Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T17:55:57.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Resolving Conflict Between Farmers and Wild Boar in Europe and Northern Asia

from Part III - Conservation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

Mario Melletti
Affiliation:
AfBIG (African Buffalo Initiative Group), IUCN SSC ASG
Erik Meijaard
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrycht, M., Merta, D., Bobek, J. & Ulejczyk, S. (2016). The demographic pattern of wild boar (Sus scrofa) inhabiting fragmented forest in north-eastern Poland. Baltic Forestry 22(2): 251258.Google Scholar
Amici, A., Serrani, F., Rossi, C. M. & Primi, R. (2012). Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L): the ‘refuge effect’. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32: 683692.Google Scholar
Andrzejewski, R. & Jezierski, W. (1978). Management of wild boar population and its effects on commercial land. Acta Theriologica 33: 309339.Google Scholar
Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. & Putman, R. (eds.). (2010). European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrios-Garcia, M. N. & Ballari, S. A. (2012). Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14(11): 22832300.Google Scholar
Bieber, C. & Ruff, T. (2005). Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 12031213.Google Scholar
Bleir, N. & Szemethy, L. (2003). Factors influencing agricultural damages. Vadbiologia 10: 3641 [in Hungarian with English summary].Google Scholar
Bleier, N., Lehoczki, R., Ujvary, D., Szemethy, L. & Csanyi, S. (2012). Relationships between wild ungulate density and crop damage in Hungary. Acta Theriologica 57: 351359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blome, S., Gabriel, C. & Beer, M. (2013). Pathogenesis of African swine fever in domestic pigs and European wild boar. Virus Research 173: 122130.Google Scholar
Bobek, B. (1973). Net production of small rodents in a deciduous forest. Acta Theriologica 18: 403434.Google Scholar
Bobek, J. (2016). Charakterystyka szkod wyrzadzanych przez dziki w uprawach rolnych na terenie polnocno-zachodniej czesci wojewodztwa warminsko-mazurskiego. PhD dissertation. Pedagogical University of Cracow, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Bobek, B., Furtek, J., Bobek, J., Merta, D. & Wojciuch-Płoskonka, M. (2017). Spatio-temporal characteristics of crop damage caused by wild boar in north-eastern Poland. Crop Protection 93: 106112.Google Scholar
Bratton, S. P. (1975). The effect of the European wild boar, Sus scrofa, on gray beech forest in Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 56: 13561366.Google Scholar
Briedermann, L. (1990). Schwarzwild. Berlin: VEB.Google Scholar
Budna, E., Grzybowska, L. & Karczewicz, A. (2007). Forestry 2007. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office, Agricultural Statistic Division.Google Scholar
Cahil, L., Llimona, F., Cabaneros, S. & Calomardo, F. (2009). Habituation of wild boar in a metropolitan area: characterisation, conflicts and solutions in Collserola Park, Barcelona. In Nahlik, A. & Tari, T. (eds.), Proc. 7th Int. Symp. Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and on suborder Suiformes: Sopron, Hungary, pp. 2527.Google Scholar
Cai, J., Zeng, Y., Li, C., Jiang, Z. & Bravery, B. D. (2008). Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 723728.Google Scholar
Calenge, C., Maillard, D., Fournier, P. & Fouque, C. (2004). Efficiency of spreading maize in the garrigues to reduce wild boar (Sus scrofa) damage to Mediterranean vineyards. European Journal of Wildlife Research 50(3): 112120.Google Scholar
Cavagnuolo, L., Bellezza, P., Bonanni, M., et al. (2015). Management of the pest species: what was planned and not done for the boar in the province of Rieti (Lazio Italy). Abstracts of the 10th European Vertebrate Pest Management Conference, no. 125.Google Scholar
Cellina, S. (2008). Effects of supplemental feeding on the body condition and reproductive state of wild boar Sus scrofa in Luxembourg. PhD thesis. Brighton: University of Sussex, 141 pp.Google Scholar
Cellina, S. (2014). Dos and don'ts in European wild boar (Sus scrofa) management or: Why can't we agree on releasing, feeding, poisoning, trapping, shooting 24/7, …. Abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on Wild Boar and other Suids, no. 14.Google Scholar
Chauhan, N. P. S., Barwal, K. S. & Kumar, D. (2009). Human–wild pig conflict in selected states in India and mitigation strategies. Acta Silvatica and Lignaria Hungarica 5: 189197.Google Scholar
Chen, J. (2006). Investigation into wildlife damage and prevention measures in Fujian Province. Forest Prospect and Design 140142 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Cherenkov, A. Y. (2004). Distribution of wild boar numbers in the Tula region. In Vestnik. Moscow: RGAZU, pp. 8485 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Conover, M. R. (2002). Resolving human–wildlife conflicts: the science of wildlife damage management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.Google Scholar
Danilkin, A. A. (2002). Pigs (Suidae). Mammals of Russia and adjacent countries. Moscow: GEOS [in Russian].Google Scholar
Danilov, P. I. (2009). New mammals in the Russian European North. Karelian Research Center, RAS. Petrozavodsk [in Russian].Google Scholar
Drozd, L. (1988). Influence of dispersion of forest complexes on the damage by wild boar in field crops in microregion of Central-East. Sylwan 11–12: 7984.Google Scholar
Economov, A. V. & Domsky, I. (2014). Negative effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) on birds nesting on the ground in European northeast Russia. Abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on Wild Boar and other Suids, no. 100.Google Scholar
Elliger, A., Linderoth, P., Pegel, M. & Seitler, S. (2001). Ergebnisse einer landesweiten Befragung zur Schwarzwildbewirtschaftung. WFS-Mitteilungen, Nr. 4/2001: 14.Google Scholar
Faliński, J. B. (1986). Succession, regeneration and fluctuation in the Bialowieza Forest (NE Poland). In Temporal and spatial patterns of vegetation dynamics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 115128.Google Scholar
Frąckowiak, W., Gorczyca, S., Merta, D. & Wojciuch-Ploskonka, M. (2013). Factors affecting the level of damage by wild boar in farmland in north-eastern Poland. Pest Management Science 69: 362366.Google Scholar
Galhano-Alves, J. P. (2004). Man and wild boar, a study in Monteshimo Natural Park, Portugal. Galemys 16: 223230.Google Scholar
Geisser, H. & Reyer, H. U. (2004). Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 939946.Google Scholar
Genov, P. (1981). Significance of natural biocenoses and agrocenoses as the source of food for wild boar (Sus scrofa L.). Ekologia Polska 29: 117136.Google Scholar
Genov, P., Tonini, V. & Massei, G. (1995). Crop damage by wild ungulates in a Mediterranean area. In Botev, N. (ed.), The game and man. Proceedings. Sofia: IUGB, pp. 214215.Google Scholar
Gomez, J. M., García, D. & Zamora, R. (2003). Impact of vertebrate acorn- and seedling-predators on a Mediterranean Quercus pyrenaica forest. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 125134.Google Scholar
Goryńska, W. (1981). Method of determining relations between the extent of damage in farm crops, big game numbers and environmental conditions. Acta Theriologica 26: 469481.Google Scholar
Groot Bruinderink, G. W. T. A. & Hazebroek, E. (1996). Wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting and forest regeneration on podzolic soils in the Netherlands. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 7180.Google Scholar
Grzybowska, L., Pac, T. & Raczkoska, J. (2014). Forestry 2014. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office, Agricultural Statistic Division.Google Scholar
Guilbert, B. (2011). L'indemnisation des degates de grand giber en France. Unpublished paper presented during International Conference on Damages inflicted by game held by the Association of Clerks and Assessors in Poland. 14–16 October 2011, Będlewo, 62-060 Stęszew, Poland.Google Scholar
Guldemond, A., Dijkman, W. & Keuper, D. (2015). Wilde zwijnen op weg in Nederland. (Wild boar on the road in The Netherlands). Report CLM 873. Culemborg: CLM.Google Scholar
Hadjisterkotis, E. & Heise-Pavlov, P. M. (2006). The failure of the introduction of wild boar Sus scrofa in the island of Cyprus: a case study. European Journal of Wildlife Research 52: 213215.Google Scholar
Hahn, N. & Eisfeld, D. (1998). Diet and habitat use of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in SW Germany. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15: 595606.Google Scholar
Hearn, R., Watkins, C. & Balzaretti, R. (2014). The cultural and land use implications of the reappearance of wild boar in North West Italy: a case study in the Val di Vara. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 5263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, J., García-Serrano, A., Counto, S., Ortuno, V. M. & García-Gonzalez, R. (2006). Diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa L) and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. European Journal of Wildlife Research 52: 245250.Google Scholar
Hohmann, U. (2014). Wild boar business in Europe – a cost–benefit analysis. Abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on Wild Boar and other Suids, no. 20.Google Scholar
Honda, T. (2007). Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar: the analysis using census data of agriculture and forestry. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society 89: 249252 [in Japanese with English summary].Google Scholar
Honda, T. & Sugita, M. (2007). Environmental factors affecting damage by wild boars (Sus scrofa) to rice fields in Yamanashi Prefecture, central Japan. Mammal Study 32: 173176.Google Scholar
Hone, J. & Atkinson, B. (1983). Evaluation of fencing to control feral hog movement. Australian Wildlife Research 10: 499505.Google Scholar
Jelenko, I., Kopušar, N. & Pokorny, B. (2013). The impact of soil properties on wild boar rooting on grassland. Zlatorogov zbornik 2: 6779 [in Slovenian].Google Scholar
Keuling, O., Stier, N. & Roth, M. (2009). Commuting, shifting or remaining? Different spatial usage patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in forest and field crops during summer. Mammalian Biology 74: 145152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kniżewska, W. & Rekiel, A. (2015). Evaluation of variation in game damage caused by the European wild boar (Sus scrofa L) in two forested hunting regions during the 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 seasons. Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego 11: 8193 [in Polish with English summary].Google Scholar
Kristiansson, H. (1985). Crop damage by wild boar in Central Sweden. Proceedings of the 17th Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 605609.Google Scholar
Kubacki, T. (1972). Wstępne informacje o badaniach nad wybiórczością żerową dzika różnych odmian ziemniaków. Zachodni Poradnik Łowiecki 1: 1321 [in Polish].Google Scholar
Labudzki, L., Gorecki, G., Skubis, J. & Wlazelko, M. (2009). Changes in the rate of wild boar damage to Zielonka Game Investigation Centre field crops in 2004–2007. Scientarium Polonorum Acta – Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria 8: 3944.Google Scholar
Langbein, J., Putman, R. & Pokorny, B. (2011). Traffic collisions involving deer and other ungulates in Europe and available measures for mitigation. In Putman, R., Apollonio, M. & Andersen, R. (eds.), Ungulate management in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215259.Google Scholar
Lemel, J. (1999). Populationstillvaxt, dynamik och spridning has vildsvinet Sus scrofa, i mellevsta Sverige. Nykoping, Sweden: Svenska Jagareforbundet.Google Scholar
Li, L., Wang, J. & Shi, J. (2010b). Human–wild boar conflict: current status, causes and countermeasures. Journal of Sichuan Zoology 29: 642645 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Li, L., Wang, J. & Shi, J., et al. (2010c). Factors influencing local people's attitudes towards wild boar in Taohangling National Nature Reserve of Jiangxi Province, China. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2: 18461856.Google Scholar
Li, L., Jianbin, S., Jing, W., et al. (2013). Factors influencing wild boar damage in Taohongling National Nature Reserve in China: a model approach. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59: 179184.Google Scholar
Li, T., Zhang, M., Han, J. & Jin, Ch. (2010a). Survey of population quantity of wild boars and their damage to the crop on Zhangguangcai mountains in Heilongjiang. Chinese Journal of Wildlife 31(02): 99103 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Linderoth, P. & Elliger, A. (2002): Schwarzwildschäden an landwirtschaftlichen Kulturen in Baden-Württemberg im Jagdjahr 2000/2001. WFS-Mitteilungen, Nr. 1/2002: 14.Google Scholar
Lipowski, A. (2003). European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) as a reservoir of infection diseases for domestic pigs. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 59: 861863 [in Polish with English summary].Google Scholar
Lissmann, G. (2011). Monetary compensation for agricultural crop damage by wildlife in Germany. Unpublished paper presented during International Conference on Damages inflicted by game held by the Association of Clerks and Assessors in Poland. 14–16 October 2011, Będlewo, 62-060 Stęszew, Poland.Google Scholar
Litvinov, V. P. (2004). Number of hunting mammal species in hunting economies and national reserves of Volga–Akhtuba flood lands. In Man and animals. Astrakhan, pp. 9597. Astrakhansky State University [in Russian].Google Scholar
Ma, J., Xiao, W., Zhang, W. & Zhou, X. (2008). An investigation of residents acceptance of wild boar and influencing factors in Hunchun Natural Reserve. Resources Science 30(6): 876882.Google Scholar
Mackin, R. (1970). Dynamics of damage caused by wild boar to different agricultural crops. Acta Theriologica 15(27): 447458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makarov, W., Domsky, D. P. & Boev, B. V. (2014). African swine fever of wild boar in Russian Federation. Abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on Wild Boar and other Suids, no. 122.Google Scholar
Markov, N. J. (1997). Population dynamics of wild boar, Sus scrofa in Sverdlovsk Oblast and its relation to climatic factors. Ekologiya 29(4): 305310.Google Scholar
Massei, G., Roy, S. & Bunting, R. (2011). Too many hogs? A review of methods to mitigate impact by wild boar and feral hogs. Human–Wildlife Interaction 5: 7999.Google Scholar
Massei, G., Kindberg, J., Licoppe, A., et al. (2015). Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Management Science 71: 492500.Google Scholar
McDevitt, A. D., Carden, R. F., Coscia, J. & Frantz, A. C. (2013). Are wild boars roaming Ireland once more? European Journal of Wildlife Research 59: 761764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelle, K. & Lejeune, P. (2015). Seasonal variations of wild boar Sus scrofa distribution in agricultural landscapes: a species distribution modeling approach. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 4556.Google Scholar
Novosel, H., Piria, M., Safner, R., Kutnjak, H. & Sprem, N. (2012). The game damages on agricultural crops in Croatia. Journal of Central European Agriculture 13(4): 631642.Google Scholar
Ohtsuka-Ito, E. & Kanzaki, N. (1998). Population trends of the Japanese wild boar during Showa era. Wildlife Conservation Japan 3: 95105 [in Japanese with English summary].Google Scholar
Ovsukowa, N. E. (1996). Wild boar. In Resources of the Russia main hunting animal species and hunting lands (1991–1995). Moscow, pp. 7778. State Service of Monitoring the Hunting Resources of Russia [in Russian].Google Scholar
Pagani, P. & Rijks, J. (2015). African swine fever in wild boar and African wild suids. Utrecht: Dutch Wildlife Health Center, Uniwersiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
Pejsak, Z., Truszczynski, M., Kozak, E. & Markowska-Daniel, I. (2014). Epidemiological analysis of two first cases of African swine fever in wild boars in Poland. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 70(6): 369372 [in Polish with English summary].Google Scholar
Pileviciene, S., Jurgelevicius, V., Pridotkas, G. & Paulauskas, A. (2016). African swine fever in wild boar population: Lithuanian experience. Abstracts of the 11th International Symposium on Wild Boar & Other Suids, no. 46.Google Scholar
Plisko, J. D. (1965). Geographical distribution and ecology of Lumbricidae in Poland. Fragmenta Faunistica 12: 57108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podgórski, T. (2016). Slow spread of African swine fever in Poland – the role of wild boar behaviour and management. Abstracts of the 11th International Symposium on Wild Boar & Other Suids, no. 48.Google Scholar
Primini, R., Pelorosso, R., Ripa, M. N. & Amici, A. (2009). A statistical GIS-based analysis of wild boar Sus scrofa traffic collisions in a Mediterranean area. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8: 649651.Google Scholar
Rosvold, J. & Andersen, R. (2008). Wild boar in Norway – is climate a limiting factor? Zoologisk rapport. Trondheim: Norges Teknisk – Naturvitenskapelige Universitet Trondheim, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Saito, M., Momose, H. & Mihira, T. (2011). Both environmental factors and countermeasures affect wild boar damage to rice paddies in Boso Peninsula Japan. Crop Protection 30: 10481054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, M., Koike, F., Momose, H., et al. (2012). Forecasting the range expansion of a recolonising wild boar Sus scrofa population. Wildlife Biology 18(4): 383392.Google Scholar
Saniga, M. (2002). Nest loss and chick mortality in capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in West Carpathians. Folia Zoologica 51: 205214.Google Scholar
Saulich, M.I. (2008). Sus scrofa L. In Afonin, A. N., Greene, S. L., Dzyubenko, N. I. & Frolov, A. N. (eds.), Interactive agricultural ecological atlas of Russia and neighboring countries. www.agroatlas.ru/en/content/pests/Sus_scrofa/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Schlageter, A. & Haag-Wackernagel, D. (2011). Effectiveness of solar blinkers as a means of crop protection from wild boar damage. Crop Protection 30: 12161222.Google Scholar
Schlageter, A. & Haag-Wackernagel, D. (2012). A gustatory repellent for protection of agricultural land from wild boar damage: an investigation on effectiveness. Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 6168.Google Scholar
Schley, L., Dufrene, M., Krier, A. & Frantz, A. C. (2008). Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 589599.Google Scholar
Serebiennikov, V. I. & Kirichenko, Y. M. (2004). Biological resources of hunting economy in the Amur region: condition, use, protection. In Problems of ecology and rational use of natural resources in the Far East region. Blagoveshchensk, pp. 217222. Blagoveshchensk State University [in Russian].Google Scholar
Servanty, S., Gaillard, J. M., Ronchi, F., et al. (2011). Influence of harvesting pressure on demographic tactics: implications for wildlife management. Journal of Applied Ecology 48(4): 835843.Google Scholar
Settimio, A., Bonanni, M., Cardone, A., et al. (2015). The changed strategies in the claiming of hunted wild boars in the province of Rieti (Italy). Abstracts of the 10th European Vertebrate Pest Management Conference, no. 169.Google Scholar
Storch, I. (1994). Habitat and survival of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus nests and broods in the Bavarian Alps. Biological Conservation 70(3): 237243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, S. (2014). Wild boar habitat use and their impact on ground breeding birds in the wetland nature reserve ‘Grande Caricaie’. Abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on Wild Boar and other Suids, no. 62.Google Scholar
Thapa, S. (2010). Effectiveness of crop protection methods against wildlife damage: a case study of two villages at Bardia National Park, Nepal. Crop Protection 29: 12971304.Google Scholar
Thurfjell, H., Ball, J. P., Ahlen, P. A., et al. (2009). Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa L: agricultural fields and edges. European Journal of Wildlife Research 55: 517523.Google Scholar
Tumidajowicz, D. (1971). Phenology of increase of underground organs of the herb layer plants in the deciduous Tilio–Carpinetum association of the Niepolomice Forest. Bulletin Academy Polish Sciences 19(12): 795799.Google Scholar
Vassant, J., Jullien, J. M. & Branolt, S. (1992). Reducing wild boar damage to wheat and oats in summer: study of the effectiveness of maize distribution in the forest. In Bobek, B., Perzanowski, K. & Reglin, W. L. (eds.), Global trends in wildlife management. Krakow: Jagiellonian University, pp. 7987.Google Scholar
Vidrih, M. & Trdan, S. (2008). Evaluation of different designs of temporary electric fence systems for the protection of maize against wild boar (Sus scrofa L., Mammalia, Suidae). Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 91: 343349.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. J. (2004). Rooting damage in farmland in Dorset, southern England, caused by feral wild boar Sus scrofa. Mammal Review 34: 331335.Google Scholar
Wójcik, M. & Hołaś Krajewska, I. (2008). O szacowaniu szkód łowieckich. Poland: Wydawnictwo Paratechnica.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. & Liu, B. (2012). Survey and control of wild boar Sus scrofa damage in Qingyun Forest, Heilongjiang Province. Chinese Journal of Wildlife 33(2), 5963 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Sun, X. & Li, Y. (2009). Preliminary study on compensation for damage of emblement by wild boar in Tai Bai Mountain Nature Reserve. Acta Agricultura Boreali – Occidentalis Sinica 6: 394396.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×