities: Explaining Antidiscrimination Ordinances and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 1152–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, John and Seddon, David. 1994. Free Markets and Food Riots. The Politics of Global Adjustments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2004. Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D. 2002. “Green Binders in Cyberspace: A Modest Proposal.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 46–51.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2001. Democracy and Association. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wernli, Boris. 1998. “Die Bestimmungsfaktoren der Wahlbeteiligung. Eine vergleichende Analyse von 10 Schweizer Kantonen.” In Selects. Die Schweizer Wahlen 1995, edited by Kriesi, H., Linder, W., and Klöti, U.. Bern: Haupt, 73–100.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “The Politics of Corruption in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 9 (2): 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2005. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” World Politics 57 (2): 262–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, Jonathan. 2008. “Direct Democracy in the Commonwealth of Independent States: The State of the Art.” C2D Working Paper Series 28.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1992. “The Alternatives to ‘Liberal Democracy’: A Latin American Perspective.” Political Studies 40 (1): 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond and Rosenstone, Steven. 1980. Who Votes?New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Joseph F. 1986. Participatory Democracy: Populism Revived. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Zovatto, Daniel. 2001. “La Práctica General de las Instituciones de Democracia Directa en América Latina. Un Balance Comparado: 1978–2000.” Presented at the Primer Encuentro Multidisciplinario sobre Democracia y Formación Ciudadana, Diciembre 6–8, México.Google Scholar
Zovatto, Daniel, Marulanda, Iván, Lizarazo, Antonio, and González, Rodolfo. 2004. Democracia Directa y Referéndum en Amércia Latina. La Paz: Corte Nacional Electoral.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • David Altman, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Book: Direct Democracy Worldwide
  • Online publication: 01 March 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933950.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • David Altman, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Book: Direct Democracy Worldwide
  • Online publication: 01 March 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933950.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • David Altman, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Book: Direct Democracy Worldwide
  • Online publication: 01 March 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933950.011
Available formats
×