Albiero, P., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, A. (2006). Contributo all’adattamento italiano dell’Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 13(2), 107–125.Google Scholar

Alderson-Day, B., Mitrenga, K., Wilkinson, S., McCarthy-Jones, S., & Fernyhough, C. (2018). The Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire–Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 48–58.Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. The American Journal of Psychology, 117(3), 389–410.Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(4), 578–602.Google Scholar

Asmuth, J., & Gentner, D. (2017). Relational categories are more mutable than entity categories. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 2007–2025.Google Scholar

Banks, B., & Connell, L. (2022a). Category production norms for 117 concrete and abstract categories, Behavior Research Methods. doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01787-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banks, B., & Connell, L. (2022b). Multidimensional sensorimotor grounding of concrete and abstract categories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 378: 20210366. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0366Google Scholar

Banks, B., Borghi, A.M., Fargier, R., Fini, C., Jonauskaite, D., Mazzuca, C., … Woodlin, G. (in press). Consensus paper: Current perspectives on abstract concepts and future research directions. Journal of Cognition.Google Scholar

Barca, L., Candidi, M., Lancia, G.L., Maglianella, V., & Pezzulo, G. (2023). Mapping the mental space of emotional concepts through kinematic measures of decision uncertainty. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 378(1870), 20210367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barca, L., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Overusing the pacifier during infancy sets a footprint on abstract words processing. Journal of Child Language, 47(5), 1084–1099.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 637–660.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1319Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R., eds., Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2013). The acquisition of abstract words by young infants. Cognition, 127(3), 391–397.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2019). Linguistic relativity and abstract words. Paradigmi, 3. https://doi.org/10.30460/95137Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2020). A future of words: Language and the challenge of abstract concepts. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Borghi, A. M. (2022). Concepts for which we need others more: The case of abstract concepts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221079625Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019a). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019b). Words as social tools: Flexibility, situatedness, language and sociality in abstract concepts. Reply to comments on “Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts.” Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 8.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. Springer.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., & Tummolini, L. (2018a). Abstract concepts, language and sociality: From acquisition to inner speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0134Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., & Tummolini, L. (2018b). Varieties of abstract concepts: Development, use and representation in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2009). Words as tools and the problem of abstract word meanings. 31. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/58m9n8rp.pdfGoogle Scholar

Borghi, A. M., & Fernyhough, C. (2023). Concepts, abstractness, and inner speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(202103712021037). http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0371Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Fini, C., & Tummolini, L. (2021). Abstract concepts and metacognition: Searching for meaning in self and others. In Robinson, M. D. & Thomas, L. E., eds., Handbook of embodied psychology: Thinking, feeling, and acting. Springer, pp. 197–220.Google Scholar

Catricalà, E., Conca, F., Fertonani, A., Miniussi, C., & Cappa, S. F. (2020). State-dependent TMS reveals the differential contribution of ATL and IPS to the representation of abstract concepts related to social and quantity knowledge. Cortex, 123, 30–41.Google Scholar

Conca, F., Borsa, V. M., Cappa, S. F., & Catricalà, E. (2021). The multidimensionality of abstract concepts: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 474–491.Google Scholar

Conca, F., Catricalà, E., Canini, M., Petrini, A., Vigliocco, G., Cappa, S. F., & Della Rosa, P. A. (2021). In search of different categories of abstract concepts: A fMRI adaptation study. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 22587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02013-8Google Scholar

Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Banks, B. (2018). Interoception: The forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0143Google ScholarPubMed

Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., & Ridgway, G. R. (2013). Abstract conceptual feature ratings: The role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00186Google Scholar

Davis, C. P., Altmann, G. T., & Yee, E. (2020). Situational systematicity: A role for schema in understanding the differences between abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(1–2), 142–153.Google Scholar

Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2010). Beyond the abstract – concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1042–1048.Google Scholar

Desai, R. H., Reilly, M., & van Dam, W. (2018). The multifaceted abstract brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0122Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2018). Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0135Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2020). More than a scaffold: Language is a neuroenhancement. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5–6), 288–311.Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2022). Abstract concepts and the embodied mind: Rethinking grounded cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dove, G., Barca, L., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Words have a weight: Language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts. Psychological Research. 86, 2451–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6Google Scholar

Dreyer, F. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Abstract semantics in the motor system? An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning. Cortex, 100, 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falandays, J. B., & Spivey, M. J. (2019). Abstract meanings may be more dynamic, due to their sociality: Comment on “Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts” by Anna M. Borghi et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.02.011Google Scholar

Falcinelli, I., Fini, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Lavarsi le mani riduce il senso di colpa: Evidenze con un compito semantico implicito. Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia, 48(1), 263–271.Google Scholar

Fingerhut, J., & Prinz, J. J. (2018). Grounding evaluative concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0142Google Scholar

Fini, C., Era, V., Da Rold, F., Candidi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Abstract concepts in interaction: The need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions. Royal Society Open Science, 8(7), 201205.Google Scholar

Fini, C., Falcinelli, I., Cuomo, G., Era, V., Candidi, M., Tummolini, L., … Borghi, A. M. (2023). Breaking the ice in a conversation: Abstract words prompt dialogues more easily than concrete words. Language and Cognition.Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44(4), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial–numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 260.Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H., Kaufmann, L., & Domahs, F. (2012). Finger counting and numerical cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00108Google Scholar

Flumini, A., Ranzini, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2014). Nomina sunt consequentia rerum – Sound–shape correspondences with everyday objects figures. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 47–60.Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Asmuth, J. (2019). Metaphoric extension, relational categories, and abstraction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1298–1307.Google Scholar

Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., & Tettamanti, M. (2013). Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067090Google Scholar

Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12(4), 395–427.Google Scholar

Harpaintner, M., Sim, E.-J., Trumpp, N. M., Ulrich, M., & Kiefer, M. (2020). The grounding of abstract concepts in the motor and visual system: An fMRI study. Cortex, 124, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.014Google Scholar

Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M., & Kiefer, M. (2018). The semantic content of abstract concepts: A property listing study of 296 abstract words. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–16.Google Scholar

Henningsen-Schomers, M. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2022). Modelling concrete and abstract concepts using brain-constrained deep neural networks. Psychological Research, 1–27, 86(8), 2533–2559.Google Scholar

Jamrozik, A., & Gentner, D. (2020). Relational labeling unlocks inert knowledge. Cognition, 196, 104146.Google Scholar

Kazanas, S. A., & Altarriba, J. (2015). The automatic activation of emotion and emotion-laden words: Evidence from a masked and unmasked priming paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(3), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keaton, S. A. (2017). Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). In Worthington, D. L., Bodie, G. D., eds., The sourcebook of listening research. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119102991.ch34Google Scholar

Kiefer, M., & Harpaintner, M. (2020). Varieties of abstract concepts and their grounding in perception or action. Open Psychology, 2(1), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0104Google Scholar

Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14.Google Scholar

Langland-Hassan, P., Faries, F. R., Gatyas, M., Dietz, A., & Richardson, M. J. (2021). Assessing abstract thought and its relation to language with a new nonverbal paradigm: Evidence from aphasia. Cognition, 211, 104622.Google Scholar

Lund, T. C., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2019). Sensitivity to emotion information in children’s lexical processing. Cognition, 190, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.017Google Scholar

Lupyan, G., & Mirman, D. (2013). Linking language and categorization: Evidence from aphasia. Cortex, 49(5), 1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.06.006Google Scholar

Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0137Google Scholar

Malt, B., & Wolff, P. (2010). Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., Barca, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2017). The peculiarity of emotional words: A grounded approach. Rivista Internazionale Di Filosofia e Psicologia, 8(2), 124–133.Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., Falcinelli, I., Michalland, A.-H., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2022). Bodily, emotional, and public sphere at the time of COVID-19. An investigation on concrete and abstract concepts. Psychological Research, 1–12, 86(7), 2266–2277.Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2018). Abstract, emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors. PeerJ, 6, e5987Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., & Santarelli, M. (2022). Making it abstract, making it contestable: Politicization at the intersection of political and cognitive science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1–22.Google Scholar

Mellem, M. S., Jasmin, K. M., Peng, C., & Martin, A. (2016). Sentence processing in anterior superior temporal cortex shows a social-emotional bias. Neuropsychologia, 89, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.019Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Moffat, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: Effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423–014-0696-0Google Scholar

Moseley, R., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2011). A role for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1634–1647.Google Scholar

Muraki, E. J., Cortese, F., Protzner, A. B., & Pexman, P. M. (2020). Heterogeneity in abstract verbs: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 211, 104863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104863Google Scholar

Muraki, E. J., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2020). Heterogenous abstract concepts: Is “ponder” different from “dissolve”? Psychological Research, 1–17.Google Scholar

Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275Google Scholar

Pexman, P. M., Heard, A., Lloyd, E., & Yap, M. J. (2017). The Calgary semantic decision project: Concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428–016-0720-6Google Scholar

Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. Developmental Science, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12549Google Scholar

Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2020). The role of emotional valence in learning novel abstract concepts. Developmental Psychology, 56(10), 1855.Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, F. (2018). The case of CAUSE: Neurobiological mechanisms for grounding an abstract concept. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0129Google Scholar

Roversi, C., Borghi, A. M., & Tummolini, L. (2013). A marriage is an artefact and not a walk that we take together: An experimental study on the categorization of artefacts. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 527–542.Google Scholar

Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1219–1222.Google Scholar

Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W.-M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 96–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Setti, A., & Caramelli, N. (2005). Different domains in abstract concepts. Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, July 21–23.Google Scholar

Shea, N. (2018). Metacognition and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0133Google Scholar

Siakaluk, P. D., Newcombe, P. I., Duffels, B., Li, E., Sidhu, D. M., Yap, M. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2016). Effects of emotional experience in lexical decision. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01157Google Scholar

Siev, J., Zuckerman, S. E., & Siev, J. J. (2018). The relationship between immorality and cleansing. Social Psychology, 49(5), 303–309.Google Scholar

Topolinski, S., Lindner, S., & Freudenberg, A. (2014). Popcorn in the cinema: Oral interference sabotages advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 169–176.Google Scholar

Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014504Google Scholar

Troche, J., Crutch, S. J., & Reilly, J. (2017). Defining a conceptual topography of word concreteness: Clustering properties of emotion, sensation, and magnitude among 750 English words. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01787Google Scholar

Tummolini, L., & Mannella, F. (2023). Kick-starting concept formation with intrinsically motivated learning: The grounding by competence acquisition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1870), 20210370.Google Scholar

Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S.-T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht025Google Scholar

Villani, C., D’Ascenzo, S., Borghi, A. M., Roversi, C., Benassi, M., & Lugli, L. (2022). Is justice grounded? How expertise shapes conceptual representation of institutional concepts. Psychological Research, 1–17, 2434–2450.Google Scholar

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019a). Le sotto-categorie dei concetti astratti: Uno studio empirico. Sistemi Intelligenti, 31(2), 235–252.Google Scholar

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019b). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 403–430.Google Scholar

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Sensorimotor and interoceptive dimensions in concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104173.Google Scholar

Villani, C., Orsoni, M., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2022, in press). Abstract and concrete concepts in conversation. Scientific Report 12, 17572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–022-20785-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A. E., Van Bon, W. H., & Van Haaften, A. W. (2003). Mode of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 385–406.Google Scholar

Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., & Xu, X. (2001). Imagery, context availabilty, contextual constraint and abstractness. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, August 1–4, p. 23.Google Scholar

Winter, B. (2023). Abstract concepts and emotion: Cross-linguistic evidence and arguments against affective embodiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1870), 20210368.Google Scholar

Yao, B., Keitel, A., Bruce, G., Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2018). Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(7), 1064.Google Scholar

Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726Google Scholar

Arshamian, A., Gerkin, R. C., Kruspe, N., Wnuk, E., Floyd, S., O’Meara, C., … Majid, A. (2022). The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures. Current Biology, 32(9), 2061–2066.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.062Google Scholar

Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., & Casasanto, D. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue: New and interdisciplinary approaches to linguistic relativity. Language Learning, 66(3), 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12196Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R., eds., Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–163.Google Scholar

Batisti, F. (2021). An argument for languages in languaging. Rivista Italiana Di Filosofia Del Linguaggio, 15(2).Google Scholar

Berlin, B. (1992/2002/2014). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., & Tummolini, L. (2018). Varieties of abstract concepts: Development, use and representation in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000089Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Capirci, O., Gianfreda, G., & Volterra, V. (2014). The body and the fading away of abstract concepts and words: A sign language analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00811Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2018). Language and the construction of time through space. Trends in Neurosciences, 41(10), 651–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.08.004Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118(1), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.010Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., & Gaby, L. (2010). Remembrances of times East: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–1639.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–189.Google Scholar

Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2017). The Whorfian time warp: Representing duration through the language hourglass. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 146(7), 911–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000314Google Scholar

Callizo-Romero, C., Tutnjević, S., Pandza, M., Ouellet, M., Kranjec, A., Ilić, S., … Casasanto, D. (2020). Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(6), 1247–1258.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2008). Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1047Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2016). Linguistic relativity. Routledge handbook of semantics. Routledge, pp. 158–174.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D., & Gordon, P. (2005). Crying “Whorf.” Science, 307(5716), 1721–1722. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.307.5716.1721Google Scholar

Conca, F., Borsa, V. M., Cappa, S. F., & Catricalà, E. (2021). The multidimensionality of abstract concepts: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 474–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Banks, B. (2018). Interoception: The forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0143Google Scholar

Cowley, S. J. (2019). The return of languaging. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 483–512.Google Scholar

Crow, K. M., van Mersbergen, M., & Payne, A. E. (2021). Vocal congruence: The voice and the self measured by interoceptive awareness. Journal of Voice, 35(2), 324–e15.Google Scholar

Davis, C. P., Altmann, G. T., & Yee, E. (2020). Situational systematicity: A role for schema in understanding the differences between abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(1–2), 142–153.Google Scholar

De la Fuente, J., Santiago, J., Román, A., Dumitrache, C., & Casasanto, D. (2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1682–1690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614534695Google Scholar

De Livio, C., Fini, C., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2022). The role of voice self-perception in the conceptual representation of gender. 18th Annual Conference of the Italian Association of Cognitive Sciences, Rovereto, Trento, December 15–17.Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.016Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2020). More than a scaffold: Language is a neuroenhancement. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5–6), 288–311.Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2021). The challenges of abstract concepts. In Robinson, M. D. & Thomas, L. E., eds., Handbook of embodied psychology. Springer, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dove, G. (2022). Abstract concepts and the embodied mind: Rethinking grounded cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dove, G., Barca, L., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Words have a weight: Language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Majid, A., & Van Staden, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic categorisation of the body: Introduction. Language Sciences, 28(2–3), 137–147.Google Scholar

Falandays, J. B., & Spivey, M. J. (2019). Abstract meanings may be more dynamic, due to their sociality: Comment on “Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts” by Anna M. Borghi et al. Physics of Life Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.02.011Google Scholar

Farias, A. R., Garrido, M. V., & Semin, G. R. (2013). Converging modalities ground abstract categories: The case of politics. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60971. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060971Google Scholar

Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1430–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.xGoogle Scholar

Gallese, V., & Cuccio, V. (2018). The neural exploitation hypothesis and its implications for an embodied approach to language and cognition: Insights from the study of action verbs processing and motor disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Cortex, 100, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.010Google Scholar

Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83(1), 49–79.Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, 3, 215–256.Google Scholar

Ghandhari, M., Fini, C., Da Rold, F., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Different kinds of embodied language: A comparison between Italian and Persian languages. Brain and Cognition, 142, 105581.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. Jr, Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1189–1210.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2021). Metaphorical embodiment. In Robinson, M. D. & Thomas, L. E., eds., Handbook of embodied psychology. Springer, pp. 101–123.Google Scholar

Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73(2), 135–176.Google Scholar

Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2015). Constructing mental time without visual experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(8), 429–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.06.011Google Scholar

Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). New space-time metaphors foster new nonlinguistic representations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 800–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12279Google Scholar

Huisman, J. L. A., Hout, R. van, & Majid, A. (2021). Patterns of semantic variation differ across body parts: Evidence from the Japonic languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 32(3), 455–486. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0079Google Scholar

Jackson, J. C., Watts, J., Henry, T. R., List, J.-M., Forkel, R., Mucha, P. J., … Lindquist, K. A. (2019). Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science, 366(6472), 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8160Google Scholar

Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423–015-0861-0Google Scholar

Kemmerer, D. (2022). Grounded cognition entails linguistic relativity: A neglected implication of a major semantic theory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–33. doi:10.1111/tops.12628Google Scholar

Lakens, D., Semin, G. R., & Foroni, F. (2011). Why your highness needs the people: Comparing the absolute and relative representation of power in vertical space. Social Psychology, 42(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000064Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Langland-Hassan, P. & Davis, C. (2023). A context-sensitive and non-linguistic approach to abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1870), 20210355.Google Scholar

Le Guen, O., & Pool Balam, L. (2012). No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00271Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2013). The island of time: Yélî dnye, the language of Rossel Island. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 61. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00061Google Scholar

Lopez, A., Atran, S., Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1997). The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions. Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 251–295.Google Scholar

Lund, T. C., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2019). Sensitivity to emotion information in children’s lexical processing. Cognition, 190, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.017Google Scholar

Majid, A. (2019). Mapping words reveals emotional diversity. Science, 366(6472), 1444–1445. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba1763Google Scholar

Majid, A., Boster, J. S., & Bowerman, M. (2008). The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition, 109(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.009Google Scholar

Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130(2), 266–270.Google Scholar

Majid, A., Burenhult, N., Stensmyr, M., De Valk, J., & Hansson, B. S. (2018). Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170139.Google Scholar

Majid, A., Jordan, F., & Dunn, M. (2015). Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language sciences, 49, 1–18.Google Scholar

Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., … Cansler, B. L. (2018). Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11369–11376.Google Scholar

Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A. (2008). Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19(3), 232–240.Google Scholar

Malt, B. C., & Majid, A. (2013). How thought is mapped into words. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(6), 583–597.Google Scholar

Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y. (1999). Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2), 230–262.Google Scholar

Malt, B., & Wolff, P. (2010). Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., Borghi, A. M., van Putten, S., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Majid, A. (2022). Gender is conceptualized in different ways across cultures. PsyArxiv Preprints. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/dpa8sGoogle Scholar

Mazzuca, C., Falcinelli, I., Michalland, A.-H., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2022). Bodily, emotional, and public sphere at the time of COVID-19. An investigation on concrete and abstract concepts. Psychological Research, 1–12.Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., Majid, A., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Gender is a multifaceted concept: Evidence that specific life experiences differentially shape the concept of gender. Language and Cognition, 12(4), 649–678.Google Scholar

Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (1999). Folkbiology. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mehling, W. E., Acree, M., Stewart, A., Silas, J., & Jones, A. (2018). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0208034.Google Scholar

Narasimhan, B., Kopecka, A., Bowerman, M., Gullberg, M., & Majid, A. (2012). Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, 595, 1–18.Google Scholar

Núñez, R., Cooperrider, K., Doan, D., & Wassmann, J. (2012). Contours of time: Topographic construals of past, present, and future in the Yupno valley of Papua New Guinea. Cognition, 124(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.007Google Scholar

Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62Google Scholar

Olofsson, J. K., & Gottfried, J. A. (2015). The muted sense: Neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 314–321.Google Scholar

Orsini, A., & Pezzuti, L. (2015). WAIS-4: Contributo alla taratura italiana (70–90 anni). Giunti OS.Google Scholar

Pecher, D. (2018). Curb your embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12311Google Scholar

Pecher, D., Boot, I., & Van Dantzig, S. (2011). Abstract concepts: Sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. In Ross, B. H., ed., Psychology of learning and motivation, Elsevier, pp. 217–248.Google Scholar

Pezzuti, L., Dawe, J., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Does mastering of abstract words decline with age? Educational Gerontology, 47(12), 527–542.Google Scholar

Rumiati, R. I., & Foroni, F. (2016). We are what we eat: How food is represented in our mind/brain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1043–1054.Google Scholar

Santiago, J., Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512–516.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., & Enfield, N. J. (2012). Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 302–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/665697Google Scholar

Sinha, C., Sinha, V. D. S., Zinken, J., & Sampaio, W. (2011). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, 2, 1157–1249.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C., eds., Rethinking linguistic relativity Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–96. (Reprinted in modified form from Pragmatics, 1, 1991, pp. 7–26.)Google Scholar

Sullivan, K., & Bui, L.T. (2016). With the future coming up behind them: Evidence that time approaches from behind in Vietnamese. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 205–233.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49–100.Google Scholar

Thompson, B., Roberts, S. G., & Lupyan, G. (2020). Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(10), 1029–1038.Google Scholar

Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117(2), 126–138.Google Scholar

Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S.-T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2013). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777.Google Scholar

Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S.-T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht025Google Scholar

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019a). Le sotto-categorie dei concetti astratti: Uno studio empirico. Sistemi Intelligenti, 31(2), 235–252.Google Scholar

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019b). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 403–430.Google Scholar

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Sensorimotor and interoceptive dimensions in concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104173.Google Scholar

Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107(3), 829–853.Google Scholar

Winter, B. (2023). Abstract concepts and emotion: Cross-linguistic evidence and arguments against affective embodiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1870), 20210368.Google Scholar

Winter, B., Marghetis, T., & Matlock, T. (2015). Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number. Cortex, 64, 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.015Google Scholar

Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1456–1488.Google Scholar

Yao, B., Keitel, A., Bruce, G., Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2018). Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(7), 1064.Google Scholar

Alderson-Day, B., McCarthy-Jones, S., Bedford, S., Collins, H., Dunne, H., Rooke, C., & Fernyhough, C. (2014). Shot through with voices: Dissociation mediates the relationship between varieties of inner speech and auditory hallucination proneness. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 288–296.Google Scholar

Alderson-Day, B., Mitrenga, K., Wilkinson, S., McCarthy-Jones, S., & Fernyhough, C. (2018). The Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire–Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 48–58.Google Scholar

Alderson-Day, B., Weis, S., McCarthy-Jones, S., Moseley, P., Smailes, D., & Fernyhough, C. (2016). The brain’s conversation with itself: Neural substrates of dialogic inner speech. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(1), 110–120.Google Scholar

Andres, M., Di Luca, S., & Pesenti, M. (2008). Finger counting: The missing tool? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(6), 642–643.Google Scholar

Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E. (2007). Contribution of hand motor circuits to counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 563–576.Google Scholar

Anelli, F., Lugli, L., Baroni, G., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2014). Walking boosts your performance in making additions and subtractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01459Google Scholar

Angeleri, R., Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., Bara, B. G., & Sacco, K. (2012). Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): Normative data. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 845–861.Google Scholar

Arcara, G., & Bambini, V. (2016). A test for the assessment of pragmatic abilities and cognitive substrates (APACS): Normative data and psychometric properties. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 70.Google Scholar

Badets, A., & Pesenti, M. (2010). Creating number semantics through finger movement perception. Cognition, 115(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.007Google Scholar

Bahnmueller, J., Maier, C. A., Göbel, S. M., & Moeller, K. (2019). Direct evidence for linguistic influences in two-digit number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(6), 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000642Google Scholar

Baixauli, I., Colomer, C., Roselló, B., & Miranda, A. (2016). Narratives of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 59, 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.007Google Scholar

Bambini, V., Arcara, G., Bechi, M., Buonocore, M., Cavallaro, R., & Bosia, M. (2016). The communicative impairment as a core feature of schizophrenia: Frequency of pragmatic deficit, cognitive substrates, and relation with quality of life. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 71, 106–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bambini, V., Arcara, G., Bosinelli, F., Buonocore, M., Bechi, M., Cavallaro, R., & Bosia, M. (2020). A leopard cannot change its spots: A novel pragmatic account of concretism in schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 139, 107332.Google Scholar

Bang, J., Burns, J., & Nadig, A. (2013). Brief report: Conveying subjective experience in conversation: Production of mental state terms and personal narratives in individuals with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(7), 1732–1740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803–012-1716-4Google Scholar

Barca, L., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2017). Pacifier overuse and conceptual relations of abstract and emotional concepts. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02014Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In Bower, G. H., ed., Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 27. Elsevier, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170144.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, M. S. (2015). The social mysteries of the superior temporal sulcus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 489–490.Google Scholar

Berkovich-Ohana, A., Noy, N., Harel, M., Furman-Haran, E., Arieli, A., & Malach, R. (2020). Inter-participant consistency of language-processing networks during abstract thoughts. NeuroImage, 211, 116626.Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016). Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(3–4), 130–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp055Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S., Springer, J. A., Kaufman, J. N., & Possing, E. T. (2000). Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 10(5), 512–528.Google Scholar

Binney, R. J., Hoffman, P., Ralph, L., & Matthew, A. (2016). Mapping the multiple graded contributions of the anterior temporal lobe representational hub to abstract and social concepts: Evidence from distortion-corrected fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 26(11), 4227–4241.Google Scholar

Bleuler, E. (1911). Dementia praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien, vol. 4. Deuticke.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2020). A future of words: Language and the challenge of abstract concepts. Journal of Cognition, 3(1).Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2022a). Concepts for which we need others more: The case of abstract concepts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(3), 238–246.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2022b). Merging affordances and (abstract) concepts. In Djebbara, Z. ed., Affordances in everyday life: A multidisciplinary collection of essays. New York: Springer. OSF Preprint. 10.31219/osf.io/zn8ahGoogle Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., & Tummolini, L. (2018). Abstract concepts, language and sociality: From acquisition to inner speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0134Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000089Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., & Fernyhough, C. (2023). Concepts, abstractness and inner speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 378(1870), 20210371.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., & Scorolli, C. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: A study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110830/Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Mazzuca, C., Da Rold, F., Falcinelli, I., Fini, C., Michalland, A.-H., & Tummolini, L. (2021). Abstract words as social tools: Which necessary evidence? Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613026Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., & Zarcone, E. (2016). Grounding abstractness: Abstract concepts and the activation of the mouth. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01498Google Scholar

Caselli, M. C., Bello, A., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S., & Pasqualetti, P. (2015). Il primo vocabolario del Bambino: Gesti, parole e frasi. Valori di riferimento fra 8 e 36 mesi delle Forme complete e delle Forme brevi del questionario MacArthur-Bates CDI: Valori di riferimento fra 8 e 36 mesi delle Forme complete e delle Forme brevi del questionario MacArthur-Bates CDI. FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar

Champagne-Lavau, M., & Stip, E. (2010). Pragmatic and executive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(3), 285–296.Google Scholar

Chojnicka, I., & Wawer, A. (2020). Social language in autism spectrum disorder: A computational analysis of sentiment and linguistic abstraction. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0229985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229985Google Scholar

Church, B. A., Rice, C. L., Dovgopoly, A., Lopata, C. J., Thomeer, M. L., Nelson, A., & Mercado, E. (2015). Learning, plasticity, and atypical generalization in children with autism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1342–1348. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423–014-0797-9Google Scholar

Daprati, E., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Proust, J., Pacherie, E., Dalery, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Looking for the agent: An investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition, 65(1), 71–86.Google Scholar

Daprati, E., Nico, D., Delorme, R., Leboyer, M., & Zalla, T. (2013). Memory for past events: Movement and action chains in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Experimental Brain Research, 226(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221–013-3436-1Google Scholar

Dapretto, M., Davies, M. S., Pfeifer, J. H., Scott, A. A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Understanding emotions in others: Mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neuroscience, 9(1), 28.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284(5416), 970–974.Google Scholar

Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Canini, M., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2018). The left inferior frontal gyrus: A neural crossroads between abstract and concrete knowledge. NeuroImage, 175, 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.021Google Scholar

D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., Aguirre, G. K., Stallcup, M., Alsop, D. C., Tippet, L. J., & Farah, M. J. (1997). A functional MRI study of mental image generation. Neuropsychologia, 35(5), 725–730.Google Scholar

Di Luca, S., & Pesenti, M. (2008). Masked priming effect with canonical finger numeral configurations. Experimental Brain Research, 185(1), 27–39.Google Scholar

Domahs, F., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2010). Embodied numerosity: Implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition, 116(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.007Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2019). Language influences social cognition: Comment on “Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts” by Anna M. Borghi et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 169–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.03.007Google Scholar

Dove, G., Barca, L., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Words have a weight: Language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts. Psychological Research, 86, 2451–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6Google Scholar

Dreyer, F. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Abstract semantics in the motor system? An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning. Cortex, 100, 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.021Google Scholar

Eskes, G. A., Bryson, S. E., & McCormick, T. A. (1990). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20(1), 61–73.Google Scholar

Fabbri-Destro, M., Gizzonio, V., & Avanzini, P. (2013). Autism, motor dysfunctions and mirror mechanism. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 10, 177–187.Google Scholar

Fabbri-Destro, M., Gizzonio, V., Bazzini, M. C., Cevallos, C., Cheron, G., & Avanzini, P. (2019). The relationship between pantomime execution and recognition across typically developing and autistic children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 61, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.01.008Google Scholar

Falandays, J. B., & Spivey, M. J. (2019). Abstract meanings may be more dynamic, due to their sociality: Comment on “Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts” by Anna M. Borghi et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 9, 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.02.011Google Scholar

Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29(5), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20422Google Scholar

Fiebach, C. J., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Processing concrete words: FMRI evidence against a specific right-hemisphere involvement. Neuropsychologia, 42(1), 62–70.Google Scholar

Fini, C., Zannino, G. D., Orsoni, M., Carlesimo, G. A., Benassi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Articulatory suppression delays processing of abstract words: The role of inner speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211053623Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology, 57(5), 822–826.Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44(4), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial–numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 260.Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2018). Number concepts: Abstract and embodied. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0125Google Scholar

Frith, C. (2012a). Explaining delusions of control: The comparator model 20 years on. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 52–54.Google Scholar

Frith, C. D. (2012b). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2213–2223.Google Scholar

Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2012). Mechanisms of social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 287–313.Google Scholar

Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C., & Tylén, K. (2012). Coming to terms: Quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological Science, 23(8), 931–939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612436816Google Scholar

Gastgeb, H. Z., Dundas, E. M., Minshew, N. J., & Strauss, M. S. (2012). Category formation in autism: Can individuals with autism form categories and prototypes of dot patterns? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(8), 1694–1704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803–011-1411-xGoogle Scholar

Gastgeb, H. Z., Rump, K. M., Best, C. A., Minshew, N. J., & Strauss, M. S. (2009). Prototype formation in autism: Can individuals with autism abstract facial prototypes? Autism Research, 2(5), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.93Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Asmuth, J. (2019). Metaphoric extension, relational categories, and abstraction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1298–1307.Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, 3, 215–256.Google Scholar

Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., & Tettamanti, M. (2013). Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067090Google Scholar

Gianelli, C., Ranzini, M., Marzocchi, M., Rettore Micheli, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2012). Influence of numerical magnitudes on the free choice of an object position. Cognitive Processing, 13 Suppl. 1, S185–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339–012-0483-7Google Scholar

Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306(5695), 496–499.Google Scholar

Granato, G., Borghi, A. M., Mattera, A., & Baldassarre, G. (2022). A computational model of inner speech supporting flexible goal-directed behaviour in Autism. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14198.Google Scholar

Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures: And other reports from my life with autism. Vintage.Google Scholar

Granito, C., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2015). Naming a Lego world. The role of language in the acquisition of abstract concepts. PLoS ONE, 10(1), e0114615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114615Google Scholar

Green, A. E., Kenworthy, L., Mosner, M. G., Gallagher, N. M., Fearon, E. W., Balhana, C. D., & Yerys, B. E. (2014). Abstract analogical reasoning in high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 7(6), 677–686.Google Scholar

Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803–005-0039-0Google Scholar

Happé, F. G. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66(3), 843–855.Google Scholar

Hein, G., & Knight, R. T. (2008). Superior temporal sulcus – It’s my area: Or is it? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2125–2136. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20148Google Scholar

Henningsen-Schomers, M. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2021). Modelling concrete and abstract concepts using brain-constrained deep neural networks. Psychological Research, 86(8), 2533–2559.Google Scholar

Herrera, G., Jordan, R., & Vera, L. (2006). Abstract concept and imagination teaching through virtual reality in people with autism spectrum disorders. Technology and Disability, 18(4), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2006-18403Google Scholar

Hobson, R. P., & Lee, A. (1989). Emotion-related and abstract concepts in autistic people: Evidence from the British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19(4), 601–623.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P., Binney, R. J., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2015). Differing contributions of inferior prefrontal and anterior temporal cortex to concrete and abstract conceptual knowledge. Cortex, 63, 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.001Google Scholar

Jessen, F., Heun, R., Erb, M., Granath, D. O., Klose, U., Papassotiropoulos, A., & Grodd, W. (2000). The concreteness effect: Evidence for dual coding and context availability. Brain and Language, 74(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2340Google Scholar

Johnson, C. R., & Rakison, D. H. (2006). Early categorization of animate/inanimate concepts in young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 18(2), 73–89.Google Scholar

Kalénine, S., Mirman, D., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2012a). A combination of thematic and similarity-based semantic processes confers resistance to deficit following left hemisphere stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 106.Google Scholar

Kalénine, S., Mirman, D., Middleton, E. L., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2012b). Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1274.Google Scholar

Kamio, Y., & Toichi, M. (2000). Dual access to semantics in autism: Is pictorial access superior to verbal access? The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(7), 859–867.Google Scholar

Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987). The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13(2), 261–276.Google Scholar

Knight, V., McKissick, B. R., & Saunders, A. (2013). A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), 2628–2648.Google Scholar

Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14.Google Scholar

Kunda, M., & Goel, A. K. (2011). Thinking in pictures as a cognitive account of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(9), 1157–1177.Google Scholar

Langland-Hassan, P., Faries, F. R., Gatyas, M., Dietz, A., & Richardson, M. J. (2021). Assessing abstract thought and its relation to language with a new nonverbal paradigm: Evidence from aphasia. Cognition, 211, 104622.Google Scholar

Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximate quantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia, 41(14), 1942–1958.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. M., & Thaiss, L. (1992). Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition, 43(3), 225–251.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liebenthal, E., Desai, R. H., Humphries, C., Sabri, M., & Desai, A. (2014). The functional organization of the left STS: A large scale meta-analysis of PET and fMRI studies of healthy adults. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00289Google Scholar

Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G., & Bekkering, H. (2007). Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1400.Google Scholar

Lindemann, O., Alipour, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Finger counting habits in Middle Eastern and Western individuals: An online survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 566–578.Google Scholar

Loetscher, T., Schwarz, U., Schubiger, M., & Brugger, P. (2008). Head turns bias the brain’s internal random generator. Current Biology, 18(2), R60–R62.Google Scholar

Lugli, L., Baroni, G., Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2013). Counting is easier while experiencing a congruent motion. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064500Google Scholar

Lupyan, G., & Mirman, D. (2013). Linking language and categorization: Evidence from aphasia. Cortex, 49(5), 1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.06.006Google Scholar

Lysaker, P. H., Carcione, A., Dimaggio, G., Johannesen, J. K., Nicolò, G., Procacci, M., & Semerari, A. (2005). Metacognition amidst narratives of self and illness in schizophrenia: Associations with neurocognition, symptoms, insight and quality of life. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112(1), 64–71.Google Scholar

Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 59–70.Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2018). Abstract, emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors. PeerJ, 6, e5987.Google Scholar

Mazzuca, C., & Santarelli, M. (2022). Making it abstract, making it contestable: Politicization at the intersection of political and cognitive science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1–22.Google Scholar

Mellem, M. S., Jasmin, K. M., Peng, C., & Martin, A. (2016). Sentence processing in anterior superior temporal cortex shows a social-emotional bias. Neuropsychologia, 89, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.019Google Scholar

Minor, K. S., Bonfils, K. A., Luther, L., Firmin, R. L., Kukla, M., MacLain, V. R., … Salyers, M. P. (2015). Lexical analysis in schizophrenia: How emotion and social word use informs our understanding of clinical presentation. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 64, 74–78.Google Scholar

Minshew, N. J., Meyer, J., & Goldstein, G. (2002). Abstract reasoning in autism: A disassociation between concept formation and concept identification. Neuropsychology, 16(3), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.16.3.327Google Scholar

Molesworth, C. J., Bowler, D. M., & Hampton, J. A. (2008). When prototypes are not best: Judgments made by children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(9), 1721–1730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803–008-0557-7Google Scholar

Moretto, G., & Di Pellegrino, G. (2008). Grasping numbers. Experimental Brain Research, 188(4), 505–515.Google Scholar

Moseley, R. L., Shtyrov, Y., Mohr, B., Lombardo, M. V., Baron-Cohen, S., & Pulvermüller, F. (2015). Lost for emotion words: What motor and limbic brain activity reveals about autism and semantic theory. NeuroImage, 104, 413–422.Google Scholar

Nagels, A., Kircher, T., Grosvald, M., Steines, M., & Straube, B. (2019). Evidence for gesture-speech mismatch detection impairments in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 273, 15–21.Google Scholar

Narzisi, A. (2020). The challenging heterogeneity of autism: Editorial. Brain Sciences Special Issue: Advances in Autism Research, 10(12), 948.Google Scholar

Nedergaard, J., Wallentin, M., & Lupyan, G. (2022). Verbal interference paradigms: A systematic review investigating the role of language in cognition, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02144-7Google Scholar

Negen, J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2009). Young children’s number-word knowledge predicts their performance on a nonlinguistic number task. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1q03q75zGoogle Scholar

Negen, J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2012). Number-concept acquisition and general vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(6), 2019–2027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01815.xGoogle Scholar

Niedenthal, P. M., Augustinova, M., Rychlowska, M., Droit-Volet, S., Zinner, L., Knafo, A., & Brauer, M. (2012). Negative relations between pacifier use and emotional competence. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), 387–394.Google Scholar

Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2004). Retrieval of abstract semantics. NeuroImage, 22(1), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.010Google Scholar

Olson, I. R., McCoy, D., Klobusicky, E., & Ross, L. A. (2013). Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes: A review and theoretical framework. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(2), 123–133.Google Scholar

Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179–217.Google Scholar

Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parola, A., Berardinelli, L., & Bosco, F. M. (2018). Cognitive abilities and theory of mind in explaining communicative-pragmatic disorders in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 260, 144–151.Google Scholar

Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S., Rosa, M. M., & Fazio, F. (1999). The neural correlates of verb and noun processing. A PET study. Brain, 122 ( Pt. 12), 2337–2344.Google Scholar

Petrolini, V., Jorba, M., & Vicente, A. (2020). The role of inner speech in executive functioning tasks: Schizophrenia with auditory verbal hallucinations and autistic spectrum conditions as case studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2452, 11.Google Scholar

Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306(5695), 499–503.Google Scholar

Plaisted, K. C. (2001). Reduced Generalization in Autism: An Alternative to Weak Central Coherence. In Burack, J. A., Charman, T., Yirmiya, N., & Zelazo, P. R., eds., The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research. Erlbaum, pp. 149–169.Google Scholar

Pobric, G., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Zahn, R. (2016). Hemispheric specialization within the superior anterior temporal cortex for social and nonsocial concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00902Google Scholar

Prinz, J. J. (2012). Beyond human nature: How culture and experience shape our lives. Penguin UK.Google Scholar

Ralph, M. A. L., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(1), 42.Google Scholar

Ranzini, M., Lugli, L., Anelli, F., Carbone, R., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2011). Graspable objects shape number processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00147Google Scholar

Rice, G. E., Hoffman, P., Binney, R. J., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: An fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0136Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., & Fabbri-Destro, M. (2010). Mirror neurons: From discovery to autism. Experimental Brain Research, 200(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221–009-2002-3Google Scholar

Rochester, S. (2013). Crazy talk: A study of the discourse of schizophrenic speakers. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar